Potential Implications of NAFTA Truck Traffic:. for better or for worse? Potential Implications of NAFTA Truck Traffic:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oklahoma DOT Perpetual Pavement Test Sections at the NCAT Test Track
Advertisements

Traffic Monitoring Guide Truck Weight Monitoring Section 5.
2010 #1 – Bird Repellant Agricultural experts are trying to develop a bird deterrent to reduce costly damage to crops in the United States. An experiment.
Pavement Design Session Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Truck Size and Weight For this Power Point go.
Project TX Strategies to Improve and Preserve Flexible Pavement at Intersections UTEP - Soheil Nazarian - Imad Abdallah Project Duration September.
By Mr.Surasak Kaewdee Transportation Engineering Dr. Kunnawee Kanitpong (Adviser) Asian Institute of Technology ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC LOADING CHARACTERISTICS.
Canadian Truck Size & Weight Harmonization New Brunswick Department of Transportation Subcommittee on Highway Transport Portland, Maine June 6-9, 2010.
Meade County Experience with Alternatives to Paving Ken McGirr Meade County Highway Supt Sturgis, SD.
Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) Data Collection & Reporting Office of Highway Policy Information 2012 Highway Information Seminar - Session: 6B Thursday, October.
Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitation Pavement Structures By Matt Mason.
Know the factors considered in the AASHTO design method
Transportation Engineering II
Vehicle and Traffic Consideration CEE 320 Steve Muench 5/9/ Highways Airports.
Accelerated Pavement Testing on Fayetteville Shale Roads Brady R. Cox, Ph.D. The University of Arkansas.
PaveDAT Pavement Damage Assessment Tool Roger Mingo, P.E.
Impact of Heavy Truck Traffic on Pavement Performance
INDOT Challenge: How to Maintain Our Highway Infrastructure Mark Newland Deputy Commissioner of Traffic Management Indiana Department of Transportation.
Analysis and Multi-Level Modeling of Truck Freight Demand Huili Wang, Kitae Jang, Ching-Yao Chan California PATH, University of California at Berkeley.
SANRAL Overload Damage Quantification Louw Kannemeyer.
Business Statistics for Managerial Decision
Calculating the Cost of Road Wear on Local Roads Mark Bondietti Riaan Burger October 2013.
Pavement Design CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Lec 28, Ch.20, pp : Flexible pavement design, ESAL (Objectives)
Lec 7, Ch4, pp83-99: Spot Speed Studies (Objectives)
Design Speed and Design Traffic Concepts
Load Equivalency. Plate theory: solutions limited to a single tire print Prickett & Ray (1951) – provided a graphical extension of Westergaard theory.
Using ESAL method.  Pavement damage depends on weight distribution.  Weight distribution depends on: ◦ Number of axles ◦ Weight on each axle ◦ Spacing.
Flexible Pavement Thickness Design / AASHTO Method
Lecture Six Radu ANDREI, PhD, P.E., Professor of Civil Engineering
CTU in Prague, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering DAF Page 1 Mean stress effect Smith‘s diagram  FL.
WFM 5201: Data Management and Statistical Analysis © Dr. Akm Saiful IslamDr. Akm Saiful Islam WFM 5201: Data Management and Statistical Analysis Akm Saiful.
Concrete Pavements The Right Tool for The Right Job.
Impact of doubling heavy vehicles on bridge
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
1 the effect of heavy vehicle composition on design traffic loading calculations (E80s)
Traffic Terms and Concepts Whydo we need to concern ourselves with traffic when we design pavements? Why do we need to concern ourselves with traffic when.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II
HBP Warranties – The Cost Benefit Evaluation Begins By: Jay Goldbaum, P.E. Colorado Department of Transportation Pavement Management and Design Program.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Project TX Strategies to Improve and Preserve Flexible Pavement at Intersections UTEP - Soheil Nazarian - Imad Abdallah - Carlos Solis Project Duration.
New Mexico Department of Transportation Research Bureau Expanding the Use of Weigh-In-Motion Data.
1 Longer Combination Vehicles & Road Trains for Texas? TxDOT Project CTR: Robert Harrison, Jolanda Prozzi, Kara Kockelman, Bridget Bienkowski, C.M.
Laval University’s experience with the wide-base single tires
 The point estimators of population parameters ( and in our case) are random variables and they follow a normal distribution. Their expected values are.
BLOCK 4 SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Pavement Data Collection Project evaluation Select feasible alternatives Reconstruction Restoration Recycling.
September 15, 2011 Presented by: Clay Harris, PMP - City of Austin Federico Mendoza, PE, PTOE – Brown & Gay Engineers, Inc. Todd Lane Alternative Geometric.
The Use of PAVEDAT for the District-wide Truck Enforcement Plan June 20, 2012 Mark Berndt Eulois Cleckley.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
Feng Hong, PE, PhD, TxDOT Darhao Chen, PE, PhD, TxDOT September 16~19, 2013, RPUG Meeting, San Antonio, TX USE GROUND PENETRATING RADAR TECHNOLOGY TO EVALUATE.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
LOADS 1.
1 1 Chapter 6 Forecasting n Quantitative Approaches to Forecasting n The Components of a Time Series n Measures of Forecast Accuracy n Using Smoothing.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-II
Sand Mining Road Impacts Committee of the Board February 7, 2012 This presentation is available at the Winona County website under.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Four-Stage of Engineering Analysis
Abstract A highway traffic noise prediction model has been developed for environmental assessment in South Korea. The model is based on an outdoor sound.
Fuel cost and road damage: evidence from weigh-in-motion data
CE 3500 Transportation Engineering Introduction to Pavement Materials
Transportation Engineering-II
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-II
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
Flexible pavement design
Supplement To Chapter 1 on OVERVIEW OF ENGINEERING ANALYSIS With additional information on Four-Stage of Engineering Analysis by Tai-Ran Hsu, Professor.
Sampling Distributions
Louisiana Accelerated Pavement Research Facility
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II
Presentation transcript:

