NTT Confidential Test plan for evaluation of video quality models for use with stereoscopic three-dimensional television content Taichi Kawano (NTT) 2012.12.10.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 3D TV/Monitor Testing Solution with VG-870A/B Proposals (Rev.2.1) April 13 th, 2009 Note : For the purpose of introduction by ASTRO or distributor only,
Advertisements

Proposal for 3D evaluation test plan in VQEG Dec Jun Okamoto (NTT)
Multimedia and weBLOGging Grade 7-9 | Cahaya Bangsa Classical School (C) 2010 Digital Media Production Facility 05 – Video Basic.
1 Digital Stereoscopic (3D) Presentation: How its Done Today and Post Production Implications Glenn Kennel Texas Instruments DLP Cinema® February 23, 2006.
Chapter 6 Review.
Standards, process, requirements 4K PLAYBACK EXPLAINED.
Comparison of subjective test methodologies VQEG Berlin meeting June 2009 P. Le Callet, R. Pépion.
Audio & Video Representation CS105. Data Representation Types of data: – Numbers – Text – Images – Audio & Video.
Proposal for subjective test plan of stereoscopic three-dimensional video June Jun Okamoto (NTT)
Image Formation and Digital Video
Proposal to study objective quality assessment of 4K resolution video in the future VQEG tests Osamu Sugimoto KDDI R&D Laboratories, Inc.
High Definition Video In The Real World
+ Video Compression Rudina Alhamzi, Danielle Guir, Scott Hansen, Joe Jiang, Jason Ostroski.
EE 5359 H.264 to VC 1 Transcoding Vidhya Vijayakumar Multimedia Processing Lab MSEE, University of Arlington Guided.
Video Data Topic 4: Multimedia Technology. What is Video? A video is just a collection of bit-mapped images that when played quickly one after another.
Video Streaming © Nanda Ganesan, Ph.D..
Sony Pictures1 Preparing your customers and your facilities for Blu-ray A powerful format that leads to new challenges in authoring and creative design.
HDMI (High-Definition Multimedia Interface) What is HDMI? Background Info Review Terminology Explain Operation Advantages.
CS Spring 2014 CS 414 – Multimedia Systems Design Lecture 5 – Digital Video Representation Klara Nahrstedt Spring 2014.
1 Hybrid Bit-Stream Models (June 22-26, 2009 Berlin)
Guidelines for use of NICT 3D Contents (Draft Version) Jun Okamoto (NTT)
M P E G A Presentation by Sebastian Graf and Thomas Winterscheid.
Data Compression and Network Video by Mark Pelley Navin Dodanwela.
NTT Confidential Test plan for evaluation of video quality models for use with stereoscopic three-dimensional television content Taichi Kawano (NTT)
Profiles and levelstMyn1 Profiles and levels MPEG-2 is intended to be generic, supporting a diverse range of applications Different algorithmic elements.
Standards Subgroup Of the Digital Television Working Group Standards Subgroup Of the Digital Television Working Group UPDATE Presenter John Knox, Manager.
VQEG MM Phase 2 Working document towards a project plan.
Nortel Confidential Information 1 Video Sample Production Summary Leigh Thorpe Nortel Paris, 7-11 May 2007.
1 Hybrid Bit-stream Models. 2 Hybrid bit-stream model: Type 1  Pros: Simple. All we need are open-source codecs.  Cons: May lose some available information.
VIDEO FORMATS Prof Oakes. Compression CODECS COMPRESSOR/DECOMPRESSOR A codec provides specific instructions on how to compress video to reduce its size,
ULTRA PIXELS ULTRA PIXELS The future of resolutions A SEMINAR ON
1 Hybrid Bit-Stream Models (January 24-26, 2009 San Jose)
WGBH Public Television Quality Workshop
Video Compression: Performance evaluation of available codec software Sridhar Godavarthy.
HDTV Video and AC-3 Payload Formats Ladan Gharai Allison Mankin USC/ISI.
1 Hybrid Bit-Stream Models (January 25-29, Boulder)
1 Hybrid Bit-Stream Models (January 24-26, 2009 San Jose)
ELIS – Multimedia Lab HEVC in JEG-Hybrid.
1 Hybrid Bit-Stream Models (September 25, 2008 Ghent) FINAL.
Towards a unique subjective experiment dataset for 3DTV – « 3DTV phase 1 » Marcus Barkowsky.
Video QoE and Standards Sales Training 05-Nov-2007.
VQEG Joint Effort Group Berlin meeting A. Bourret- K. Brunnström P. Le Callet.
