The Observation of B 0 s – B 0 s Oscillations: a 20 Year Perspective 23 Nov 2006, Music Pier, Ocean City, NJ, photo: Tom Welsh Joseph Kroll University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon 1 B s Mixing at CDF Seminar at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Gavril Giurgiu Carnegie Mellon University August 16,
Advertisements

Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
Search for B s oscillations at D  Constraining the CKM matrix Large uncertainty Precise measurement of V td  properly constrain the CKM matrix yield.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
First CDF II Results on B s Mixing Joseph Kroll (Penn) Franco Bedeschi (INFN-Pisa) for the CDF B s Mixing Group La Jolla, CA – site of CKM2005.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
Matter-Antimatter Transformations at 3 Trillion Hertz Prof. Joseph Kroll University of Pennsylvania Fall 2006.
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
Observation of B 0 s – B 0 s Oscillations The CDF Collaboration 1 st St. Ocean City, NJ, Feb. 7, 2003, H 2 O 35 0 F Joseph Kroll University of Pennsylvania.
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
1 CDF Results on B Physics Masashi Tanaka (Argonne) The Tevatron Connection June 24th, 2005.
03/09/2008 Md. Naimuddin 1 Masses, Lifetimes and Mixings of B and D hadrons Md. Naimuddin (on behalf of CDF and D0 collaboration) Fermi National Accl.
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
B c Results from CDF II Satyajit Behari (For the CDF Collab.) Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,USA 23 rd Jul HEP2005 Europhysics Conference, Lisboa,
Max Baak1 Impact of Tag-side Interference on Measurement of sin(2  +  ) with Fully Reconstructed B 0  D (*)  Decays Max Baak NIKHEF, Amsterdam For.
Wouter Verkerke, UCSB Limits on the Lifetime Difference  of Neutral B Mesons and CP, T, and CPT Violation in B 0 B 0 mixing Wouter Verkerke (UC Santa.
Cano Ay, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, B mixing and flavor oscillations at DØ Cano Ay University Mainz for the DØ Collaboration 23 may.
February 28, 2008Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallee d'Aoste, B States at the Tevatron Matthew Jones Purdue UniversityPurdue University/CDFCDF.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
B c mass, lifetime and BR’s at CDF Masato Aoki University of Tsukuba For the CDF Collaboration International Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium BNL.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Aart Heijboer ● Observation of Bs oscilations ● Nikhef special seminar ● 01/08/07 ● slide 1 ● 03:44:44 PM Aart Heijboer University of Pennsylvania.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Sinéad M. Farrington University of Liverpool University of Edinburgh Seminar October 2006 B s Mixing at CDF 0.
Measurement of the B 0 s Oscillation Frequency: Matter-Antimatter Transformations at 3 THz Prof. Joseph Kroll University of Pennsylvania UCSD 16 May 2006.
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
Beautiful B Physics at the Tevatron IOP HEPP half day meeting Results From the Tevatron Imperial College London, 21 September 2005 Rick Jesik Imperial.
Working Group 3 Summary: V td, V ts, and Friends Jeffrey Berryhill Laurent Lellouch Mikolaj Misiak Christoph Paus CKM Workshop, UCSD March 18, 2005 K BsBs.
1 Physics at the Tevatron Lecture III Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool CERN, May 15-19th 2006.
Penn CDF B Physics Overview Joseph Kroll – Penn DOE Site Visit – 8 August 2005.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
03/19/2006 Md. Naimuddin 1 B s Mixing at the Tevatron Md. Naimuddin (on behalf of CDF and D0 collaboration) University of Delhi Recontres de Moriond 19.
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
Sergey Burdin FNAL DØ Collaboration 8/12/2005 Chicago Flavor New Bs Mixing Result from DØ.
The Observation of B 0 s – B 0 s Oscillations The CDF Collaboration 1 st St. Ocean City, NJ, Feb. 7, 2003, H 2 O 35 0 F Joseph Kroll University of Pennsylvania.
A. Drutskoy, University of Cincinnati B physics at  (5S) July 24 – 26, 2006, Moscow, Russia. on the Future of Heavy Flavor Physics ITEP Meeting B physics.
B Masses and Lifetimes at the Tevatron Satoru Uozumi University of Tsukuba Duke University.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
1 Koji Hara (KEK) For the Belle Collaboration Time Dependent CP Violation in B 0 →  +  - Decays [hep-ex/ ]
1 Heavy Flavor Physics At the Tevatron Cheng-Ju S. Lin (Fermilab ) Aspen Winter Conference Aspen, Colorado 13 February 2006.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Properties of B c Meson On behalf of DØ Collaboration Dmitri Tsybychev, SUNY at Stony Brook, PANIC05, Santa Fe, New Mexico B c is ground state of bc system.
BEACH 04J. Piedra1 Matter-Antimatter Oscillations Introduction to flavor physics Tevatron and CDF B s Oscillations Conclusion Matthew Herndon, October.
B hadrons Tevatron By Eduard De La Cruz Burelo University of Michigan On behalf of the CDF and D0 collaborations Lancaster University UK, 2-8.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
P Spring 2002 L16Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.
1 Physics at the Tevatron Lecture III Beate Heinemann University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CERN Academic Training Lectures,
2010/09/01cpv from b factories to tevatron and lhcb1 Recent B Physics Results from CDF Tomonobu Tomura (University of Tsukuba)
7/7/06Jason Rieger BEACH 2006 Rare B Decays at the Tevatron Jason Rieger, Indiana University On behalf of the DØ and CDF collaborations BEACH 2006.
Semi-Leptonic B s Mixing at DØ Meghan Anzelc Northwestern University On Behalf of the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006.
B s Mixing Results for Semileptonic Decays at CDF Vivek Tiwari Carnegie Mellon University on behalf of the CDF Collaboration.
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
B States at the Tevatron
Martin Heck, for the CDF II collaboration
If not the Standard Model, What?
B mixing and lifetimes at the Tevatron
Presentation transcript:

The Observation of B 0 s – B 0 s Oscillations: a 20 Year Perspective 23 Nov 2006, Music Pier, Ocean City, NJ, photo: Tom Welsh Joseph Kroll University of Pennsylvania CKM 2006 Nagoya Dec 2006

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM I only show published resultsReferences highlighted in green If two uncertainties are shown: 1 st is statistical, 2 nd is systematic Outline Reminder of the importance of measuring  m d,s Measurements of time integrated mixing probability  Measurements of  m d Measurements of  m s

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Our Story Begins 20 Years Ago UA1 1986: Evidence for B 0 & B 0 s mixing From the Abstract: “Combined with the null result from searches for B 0 $ B 0 oscillations at e + e - colliders, our results are consistent with with transitions in the B 0 s system as favoured theoretically” C. Albajar et al., Phys. Lett. B 186, 247 (1987) B 0 s not yet directly observed B mixing probability: H.-G. Moser, “Dimuon Production at the CERN p-pbar Collider, RWTH Aachen, PITHA (1987)

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Two-State Quantum Mechanical System Common decay modes ! 2-state QM system Eigenstates of 2-state system (neglecting CP violation) “Light” (CP-even) “Heavy” (CP-odd) mass & width Antiparticle exists at time t! Start (t=0) with particle

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM “If there is any place where we have a chance to test the main principles of quantum mechanics in the purest way – does the superposition of amplitudes work or doesn’t it – this is it.” comment concerning K 0 ’s R. P. Feynman in Lectures on Physics Vol. III

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Importance of Neutral B Meson Oscillations Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix weak mass fundamental parameters that must be measured Oscillation frequencies (  m d,  m s ) determine poorly known V td, V ts |V td | & |V td /V ts | measure one side of Unitary Triangle New particles in loops alter expectations  test Standard EWK Model

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Theoretical uncertainties reduced in ratio: All factors well known except from Lattice QCD calculations (Okamoto, hep-lat/ ) Limits precision on V td, V ts to ~ 10% PDG 2006 ~ 4%