Potential Implications of NAFTA Truck Traffic:

for better or for worse? Potential Implications of NAFTA Truck Traffic:

for better or for worse? Dr. Jorge A Prozzi The University of Texas Border Partnership Working Group 7 September 2006, Austin, Texas Potential Implications of NAFTA Truck Traffic:

Presentation Outline Effect of Loads on Pavement Damage Effect of Loads on Pavement Damage Historical (ESAL)Historical (ESAL) Recent Findings (TxDOT Research )Recent Findings (TxDOT Research ) Data Analysis Data Analysis Preliminary Results Preliminary Results Preliminary Findings Preliminary Findings

Historical: ESAL Where,  LEF i : load equivalency factor for load i-th  n i : number of axles of load i-th  x i : axle load i-th  L S : standard axle load  m : power, usually 4.0

Historical: ESAL  Power value, m:  4.0 according to analysis of the AASHO Road Test (based on riding quality)  for fatigue cracking  Around for rutting or surface deformation  Other research studies found values varying from less than 1.0 to 6.0 or even larger  So, which exponent (power) should we use?  Is it safe to use a higher power value?

Historical: ESAL

Type II Type III Type I

Mixed Lognormal distribution Mixed Lognormal distribution Where Where x: axle load, kipx: axle load, kip k: the k-th peakk: the k-th peak K: number of peaks, (1-3)K: number of peaks, (1-3) λ k, ζ k : parametersλ k, ζ k : parameters W k : weights, ∑W k = 1W k : weights, ∑W k = 1 Recent Findings: TxDOT

 Where  M: total number of axles  f(x): relative frequency of axle load i-th,  LSF: load spectra factor, which represents the number of ESALs of a “representative” axle.

Advantages of the log-normal random variable X: The logarithm of X (axle load) is normal. The logarithm of X (axle load) is normal. X is non-negative, as axle loads are. X is non-negative, as axle loads are. The parameters have physical meaning. The parameters have physical meaning. It has a close-form expression for the LSF, which captures the damaging effect of loads on pavements: It has a close-form expression for the LSF, which captures the damaging effect of loads on pavements: Recent Findings: TxDOT

