AAE 450 Spring 20081 Brian Budzinski February 21, 2008 Aerothermal Group Contact Lifting Bodies / Pitching Moment and Shear Assistance from: Alex Woods.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stability.
Advertisements

VISCOUS CFD ANALYSIS OF GENERIC MISSILE WITH GRID FINS By Swapnil. D
Aerodynamic Modeling for the Ohio University UAV For the Quarterly Review of the NASA/FAA Joint University Program for Air Transportation Research Wednesday.
PREPARED BY: JANAK GAJJAR SD1909.  Introduction  Wind calculation  Pressure distribution on Antenna  Conclusion  References.
1 Alex Woods March 20 Aerothermodynamics Group Force Model Walkthrough.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Scott Breitengross Jan 24, 2008 Trajectory group, delta V Delta V determination.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Adam Waite January 24, 2008 Dynamics and Control Thrust Vector Control Analysis for an Air Launched Rocket.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Allen Guzik January 31, 2008 Trajectory Airplane Launch Trajectory Code and ΔV Drag Comparison Trajectory Optimization 1/5.
Research & Development  Wind Tunnel Testing –Needs to be applicable for subsonic, transonic, and supersonic velocities –Scaled down model Associated costs.
Kite Flight Dynamics Sean Ganley and Z! Eskeets Calculus 114.
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag Aerospace Engineering
LinPAC Ver Version 2.0 March LinPAC Ver Method Combined semi-empirical and potential, based on published data collected from western.
Modeling In-flight Inert Gas Distribution in a 747 Center-Wing Fuel Tank William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Aerodynamics Dane Johannessen.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Jayme Zott Aerothermodynamics Coefficient of Drag CFD update ref. on all CFD – Brian Budzinski, Chris Strauss.
Flight Simulation: Physics of Aircraft Games Fundamentals © by Jarek Francik Kingston University, London
AAE 450 Spring Brian Budzinski January 23, 2008 Aerothermal Group Contact CFD Ref. Jayme Zott and Chris Strauss.
LESSON LD04 Aerodynamics
Fundamentals of Rocket Stability It’s (not) rocket science!
Airplane Flight: X-Plane in the Classroom Four Forces Of Flight Weight Lift Drag Thrust.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Aerothermal 1 Brian Budzinski March 27, 2008 Aerothermal Group Contact Lifting Body Overview.
Aerodynamic Ground Effect: a case-study of the integration of CFD and experiments Tracie Barber & Stephen Hall University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
3 th International Symposium on Integrating CFD and Experiments in Aerodynamics U.S. Air Force Academy, CO, USA June 20-21, 2007 Integration of CFD and.
2D Airfoil Aerodynamics
Drag and Lift E80 Fluid Measurements Spring 2009.
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag.
Period 2 Question 1.
Development of Aerodynamic Forces. Overview Streamline Patterns Review Pressure Patterns Understanding how lift is Generated.
Compressor Cascade Pressure Rise Prediction
1 Chris Strauss Aerothermodynamics Semester Recap.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 18, 2003.
Team 5 Aerodynamics QDR 2 Presented By: Christian Naylor Charles Reyzer.
CE 1501 Flow Over Immersed Bodies Reading: Munson, et al., Chapter 9.
DLR Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology 1 Simulation of Missiles with Grid Fins using an Unstructured Navier-Stokes solver coupled to a Semi-Experimental.
1 Alex Woods 2/6/08 Aerothermodynamics Group Cp and Cd Models.
1 Alex Woods February 21st Aerothermodynamics Group Aerodynamic Forces Code.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Trajectory Code Validation Slides 04/12/08.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Aerothermal 1 Brian Budzinski March 6, 2008 Aerothermal Group Contact History of the Drag Model Assistance from: Jayme Zott & Alex.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Numerical Simulation of the Aerodynamics of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines under.
AAE 450 Spring Brian Budzinski February 7, 2008 Aerothermal Group Contact Lifting Bodies/Lift and Drag Curves.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Jayme Zott Aerothermodynamics Coefficient of Drag vs. AOA CFD update.
Beard & McLain, “Small Unmanned Aircraft,” Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 4: Slide 1 Chapter 4 Forces and Moments.
1 Alex Woods March 6 Aerothermodynamics Group Force Results for Current Models.
LESSON LD04 Aerodynamics
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 6
Purdue Aeroelasticity
From: Flight Dynamics and Simulation of Laser Propelled Lightcraft
Stephan Shurn 28 February 2008 Propulsion Thrust Vector Control
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 6 – Multi-DOF systems
Stability
Jayme Zott Aerothermodynamics Aerodynamic Loads Special thanks to Alex Woods, CJ Hiu and the entire trajectory group AAE 450 Spring 2008.
Chris Strauss Aerothermodynamics- CFD Drag Standard Deviation/CMARC Update (Method by Chris Strauss, credit for results and code to Brian Budzinski.
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 27, 2006
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
LESSON LD04 Aerodynamics
Jeff Stuart 1/31/2008 Dynamics and Control Simplified Rigid Body Equations of Motion AAE 450 Spring 2008.
AAE 450: Aero-thermodynamics
Jayme Zott Aerothermodynamics Coefficient of Drag
Alex Woods January 24th Aerodynamics Determination and Influences of Center of Pressure AAE 450 Spring 2008.
Aerodynamic Stability of Finned Rockets
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lectures 10 and 11
Rocket Stability Practice Problems LabRat Scientific © in 20 in
LESSON LD04 Aerodynamics
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 10
Jesii Doyle 2/28/2008 Internal Structures, Inter-Stage Skirts, Shear Stress Calculation, CAD Final Skirt Design AAE 450 Spring 2008.
Jayme Zott Aerothermodynamics Aerodynamic Loads Special thanks to Alex Woods, CJ Hiu and the entire trajectory group AAE 450 Spring 2008.
Dynamics & Controls PDR 2
Presentation transcript:

