WELCOME TO THE CASA/GAL NETWORK VOCA WEBINAR The webinar will start shortly. We kindly ask that you keep your phones and wireless headsets on mute unless.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends in Number of High School Graduates: National
Advertisements

PARTISAN CONTROL AND STATE DECISIONS ABOUT OBAMACARE FULL GO STATES (n = 22) Arkansas Michigan CALIFORNIA MINNESOTA COLORADO NEVADA CONNECTICUT New Hampshire.
Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2004 CONFERENCE, MOBILE, AL OCTOBER 09-11, 2004 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
Washington Tuition and Fee Report House Higher Education Committee January 21, 2004.
TOTAL CASES FILED IN MAINE PER 1,000 POPULATION CALENDAR YEARS FILINGS PER 1,000 POPULATION This chart shows bankruptcy filings relative to.
5 Year Total LIHEAP Block Grant Allotment (FY ) While LIHEAP is intended to assist low-income families with their year-round home energy needs,
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
U.S. Civil War Map On a current map of the U.S. identify and label the Union States, the Confederate States, and U.S. territories. Create a map key and.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. Title I - Part A In a nutshell….a primer.
Chart 6. 12: Impact of Community Hospitals on U. S
Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2003 CONFERENCE, BURLINGTON, VT SEPTEMBER 3-5, 2003 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
Selected Data for West Virginia Higher Education J. Michael Mullen WVFAA November 6, 2003.
This chart compares the percentage of cases filed in Maine under chapter 13 with the national average between 1999 and As a percent of total filings,
Fasten your seatbelts we’re off on a cross country road trip!
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
Judicial Circuits. If You Live In This State This Is Your Judicial Circuit Alabama11th Circuit Alaska 9th Circuit Arkansas 8th Circuit Arizona 9th Circuit.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
The United States.
Figure 1. Growth of HSA/HDHP Enrollment from March 2005 to January Source: 2010 AHIP HSA/HDHP Census.
It’s been 18 years… 1996 Purchasing Power compared to cents to the dollar. What $1.00 could buy in 1996 now costs $1.48.
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
 As a group, we thought it be interesting to see how many of our peers drop out of school.  Since in the United States education is so important, we.
CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
Hawaii Alaska (not to scale) Alaska GeoCurrents Customizable Base Map text.
US MAP TEST Practice
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
1 of (F)DEC2015 IMCOM integrates and delivers base support to enable readiness for a self-reliant and globally-responsive All Volunteer Army WE.
TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
The United States is a system that can be broken into 5 major parts or regions.
Can you locate all 50 states? Grade 4 Mrs. Kuntz.
1st Hour2nd Hour3rd Hour Day #1 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5.
NEADA Winter Meeting February 28, 2017.
2012 IFTA / IRP MANAGERS’AND LAW ENFORCEMENT WORKSHOP
The United States Song Wee Sing America.
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
The United States.
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Physicians per 1,000 Persons
USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1992 – 2012
Name the State Flags Your group are to identify which state the flag belongs to and sign correctly to earn a point.
GLD Org Chart February 2008.
Membership Update July 13, 2016.
2008 presidential election
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1987 – 2007
State Adoption of Uniform State Test
The States How many states are in the United States?
State Adoption of NMLS ESB
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
Fifty nifty United States
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
Fifty Nifty United States
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Regions of the United States
DO NOW: TAKE OUT ANY FORMS OR PAPERS YOU NEED TO TURN IN
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Introductions by Region…
San Francisco, California October 10, 2005
Presidential Electoral College Map
2008 presidential election
WASHINGTON MAINE MONTANA VERMONT NORTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA MICHIGAN
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
The estimated number of adults and adolescents living with AIDS in each region of the 50 states and the District of Columbia increased from 1993 through.
CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)
Percent of adults aged 18 years and older who have obesity †
In 2006, approximately 46% of all AIDS cases among adults and adolescents were in the South, followed by the Northeast (26%), the West (16%), and the Midwest.
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA
Presentation transcript:

WELCOME TO THE CASA/GAL NETWORK VOCA WEBINAR The webinar will start shortly. We kindly ask that you keep your phones and wireless headsets on mute unless speaking. Please feel free to use the chat box on your screen to send questions to National CASA or you may also us at

CASA/GAL NETWORK VOCA WEBINAR JANUARY 7, 2016

WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS SALLY WILSON ERNY, CHIEF PROGRAM OFFICER

COURTESY ANNOUNCEMENTS In order to ensure optimal call quality for all participants, we kindly ask that you keep your line on mute unless you are speaking. You are welcome to send questions at any time about VOCA funding to Presentation slides will be made available after today’s call.

