Introduction to the ClearPEM projects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What are PET basics?.
Advertisements

Detector Characterisation Group
Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
PET Design: Simulation Studies using GEANT4 and GATE - Status Report - Martin Göttlich DESY.
1 Physics & Instrumentation in Positron Emission Tomography Paul Vaska, Ph.D. Center for Translational Neuroscience Brookhaven National Laboratory July.
1 A Design of PET detector using Microchannel Plate PMT with Transmission Line Readout Heejong Kim 1, Chien-Min Kao 1, Chin-Tu Chen 1, Jean-Francois Genat.
Planar scintigraphy produces two-dimensional images of three dimensional objects. It is handicapped by the superposition of active and nonactive layers.
A High-speed Adaptively-biased Current- to-current Front-end for SSPM Arrays Bob Zheng, Jean-Pierre Walder, Henrik von der Lippe, William Moses, Martin.
8/18/2015G.A. Fornaro Characterization of diffractive optical elements for improving the performance of an endoscopic TOF- PET detector head Student: G.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
1 PET in the detection of breast cancer The ClearPEM Project Encontro Nacional de Ciência — Ciência 2009 Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian de Julho de.
Report on SiPM Tests SiPM as a alternative photo detector to replace PMT. Qauntify basic characteristics Measure Energy, Timing resolution Develop simulation.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Coincidence to Image: PET Imaging Jennifer White Marketing Manager SNS Workshop October 13, 2003.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
May 2015ECFA meeting1 Spin-off technologies for cancer diagnosis J. Varela, LIP Lisbon ECFA meeting, Coimbra, 15 May, 2015.
Presentation of the ClearPEM-Sonic mammography scanner ClearPEM-Sonic.
LIP - L ABORATORY OF I NSTRUMENTATION AND EXPERIMENTAL P ARTICLE PHYSICS Lisbon, PORTUGAL THE 12 TH VIENNA CONFERENCE ON INSTRUMENTATION FEV 2010.
Fundamental Limits of Positron Emission Tomography
First Results from a Test Bench for Very High Resolution Small Animal PET Using Solid-State Detectors Klaus Honscheid for The CIMA Collaboration The Ohio.
A Front End and Readout System for PET Overview: –Requirements –Block Diagram –Details William W. Moses Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Department.
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
Montpellier, November 15, 2003 J. Cvach, TileHCAL and APD readout1 TileHCAL- fibre readout by APD APDs and preamplifiers Energy scan with DESY beam –Energy.
P. Lecoq CERN 1 February 2012 ICTR-PHE 2012, Geneva, February 27-March 2, 2012 Novel multimodal endoscopic probes for simultaneous PET/ultrasound imaging.
HEALTH Novel MR-compatible PET detectors for simultaneous PET/MRI imaging FP7-HEALTH-2009-single-stage The focus should be to develop novel.
Professor Brian F Hutton Institute of Nuclear Medicine University College London Emission Tomography Principles and Reconstruction.
THE 12 TH VIENNA CONFERENCE ON INSTRUMENTATION FEV 2010 The ClearPEM Breast Imaging Scanner LIP - L ABORATORY OF I NSTRUMENTATION AND EXPERIMENTAL.
Nuclear Medicine: Tomographic Imaging – SPECT, SPECT-CT and PET-CT Katrina Cockburn Nuclear Medicine Physicist.
Seoul National University Functional & Molecular Imaging System Lab Progress in Nuclear Imaging Mikiko Ito, PhD Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National.
07-Jan-2010 Jornadas LIP 2010, Braga JC. Da SILVA Electronics systems for the ClearPEM-Sonic scanner José C. DA SILVA, LIP-Lisbon Tagus LIP Group * *J.C.Silva,