AAE 450 Spring Brian Budzinski February 21, 2008 Aerothermal Group Contact Lifting Bodies / Pitching Moment and Shear Assistance from: Alex Woods

AAE 450 Spring Aerothermal Code: Brian Budzinski Wing Pitching Moment Coefficient Model: Air launch Initial Configuration: Horizontal (α=0°) Final Configuration: Vertical (α=90°) Assumptions: Newtonian Model Turbulent Flow Unstable Configuration Static Center of Mass Moments about Center of Mass

AAE 450 Spring Aerothermal Wing Shear Coefficient Code: Brian Budzinski Future Work: Double Check Validity of Results Further Code Integration Assumptions: Newtonian Model Turbulent Flow Shear imparted on rocket from wing is equal to the normal force acting on the wing.

AAE 450 Spring Wing Normal Force Coefficient Code: Brian Budzinski Normal force as a function of angle of attack for a delta wing configuration

AAE 450 Spring Wing Axial Force Coefficient Code: Brian Budzinski Axial force coefficient as a function of angle of attack for a delta wing configuration

AAE 450 Spring Code: Brian Budzinski Fin Pitching Moment Coefficient NOTE: Unsure about the validity of the results Assumptions: Newtonian Model Turbulent Flow Unstable Configuration Static Center of Mass Moments about Center of Mass

AAE 450 Spring Code: Brian Budzinski Assumptions: Newtonian Model Turbulent Flow Shear imparted on rocket from fins is equal to the normal force acting on the fins. NOTE: Unsure about the validity of the results Fin Shear Coefficient

AAE 450 Spring References:  (1) Hankey, Wilbur L. “Re-Entry Aerodynamics” AIAA, Washington D.C., 1988, pp  (2) AAE 450 Senior Design Class: Spring 2007, "Project Aquarius"  (3) Rhode, M.N., Engelund, W.C., and Mendenhall, M.R. “Experimental Aerodynamic Characteristics of the Pegasus Air- Launched Booster and Comparisons with Predicted and Flight Results” AIAA , June 1995 Aerothermal

AAE 450 Spring Work Outline Aerothermal Group Contact  Interface between groups  Interface within group CFD  CATIA Model  Gambit Mesh  FLUENT Lifting Bodies  Wing -C D, C L, C M, Shear  Fins -C D, C L, C M, Shear