HUD and Emergent Use Walter Kraft. Device Classification Significant risk – Often involve an invasive procedure for implantation or use – Requires IDE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Ann Johnson IRB Administrator, IRB Member. Objectives 1. Identify the components necessary for management and oversight of tissue repositories used for.
Susan Burner Bankowski, M.S., J.D. Chair, OHSU IRB
Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE) CFR Title 21, Part 812
IRB Process & Medical Devices
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Regulation of Medical Devices Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation.
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Informed Consent, and Responsibilities Requirement for IRBs -DHHS: 45 CFR Part 46 -FDA: 21 CFR 56 Requirement for and.
IRB Review of Device Research and Other Clinical Uses of Devices
Single Use Expanded Access IND/IDE: FDA and IRB Requirements Before and After Use IRB Webinar October 9,2014.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
IRB-Investigator/ Research Coordinator Mtg. “What You Can Do to Facilitate an Efficient IRB Review” January 13, 2004 George Gasparis.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Special IND/IDE Considerations: Emergency Use of Investigational Product Compassionate Use & Emergency Research July 21,
Special Topics in IND Regulation
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
IMDMC Reg 101 Course Clinical Research and IDEs
Human Investigation Committee  Is it research?  If yes, does it involve human subjects?  If yes, can it be exempt?  If no, will a Request for.
Investigational New Drug Application 21 CFR Part 312 A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International
+ Medical Devices Approval Process. + Objectives Define a medical device Be familiar with the classification system for medical devices Understand the.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
1 THE UNIQUE ROLES OF IRB IN MEDICAL DEVICE CLINICALL TRIAL Chiu Lin, Ph.D. CITI, May, 2009 CITI, May, 2009.
Device Research Presented by Marian Serge, R.N.. Goals Identify devices Recognize difference between significant risk (SR) and non- significant risk (NSR)
Regulatory Considerations for Investigational Assays: Planning for Success Elizabeth Mansfield, PhD OIVD/FDA “Next-Generation DNA Sequencing as a Tool.
International Human Subject Research Legal and Ethical Considerations for Investigators Theresa J. Colecchia, Esq. Associate General Counsel May 8, 2006.
HRPP Training – Session Two Human Research Protection Program Manager
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
When do I need an IND ? FDA Guidance for Industry – Investigation New Drug Applications (INDs) - Determining Whether Human Research Studies Can Be Conducted.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 19-20, 2007 Cincinnati, Ohio.
Medical Devices IRB Determination IRB Member Continuing Education.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
Ethical and Regulatory Considerations in Research using Residual Specimens Jeffrey R. Botkin, M.D., M.P.H. Professor of Pediatrics and Medical Ethics Associate.
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
Paula Peyrani, MD Division of Infectious Diseases University of Louisville The IRB Process What do I need to know? The IRB Process.
Welcome New IRB Members! Today we will discuss: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
Regulatory requirements: children, assent, and consent waivers and waiver of documentation Bob Craig, 2007.
Welcome New IRB Member! This brief presentation covers: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
EXPEDITED PROTOCOL REVIEW AN IRB INFOSHORT APRIL 2013.
BIORESEARCH MONITORING & IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES Presented by Jean Toth-Allen, Ph.D. Biophysicist/Consumer Safety Officer Division of Bioresearch Monitoring.
Human Specimen Repositories Requirements of 21 CFR Parts 50 & 56 PRIM & R May 5, 2004 Sally A. Hojvat, Ph.D. Director of Microbiology Devices Office of.
Levels of Review of Research and Quality Improvement Walter Kraft, MD Associate Director, Office of Human Subjects Protection Department of Pharmacology.
Exempt Unless otherwise required by Department or Agency heads, research activities in which the only involvement of human subjects will be in one or more.
Drug Development and IND Process GC 690 Walter Kraft, MD.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
EXCEPTION FROM INFORMED CONSENT IN CPR DEVICE TRIALS: PROTECTION OF PATIENTS’ RIGHTS Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting September 21, 2004 Elisa.
Cancer Clinical Trials Office Clinical Trials & Research Training Oct2014.
Guidance for IRBs Barbara D
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Conditional IRB Approval
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Welcome New IRB Members!
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Device Review Decision Tree Version Date: 4/28/15 This decision tree to be used for studies involving research on a device ( approved or unapproved)
Lana Gevorkyan Corporate Director Human Research Protection Program
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Clinical Investigations
Streamlining IRB Procedures for Expanded Access
Intermediate-Size Patient Populations INDs: What Are They, When Should They Be Used, and Who May Apply for Them?” Richard Klein, Former Director, FDA.
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
What the IRB is looking for when reviewing your protocol
TRTO (Translational Research Trials Office)
Protocol Approval Criteria
Presentation transcript:

HUD and Emergent Use Walter Kraft

Device Classification Significant risk – Often involve an invasive procedure for implantation or use – Requires IDE consideration Non-significant risk (NSR) devices – Requires only IRB protocol approval

Investigational New Device: – A device permitted by the FDA to be tested in humans but not yet determined to be safe and effective for a not yet licensed. This includes devices already approved for other indications Investigational Device Exemption (IDE): – veterinary – diagnostic device, if the testing: Is noninvasive. Does not require an invasive sampling procedure that presents significant risk. Does not by introduce energy into a subject.

Humanitarian Use Device (HUD) 21 CFR 814.3(n) Created by 1990 Law For diseases with <4000 people/year in US Sponsor files a humanitarian device exemption (HDE) with FDA Issue “orphan subset” of common disease – Unmet medical need is not sufficient rationale

Regulatory Status HUD use not research Only circumstance where IRB has clearly defined oversight of non-research activity HDE does not expire so long as device continues to meet requirements IRB does require periodic review

IRB review TJU Policy SC 503 Initial Review could – approve the use of the device without any restrictions, OR – use of the device under protocol, OR – use of the device on a case-by –case basis on a protocol basis Continuing Review – expedited review

Consent IRB will make a determination as to whether it would be prudent to require a consent form, IRB may require that both the investigator and the subject sign the Device Brochure Investigator must agree that use is not part of research project or study designed to collect data to support an FDA pre-market approval application

Emergent Use of Devices Emergency use; not sufficient time to obtain IRB approval [(21CFR56.102(d)]. Reported to the IRB within 5 working days after its initiation/administration. Any subsequent use of the test article must have prior review by the full IRB (21 CFR )..

Emergent and Emergency Uses of Drug or Device Emergency uses must meet ALL criteria: disease is life threatening or severely debilitating no generally acceptable alternative for treatment is available requires intervention with the investigational drug or biologic before review at a convened IRB meeting

Investigator Responsibilities independent assessment of necessity by an uninvolved physician informed consent from the participant or participant’s legally authorized representative documenting consent notify the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Evaluate the likelihood of a similar need for recurring use of the test article, Consider IRB approval, or IND or IDE for subsequent use. Repeated use of emergent use not appropriate