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Some History Important prehistory: 1983: long B hadron lifetime 2006 APS Panofsky Prize 1986: 1 st evidence of B mixing from UA1 C. Albajar et al., PLB, 186, 247 (1987) 1987: Definitive observation of B 0 mixing by ARGUS - indicates UA1 must be B s, heavy top (>50 GeV) confirmed by CLEO 1990’s: LEP, SLC, Tevatron - time-integrated meas. establishes B s mixes (maximally) - measure time-dependent B 0 oscillations - lower limits on B s oscillation frequency 2000: B factories improve precision of B 0 oscillation frequency 2006: Tevatron discovers B s oscillations - two-sided 90% CL limit by DØ - 1 st measurement of oscillation frequency by CDF - definitive observation of oscillation signal by CDF H. Albrecht et al., PLB, 192, 245 (1987) V. M. Abazov et al., PRL, 97, (2006) A. Abulencia et al., PRL, 97, (2006) & PRL, 97, (2006) M. Artuso et al., PRL, 62, 2233 (1989) too many references to list individually Belle: K. Abe et al., PRD 71, (2005)Babar: B. Aubert et al., PRD 73, (2006)

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM : B Hadron Lifetime Measurement 2006 Panofsky Prize: Bill Ford, John Jaros, Nigel Lockyer MAC: E. Fernandez et al., PRL (1983) MarkII: N. Lockyer et al., PRL (1983) Signed impact parameter (no Silicon) c sample b sample background e,  thrust axis 500  m 100  m SLC & SLD:  xy = 3.5  m  Z = 17  m PEPII

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Methods to Measure  m Time Integrated (assuming  = 0) Measure probability B decays as B: Mixing first established with time integrated quantities Time Dependent (required for  m À  ) Measure probability B decays as B as a function of proper decay time t  m = oscillation frequency (LEP, LHC, SLC, Tevatron)

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM First Signature for B Mixing: Like-Charge Leptons Based on semileptonic B decay: Account for: Coherentincoherent

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM UA1: 1 st Evidence for B Mixing C. Albajar et al., Phys. Lett. B 186, 247 (1987) Measured: Expected: for no mixing, but b ! c ! l etc. Determined: no mixing disfavored at 2.9  Combination of B 0 & B 0 s mixing

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM ARGUS: Observation of B 0 Oscillations H. Albrecht et al., PLB, 192, 245 (1987) 1 fully reconstructed event with two B 0 ’s (two  + ) Measured  d using r from - dileptons (4.0  ) - lepton+B 0 ’s (3.0  ) important uncertainty: B 0 to B + ratio

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Early 90’s: B 0 s Mixing Established Z-pole, hadron colliders R. Akers et al., ZfP, C60, 199 (1993) Example: OPAL Extracted: Data favor maximal  s B s mixing “discovered” +  d from CLEO Fraction of B s mesons produced B s mixing probability

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM : First Direct Evidence of B s Signal Well known background poorly known background (small) P. Abreu et al. (Delphi) Phys. Lett. B 289, 199 (1992) also: D. Buskulic et al. (Aleph) Phys. Lett. B 294, 145 (1992) P. D. Acton et al. (Opal) Phys. Lett. B 295, 357 (1992) Sample: 270 K hadronic Z

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Time Dependent Measurement of  m d Requires 3 pieces of information per event –Flavor of B at production –Flavor of B at decay –Proper decay time of B Flavor of B at production – several techniques “opposite-side” use other B hadron in event: leptons, jet-charge, kaons “ same-side” use associated particles produced in fragmentation Flavor of B at decay –requires signal (B 0 ) fraction –inclusive (reconstruct secondary vertex, use “jet-charge”) –partial (lepton, charm) –semi-exclusive or exclusive (lepton+charm, hadronic) Proper decay time –resolution depends on method used to reconstruct B decay

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM ALEPH: 1 st Time Dependent Measurement R. Akers et al., ZfP, C60, 199 (1993) w. lepton tag from “other” B Experimental Effects perfect proper time effects prod. flavor mistag, backgnd Measured Asymmetry D 0 Decay Length (cm) D

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM State of the Art:  m d Belle: K. Abe et al., PRD 71, (2005) Babar: B. Aubert et al., PRD 73, (2006) Belle: B 0 lifetime BaBar:  m d

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM  m d is “easy”: B 0 oscillates once every 8 decay times  m s is a different story…