Filipe Castro Departamento de Física & i3n Universidade de Aveiro C S I(N A ) W AVELENGTH - SHIFTING FIBER GAMMA CAMERA USING S I PM S LIP Lisboa Apr.
Timing Studies of Hamamatsu MPPCs and MEPhI SiPM Samples Bob Wagner, Gary Drake, Patrick DeLurgio Argonne National Laboratory Qingguo Xie Department of.
ClearPEM, J. Varela EuroMedIm06, Marseille, May ClearPEM: a PET imaging system dedicated to breast cancer diagnostics J. Varela LIP/IST Lisbon &
Rebecca Barrett CRYSTAL LAB. PET Detects gamma rays Interact with the crystals and release photons Smaller the crystal, the less uncertainty.
Impact of Axial Compression for the mMR Simultaneous PET-MR Scanner Martin A Belzunce, Jim O’Doherty and Andrew J Reader King's College London, Division.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade, L.Peralta, J. Varela GEANT4 Medical Applications at LIP GEANT4 Workshop, September – 4 October LIP – Lisbon.
P. Lecoq CERN February SiPM Workshop, CERN, February, 2011 New Approaches in Scintillation Detectors in the Context of HEP Calorimetry and.
1 Nuclear Medicine SPECT and PET. 2 a good book! SR Cherry, JA Sorenson, ME Phelps Physics in Nuclear Medicine Saunders, 2012.
Peter Dendooven LaBr 3 and LYSO monolithic crystals coupled to photosensor arrays for TOF-PET Physics for Health in Europe Workshop February 2-4, 2010,
1 Rome, 14 October 2008 Joao Varela LIP, Lisbon PET-MRI Project in FP7 LIP Motivations and Proposals.
Update on works with SiPMs at Pisa Matteo Morrocchi.
P. Lecoq CERN 1 September 2014 MEDAMI 2014, Alghero, 3-7 September, 2014 A dedicated detector for pancreas and prostate biomarkers developments FP7 project,
Simulations in Medical Physics Y. TOUFIQUE*, R.CHERKAOUI EL MOURSLI*, M.KACI**, G.AMOROS**, *Université Mohammed V –Agdal, Faculté des Sciences de Rabat,
P. Lecoq CERN2 February ENVISION WP2 Meeting CERN Group contribution to ENVISION WP2 Paul Lecoq CERN, Geneva.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
1 PET Project: current and future developments A. Trindade – PET/LIP Group Jornadas LIP, January 2008 Outline:  Development of PET technologies applied.
LISHEP 2015, Manaus 1 PET Technologies and developments Jose DA SILVA LIP-Lisboa Manaus
+ Voxel Imaging Pizza Gianluca De Lorenzo. + Positron Emission Tomography April Gianluca De Lorenzo.
Performance of scintillation pixel detectors with MPPC read-out and digital signal processing Mihael Makek with D. Bosnar, V. Gačić, L. Pavelić, P. Šenjug.
Physics & Instrumentation in Positron Emission Tomography
Trigger System for a Thin Time-of-flight PET scanner
High-Speed Data Acquisition Electronics for a PEM Scanner
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
Detailed simulations of a full-body RPC-PET scanner
Summary of the Compton-PET project
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Application of Nuclear Physics
Next generation 3D digital SiPM for precise timing resolution
X. Zhu1, 3, Z. Deng1, 3, A. Lan2, X. Sun2, Y. Liu1, 3, Y. Shao2
BESIII EMC electronics
AGATA week Uppsala, July 2008
MCP PET Simulation (7) – Pixelated X-tal
P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade, L.Peralta, J. Varela
md-NUV PET project meeting
ME instrument and in-orbit performance
GRETINA experiments with fast beams at NSCL
A Time Driven Readout Scheme For PET and CT… …using APDs and SiPMs
Status Report on MCP PET Simulation
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the ClearPEM projects Joao Varela LIP, Lisbon On behalf of the ClearPEM Collaboration Jornadas LIP Universidade do Minho, 7-9 January 2010