AGENDA Update on FY 2016 Omnibus (Federal) VOCA Outcome Discussion of Potential State-Level Implications of FY 2016 Omnibus Outcome Other Pending Federal Level Activity with Potential Impacts on VOCA grants Discussion/Q&A – Upcoming VOCA Timelines and Strategies

FY 2016 OMNIBUS – VOCA FUNDING

VOCA DISCUSSION CAVEATS States have maximum latitude in making funding determinations based on federal guidelines. States operate on a variety of VOCA grant cycles (e.g. 12 months, 18 months, 36 months, other options) and schedules with varying funding priority areas. The federal fiscal year (one year, Oct.-Sept.) could potentially impact multi-year state VOCA grant cycles.

FEDERAL FUNDING – CRIME VICTIMS FUND Fiscal YearCVF Cap FY 2014 Enacted$745 million FY 2015 Enacted$2.36 billion FY 2016 Enacted (Omnibus) $3.042 billion -$379 million: VAWA Programs -$10 million: DOJ Auditing & Oversight = $2.65 billion estimated CVF adjusted total $2.26 billion estimated for state VOCA grants (+ 15%)

CRIME VICTIMS FUND DISTRIBUTION Remaining Balance: 1) OVC Discretionary Grants, 2) State Victim Compensation Grants, 3) State Victim Assistance Formula Grants Federal Victim Notification System Funding ($5 million) FBI Victim Witness Specialists Funding U.S. Attorneys Victim Witness Coordinators Funding Children’s Justice Act Program Funding Congress Determines Annual Crime Victims Fund Cap

STATE VOCA GRANTS (VICTIM ASSISTANCE GRANTS) DOJ determines the amount of funds available to each state. The 50 states plus DC receive a base amount of $500K each year for Victim Assistance Grants and any additional funds are distributed based on a formula determined by U.S. Census population data. The grants support direct services to crime victims and are distributed by states according to DOJ established guidelines.

STATE VOCA GRANTS (VICTIM ASSISTANCE GRANTS) States are required, under DOJ guidelines, to prioritize the following groups for Victim Assistance Grants: (1) underserved populations of victims of violent crime (2) victims of child abuse (3) victims of sexual assault (4) victims of spousal abuse

CRIME VICTIMS FUND – FY 2017 While Congress just passed the FY 2016 Omnibus, the FY 2017 appropriations process is just around the corner. The process will officially start with the release of the President’s FY 2017 Budget in February, followed by budget hearings, programmatic requests, and markups in February – May (approximately).

POTENTIAL STATE-LEVEL IMPLICATIONS

VOCA GRANT ESTIMATES It is possible to project what the FY 2016 increase would look like in terms of individual state allocations, based on the federal grant formula. Any estimates are very preliminary at this point and final numbers will not be available until DOJ releases the funds. It is still very early in implementation process for the FY 2016 funds. The most accurate and final information will come from your state VOCA administrator. National CASA will continue to make every possible effort to update you with timely data.

ESTIMATED INCREASE IN STATE VOCA GRANTS (VICTIM ASSISTANCE GRANTS) StateFY 2014FY 2015FY 2016 (Estimated) Alabama $6.97 million$29.52 million$31.04 million Alaska $1.48 million$4.90 million$5.12 million Arizona $9.37 million$40.78 million$42.37 million Arkansas $4.46 million$18.25 million$19.19 million California $51.82 million$ million$ million Colorado $7.55 million$32.55 million$33.79 million Connecticut $5.31 million$22.02 million$23.21 million Delaware $1.73 million$6.09 million$6.34 million District of Columbia $1.36 million$4.44 million$4.58 million Florida $26.68 million$ million$ million

ESTIMATED INCREASE IN STATE VOCA GRANTS (VICTIM ASSISTANCE GRANTS) StateFY 2014FY 2015FY 2016 (Estimated) Georgia$13.87 million$60.92 million$63.63 million Hawaii$2.38 million$8.99 million$9.38 million Idaho$2.65 million$10.28 million$10.69 million Illinois$17.74 million$77.58 million$81.90 million Indiana$9.29 million$39.98 million$42.0 million Iowa$4.63 million$19.09 million$20.02 million Kansas$4.37 million$17.87 million$18.78 million Kentucky$6.38 million$26.91 million$28.27 million Louisiana$6.69 million$28.32 million$29.73 million Maine$2.27 million$8.46 million$8.89 million

