Increasing service user influence on the selection of nursing students Fiona Dobson, Beryl Pearson & Elaine Walker.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Excellence Framework Jane Boggan Planning Division Research Staff Forum - January 2010.
Advertisements

Telephone Interviews Case Study: Restoring Rivers One Reach at a Time: Results from a Survey of U.S. River Restoration Practitioners Boris Bruk February.
Team Leader Presentation: Collecting Outcomes. Introduction The Changes: Three month outcome form no longer in use Hard outcomes collected by text message.
Pan London Practice Assessment Document Presentation prepared for “ London Mental Health Nursing: Recruiting and Growing the Best” Jane Fish Project Manager,
Young People and Commissioning ok.org.uk/integratedcommissioning.
CCPS event Edinburgh Thursday 26 th March 2009 Getting it Right for Carers.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Revalidation for nurses and midwives consultation phase 2
Putting Research Evidence to Work Research Seminar 14 th January 2009.
Involving young people Commissioning Workshop “Setting the Standards in Sheffield”
Working with service-users in midwifery education Annabel Jay Senior Lecturer, University of Hertfordshire Maastricht, 2013.
Creating Better Health and Care Services An overview of a Better Health and Care Review process.
Evaluating Socio-Economic Development - the ever-evolving EVALSED Guide Elliot Stern Presentation to Conference: Evaluating Public Interventions.
Improvement Service / Scottish Centre for Regeneration Project: Embedding an Outcomes Approach in Community Regeneration & Tackling Poverty Effectively.
Implementing a School Wide Teaching and Learning Forum Morag Redfern Paul Street School of Health & Social Care.
PEF/Oct/2007Developed by W. Ainsworth, S.Davies, D.Hassle, S.Parks, M.Wallen Briefing session on the NMC Standards to Support Learning and Assessment in.
How do nurses use new technologies to inform decision making?
Mentor Update SM Davis.
Stage One: Registrant, (N.M.C., 2006). Student Handout. (May, 2008).
AOHNP Revalidation Project Diane Romano-Woodward President January 21 st 2015.
Promoting Excellence in Family Medicine Enabling Patients to Access Electronic Health Records Guidance for Health Professionals.
Use of Multiple-Mini Interviews in student nurse selection (A values based approach to selection) Beattie Dray Principal Lecturer:
Designing Influential Evaluations Session 2 Topics & Timing Uganda Evaluation Week - Pre-Conference Workshop 19 th and 20 th May 2014.
Service Equality Team July 2005 Action for Equality Briefing.
Political Leadership How to influence! And Current OH Issues Carol Bannister Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom.
1 Simon Bradstreet: SRN Allison Alexander: NHS Education for Scotland/SRN Scottish Recovery Indicator.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
Hampshire PE and School Sport Conference ‘Raising Attainment across the School Curriculum through PE and School Sport’ ACHIEVING OUTSTANDING
Dawne Gurbutt, Discipline Lead, Health Related Studies 11 th July 2013 Enhancing the student learning experience through Patient & Public Involvement Practice,
Calderdale Place Survey “a new focus on improving outcomes for local people and places”
COMMUNITY Needs Assessment Overview
Evaluation and Planning for the Improvement of Performance (EPIP) AS Physical Education.
Add presentation title to master slide | 1 New inspection methodology from September 2009 NATSPEC conference Lorna Fitzjohn May 2009.
Scoping Exercise: Assistant Practitioners’ role in the Administration of Medicines across the North West. in conjunction with York University.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
OFSTED SUBJECT SURVEY INSPECTIONS (2009 framework)
Notions of involvement in North East research networks Dr Tina Cook & Dr Anna Jones, School of Health, Community and Education Studies, Northumbria University.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
Your Ambulance Service Foundation Trust Consultation.
National Evaluation of Community Sport Activation Fund (CSAF)
UK Wide Core Skills & Training Framework Findings of 2 nd Stage Consultation and Implications for Development of the Framework.
BTEC 1 NQF BTEC Foundation Diploma in Art and Design PLANNING.
Page 1 RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FRAMEWORK : RESEARCH IMPACT ASESSMENT LESSONS FROM THE PILOT EXERCISE Professor John Marshall Director Academic Research Development.
National Healthcare Scientist Recruitment Process Val Davison Louise Ayers National Healthcare Science School of Genetics.
Qualifications Information Review CONSULTATION | 2012 QIR Consultation.
Regional Seminar 2005 EVALUATING POLICY Are your policies working? How do you know? School Development Planning Initiative.
Seven Set Reviews Background NSS wants to be valued as a world class partner that enables & supports transformation in the health & well being of.
Revalidation of nurses and midwives in the UK Yasmin Becker Assistant Director –Revalidation and Standards 9 October - NIPEC.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Improving Local Indicators Project 3 rd Consultation Workshop David Hume Chair of Project Board.
Evaluation of Phase 2 of Choose Life Patricia Russell & Associates.
Course Rep Induction Welcome to the Course Representatives’ Induction
Insert organisational logo here on master slide What is PPI? (Public & Patient Involvement) Name Title Organisation Name.
Northern Lincolnshire Healthy Lives Healthy Futures Programme Programme Update for North East Lincolnshire Partnership Board 12 September 2013.
EMenthe workpackage 2 (TCD) The aim of this package was to identify key stakeholders perceptions of the required elearning components for advanced mental.
Framework for Excellence What is the Framework? The Framework is the Governments National Assessment Framework for Education and Training Public.
The purpose of evaluation is not to prove, but to improve.
Local Government and Public Body Analysts Survey Conference Scottish Household Survey Survey Review March 2010 Hugh Munro SHS Project Team.
Market Analyst – Una Borte The Cogent Oracle Project 2009.
A Brave New World: Using the New Ofsted Framework on DWP Inspections Karen Adriaanse March 2010.
Making Every Contact Count (MECC) and Optimising Outcomes Dr Siân Griffiths Consultant in Public Health Medicine.
Brian T. Malec, Ph.D. Professor of Health Administration Department of Health Sciences California State University, Northridge Northridge, CA
Introduction of Specialist Perinatal Mental Health Service in NHS Lanarkshire Dr Aman Durrani;Consultant Psychiatrist Helen Sloan;Senior Charge Nurse.
HSC Provide information about health and social care or children and young people’s services EDUC8TIONS LTD.
Top Tips Localism In Action Tip 1: Getting Started Use existing links to build a strong localism partnership across the CA area Be proactive,
OUR FOCUS FOR 2011 TO 2012 The CfWI produces quality intelligence to inform better workforce planning, that improves people’s lives.
Consulting with deaf children and young people
Unit 4 - A06 – Review Grade Criteria To get a c
Presentation transcript:

Increasing service user influence on the selection of nursing students Fiona Dobson, Beryl Pearson & Elaine Walker

Context NMC drivers: 2010 Standards for pre-registration nursing education NHS key performance indicators Fitness for practice Political drivers in health and public sectors Changing public expectations Francis Report (2013)

Process Development: What was our previous process? Why did we want to change? What did we want to achieve? What were the primary aims? Who to involve? How to consult with others? What was our time-frame? What were other AEIs doing? What did the literature say?

Refining Process: Not what but how? Achievable across the nations and regions Manageable Equitable Endorsement of service users Resource effective

Annual review of selection process Short Timescale SU agreed decision SUs briefed and prepared Consultation on topic for applicant’s discussion task for SU OU Staff Supporting statement (UCAS criteria) + SU discussion task Short listed Y/N or Accept/Reject application Guidance notes + application form sent out Application submitted (electronically) Provides details of applicant’s discussion task for SU Consequential benefit = IT skills Initial Process

Support from OU academic/admin staff Consequences: e.g. Issues if SU away, sick, lacks IT OU/ Partner / practitioner Applicant given verbal feedback on task & SU question asked by panel SU grades task, prepares interview question and returns to OU Support from OU academic/admin staff Applicant’s task made anonymous & sent to SU with criteria Applicant has face to face individual interview Information added to selection record Interview outcome: accept or reject? SU question is equal weighting in interview schedule Feedback to applicant and SU Process for shortlisted applicants Short Timescale

2012: Pilot Phase How we identified service users Preparing and supporting service users Approximately 160 discussion tasks reviewed by 16 service users Informal feedback from employers Informal feedback from service users

Plan for evaluation: 2013 Case study approach Statistical returns Survey monkey EmployersTelephone focus group ApplicantsAs above Service UserAs above Emerging themes Identify and disseminate best practice Consequential benefits

Open forum & any questions