Content Pedagogy Design Group: Jeanne Bennett, Corrine Chalifour, Warren Dobbins, Julie Jones, Liz Linear, Lindi McCurry, Jigna Patel, Sue Varga-Ward,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
What it means for New Teachers
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
 The purpose of the RTI/CCP Grant is to enhance the knowledge, skills, and dispositions of in-service teachers, pre-service teachers, and teacher education.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
E-Program Portfolio Let’s Begin Department of Reading and Language Arts Program Portfolio Central Connecticut State University Name: Date Submitted: Program.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
ADEPT Framework
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Research-Based Cutting Edge Professional Development Communicate, Connect, Collaborate, Conceptualize, Create For Results Oriented Learning Experiences.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot (TPEP). Objectives & Agenda What we’re going to learn General Pilot Details …. Who, What, How, What Then Explore.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Professional Development for the Teachers of Tomorrow’s Children WACTE October 28, 2008 Sheila Fox, WWU.
Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
Other Options Design Group: Jeanne Bennett, Corrine Chalifour, Warren Dobbins, Julie Jones, Lindi McCurry, Jigna Patel, Sue Varga-Ward, Tom Tomberlin March.
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Getting Started Patrick Ledesma, Ed.S, NBCT National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Fairfax County Public Schools, VA.
Mentoring Moments: Powerful Designs for Mentoring Teaching Policy and Standards Branch Issue 12 / Nov 2012.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Center for Teacher Leadership Virginia Commonwealth University Dr. Terry Dozier, Director VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Mrs. Stacey Branch Coordinator,
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.
Implementing edTPA An Overview.
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
What it means for New Teachers
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
FEAPs (Florida Educator Accomplished Practices)
WHAT IS LIFE LONG LEARNING IMPORTANCE OF LIFE LONG LEARNING
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Presentation transcript:

Content Pedagogy Design Group: Jeanne Bennett, Corrine Chalifour, Warren Dobbins, Julie Jones, Liz Linear, Lindi McCurry, Jigna Patel, Sue Varga-Ward, Tom Tomberlin April 27 th, 2011

When CMS began the process of developing multiple measures of teacher effectiveness, they designated an “Other Options” design group that was charged with investigating critical components of teacher effectiveness that had not yet been identified. The focus of the group quickly went to instructional quality and what determines whether a teacher’s instruction is of high quality or not. The design team has determined that “content pedagogy” is the most critical element of high quality instruction.

Content pedagogy refers to the teaching skills teachers use to impart specialized knowledge/content of their subject areas to learners. This complex combination of skills and abilities can include essential knowledge, dispositions, commitments, and instructional behaviors that allow educators to practice at high levels. Recognizing effective practice and teachers who demonstrate it is the single most important action the nation can take to improve schools. Source: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1998). Washington, DC.

TIER 4 Create TIER 2 Application TIER 3 Analysis & Evaluation TIER 1 Knowledge & Understanding

Knowledge * Praxis Exam * Error Analysis Identification * Demonstrate knowledge of research-based practices * Knowledge of associated vocabulary Classification * Developmentally appropriate lessons * Differentiated Lessons * Engagement of Students

Teacher selects and applies instructional practices consistently throughout teaching Teacher maintains records of how practices are being applied in classroom (e.g., portfolio containing lessons, activities, research articles and reflection logs. C & I maintains database of approved resources and determines validity of other resources Observation conducted by outside personnel (Tier IV?) to verify proficiency in practice

Teacher conducts a narrowly focused action research project Application process for project – teacher provides background research, rationale and need, identifies salient data, plan for collecting data, timeline of project Opportunities for collaborative projects – across classes, grades, and schools. Teachers share results of the research project – district develops a repository of research on instructional practices.

Teacher creates presentations on best practices for colleagues, local and district PD, conferences, etc. Establish an “open” classroom designed for teacher students to learn from master teachers. Lead professional development “learning labs” Tier IV teachers become a resource (coach, mentor, advisor) for other teachers as they advance through the tiers. Assist in the creation of a “practice library” that warehouses effective best practices.

 What are three advantages and three disadvantages of having teachers work on an action research project?  Would you take the opportunity to pilot the measure as presented? Why or Why not?  List the strengths and weaknesses of each of the four tiers. Please be as specific as possible.