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM How Do We Look for “Fast” Oscillation? Measure asymmetry A as a function of proper decay time t “unmixed”: particle decays as particle For a fixed value of  m s, data should yield Amplitude “A” is true value of  m s Amplitude “A” is 0 otherwise “mixed”: particle decays as antiparticle Units: [  m] = ~ ps -1, ~ =1 then  m in ps -1. Multiply by £ to convert to eV Amplitude method: H-G. Moser, A. Roussarie, NIM A384 p. 491 (1997)

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Start 2006: Published Results on  m s Results from LEP, SLD, CDF I  m s > 14.4 ps -1 95% CL source: Frequency  m s (ps -1 ) 15  m s = 15 ps -1 Amplitude 1 0 >3.4 cycles per lifetime Average 0.48 § 0.43

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Ingredients in Measuring B s Oscillations opposite-side K – jet charge Decay mode tags b flavor at decay 2 nd B tags production flavor Dilution D = 1 – 2w w = mistag probability  = efficiency  D 2 = effective tagging power Proper decay time from displacement (L) and momentum (p)

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Aleph: Golden Event D. Buskulic et al., PLB (1993) Bonus: Same-side K + Opp.-side e - Produced as This paper reported the 1 st precise measurement of m(B s )

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Key Experimental Issues Uncertainty on Amplitude Signal size Signal to Background Proper time Resolution Production flavor Tag performance Full reconstruction critical a large  m s For limit on  m s must know S/B, D,  t

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Example of e + e - Analysis: SLD Electron beam polarization Provided unique flavor tag Inclusive vertexing method exploiting unique CCD detector K. Abe et al., PRD 67, (2003) Limits

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Highlights of Tevatron Analyses Details see F. Bedeschi (CDF) & G. Weber (DØ) in WG3

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM The Challenge CDF: Run Event 1859

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM DØ Semi-muonic Signals & Lifetime Oscillation analysis Lifetime Measurement Signal: 26,700most precise single measurement Signal: 5,176 V. M. Abazov et al., PRL (2006)

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM CDF: Semileptonic Signals Total signal: 61500

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Semileptonics: Correction for Missing Momentum Reconstructed quantity Correction Factor (MC)Decay Time Reconstructed momentum fraction proper decay time (ps) T = 2  /  m s resolution (fs)

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM CDF Fully Reconstructed Signal Cleanest decay sequence Also use 6 body modes: Also partially reconstructed decays: Total hadronic signal 8700

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Decay Time Resolution: Hadronic Decays = 86 £ s ¼ period for  m s = 18 ps -1 Oscillation period for  m s = 18 ps -1 Maximize sensitivity: use candidate specific decay time resolution Superior decay time resolution gives CDF sensitivity at much larger values of  m s than previous experiments

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Same Side Flavor Tags Particle id very important CDF TOF critical (dE/dx too) Charge of K tags flavor of B s at production So far only used by CDF Most powerful flavor tag:  D 2 = 4-5% Opposite-side tags: CDF:  D 2 = 1.8% DØ:  D 2 = 2.5% A. Ali, F. Barreiro ZfP C (1986); M. Gronau, A. Nippe, J.L. Rosner, PRD (1993); M. Gronau, J.L. Rosner PRD (1994)

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM March 2006: Result DØ Collaboration V. M. Abazov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 97, (2006)

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM DØ Result (Continued) 17 <  m s < 21 ps 90% CL 1 st reported direct experimental upper bound V. M. Abazov et al., PRL (2006) Probability “Signal” is random fluctuation is 5%

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM April 2006: Result from the CDF Collaboration Probability that random fluctuations mimic this signal is 0.2% (3  ) Assuming signal hypothesis: measure  m s A. Abulencia et al., PRL (2006) Next goal was to observe signal with > 5  significance likelihood ratio

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Resulting Improved Analysis A/  A = 6.1 Sensitivity 31.3 ps -1 Hadronic & semileptonic decays combined A. Abulencia et al., PRL (2006) published on-line on 12 Dec 2006

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Measured Value of  m s - log(Likelihood) Hypothesis of A=1 compared to A=0

