Existing Non-tidal Monitoring Network. Existing Non-tidal Monitoring Network classified according to size of watershed and predominant land use upstream.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S trategic S ubwatershed I dentification P rocess Illinois Department of Natural Resources Conservation 2000 Ecosystems Program.
Advertisements

1 Project Plan for Baseline Ambient Air Monitoring near Potential Hydraulic Fracturing Zones in Lee County, NC Mike Abraczinskas, Deputy Director North.
Ann D Hirekatur Project Manager State of Lake Wisconsin Meeting July 13, 2013 Wisconsin River Basin Water Quality Improvement Project.
How to measure the CMEF R2 Indicator about Gross Value Added in agricultural holdings without reliable accounting data ? A methodological proposal applied.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule & 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations;
Planning 319/NPS Projects. Failure to Plan? Planning consists of four planning phases. Contracting Planning process Implementation Issuing Payment.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mountain-Prairie Region Landscape Conservation Implementation Status Report: Summer, 2010.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Carin Bisland, EPA Management Board Presentation 5/9/12.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Chesapeake Bay Program Habitat Goals Implementation Team June 26, 2013.
Adem.alabama.gov Incorporating NPS Intensive Surveys into ADEM’s Monitoring Strategy Southeastern Water Pollution Biologists’ Association Meeting Lake.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
Catoctin TMDL Project Proposal for New Initiatives to Loudoun Watershed Management Stakeholders Steering Committee Loudoun Watershed Watch Data Compilation.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.
Future of the Big Darby Watershed Steven Gordon December, 2001.
United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State, Research, Education and Extension Service Current Status of the CSREES Water Program Michael.
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
SRRTTF Technical Activities Where We’ve Been, Where We’re Going Dave Dilks Spokane River Regional Toxics Task Force Workshop January 13,
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Wetland Monitoring What Do We Need? Integration of Wetland Monitoring and Wetland Management Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Dept. of the Environment.
A Decade of Working Together on Conservation & Sustainable Use of Canada’s Natural Assets CBS endorsed by FPT Ministers in April 1996 Federal, provincial,
Michigan Watershed Plan Reviews Presentation at the Michigan Watershed-Based Planning Workshop, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Updating Background Conditions and BMP Efficiencies Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office
1 Overview on Present Database System of EIA for Sustainable Development of Nepal - Dipak Adhikari - Media Forum for Research and - Development (MFRD),
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Our main charge should be to identify indicators of progress toward CCMP goals and objectives, and to organize the indicators into a score card, and produce.
1 Phase 5.3 Calibration Gary Shenk 3/31/ Calibration Method Calibration method largely unchanged for several years –P5.1 – 8/ first automated.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Answering the Question: Why? Factors Affecting Change in Water Quality Exceptional challenge to explain “why” Poor quality of pollution source information.
Managing Through Partnerships Ralph Cantral NOAA’s Ocean Service September 5, 2003.
Presentation to Association Municipalities of Ontario Implementation of Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices Ministry of the.
What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.
After Permitting –or- just when you thought you were out of the woods There is NO After! Between Permitting Compliance Schedules Permit Amendments Permit.
Potential Activities, Costs, and Priorities for Watershed Monitoring Scott Phillips Joel Blomquist Katie Foreman Eff/Opt Conf Call July 24, 2009.
Development of a Hydrodynamic and Salinity Model for Naples Bay and Rookery Bay Why do we need this project?  Recommended in Naples Bay SWIM Plan  Evaluate.
Carin Bisland, EPA Principals’ Staff Committee 5/14/12.
1 Economic Analysis Steven Blum Alan T. Monji Environmental Scientist Region 9.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
1 RPO Data Analysis/Monitoring Grant Guidance Review Extracted from the EPA’s 3/5/02 RPO 4 th Year Policy, Organizational & Technical Guidance.
Jim Stockinger, Erin Eid, Jennifer Maloney and Mike Trojan
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Land accounts at the EEA Jean-Louis Weber & Ferràn Paramo 3 February 2004.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Science and Technology TAC Review of Action Items and TAC Priorities for the June 21, 2002 Clean Water Summit.
Coastal Aquifer Management in the Caribbean Workshop 14 th -16 th December 2011 The Water Resource Management Agency Ministry of Sustainable Development,
Origin  On October 18, 1997 – 25 th Anniversary of Clean Water Act – Federal agencies were asked to rededicate their efforts to cleaning up the Nations.
Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)
Citizens Advisory Council
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Bacteria SW-WLA Implementation Plans
The Watersheds of Harris and Montgomery Counties
Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment
Funding at Record Levels
The use of Article 17 assessments in SE (national biodiversity strategies, measuring progress, target setting etc.) ArtDatabanken.
Customer Service Call Center Update
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
Жирэмслэлт ба тархины харвалт
Integrated Reports Classified Use Support Evaluation
“Water Science meets Policy” Event - 30th September – Brussels
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café
Agricultural Land & Avian Foraging Habitat Mitigation Fee
Presentation transcript:

Existing Non-tidal Monitoring Network

Existing Non-tidal Monitoring Network classified according to size of watershed and predominant land use upstream of site - existing sites are predominantly large or very large watersheds in predominantly rural landscapes

Each site has information for land use breakouts as well as station type and availability of long term and short term trends and status data

Proposed sites for FY11 focus on smaller watersheds in urban and agricultural watersheds with BMP implementation potential

Each proposed site has information characterizing the nature of the area being monitored, including predominant land use, watershed size, monitoring agency, whether it is located in the Coastal Plain, and anticipated cost

Proposed additions for FY12 help to fill out other areas important for monitoring progress toward the TMDL

Proposed sites FY11 and FY12 have been assessed for their potential for substantial BMP implementation

The proposed expanded network after implementation of the FY11 and FY12 additions and conversion of a few sites from Secondary to Primary