The ClearPEM Projects High performance PET scanner for breast cancer detection. Scanner is in clinical tests. Other applications to brain imaging and PET animal are being pursued Projects developed by the ClearPEM consortium, in the framework of Crystal Clear at CERN IP licensed to PETsys, SA

The ClearPEM scanner Good spatial resolution ( ~1.5 mm in whole FoV) Fine crystal segmentation (2x2 mm) DoI measurement with good resolution (FWHM ~2 mm) Dual APD readout of individual crystal pixels High Sensitivity ( ~ 40 cps/kBq in center FoV) Long LYSO crystals (20 mm) Two detector plates with large active area Reduced Random Background (~30%) Large flux of single photons (up to 10 MHz) Coincidence time resolution of ~4 ns FWHM

The ClearPEM scanner

The ClearPEM detector Two detector plates: 6144 LYSO 2x2x20 mm3 crystals 12288 APD pixel channels Dual readout of crystal pixels for DoI measurement 160x180 mm2 active area Water cooling 75% of detector channels presently installed

ASIC Performance Pulse Shape Noise Amplifier rise time: 20ns Variation of baseline and pulse shape 1-2% Noise Pedestal RMS = 2.2 ADC Counts = 5keV ENC = 1300 e- r.m.s. Inter-channel dispersion ~ 8% Response to test pulse Noise measurement

Data Acquisition Performance Trigger Performance Events in coincidence up to 1.5MHz (This involves computation of energy and time, Compton grouping and transmission to the trigger processor) Acquisition rate up to 0.8MHz (This involves readout of the event dataframe after issuing a trigger) Disk storage rate ~ 400MB/s High performance useful for fast calibration runs Needed for other PET applications

Ancillary Systems Cooling Bias Voltages Water cooling of detector plates at 18 oC Stability of temperature ± 0.1 oC Bias Voltages Regulation of APD bias voltages on the detector heads (64 regulation channels) Long-term stability of HV ~ 28 mV rms r.m.s. ~28 mV 40 hours

Energy Resolution Energy measurements: 137Cs Na-22 spectra summed for all crystals Energy measurements: Average energy resolution at 511 keV for the full scanner is 16.0% Dispersion of energy resolution of individual crystals is 8.8% Good energy linearity (~ up to few percent) 137Cs Resolution ~12.5% Photopeak measurements

Time Resolution Time measurement: Typical pulse sampling Time measurement: Photon time is extracted from the pulse samples fitted by the function: Coincidence time resolution of the whole scanner is 5.2 ns FWHM 137Cs 50 MHz sampling Resolution ~12.5% Time difference in coincidence events All scanner coincidences

Energy in bottom vs top APDs DoI Resolution Asymmetry distributions for different impact points in the crystal Depth of interaction measurement DoI is measured from light asymmetry in crystal dual readout From direct measurement (collimated photons): DoI resolution ~ 2 mm FWHM for light asymmetry ±40% Lu-176 background in crystals is used for DoI calibration in whole scanner Average light asymmetry is ±59% Energy in bottom vs top APDs

Energy Dependence on DoI Photopeak position as a function of DoI Energy is independent of DoI: E[keV]=Kabs.(Etop+Krel.Ebottom) Z[mm]=CDOI.((Etopkrel.Ebottom)/(Etop+krel.Ebottom)) Photopeak position is independent of DoI (up to few percent) Energy resolution does not depend on DoI 137Cs Resolution ~12.5% Energy resolution as a function of DoI

Scanner Calibration Energy: Depth of interaction (Lu-176 background): Distribution of energy calibrations Energy: Dispersion of channel gains 15.3% Depth of interaction (Lu-176 background): Dispersion of DoI calibration constants 7.8% Time calibration: Two pulse shape parameters per channel Dispersion of time calibration constants 2% ~4600 crystals Distribution of pulse peak time ~4600 crystals

