Target Acq and Imaging Target Acq and Imaging Bright Object Constraints Bright Object Constraints COS or STIS? COS or STIS? COS Training Series III. Optimizing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CALIBRATION WRINKLES Project OBJECTIVE: Test techniques for improving echelle-mode wavelength  scales of STIS, solar-system’s premier high-res UV.
Advertisements

Return to Hubble: Servicing Mission 4 Dr. Frank Summers Space Telescope Science Institute April 2, 2009.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA COS Science Calibration & Instrument Status TIPS 20 Nov 2003 Last COS TIPS Aug 2003.
Post-SM4 Sensitivity Calibration of the STIS Echelle Modes Azalee Bostroem With help from: Ralph Bohlin, Alessandra Aloisi, Charles Proffitt, Kenneth Hart,
The Next UV Spectrograph for the Hubble Space Telescope Stéphane Béland – ASTR-5550 – April 13, 2009.
November 13, 2003COS Preship Review1 Resolution Specification Definition of resolution –In all cases the resolution is defined as , where  is the FWHM.
Initial Alignment Check / Calibration in Vacuum Dennis Ebbets With substantial contributions from Tom Delker, Erik Wilkinson, Steve Osterman, Ken Brownsberger,
- page 1 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center PACS Photometer AORs How to Prepare an Observation with HSpot: 2 Science Use.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Hubble Mission Status Review Charles D. (Tony) Keyes Last Review:
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Venus Observations HST Program Objectives v Explain Venus observing strategy. v Review areas of special concern with Venus observations and explain.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA TIPS / COS TV Update 21 December 2006 Agenda Agenda Testing Setup and Status Testing Setup.
Round Table Discussion Of Spectroscopic Processing & Products for the Scientific Legacy Nov 16, 2012HST Spec Pipeline & Legacy Products Round Table Kaiser,
Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Hubble Space Telescope James C. Green University of Colorado Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Instrument Design and Capabilities.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA COS Status FUV Detector “1-bounce design” NUV Detector HST aberration fully-corrected Calibration.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA COS TAGFLASH System Requirements Review COS Lamp Lifetime Estimates for TAGFLASH Scenarios.
Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 1 of 16 COS Science Team Meeting – STScI Status  STScI Integrated Scheduling System Development – TIME-TAG (primary science mode)
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
18 May 2006 Slide 1 of 10 STScI TAGFLASH Ground System Development Current ground system could support immediate COS launch Current ground system could.
Figure 8.Color map of the geometric correction along the dispersion axis for segment A. Figure 4. Measured distortions for all PSA positions for segment.
ST–ECF UC, Dec 01 1 NGST support at the ST-ECF Bob Fosbury
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA Hubble Mission Status Review Charles D. (Tony) Keyes Last Review: 10 June August 2003.
TIPS COS Overview - Keyes : 18 May 2000 COS Overview v CDR: April 2000 v FUV delivery: January 2001 v Environmental (Thermal-Vac): spring 2002 v Launch:
JWST Calibration Error Budget Jerry Kriss. 15 March 20072/14 JWST Flux & Wavelength Calibration Requirements SR-20: JWST shall be capable of achieving.
The Status of COS Flat Fields Tom Ake TIPS 21 August 2008.
Selection of the New COS/FUV Lifetime Position Cristina Oliveira Jan TIPS Meeting - COS/FUV Lifetime1.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA TIPS: STIS Report Paul Goudfrooij 1.Unusual Target ACQ Failures: Update & Resolution 2.Calibration.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA COS Pipeline Calibration Outline of CALCOS Processing Steps and Keywords Reference Files Associations.
1-D Flat Fields for COS G130M and G160M Tom Ake TIPS 17 June 2010.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA COS Monthly Status Review 18 January 2007.
Spectroscopy with PACS M82 PACS line imaging from the SHINING team (Contursi et al First Results workshop talk) Phil Appleton and Dario Fadda for.
MIRI Dither Patterns Christine H Chen. Dithering Goals 1.Mitigate the effect of bad pixels 2.Obtain sub-pixel sampling 3.Self-calibrate data if changing.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA COS Pipeline PDR File Structure Overview Charles D. (Tony) Keyes 7 December 2000.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA COS Monthly Status Review 18 January 2007.
TIPS COS Status: SMOV update III STScI/CU COS Team 17 September 2009.
COS Training Series II. Optimizing Observations --- David Sahnow February mm.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Status STIC 13 February 2001.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA SMOV4 Requirements Review Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Scott D. Friedman STScI 30 July 2003.
MOS Data Reduction Michael Balogh University of Durham.
1 JULIA ROMAN-DUVAL & COS/STIS TEAM AUGUST 12, 2014 MOVING COS/FUV TO LIFETIME POSITION 3 See also Poster by Proffitt et al.
Lecture 3-Building a Detector (cont’d) George K. Parks Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
25s detection of the Sy1 galaxy NGC3516 The Palermo BAT survey project Application to a sample of SDSS LINERs V. La Parola, A.Segreto, G. Cusumano, V.
Click to Change Title Here is a text box to present information in paragraph format, instead of bulleted lists. We’ve left space to the right for an image.
The Status of HST/COS and HST/STIS Cristina Oliveira 8/12/14COS and STIS Cal Workshop1 SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA.
Optimization Strategies for the NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool James Muzerolle.
HST Quarterly Review Page 1 Space Telescope Science Institute 15 October 2003 SI Status: COS STScI COS Program Activity SubprojectSTScI Activity Instrument.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA COS Monthly Status Review 24 October 2007.
ETC Block Diagram. Source Spectrum is derived from: Spectra Type –Stellar (50 stellar types) –Galaxies (elliptical, spiral) –QSO Luminosity Profile –point.
Keyes – 1 February 2000 : Slide 1 of 6 COS Monthly Status Review v OP-01 updates and revisions – STScI and IDT schedule and agenda for continuing COWG.
STIS Status TIPS, September 17, 2009 Charles Proffitt for the STIS team.
July 25th, 2000WFC3 Critical Science Review1 Performance Summary in Key Science Areas Verify that WFC3 as designed is capable of carrying out the WFC3.
COS Training Series COS Update: pre-SMOV / Cycle Tony Keyes March 2009.
Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) is a NASA infrared- wavelength astronomical space telescope launched on December 14, 2009 It’s an Earth-orbiting.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
From the NGSL to Absolute Flux Sara Heap, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Don Lindler, Sigma Space Corporation Phase 1: NGSL observations + in situ calibration.
Single Object Spectroscopy and Time Series Observations with NIRSpec
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
Observing Strategies and Constraints
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
Institute of Cosmos Sciences - University of Barcelona
JWST NIRCam Time Series Observations
COS FUV Flat Fields and Signal-to-Noise Characteristics
Diane Karakla ESAC “On Your Mark” Workshop Madrid, Sept
Instrument Introduction
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Summary Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy Jeff Valenti JWST Mission Scientist Space Telescope Science Institute.
Calibration of the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph
MIRI Observing Templates
Observational Prospect of NIREBL
Presentation transcript:

