Beam-Plasma Working Group Summary Barnes, Bruhwiler, DavidTech-X Clayton,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 Halo Formation and Emittance Growth of Positron Beams in Long, Dense Plasmas Patric Muggli and the E-162 Collaboration:
Advertisements

Erdem Oz* USC E-164X,E167 Collaboration Plasma Dark Current in Self-Ionized Plasma Wake Field Accelerators
Design and Experimental Considerations for Multi-stage Laser Driven Particle Accelerator at 1μm Driving Wavelength Y.Y. Lin( 林元堯), A.C. Chiang (蔣安忠), Y.C.
The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
Particle acceleration in plasma By Prof. C. S. Liu Department of Physics, University of Maryland in collaboration with V. K. Tripathi, S. H. Chen, Y. Kuramitsu,
Radiation Physics | ELBE | SRF Photo Injector for Electron- Laser Interaction LA 3 NET conference: Laser applications at accelerators, Mallorca,
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Particle-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration James Holloway University College London, London, UK PhD Supervisors: Professor Matthew wing University College.
UCLA Experiments with short single e-bunch using preformed and beam ionized plasma Retain ability to run short single bunch with pre-ionized plasma Ken.
Energy Loss of Very High Charge Beams in Plasma: Theory J. Rosenzweig, N. Barov, M. Thompson, R. Yoder UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy ICFA Workshop,
Chengkun Huang | Compass meeting 2008 Chengkun Huang, I. Blumenfeld, C. E. Clayton, F.-J. Decker, M. J. Hogan, R. Ischebeck, R. Iverson, C. Joshi, T. Katsouleas,
PWFA WG > 25 participants. 5 presentations: A. Krasnykh, A Proposal for Study of Structure and Dynamics of Energy/Matter Based on Production of γ-Ray.
Erik Adli CLIC Workshop 2015, CERN, CH 1 Erik Adli Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway Input from: Steffen Doebert, Wilfried Farabolini,
A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.
1 Work supported by Department of Energy contracts DE-AC02-76SF00515 (SLAC), DE-FG03-92ER40745, DE-FG03-98DP00211, DE- FG03-92ER40727, DE-AC-0376SF0098,
E. Bong, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Overview E. Bong LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
David H. Dowell Injector Physics/Diagnostics/Gun&L0 RF April 29-30, 2004 Injector Physics / Diagnostics / Gun & L0 Linac.
2 Lasers: Centimeters instead of Kilometers ? If we take a Petawatt laser pulse, I=10 21 W/cm 2 then the electric field is as high as E=10 14 eV/m=100.
The AWAKE Project at CERN and its Connections to CTF3 Edda Gschwendtner, CERN.
Chan Joshi University of California Los Angeles Fermi national Accelerator Lab May The Future of Plasma Wakefield Acceleration.
FACET and beam-driven e-/e+ collider concepts Chengkun Huang (UCLA/LANL) and members of FACET collaboration SciDAC COMPASS all hands meeting 2009 LA-UR.
W.B.Mori UCLA Orion Center: Computer Simulation. Simulation component of the ORION Center Just as the ORION facility is a resource for the ORION Center,
High Energy Density Physics with Ultra- Relativistic Beams T. Katsouleas University of Southern California Ron Davidson Symposium June 12, 2007 Celebrating.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
FNAL, May 10, Introduction for Beam Diagnostics Laboratory Main Mission: R&D on charged particle beam diagnostics for e + /e - linear colliders.
S2E in LCLS Linac M. Borland, Lyncean Technologies, P. Emma, C. Limborg, SLAC.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Recent Results on the Plasma Wakefield Acceleration at FACET E 200 Collaboration 1)Beam loading due to distributed injection of charge in the wake reduces.
Transverse Profiling of an Intense FEL X-Ray Beam Using a Probe Electron Beam Patrick Krejcik SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Beam Plasma Physics Experiments at ORION Mark Hogan SLAC 2 nd ORION Workshop February 18-20, 2003.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Beam Driven Plasma-Wakefield Linear Collider: PWFA-LC J.P Delahaye / SLAC On behalf of J.P. E. Adli, S.J. Gessner, M.J. Hogan, T.O. Raubenheimer (SLAC),
1 Franz-Josef Decker 1 Multi-Bunch Operation for LCLS Franz-Josef Decker March 17, Definitions and goals multi-bunch within.
Realizing an Ion Channel Laser at FACET-II Mike Litos Oct. 15, 2015 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory FACET-II Science Opportunities Workshop.
James Holloway University College London, London, UK PhD Supervisors: Professor Matthew Wing University College London, London, UK Professor Peter Norreys.
Electron Sources for ERLs – Requirements and First Ideas Andrew Burrill FLS 2012 “The workshop is intended to discuss technologies appropriate for a next.
Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 1 Erik Adli Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway Input from: Steffen Doebert, Wilfried Farabolini,
김 귀년 CHEP, KNU Accelerator Activities in Korea for ILC.
First Electrons at the Fermilab superconducting test accelerator Elvin Harms Asian Linear Collider Workshop 2015, Tsukuba 24 April 2015.
Prospects for generating high brightness and low energy spread electron beams through self-injection schemes Xinlu Xu*, Fei Li, Peicheng Yu, Wei Lu, Warren.
Summary WG5 R&D for Innovative Accelerators Greg LeBlanc.
Ionization Injection E. Öz Max Planck Institute Für Physik.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
SABER Longitudinal Tracking Studies P. Emma, K. Bane Mar. 1, 2006
V.N. Litvinenko (SBU) C. Joshi, W. Mori (UCLA)
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Status of the MAX IV Short Pulse Facility
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Test of Optical Stochastic Cooling in CESR
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Test of Notch Collimator - December 2005
Proton driven plasma accelertion
WG2 Summary: Diagnostics, measurements, and commissioning
E-164 E-162 Collaboration: and E-164+X:
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
Status of FEL Physics Research Worldwide  Claudio Pellegrini, UCLA April 23, 2002 Review of Basic FEL physical properties and definition of important.
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
Enhanced Self-Amplified Spontaneous Emission
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Presentation transcript:

Beam-Plasma Working Group Summary Barnes, Bruhwiler, DavidTech-X Clayton, Dimitrov, DimitreTech-X Esarey, fubiani, Hogan, Joshi, Chan Katsouleas, Muggli, OConnell, Oz, Patrick, Walz, Principal participants: Prepared by C. O’Connell and C. Barnes Presented by T. Katsouleas

9:20-9:45 "Particle-in-cell simulations of tunneling ionization effects in plasma- based accelerators” D. Bruhwiler 9:45-10:10 "Parameter Studies of Tunneling Ionization Effects in E- 164 with Cs and Li”, D. Dimitrov 10:35-11:00 “Recent non-linear beam loading studies”, Mori 11:15-12:15 Joint w/ Plasma Astro 1:15-2:15 Joint w/ Plasma Astro 2:30- 3:00 “Discussion of Proposed Plasma Experiments,” Hogan 3:00 Open forum for new experiments 4:15 Joint w/ Sources -- Gwenel and Jamie Beam-Plasma Schedule Wednesday 2/19/03 9:00-9:20 Organizational meeting: Talk sign-ups

Beam-Plasma cont’d Open forum for new experiments Requirements for Beam-ionized plasmas and wakes Brainstorm 1: plasma astrophysics expts (joint?) Brainstorm 2: prioritized issues for plasma accelerators Brainstorm 3: beam physics opportunities Brainstorm 4: Real-time modeling ideas

Proposed ORION Experiments Illustrate Flexibility of ORION Facility: Workshop Goal: Augment this list

Priority for the Plasma-Beam Physics Workgroup: High Quality Acceleration with Narrow  E to be achieved through Drive and Witness Bunches Critical Parameters: Drive: 1nC Witness: 0.2 ps with.1 nC (light beam loading but narrow width limits  E) OR 0.4 ps with.3 nC (beam loading allowing for monoenergetic gain) Questions: * Given the beam optics what will the witness beam look like -  z, etc? * We can tolerate high emittance (x10). What charge and bunch length can we get? For the 60 MeV witness: * Can we compress the bunch in the bypass line by factors of 5-10? * Phase slippage an issue for the 60 MeV beam (needs detailed modeling) * Will the kicker for the 2nd bunch extraction be fast enough (20 ns)? * Beam jitter for the witness bunch such that both bunches align -   r * What is the timing resolution for the low energy bunch? * Can the two energies be focused to the plasma entrance? * Are there better ways to make a witness bunch out of the single pulse via the rf gun? * Concern that NLCTA chicane is not compatible with our requirements

Non-linear wakes allow low energy spread acceleration. Plasma Density: 5.66E15 cm-3 1st Beam: Nb=3.0E10, Sigma_z=100µ, Sigma_r=25µ, E=28.5Gev 2nd beam: Nb=1.0E10, Sigma_z=20µ, Sigma_r=25µ, E=28.5Gev 2nd beam charge density 1st beam charge density Nonlinear wake Modeling Short Pulse PWFA Scenarios: E-164 and Afterburners – W. Mori Wake flattened

Intense drive beam can ionize gas AND excite wake 50 GeV E-164X e - drive beam is short –  r =20  m &  z =30  m, with 2x10 10 e- in the bunch Variables r & z are normalized to e =282  m –neutral Li density is n Li =1.4x10 16 cm -3, peak e- density is n e =n Li –up to 27 Li + /e - pairs are created in each cell where ionization occurs The fields are normalized to E 0 =11.4 GV/m –first peak in E z is greater than E 0, which indicates a nonlinear response –the wake then rapidly loses coherence D. Bruhwiler

OOPIC Simulations of Tunneling Ionization Effects in E-164 TI of Cs (left column) vs Preionized Only (right column)  z =100  m;  r =20  m; N beam =1x10 10 ; n e =5x10 15 cm -3 ; n Cs =1.25x10 17 cm -3 Ez surface plot Preionized plasma electrons Ez surface plot Preionized plasma electrons

ExperimentDiscussion Basic Physics Heavy Beam LoadingCan give lower energy spread of accelerated particles (via wake flattening) and gives high efficiency. Beam ionized SourcesChoose parameters such that the incoming beam can ionize the plasma source with tunnel ionization: AstrophysicsWeibel/Filamentation Experiment - Basic plasma physics, produces magnetic turbulence leading to synchrotron radiation. A possible model for GRBs. Needs as much charge and as long a pulse as possible & LARGE (~mm) spot sizes. Levels: 1.) 60 MeV: Detect Filaments on screen 2.) 350 MeV: Detect Synch. Rad. 3.) 350 MeV + variable witness: Detect B field Lifetime New ORION Experiments: BB

Integrating Code into ORIONFaster Couple Codes: PARMELA for the rf Gun ELEGANT for the beamline QUICKPIC, OSIRIS, OOPIC for plasma GENESIS for FEL interactions Couplers: SDDS utilities MATLAB Unix scripts Management: code czar?, SLAC IT, SLC Control System, etc. Possible local cluster of ~16 nodes or access to remote clusters (QUICKPIC from 2 hours to 5 minutes). Dual use clusters. Gigabit Connections to cluster from data collection computers Real Time Modeling: Discussed possibility of integrating software and hardware into ORION facility such that users have capability to model gun to detector.