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Significance: Probability of Fluctuation Probability of random fluctuation determined from data Probability = 8 £ 10  8  (5.4  ) Have exceeded standard threshold to claim observation 28 of 350 million random trials have L <

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Asymmetry (Oscillations) in Time Domain Period 0.35 ps Aside: for B 0 Period = 12.6 ps

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Summary of CDF Results on B 0 s Mixing Observation of B s Oscillations and precise measurement of  m s Precision: 0.7% Probability random fluctuation mimics signal: 8 £ Most precise measurement of |V td /V ts | ( 2.83 THz, eV) A. Abulencia et al., PRL (2006)

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Why CDF? Tevatron delivered required luminosity “Deadtime-less” 3-level trigger system with great flexibility –First two levels have pipelines to reduce deadtime –Silicon Vertex Tracker: trigger on displaced tracks at 2 nd level Charged particle reconstruction – Drift Chamber and Silicon –excellent momentum resolution: R = 1.4m, B = 1.4T –lots of redundancy for pattern recognition in busy environment –excellent impact parameter resolution (25  m £ 25  m beam) Silicon layer on beampipe (Layer00) at 1.5cm Particle identification –specific ionization in central drift chamber (dE/dx) –Time of Flight measurement at R = 1.4 m –electron & muon identification

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Conclusions 20 year quest has come to a conclusion –B s oscillations observed –  m s precisely measured –fundamental parameters measured –rapid oscillations made it very challenging to observe Long B lifetime and significant B mixing prerequisite to observe CP violation at the B factories Next step is to look for CP violation in B s decays –expect sin2  s to be very small (few % asymmetry) –large value  unambiguous signal of new physics More exciting times ahead for flavor physics

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Backup Slides

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Time of Flight Detector (TOF) 216 Scintillator bars, 2.8 m long, 4 £ 4 cm 2 R=140 cm read out both ends with fine mesh PMT (operates in 1.4 T B field – gain down ~ 400) anticipated resolution  TOF =100 ps (limited by photostatistics) Kaon ID for B physics Measured quantities: s = distance travelled t = time of flight p = momentum Derived quantities: v = s/t m = p/  v

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Two Types of Flavor Tags Opposite side Same sideBased on fragmentation tracks or B ** + Applicable to both B 0 and B 0 s − other b not always in the acceptance − Results for B + and B 0 not applicable to B 0 s + better acceptance for frag. tracks than opp. side b Reminder: for limit on  m s must know D Produce bb pairs: find 2 nd b, determine flavor, infer flavor of 1 st b

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Types of Opposite Side Flavor Tags Lepton tags Jet charge tag Kaon tag mistags from jet from b (b) has negative (positive) charge on average low  high D high  low D Largest  D B factories Not used in present analysis TOF

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Calibrate with Large Statistics Samples of B + & B 0 Example: semileptonic signals Results:  D 2 = 1.54 § 0.05 [  m d = § (stat) § (syst)] Hadronic signals: B + (D 0  + ) = 26,000 B 0 (D -  + ) = 22,000

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Compare Performance Data and Simulation Check prediction for kaon tag on B +, B 0 Good agreement between data & MC Systematic based on comparisons K K  

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Same Side Flavor Tags Based on correlation between charge of fragmentation particle and flavor of b in B meson TOF Critical (dE/dx too)

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Kaons Produced in Vicinity of B’s Larger fraction of Kaons near B 0 s compared to B 0, B +, as expected

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Example of Candidate candidate Same-side Kaon tag Opposite-side Muon tag Zoom in on collision pt.

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Measuring Resolution in Data Use large prompt D meson sample CDF II, D. Acosta et al., PRL 91, (2003) Real prompt D + from interaction point pair with random track from interaction point Compare reconstructed decay point to interaction point

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Proper Time & Lifetime Measurement production vertex 25  m £ 25  m Decay position Decay time in B rest frame

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Determination of |V td /V ts | Previous best result: D. Mohapatra et al. (Belle Collaboration) PRL (2006) CDF

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Improvement from Neural Net Selection

15 Dec 2006J. Kroll (Penn) CKM Scans for Individual Signatures