Target Acq and Imaging Target Acq and Imaging Bright Object Constraints Bright Object Constraints COS or STIS? COS or STIS? COS Training Series III. Optimizing Observations (part 2) --- Soderblom, Friedman, Keyes February mm

Today’s talks  Part 1 (Dave Soderblom): – Acquisitions with COS – Using COS/NUV for imaging  Part 2 (Scott Friedman): – Bright object constraints  Part 3 (Tony Keyes): – Comparing COS and STIS

COS or STIS? COS or STIS? COS Training Series III a.: Acquisitions and NUV Imaging --- Dave Soderblom --- (Scott Friedman, Brittany Shaw) 22 February mm

The story so far …   COS is an new ultraviolet spectrograph for HST to be installed in SM4, built by a team in Boulder (J. Green, P.I., plus Ball Aerospace)   The FUV channel is optimized for spectra of faint point sources at moderate resolution and signal-to-noise. The FUV detector is an open-faced XDL device, good for about 1100 to 1850 Å.   The NUV channel was added by NASA to provide some additional capabilities. This now includes imaging and imaging acquisitions. The NUV detector is a STIS spare MAMA, good from about 1800 to 3200 Å.   Both are used in TIME-TAG mode (also ACCUM) which includes real-time wavelength calibration.

COS Acquisitions   COS is a small-aperture instrument; acquisitions are critical for success of the observation and for data quality.   The quickest and most effective way to acquire – by far – is with an imaging acquisition.   As part of its initial design, COS flight S/W includes the means to acquire and center targets using dispersed light.

