Nitrogen Use Efficiency as Influenced by Crop Response Index. G.V. Johnson, W.R. Raun, R.W. Mullen, R.L. Westerman and B.B. Tucker Department of Plant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
History of Predicting Yield Potential TEAM VRT Oklahoma State University TEAM VRT Oklahoma State University.
Advertisements

Effect of Long-term Cattle Manure Application on Soil Test Phosphorus, Organic Carbon and Winter Wheat Grain Yield Natasha Macnack, Peter Omara, Lawrence.
Jacob P. Vossenkemper Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University.
Plant Nitrogen Assimilation and Use Efficiency
Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is estimated to be 33% throughout the world, and can be lower in single, pre-plant applications compared with split nitrogen.
Using Adapt-N On-farm strip trials on Long Island, NY: Above: A = 93 lb N, G = 159 lb N Below: A = 132 lb N, G = 175 lb N AG AG Incorporating Local Weather.
The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Nutrient Cycling and Forest Productivity By: Eric Sucre.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Oklahoma State University Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Nitrogen Loss from Urea.
Plant sensing technology
2  Objective: Improve in-season estimate of yield for winter wheat utilizing profile soil moisture (0-80 cm) obtained from Oklahoma Mesonet data. Lahoma.
Presented By: Scott Clark SOIL 4213
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet.
Spatial Variability in Precision Agriculture What is it? What is it? – Precision n. The quality or state of being precise. Used or intended for precise.
Evaluation of Foliar UAN and Timing on Wheat Grain Yield and Protein Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, 371 Agricultural.
NITROGEN CYCLE Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK Tel: (405)
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Use of By-Plot CV’s for Refining Mid-Season Fertilizer N Rates Daryl Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Use of Alternative Concepts for Determining Preplant and Mid-Season N rates.
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet Rationale Weather is an aspect of agricultural sciences that cannot.
Global Change Impacts on Rice- Wheat Provision and the Environmental Consequences Peter Grace SKM - Australia Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse.
Development of a SBNRC Calculator for Cotton D. Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University W. Raun, J. Solie, M. Stone, R. Taylor, O. Walsh, D. Edmonds, C.
Economically Raising Nitrogen Use Efficiency By: Paul Hodgen.
Enhancing Sorghum Yield and Profitability through Sensor Based N Management Dave Mengel and Drew Tucker Department of Agronomy K-State.
Automated Calibration Stamp Technology for Improved In-Season Nitrogen Fertilization K. Freeman, R. Teal, C. Mack, K. Martin, B. Arnall, K. Desta, J. Solie,
 Part of › Amino Acids: Building blocks of proteins › Enzymes: responsible for all biological process › Nucleic Acids › Cholorphyll  Needed for Carbohydrate.
Effect of soil compaction and fertilization practise on N 2 O emission and CH 4 oxidation Sissel Hansen 1 Marina A. Bleken 2, Bishal K. Sitaula 3, 1)Bioforsk.
Soil-Plant Inorganic Nitrogen Buffering W.R. Raun, G.V. Johnson, H. Sembiring, E.V. Lukina, J.M. LaRuffa, W.E. Thomason, S.B. Phillips, J.B. Solie, M.L.
Organic Waste N and P Dynamics Under Dryland Agroecosystems Jim Ippolito and Ken Barbarick USDA-ARS-NWISRL & Colorado State University.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Fertilizer Management
THE EFFECT OF REDUCED TILLAGE METHODS ON PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOIL AND ORGANIC MATTER CYCLES Huzsvai László – Rátonyi Tamás – Megyes Attila-
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
Effect of Preplant/Early Irrigation, Nitrogen and Population Rate on Winter Wheat Grain Yield Plant and Soil Sciences Department, Oklahoma State University,
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Micronutrients Gordon Johnson, Bill Raun, Hailin Zhang Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Gordon Johnson, Bill Raun, Hailin.
Nitrogen sources for Topdressing Using Variable Nitrogen Fertilizers.
Economics of Variable Applied Nitrogen Fertilizer By Brad W Collier.
Influence of Late-Season Foliar Nitrogen Applications on Grain Protein in Winter Wheat C.W. Woolfolk, W.R. Raun, G.V. Johnson E.G. Krenzer, and W.E. Thomason.
Management Practices and Nitrogen Availability for Organic Vegetables Grace (Guihua) Chen University of Maryland, Dept. of Entomology Contact:
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
THE NITROGEN CYCLE How are my farming practices affecting the environment & long term stability?
Hero Gollany USDA-ARS Pendleton, OR NUE Conference - August 8-10, 2016.
Nitrogen sources for Topdressing Winter Wheat In Oklahoma
Fertilizer Management in No-Till Farming
Evaluation of the Yield Potential Based NFOA for Cotton
Development of a Response Index for Corn
Spatial Variability in Precision Agriculture
C. Kallenbach1. , W. Horwath1, Z. Kabir1, J. Mitchell2, D
Sensing Resolution in Corn
Nicolas Tremblay, M.Y. Bouroubi
EVOLUTION OF NITROGEN REFERENCE STRIPS
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
Evaluation of Midseason UAN Application Depth in Winter Wheat
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Sensors and Fertility Management
Concepts and Rationale for Regional Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn
History of Predicting Yield Potential
Predicting Winter Wheat Grain Yield under Grazed and Non-Grazed Production Systems Jason Lawles.
Utilizing Indicator crop N-rich strips for anticipating pre plant and side dress Nitrogen rates for maize. Rationale Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in cereal.
REVIEW.
Annual ASA Meeting, Indianapolis
Corn Algorithm Comparisons, NUE Workshop
OSU Corn Algorithm.
Relationship between mean yield, coefficient of variation, mean square error and plot size in wheat field experiments Coefficient of variation: Relative.
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Corn Algorithm Comparisons, NUE Workshop
Measurement of soil redox potential
Conventional N Management for Oklahoma
The Importance of Long-Term Trials: What Have We Learned?
Presentation transcript:

Nitrogen Use Efficiency as Influenced by Crop Response Index. G.V. Johnson, W.R. Raun, R.W. Mullen, R.L. Westerman and B.B. Tucker Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University R.A. Olson Department of Agronomy University of Nebraska G.V. Johnson, W.R. Raun, R.W. Mullen, R.L. Westerman and B.B. Tucker Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University R.A. Olson Department of Agronomy University of Nebraska

RI > 1.5 RI < 1.5 RI > 1.5 RI < 1.5 Higher NUE Lower NUE Higher NUE Lower NUE Apply more N Apply less N Apply more N Apply less N Potential for increased yield Response Index

Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency for Cereal Production  Raun and Johnson Agron. J. 91:  Worldwide NUE = 33 %  1 % change = $234,658, 462  Raun and Johnson Agron. J. 91:  Worldwide NUE = 33 %  1 % change = $234,658, 462

Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency for Cereal Production  Potential Improvements  Crop Rotations  Forage Production Systems  Hybrid or Cultivar  Conservation Tillage  NH 4 -N Source  In-Season and Foliar-Applied N  Fertigation  High Resolution Precision Management  Potential Improvements  Crop Rotations  Forage Production Systems  Hybrid or Cultivar  Conservation Tillage  NH 4 -N Source  In-Season and Foliar-Applied N  Fertigation  High Resolution Precision Management

Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency for Cereal Production  Cause of low NUE  Soil-Plant system leaks  Loss increases with excess mineral-N  Cause of low NUE  Soil-Plant system leaks  Loss increases with excess mineral-N

Leaching Denitrification NO, N 2 O Fertilizers Plant Uptake Nitrification NO 3 - NH 4 + N2N2 N2N2 + H 2 O NH 3 + OH - Harvest + OH - NH 3 Volatilization Loss of N from soil-plant system

Harvested-N 1 - Harvested-N 0 Fertilizer-N 1 X 100 = NUE

Influence of year on NUE winter wheat receiving 90 kg N/ha.

Unfertilized yield is variable over time. Unfertilized yield is variable over time. y = x C.V. = 30.4 % y = x C.V. = 30.4 % Control plot yield of winter wheat (Lahoma, OK):

Fertilized yield is variable over time. Fertilized yield is variable over time. Y = 23.95x C.V. = 20.5 % Y = 23.95x C.V. = 20.5 % Maximum yield of winter wheat (Lahoma, OK)

Are fertilized and unfertilized wheat yields related?

What is the temporal variability of fertilizer-N response?  Response Index (RI) RI = Max yield N x / yield N 0  RI = Indication of the degree to which N, external to the growing environment, is needed to support potential yield.  Response Index (RI) RI = Max yield N x / yield N 0  RI = Indication of the degree to which N, external to the growing environment, is needed to support potential yield.

Temporal variability of wheat response to N

Relationship of fertilized and non fertilized yield to R.I.

Irrigated maize and sorghum

Response Index for irrigated maize and sorghum over time.

Conclusions  NUE of wheat is usually < 70 % at low fertilizer-N rates and decreases with increasing N input.  NUE for maize and sorghum is usually < 50 %.  Supply of non-fertilizer N to crop changes greatly from year to year.  Soil moisture and temperature variability?  NUE of wheat is usually < 70 % at low fertilizer-N rates and decreases with increasing N input.  NUE for maize and sorghum is usually < 50 %.  Supply of non-fertilizer N to crop changes greatly from year to year.  Soil moisture and temperature variability?

Conclusions:  Response to fertilizer-N is influenced more by external N inputs and mineralized soil-N (N 0 yield) than by potential yield, in a given year.  Since this is found for soil that has not received fertilizer N for over 20 year, it is even more likely to occur in fields that have a history of receiving fertilizer-N each year.  Response to fertilizer-N is influenced more by external N inputs and mineralized soil-N (N 0 yield) than by potential yield, in a given year.  Since this is found for soil that has not received fertilizer N for over 20 year, it is even more likely to occur in fields that have a history of receiving fertilizer-N each year.

Conclusions  NUE may be improved by knowing the response index and avoiding excess fertilizer-N.  Identify potential yield each year.  Identify non-fertilizer N contributions.  Apply fertilizer-N in-season.  NUE may be improved by knowing the response index and avoiding excess fertilizer-N.  Identify potential yield each year.  Identify non-fertilizer N contributions.  Apply fertilizer-N in-season.