Abstract The goal of this study was to identify patterns of development of romantic relationships among females in high school, and to determine if involvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project VIABLE: Behavioral Specificity and Wording Impact on DBR Accuracy Teresa J. LeBel 1, Amy M. Briesch 1, Stephen P. Kilgus 1, T. Chris Riley-Tillman.
Advertisements

Time Series and Forecasting
Maternal Psychological Control: Links to Close Friendship and Depression in Early Adolescence Heather L. Tencer Jessica R. Meyer Felicia D. Hall University.
Adolescent Relationships as Predictors of Neural Measures of Early Adulthood Emotional Reactivity Rachel K. Narr, Lauren Cannavo, Elenda T. Hessel, Lane.
Race and Socioeconomic Differences in Health Behavior Trajectories Across the Adult Life Course ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was supported by the grant.
Correlation & Regression Chapter 15. Correlation statistical technique that is used to measure and describe a relationship between two variables (X and.
Putting Together the Pieces: Meaning Matters in Children’s Plural Comprehension Craig Van Pay, Areanna Lakowske & Jennifer Zapf.
Fall 2006 – Fundamentals of Business Statistics 1 Chapter 13 Introduction to Linear Regression and Correlation Analysis.
Clustered or Multilevel Data
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
Linear Regression and Correlation Analysis
Self-Protective Memory of Interpersonal Events Margaret Wile, Angela Neal, Christine Coyne, and Edward Lemay Department of Psychology, University of New.
Women, Minorities, and Technology Jacquelynne Eccles (PI), Pamela Davis-Kean (co-PI), and Oksana Malanchuk University of Michigan.
1 Chapter 17: Introduction to Regression. 2 Introduction to Linear Regression The Pearson correlation measures the degree to which a set of data points.
Chapter 7 Correlational Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Quantitative Research
Correlation and Linear Regression
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 13 Linear Regression and Correlation.
Correlation and Linear Regression Chapter 13 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Modeling Developmental Trajectories: A Group-based Approach
Stability of Resilience in Children of Adolescent Mothers Keri Weed University of South Carolina Aiken Deborah Keogh, and John Borkowski University of.
Katherine Little, Laura Widman, Deborah P. Welsh, Nancy Darling
Linear Regression and Correlation
Following lives from birth and through the adult years Examining the truth behind the myth of the 'the Monstrous Army on the March' Dylan.
Pubertal Timing and Tempo: Associations with Friends’ Behavior in Early and Middle Adolescence Catherine Thompson 1, Meredith Henry 2, Sylvie Mrug 2 1.
Acknowledgments: Data for this study were collected as part of the CIHR Team: GO4KIDDS: Great Outcomes for Kids Impacted by Severe Developmental Disabilities.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © The Homework Effect: Does Homework Help or Harm Students? Katherine Field EdD Candidate, Department.
Self Competence and Depressive Symptoms in Ethnic Minority Students: The Role of Ethnic Identity and School Belonging Praveena Gummadam and Laura D. Pittman.
Abstract In adult relationships, aggressive or physically abusive partners often attempt to limit their partners interactions with friends and family (Walker.
Printed by Parent-Adolescent Relationship Quality and the Development of Romantic Values Jessica K. Winkles, Joseph P. Allen University.
What is Development? Systematic changes and continuities –In the individual –Between conception and death “Womb to Tomb” Three broad domains –Physical,
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Grace White, B.S. Erika Lawrence, Ph.D University of Iowa.
Romantic Partner Selection and Relationship Quality in Adolescence: Do Parent or Early Peer Relationships Matter More? Joanna M. Chango, David E. Szwedo,
CHILDHOOD MALTREATMENT AND ADOLESCENT ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR: Romantic Relationship Quality as Moderator Susaye S. Rattigan, M.A. & Manfred H.M. van Dulmen,