ClearPEM Sensitivity 14 Sensitivity measurement: Na-22 source A(22Na) = 2.73 µCi ± 0.3% (101kBq) Sensitivity at center of FoV for 10 cm Detector Head opening is 1.0% (350-700 keV, 20 ns) Correction factors: Incomplete (75%) detector: 1.3 In-detector Comptons: ~2 Corrected sensitivity: ~2.6% Monte Carlo estimation: 3.1% Count rate scan Sensitivity (100 mm ): 1.0% 14

ClearPEM Spatial Resolution With DoI Point source imaging Na-22 point source in a grid with 5mm pitch Energy window 400-600 keV Sinograms of 16 source positions are added Reconstruction with 3D-OSEM / STIR Spatial resolution Transaxial 1.2 mm FWHM (corrected for source size ~1mm) DoI effect Images without using DoI information show considerable blurring 5 mm 1 mm Without DoI

ClearPEM Image Uniformity Images of uniform Ge-68 source Reconstruction with 4 orientations of the detector plates Absorption, scatter and corrections are not applied Image artifacts due to detector effects are corrected Good image uniformity Cylinder filled with positron emitter Ge-68 EW=400-700keV TW=4 ns 6 iterations 3D-OSEM

Clinical Tests Program Scanner Installation Hospital IPO, Porto Phase 1 (present) Patients indicated for PET/CT (other disease) Negative breast exams Tuning the image reconstruction with real cases 11 exams done Phase 2 Patients with positive indication from x-rays mammography Assessment of PEM sensitivity / specificity Comparison to mammography and MRI ClearPEM scanner at IPO Porto

Initial clinical exams Example of typical exam: dose 8 mCi 150 mm detector plate opening 4 angular orientations coincidence window ±4 ns energy window 400-650 keV fraction of randoms in FoV is 35% Reconstruction: 3D-OSEM randoms, attenuation and scatter corrections not applied simple normalization correction on-going work to reduce statistical noise

ClearPEM and Ultrasound Dualmodal PET – US CERIMED , Hospital Marseille, other partners Ultra-sound probe with elastography capabilities Cross-reference system and PET-US image fusion Construction of second ClearPEM machine is well advanced ClearPEM-Sonic

PET Animal Pre-clinical studies with small and medium size animals PET/MR insert Texas Institute of Preclinical Studies Application to brain imaging /EPFL 35 cm 60 cm 4.5 cm Cooling plates Detector modules Version with DoI

High performance PET Improvements to Electronics/DAQ Optical S-link (under test) ASICv4 (in design) Intelligent Front End Board (in project) PET Ring Trigger (hw ready) PET Time-of-Flight (FWHM ~200 ps) SiPM and TOF ASIC (collaboration with Torino and CERN) SPAD single-photon detectors integrated with TDCs (collaboration with TUDelft and CERN)

The ClearPEM Collaboration E. Albuquerque1, F. G. Almeida2,13, P. Almeida3, E. Auffray10, J. Barbosa2, A. L. Bastos9, V. Bexiga1, R. Bugalho4, C. Cardoso4, S. Carmona8, J.F. Carneiro2, B. Carriço4, C. S. Ferreira4, N. C. Ferreira5, M. Ferreira4, M. Frade4, F. Gonçalves1, C. Guerreiro5, P. Lecoq10, C. Leong1, P. Lousã6, P. Machado1, M. V. Martins3, N. Matela3, R. Moura4, J. Neves4, P. Neves6, N. Oliveira3, C. Ortigão4, F. Piedade6, J. F. Pinheiro4, P. Relvas6, A. Rivetti , P. Rodrigues4, I. Rolo4, A. I. Santos8, J. Santos2, M. M. Silva1, S. Tavernier11, I. C. Teixeira1,9, J. P. Teixeira1,9, J. C. Silva4,10, R. Silva4, A. Trindade4, J. Varela4, 12   1 INESC-ID, 2 INEGI, 3 IBEB/FCUL, 4 LIP, 5 IBILI/FMUC, 6 INOV, 8 HGO, 9 IPO, 10CERN, 11VUB Funded by