COS optical schematics

What is COS Acquiring? 1450 Å, at PSA: 95% throughput (R. Makidon)

Corrected image at MAMA

Centering for throughput Precise centering not important for throughput; leeway of 0.5 arcsec

Centering for wavelength Precise centering is critical for wavelength accuracy: One NUV resel = 3 pixels = arcsec One NUV pixel = 1/40 arcsec = arcsec Centering goal should be about 0.01 to 0.02 arcsec Note that FUV resels are 6 pixels wide = arcsec; again about 0.01 to 0.02 arcsec acquisition is desired.

Imaging acquisition steps NUV ACQ/IMAGE is recommended for most cases: Quick Accurate Minimal overhead (~2 min) to switch to a grating of choice Pt-Ne lamp exposed WCA image location implies PSA location (to be checked in SMOV) Shutter opened, target image taken (TIME-TAG) for user-selected exposure time x 4 arcsec sub-array on MAMA read out (about 150 pixels square) and saved x 9 pixel checkbox array passed over image. Pixel with most counts determined The 9 x 9 array is centered on brightest pixel, and a flux-weighted centering algorithm used to calculate target position HST moved to this pointing and a verification image is taken and saved.

Imaging acquisition examples 1. Old (inactive) G dwarf, V = 13: Exposure time for S/N = 40 is 40 sec (ETC) Total time is (2 x 40 sec) + 7 min = ~9 min 2. QSO (flat spectrum), needs 10 orbits to get FUV spectrum to S/N = 20 at 1300 Å: Target flux is 1.3 FEFU G130M; Exposure time for S/N = 40 is 4.3 sec 3. QSO (flat spectrum), needs 10 orbits to get NUV spectrum to S/N = 20 at 1850 Å: Target flux is 3.7 FEFU G185M; Exposure time for S/N = 40 is 1.5 sec FEFU = Femto-erg flux unit = 10 –15 ergs cm –2 s –1 Å –1

Imaging acquisition limits Imaging mode is very sensitive. Local count rate screening limit is 80 per pixel per sec. For flat spectrum, what flux hits this limit? PSA + MIRRORA: 2 FEFU BOA + MIRRORA: 400 FEFU PSA + MIRRORB: 30 FEFU BOA + MIRRORB: 6,000 FEFU

Dynamic range for ACQ/IMAGE

Optical performance

Dispersed-light acquisitions 1 Some targets will be too bright for an imaging acquisition, even with the BOA and MIRRORB. But if an object is safe to get a spectrum of, it can always be acquired in dispersed light. COS can acquire targets using the spectrum itself: Pt-Ne lamp is exposed to locate aperture using known offset Spiral search (ACQ/SEARCH), with SCAN-SIZE = 2, 3, 4, or 5 per side FUV acq’s use sub-arrays to avoid airglow lines STEP-SIZE is also a choice, but default (1.767) recommended Several algorithms to find source; CENTER=FLUX-WT, FLUX-WT-FLR, or BRIGHTEST Exposure time about 40 sec for 1 FEFU flat source with G130M or G160M to get the recommended S/N = Quality of centering probably 0.1 to 0.2 arcsec.

Dispersed-light acquisitions 2 After the ACQ/SEARCH, can peak-up in both directions: PEAKXD for cross-dispersion direction: TIME-TAG spectrum obtained Mean location in x-d direction computed Known offset applied Telescope moved to centroid Good to 0.03 to 0.04 arcsec. PEAKD for along-dispersion direction: Like ACQ/SEARCH, but linear Telescope moved, exposed, centroid computed Can choose 3, 5 (=DEF), 7, or 9 steps, plus STEP-SIZE Centering options as for ACQ/SEARCH Individual spectra not saved, but total counts are

Dispersed-light examples Flat-spectrum sources, same “faint QSO” that needs 10 orbits to reach S/N = 20: FUV: G130M, 1300 Å: 60 counts/sec from spectrum, 27 sec exposure NUV: G185M, 1850 Å: 23 counts/sec from source, background = 16; 117 sec needed for S/N = 40 Note that these are exposure times per dwell point, plus 20 sec overhead per point; this is what makes D-L acq’s relatively slow.