Attractive Equals Smart? Perceived Intelligence as a Function of Attractiveness and Gender Abstract Method Procedure Discussion Participants were 38 men.
Can Peer Pressure Be A Good Thing? Megan M. Schad, Meredyth A. Evans, David E. Szwedo, Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia We would like to thank the.
Examining Relationships in Quantitative Research
Module 2 Research Strategies.
What is a “Launch” relationship? Definition: Individual differences in the rate of change of a target variable is predicted from individual differences.
Changing With The Seasons: Does vitamin D affect mood? Dave G. Downing & David C. R. Kerr, Ph.D. School of Psychological Science, College of Liberal Arts.
The Broader Context of Relational Aggression in Adolescent Romantic Relationships Megan M. Schad, David E. Szwedo, Amanda Hare, Jill Antonishak, Joseph.
Expecting the worst often leads to poor outcomes. This process is particularly true in close relationships, as those who are most sensitive to rejection.
Longitudinal Links to Positive Parenting among African American and Hispanic American Low-Income Mothers Laura D. Pittman INTRODUCTION Given the growing.
A Comparison of General v. Specific Measures of Achievement Goal Orientation Lisa Baranik, Kenneth Barron, Sara Finney, and Donna Sundre Motivation Research.
Transitions to Sexual Intercourse and Substance Use Among South African High School Students Lori-Ann Palen, Edward A. Smith & Linda L. Caldwell The Pennsylvania.
© 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 12 Testing for Relationships Tests of linear relationships –Correlation 2 continuous.
Four-year trends in sport participation and retention: the gender differences R.M Eime 1,2., J.T Harvey 1., M.J Charity 1,2., M.M Casey 1., H Westerbeek.
Personally Important Posttraumatic Growth as a Predictor of Self-Esteem in Adolescents Leah McDiarmid, Kanako Taku Ph.D., & Aundreah Walenski Presented.
Results  The cluster analysis resulted in a four-group solution, chosen based on maximizing the variance (53% in the present solution) accounted for relative.
Gender Differences in Buffering Stress Responses in Same-Sex Friend Dyads Sydney N. Pauling, Jenalee R. Doom, & Megan R. Gunnar Institute of Child Development,
The Role of Physical Attractiveness in Adolescent Romantic Relationships. Rebecca Furr, M.A. & Deborah Welsh, Ph.D. University of Tennessee.
Attachment and Development in Adolescent Romantic Couples’ Relationship Quality Sharon C. Risch University of Tennessee.
The Chicago Guide to Writing about Multivariate Analysis, 2 nd edition. Visualizing shapes of interaction patterns with continuous independent variables.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2008McGraw-Hill/Irwin Linear Regression and Correlation Chapter 13.
From Managing Emotions to Improving Relationships: Higher Quality Best Friendships Predicted from Earlier Emotion Regulation. Elenda T. Hessel, Megan M.
Reciprocal Relations Between Parent-Child Relationship Quality and Children's Adjustment During Early Childhood Chelsea M. Weaver, Anne M. Gill, Katelyn.
Can Pretty People Have Their Cake and Eat it Too? Positive and Negative Effects of Physical Attractiveness. Megan M. Schad, David E. Szwedo, Joanna M.
Correlation and Linear Regression
Day-to-day variability in older adults' physical activity:
Roommate Closeness Development and Pathological Personality Traits
Evaluation of a Multi-Site, Out-of-School-Time Program: Contextual, Individual, and Combined Influences on Outcomes Amy Corron, United Way of Greater Houston.
Mean of Subjectivity of Self Mean of Objectivity of Self
Religiosity and Romantic Beliefs
Sociosexuality and Perceptions of Partner Over Time
Relationships among Adolescents’ Negative Interaction Styles with Friends and Romantic Partners and Depressive Symptoms Joanna M. Chango, Erin M. Miga,
Introduction and Hypotheses
The Importance of Positive Peer Relationships in Predicting Decreases in Adolescents’ Depressive Symptoms over Time Joanna M. Chango, Erin M. Miga, & Joseph.
Linear Regression and Correlation
Presentation transcript:

Abstract The goal of this study was to identify patterns of development of romantic relationships among females in high school, and to determine if involvement with best female friendships was influenced by patterns of involvement with romantic partners. In this study, retrospective data were gathered from 102 female adolescents (M age = 18.2). Estimates of the amount of leisure time spent with best female friends and romantic partners were gathered after focusing participants on eight time periods during high school. Cluster analysis was used to classify participants based upon repeated measures of the amount of leisure time spent with romantic partners during high school. Five clusters of females with very different patterns of involvement with partners were identified. These groups of female adolescents also exhibited differing patterns of involvement with their best female friends during high school.

Introduction To understand social lives we need to study associations between levels of relationships (Hinde, 1992). As Bronfenbrenner (1988) proposed, the first task of ‘an ecology of human behavior’ is to understand linkages between levels of environmental influence. The research of Zani and colleagues (1993) and Hendry and colleagues (1993) has suggested that the transition to dating and steady romantic relationships does not uniformly change existing involvement with social networks. Despite this information, as well as studies of the average age of initiation and predictors of dating, very little information exists to describe the normative timing of the transition or individual variation in the transition to involvement in romantic relationships. In response, the goal of this study was to identify patterns of involvement in romantic relationships among females in high school, and to determine if patterns of time spent with best female friends was influenced by patterns of involvement with romantic partners.

Participants and Data Collection Procedures Participants were 102 white females who had recently graduated from high school. Seniors were recruited the last month of school at a large urban high school. The school population was socioeconomically and racially diverse. Because of evidence that individuals of different racial/ethnic backgrounds may have systematically different experiences of the transition to romantic relationships (for example, see Phinney, et al., 1990) this study was limited to white females. Overall, 37 females from this urban high school were interviewed in the summer after their senior year. The remaining 55 participants were recruited at a large urban university. Recruitment involved advertising on campus for females (19 years of age or less) that were interested in participating in a study of high school relationships. These interviews were completed at the university or at the interviewees' homes. The portion of the interview and survey described here took between 20 and 40 minutes to complete.

Measurement Retrospective data of level involvement with best female friends and romantic partners during high school were gathered by asking participants a series of questions. After focusing participants on eight periods during high school (in the fall and spring of grade 9, 10, 11, and 12), they were asked to estimate the amount of time that was spent outside of work and school (leisure time or “free-time”) with their best female friends and with their romantic partners. Participants were given a visual-analog scale ranging from 0 to 100 and asked to write numbers to indicate the time they selected. Normative and significant events (such as the start of each new school year, sports of the season, prom, activities, etc.) and general conversation about each time during high school were used to help focus participants prior to making estimates.

Results Cluster Analysis: Patterns of Involvement with Romantic Partners A k-means clustering algorithm (Hartigan, 1975) was used to classify participants based upon repeated measures of the amount of leisure time spent with romantic partners during high school. K-means clustering was used to minimize within cluster variance on criterion variables and between cluster differences, while allowing all profiles to be considered. This algorithm makes no attempt to obtain groups of similar size. The criterion variables used to identify clusters were average time spent with romantic partners in 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th grades. The mean square ratio statistic (R; Hartigan, 1975) was used to guide the selection of the appropriate number of clusters. To justify selecting a larger number of clusters, R was required to be at least 10. A 5-cluster solution was chosen over a 2-, 3-, and 4-cluster solution (R = 58.3, R = 23.7, and R = 26.6, respectively). A 6-cluster solution was also considered, and, although the value of R justified moving to 6 clusters (R = 12.0), this solution was not chosen due to small cluster sizes (3 clusters had fewer than 10 members) and no real gain in conceptual clarity.

THREE clusters had varying levels of somewhat stable involvement with romantic partners during high school (Figure 1). CLUSTER 1, LOW INVOLVEMENT: Contained 59 participants who, on average, reported spending a very little time with partners throughout high school. CLUSTER 2, MODERATE INVOLVEMENT: Contained 12 participants who spent a moderate amount of time with partners in grade 9 that remained steady throughout most of high school. CLUSTER 3, HIGH INVOLVEMENT: Contained 10 females who spent a high proportion of their leisure time with partners throughout high school. The other TWO clusters increased involvement with romantic partners between grade 9 and grade 12 (Figure 2). CLUSTER 4, EARLY INCREASING: Contained 10 participants who exhibited a sharp increase in time with romantic partners between grade 9 and grade 10 with only a slight decline thereafter. CLUSTER 5, LATE INCREASING: Contained 11 females who reported a sharp increase in time spent with romantic partners later in high school (between grade 10 and 12).

Results Involvement with Best Female Friends The next step was to determine whether these clusters also exhibited different patterns of involvement with best female friends during high school. A random effects mixed model (Bryk & Raudenbush, 1992; Littell, Milliken, Stroup, & Wolfinger, 1996; Singer, 1997) was used to examine between-cluster differences in trajectories of time spent with female friends during high school. In this model, time spent with best female friends was the criterion variable. Predictor variables included the time of measurement, a variable indicating cluster membership, and the interaction between time of measurement and cluster. Clusters were coded from one to five and time of measurement was specified as repeated within subjects. Coding guaranteed that all clusters would be contrasted with the largest cluster (low involvement). In this model, the main effect of cluster tested the difference in the average amount of time spent with best female friends in fall of grade 9 between each cluster and the low involvement cluster. The interaction effect tested the difference in the average linear rate of change in time spent with friends between each cluster and the low involvement cluster.