Data Analysis TxDOT operates approximately permanent WIM stations, mostly on rural interstate and US highways TxDOT operates approximately permanent WIM stations, mostly on rural interstate and US highways Selection criteria: Selection criteria: enough time series data, andenough time series data, and close to US-Mexico borderclose to US-Mexico border D522, near McAllen (Hidalgo), on US 281 D522, near McAllen (Hidalgo), on US 281 D516, near San Antonio, on IH 35 D516, near San Antonio, on IH 35

Data Analysis Class 9 (3S2) and Class 5 were analyzed in detail; they account for +80% of the volume Class 9 (3S2) and Class 5 were analyzed in detail; they account for +80% of the volume Analysis was done Analysis was done per direction (north- and southbound)per direction (north- and southbound) per axle type (steering, single, and tandem)per axle type (steering, single, and tandem) per year (to establish and document trends)per year (to establish and document trends) We calculated pavement damage by applying the LSF concept explained earlier We calculated pavement damage by applying the LSF concept explained earlier

Preliminary Results

D522 – US 281, McAllen Class 9, steering axle load distribution for northbound and southbound lanes Class 9, steering axle load distribution for northbound and southbound lanes

D522 – US 281, McAllen Class 9, tandem axle load distribution for northbound and southbound lanes Class 9, tandem axle load distribution for northbound and southbound lanes

D522 – US 281, McAllen Class 9, tandem axle load distribution for northbound and southbound lanes in 2002 Class 9, tandem axle load distribution for northbound and southbound lanes in 2002

D522 – US 281, McAllen Class 5, steering and single axle load distribution for southbound direction Class 5, steering and single axle load distribution for southbound direction

Preliminary Findings (D522) Class 9 Class 9 bi-modal for tandem, uni-modal for steeringbi-modal for tandem, uni-modal for steering small but steady rightward shiftsmall but steady rightward shift northbound traffic is heavier than southboundnorthbound traffic is heavier than southbound northbound is Type III; southbound, Type IInorthbound is Type III; southbound, Type II Class 5 Class 5 steering and single show uni-modal spectrasteering and single show uni-modal spectra not significant directional distribution, nor load increase (rightward shift)not significant directional distribution, nor load increase (rightward shift)

Preliminary Findings (D522) Class 9, LSF estimation for steering and tandem axles in northbound and southbound directions. Class 9, LSF estimation for steering and tandem axles in northbound and southbound directions. Note that the “number of ESALs per vehicle” is increasing. Note that the “number of ESALs per vehicle” is increasing.

D516 – IH 35, San Antonio Class 9, steering axle load distribution for northbound direction Class 9, steering axle load distribution for northbound direction

D516 – IH 35, San Antonio Class 9, tandem axle load distribution for northbound direction Class 9, tandem axle load distribution for northbound direction

Preliminary Findings (D516) Class 9 Class 9 bi-modal distribution for tandem axlesbi-modal distribution for tandem axles uni-modal for steering axlesuni-modal for steering axles consistent rightward shiftconsistent rightward shift spectra is changing from Type II to Type IIIspectra is changing from Type II to Type III no significant difference per directionno significant difference per direction Class 5 Class 5 similar findings as for D522similar findings as for D522

Preliminary Conclusions In addition the volume increase, the LSF, ESAL per vehicle, should be closely monitored. In addition the volume increase, the LSF, ESAL per vehicle, should be closely monitored. The LSF captures the load-associated pavement damage “contained” in the load distribution. The LSF captures the load-associated pavement damage “contained” in the load distribution. We captured the change in the mid-1990s due to NAFTA, therefore, we should capture any future shift, even is it is small We captured the change in the mid-1990s due to NAFTA, therefore, we should capture any future shift, even is it is small Small changes, however, may cause significant increase in pavement damage and, therefore, on TxDOT maintenance and rehabilitation activities. Small changes, however, may cause significant increase in pavement damage and, therefore, on TxDOT maintenance and rehabilitation activities.

What is next? We will incorporate at least two more WIM stations from the border region or I-10. We will incorporate at least two more WIM stations from the border region or I-10. We are trying to obtain similar data from Mexican bordering states to carry out a similar analysis. We are trying to obtain similar data from Mexican bordering states to carry out a similar analysis. We want to evaluate the potential increase in the proportion of six-axle trucks (3S3). We want to evaluate the potential increase in the proportion of six-axle trucks (3S3).