Initial pointing and sky searches COS has a very small aperture (2.5 arcsec), although the image plane “sees” slightly more of the sky than that. How much sky should be searched (ACQ/SEARCH) to ensure a good acquisition every time without unduly wasting telescope time? The quality of dead-reckoning pointings after SM4 is not yet known, but with the advent of the GSC2 coordinate system and with regular aperture location determinations, initial pointings with errors < 1 arcsec are anticipated. Our Cycle 17 recommendation is that observers use a 2x2 spiral at the start of their acquisition sequence to guarantee acquiring the target. This may be eliminated in Cycle 18.

The spiral search  Note default (and correct) STEP-SIZE = arcsec  Initial point offset by half step if SCAN-SIZE = 2 or 4.

ACQs in Phase II To carry out an imaging acquisition, use Mode=ACQ/IMAGE, Config=COS/NUV Mode=ACQ/IMAGE, Config=COS/NUV Aperture=PSA or BOA; SpecEl = MIRRORA or MIRRORB Aperture=PSA or BOA; SpecEl = MIRRORA or MIRRORB There is one Optional Parameter: STRIPE [= DEF, SHORT, MEDIUM, LONG] There is one Optional Parameter: STRIPE [= DEF, SHORT, MEDIUM, LONG] The “length” refers to wavelength. The “length” refers to wavelength. No need to specify ordinarily, DEF=MEDIUM. No need to specify ordinarily, DEF=MEDIUM. G230L is an exception. G230L is an exception. Use ETC to calculate exposure time for S/N = 40. Use ETC to calculate exposure time for S/N = 40.

ACQs in Phase II (2) To carry out an imaging search phase, use Mode=ACQ/SEARCH, Config=COS/NUV Mode=ACQ/SEARCH, Config=COS/NUV Aperture=PSA or BOA; SpecEl = MIRRORA or MIRRORB Aperture=PSA or BOA; SpecEl = MIRRORA or MIRRORB As noted, SCAN-SIZE=2 is recommended unless coordinates are believed inferior. As noted, SCAN-SIZE=2 is recommended unless coordinates are believed inferior. STEP-SIZE can be specified, but DEF is recommended as it exactly fills sky. STEP-SIZE can be specified, but DEF is recommended as it exactly fills sky. CENTER specifies the algorithm CENTER specifies the algorithm FLUX-WT is default and recommended. FLUX-WT is default and recommended. BRIGHTEST returns to brightest pixel and is not recommended. BRIGHTEST returns to brightest pixel and is not recommended. FLUX-WT-FLR subtracts the “floor” value from all points and is recommended for NUV (higher background) and is default for STEP-SIZE = 3, 4, or 5. FLUX-WT-FLR subtracts the “floor” value from all points and is recommended for NUV (higher background) and is default for STEP-SIZE = 3, 4, or 5.

ACQs in Phase II (3) To carry out a dispersed-light acquisition, use first Mode=ACQ/SEARCH, Config=COS/FUV (or NUV) Mode=ACQ/SEARCH, Config=COS/FUV (or NUV) Aperture=PSA or BOA; SpecEl = grating Aperture=PSA or BOA; SpecEl = grating Choose SCAN-SIZE and STEP-SIZE. Choose SCAN-SIZE and STEP-SIZE. CENTER specifies the algorithm; same as above. CENTER specifies the algorithm; same as above. Then use ACQ/PEAKXD to center in cross-dispersion direction Then use ACQ/PEAKXD to center in cross-dispersion direction No Optional Parameters No Optional Parameters Then use ACQ/PEAKD to center along wavelength. Then use ACQ/PEAKD to center along wavelength. NUM-POS (linear), STEP-SIZE, and CENTER as above. NUM-POS (linear), STEP-SIZE, and CENTER as above.

Extended sources (NUV)

COS Training Series III b.: Bright Object Issues --- Scott Friedman February mm

Agenda  Bright object concerns  Limit checks  Count rate limits  Bright object mitigation strategies  APT is your friend  A special bonus…if there is time - Pulse Height Distribution

Bright Object Concerns  Excessive count rates can damage any microchannel plate detector  All microchannel plate detectors on HST have bright object limits – STIS (FUV MAMA, NUV MAMA), ACS (SBC)  Both COS detectors (FUV XDL, NUV MAMA) subject to bright object limits  After SM4 there will be 5 working MCP detectors on HST  Every science target and all nearby field targets for every COS observation will have to be cleared for safety. This is a large but necessary burden for observers, PCs, and CSs.