Females in all but one cluster spent different amounts of their leisure time with best female friends early in high school when compared to the low involvement group (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Involvement with Best Females Friends in Grade 9 In grade 9, the moderate involvement cluster spent about the same amount of time with best female friends as the low involvement cluster. In grade 9, females in the high involvement, early increasing, and late increasing clusters spent significantly more time with friends than females in the low involvement cluster. Change in Involvement with Best Female Friends from Grade 9 to Grade 12 In the low involvement cluster, time with friends slightly increased from fall of grade 9 to spring of grade 12. In contrast, the late increasing cluster greatly reduced their time with best female friends during the same period of time. Time spent with female friends within the other three clusters (moderate involvement, high involvement, and early increasing) also declined during high school, but the linear change in involvement with best female friends of these three groups did not significantly differ from the low involvement cluster.

Conclusions Among white females, five patterns of development of romantic relationships during high school exist. These include three clusters that spend almost unvarying amounts of time with romantic partners during high school (low, moderate, or high) and two clusters that increase the amount of time they spend with romantic partners during high school (increasing sharply between grade 9 and 10 or between grade 10 and 12). Females with these different patterns report that their time spent with best female friends also varied. All clusters, except the moderate involvement cluster, spend significantly more time with best female friends early in high school when compared to the low involvement cluster (about 60% to 65% compared to 48%). Excepting the low involvement cluster, all clusters reduce time with friends while increasing time with partners. Time spent with friends is reduced between 2% and 8% per year depending on the cluster. The late increasing cluster seems to trade the most time with friends for time with partners.

References Bronfenbrenner, U. (1988). Interacting systems in human development. Research paradigms: Present and future. In N. Bolger, A. Caspi, G. Downey, & M. Moorehouse (Eds.), Persons in context: Developmental processes. New York: Cambridge University Press. Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear modeling. Newbury Park. CA: Sage. Hartigan, J. (1975). Clustering algorithms. Wiley: New York. Hendry, L.B., Shucksmith, J., Love, J.G., & Glendinning, A. (1993). Young people's leisure and lifestyles. New York: Routledge. Hinde, R.A. (1992). Developmental psychology in the context of other behavioral sciences. Developmental Psychology, 28, Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W., & Wolfinger, R.D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc. Phinney, V.G., Jensen, L.C., Olsen, J.A., & Cundick, B. (1990). The relationship between early development and psychosexual behaviors in adolescent females. Adolescence, 25, Singer, J.D. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Manuscript under review by The Journal of Education and Behavioral Statistics. Zani, B. (1993). Dating and interpersonal relationships in adolescence. In S. Jackson & H. Rodriguez ‑ Tomé (Eds.), Adolescence and its social worlds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

High Involvement (n=10) Moderate Involvement (n=12) Low Involvement (n=59) th Grade10th Grade11th Grade12th Grade Mean Amount of Leisure Time Spent with Romantic Partners Clusters 1, 2, and 3 Figure 1. Trajectories of Time Spent with Romantic Partners during High School among Clusters 1, 2, and 3

th Grade10th Grade11th Grade12th Grade Mean Amount of Leisure Time Spent with Romantic Partners Late increasing (n=11) Clusters 4 and 5 Figure 2. Trajectories of Time Spent with Romantic Partners during High School among Clusters 4 and 5 Early increasing (n=10)

Mean Amount of Leisure Time Spent with Best Female Friends High Involvement (n=10); slope = Moderate Involvement (n=12); slope = Low Involvement (n=59); slope = 0.36 Clusters 1, 2, and 3 Figure 3. Trajectories of Time Spent with Best Female Friends during High School among Clusters 1, 2, and 3

th Fall 9th Spring 10th Fall 10th Spring 11th Fall 11th Spring 12th Fall 12th Spring Mean Amount of Leisure Time Spent with Best Female Friends Early increasing (n=10); slope = Late increasing (n=11); slope = Clusters 4 and 5 Figure 4. Trajectories of Time Spent with Best Female Friends during High School among Clusters 4 and 5