ESTIMATED INCREASE IN STATE VOCA GRANTS (VICTIM ASSISTANCE GRANTS) StateFY 2014FY 2015FY 2016 (Estimated) Maryland $8.43 million$36.26 million$37.96 million Massachusetts $9.46 million$40.86 million$42.79 million Michigan $13.75 million$59.80 million$63.02 million Minnesota $7.75 million$33.15 million$34.74 million Mississippi $4.50 million$18.41 million$19.39 million Missouri $8.59 million$36.78 million$38.69 million Montana $1.85 million$6.62 million$6.91 million Nebraska $3.0 million$11.76 million$12.31 million Nevada $4.23 million$17.49 million$18.13 million New Hampshire $2.27 million$8.44 million$8.85 million

ESTIMATED INCREASE IN STATE VOCA GRANTS (VICTIM ASSISTANCE GRANTS) StateFY 2014FY 2015FY 2016 (Estimated) New Jersey $12.41 million$53.99 million$56.73 million New Mexico $3.29 million$12.98 million$13.66 million New York $26.81 million$ million$ million North Carolina $13.68 million$60.01 million$62.72 million Ohio $15.99 million$69.88 million$73.60 million Oklahoma $5.65 million$23.70 million$24.83 million Oregon $5.76 million$24.26 million$25.34 million Pennsylvania $17.60 million$77.02 million$81.21 million Rhode Island $1.90 million$6.81 million$7.13 million South Carolina $6.89 million$29.42 million$30.66 million

ESTIMATED INCREASE IN STATE VOCA GRANTS (VICTIM ASSISTANCE GRANTS) StateFY 2014FY 2015FY 2016 (Estimated) South Dakota $1.63 million$5.60 million$5.84 million Tennessee $9.19 million$39.69 million$41.54 million Texas $35.91 million$ million$ million Utah $4.38 million$18.11 million$18.82 million Vermont $1.33 million$4.24 million$4.46 million Virginia $11.56 million$50.33 million$52.69 million Washington $9.83 million$42.76 million$44.55 million West Virginia $2.98 million$11.57 million$12.21 million Wisconsin $8.18 million$34.95 million$36.79 million Wyoming $1.28 million$3.99 million$4.18 million

NETWORK VOCA FUNDING According to the 2014 National CASA Annual Survey, state CASA/GAL organizations and/or local programs in 27 states reported receiving VOCA funding. Specifically, local programs and some state organizations reported receiving $16.45 million total in VOCA funds. The states with the largest grant totals (local programs or state organizations) included Texas, Georgia, Ohio, New Jersey, Virginia, and Oklahoma. The states with the largest VOCA allocations (based on the FY 2015 allocation) include California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, and Pennsylvania.

OUTREACH Initiate outreach, sooner rather than later, with your state VOCA administrator. Find ways to positively highlight strong outcomes produced by CASA/GAL programs with VOCA funds from the state. For first time applicants, be prepared with a fact-base around your current efforts and outcomes, and what outcomes you might be able to estimate with a VOCA grant. Consider opportunities to serve as a resource to the state administrator. Highlight program’s ability to collect and demonstrate data-driven outcomes. State offices and local programs should coordinate and communicate.

OTHER PENDING FEDERAL LEVEL ACTIVITY WITH POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON VOCA GRANTS

OTHER FEDERAL LEVEL VOCA ACTIVITY Proposed DOJ VOCA Rulemaking National CASA is working with Hill offices around various efforts toward finalizing the rule Crime Victims Caucus Cong. Poe - TX, Cong. Costa – CA Current VOCA Authorizing Legislation Fairness for Crime Victims Act [S – Sen. Toomey, H.R – Cong. Pitts] Potential Comprehensive VOCA Legislation

VOCA Q&A

CURRENT EVENTS AT NATIONAL CASA THE SIX-MONTH REPORTING PERIOD (JULY-DECEMBER 2015) IS NOW OPEN. THE DEADLINE IS JANUARY 22 ND AND IS A REQUIREMENT OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. CONTACT US AT

ADDITIONAL VOCA QUESTIONS CONTACT: , EXT. 304

DISCLAIMER POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS WEBINAR ARE THOSE OF THE PRESENTERS AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE OFFICIAL POSITION OR POLICIES OF OJJDP OR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.