FUV Overlight Limit Checks  HV power supply overcurrent limits – HVAI, HVBI, and AUXI monitored for magnitude and persistence – Triggered if current exceeds I max for time > t min  Global Rate Monitor – Local limit reached before global limit – Value set to limit dead-time induced non-linearity  Local Rate Check – Performed over localized area prior to each exposure

NUV Overlight Limit Checks  Bright Scene Detection – Monitors pairs of anode rows with 32 row spacing – Applicable to extended objects more than point sources  Software Global Monitor – 0.1 second sampling time fastest of all checks – Ineffective above 4  10 6 counts sec -1 due to electronics limitations  Local Rate Check – Performed over localized area prior to each exposure

CARD Count Rate Limits (Constraints and Requirements Document)  FUV Detector – 1500 counts sec -1 resel -1 local limit – No global safety limit set because local limit more restrictive > 21,000 counts sec -1 segment -1 for no data loss  NUV Detector – 4500 counts sec -1 resel -1 local limit – 1.5  10 6 counts sec -1 global limit

Count Rate Limits

Count Rate Screening Limits

Local and Global Flux Limits 1 FEFU = erg cm -2 sec -1 Å -1

Bright Object Mitigation Strategies  Use Bright Object Aperture (BOA) – Available for all modes (spectroscopy, imaging, target acquisition) – Wedge in BOA degrades resolution by factor of 3-5

Bright Object Mitigation Strategies  Use MIRRORB – Attenuates by a factor of ~25 (3.5 magnitudes) – Forms double image

Bright Object Checking in APT  Target and field objects must be checked for safety  PSA and BOA displayed on DSS image – Aperture transmissions separately correct  GALEX catalog information can be imported into APT – AIS has FUV ( p = 1524 ) and NUV bands ( p = 2297 ) – AIS has FUV ( p = 1524 Å) and NUV bands ( p = 2297 Å) – Very useful for clearing objects

APT Listing of Objects in FOV QSO with nearby field star

PSA zone

BOA zone

GALEX AIS Sky Coverage Tiles of All-Sky Imaging Survey (AIS)

GALEX All-Sky Imaging Survey  Covers only a fraction of the sky – ~60% when DR4 released next month – ~75% when complete  Areas not covered: – Galactic plane – Large and Small Magellanic Clouds

Bright Object Issues - Summary  Both COS MCP detectors are subject to damage if subject to overlight conditions  All science targets and field objects must be checked for safety  The BOA (for all observing modes) and MIRRORB (for NUV imaging only) can be used to attenuate light  Bright Object Tool in APT has many useful features – GALEX data can accurately clear objects (or not!) – ORIENT specification can be used to avoid bright field objects (but use this sparingly)

Pulse Height Distribution  A few more words…

Microchannel Plates Wiza, 1979

Microchannel Plates

Pulse Heights (FUV only)  Pulse height thresholding can be used to screen photons  Default thresholding will be determined during SMOV Threshold Modal Gain FUSE

COS or STIS? COS or STIS? COS Training Series III c.: Instrument Introduction (continued) --- Tony Keyes February mm

STIS or COS?  COS is 10-30x faster than STIS in FUV at R=20,000 for point sources; even greater advantage at faint end due to low noise and pulse-height discrimination capability  COS has quite degraded resolution for extended objects (see table below); for FUV, portions of objects closer than 1 arcsec apart will overlap; for NUV, spectrum stripes will partially overlap for objects more than 1 arcsec in spatial extent R R R source size G140L G130M G230L point " diameter " diameter " diameter " diameter " diameter

COS or STIS?  In NUV, COS M mode observing is inefficient for cases requiring large spectral coverage  In NUV, COS background rate is expected to be 4x lower than STIS, but is TBD  COS has no resolution higher than 20,000 and is a UV- only instrument  COS FUV TIME-TAG mode includes the pulse-height for superior noise rejection  STIS TIME-TAG has higher time-resolution and may be used on brighter targets  The answer depends upon your application: refer to the IHBs and use the ETCs to evaluate your targets

 Limiting Flux to achieve S/N=10 in 3600 sec exposures with uniform binning corresponding to R~20,000 (0.08 Å). COS PSA aperture used; STIS slit losses included.

 Limiting Flux to achieve S/N=10 in 3600 sec exposures with uniform binning corresponding to R~20,000 (0.12 Å). COS PSA aperture used; STIS slit losses included.