ELIS – Multimedia Lab MPEG activities. ELIS – Multimedia Lab MPEG activities HEVC: High Efficiency Video Coding MFC: MPEG Frame Compatible 3DTV.
Discussion for JEG in Ghent Marcus Barkowsky. July 2013 Marcus Barkowsky - 2 -
JEG-Hybrid. JEG Full database AGH database with additional packet loss HRCs AGH database of coding conditions JEG264HMIX1.
1 Hybrid Bit-stream Models. 2 Hybrid bit-stream model: Type 1  Pros: Simple. All we need are open-source codecs.  Cons: May lose some available information.
Proposal for a project to develop full reference media-layer objective metric for stereoscopic three-dimension video NTT Service Integration Laboratories,
Video Formats By: Pratik Man Singh Pradhan. Topics to Cover Video Types Video Formats Aspect Ratio Video Resolutions FPS.
VQEG HDTV Scene Pool 3 Summary Acreo Ghent University – IBBT NTIA.
1. hybrid - bitstream models VQEG Berlin Meeting June 2009 for Discussion Jens Berger, Silvio Borer.
Discussion for JEG in Singapore Marcus Barkowsky.
1 Hybrid Bit-Stream Models (June 28 – July 2, Krakow)
Audio/Video compression Recent progress Alain Bouffioux December, 20, 2006.
1 Hybrid Bit-Stream Models (September 2008 Ghent).
VQEG MM Phase 2 Working document towards a project plan.
1 Hybrid Bit-Stream Models (June 28 – July 2, Krakow)
Proposal for 3D evaluation test plan in VQEG June Jun Okamoto (NTT)
3DTV Work Group VQEG meeting Krakow 28 June – 2 July 2010.
1 Hybrid Bit-Stream Models (June 28 – July 2, Krakow)
1 Hybrid Bit-stream Models (Sep 2007 Ottawa). 2 Basic Ideas Using information extracted from bit- stream data, it may be possible to develop better perceptual.
Proposal for a project to develop full reference media-layer objective metric for stereoscopic three-dimension video NTT Service Integration Laboratories,
Moving from HDTV-1 to HDTV-2 VQEG agreed to use the HDTV Phase 1 test plan for the first draft of HDTV Phase 2 test plan The question for this meeting.
Hybrid Projects VQEG Rennes, June Four proponents: DT, OPTICOM, SwissQual, Yonsei Models were submitted on June 6. Next steps –Source selection.
242/102/49 0/51/59 181/172/166 Primary colors 248/152/29 PMS 172 PMS 137 PMS 546 PMS /206/ /227/ /129/123 Secondary colors 114/181/204.
Digital Video Representation Subject : Audio And Video Systems Name : Makwana Gaurav Er no.: : Class : Electronics & Communication.
1 Hybrid Bit-stream Models. 2 Hybrid bit-stream model: Type 1  Pros: Simple. All we need are open-source codecs.  Cons: May lose some available information.
High Definition Television. 2 Overview Technology advancements History Why HDTV? Current TV standards HDTV specifications Timeline Application Current.
1 Hybrid Bit-Stream Models (January 25-29, Boulder)
August ICA Agenda Time Topic 8:00 – 8:15
Video Compression - MPEG
Presentation transcript:

NTT Confidential Test plan for evaluation of video quality models for use with stereoscopic three-dimensional television content Taichi Kawano (NTT)

NTT Confidential Aim/Target of 3D objective metric project Aim: Develop FR media-layer objective metric for stereoscopic three-dimensional (3D) video quality Target service: - 3D video distribution service - 3D Blu-ray / DVD Target user: Service / content providers 2

NTT Confidential Summary of discuss points 3 Discuss following 8 issues: 1. Input of objective quality model 2. Subjective rating test 3: Display Specification and Set-up 4. Source Reference Channel (SRC) 5. Hypothetical Reference Circuit (HRC) 6. ILG and proponents 7. Number of tests 8. Schedule

NTT Confidential Discuss point 1/8: Input of objective quality model Model input (3.2): Option 1: FS and SbS format videos are used, where model requires flag whether input is FS or SbS. Option 2: FS format is used for FS and SbS format video (i.e., Flag is not needed). Proposal for input of model: Frame sequential (FS) format Reason: If format is SbS, viewers see FS on 3D monitor (i.e., SbS is converted to FS). 4

NTT Confidential Discuss point 2/8: Subjective rating test Voting methodology (4.4): ACR-HR # Same as HDTV test Number of viewer (4.7): 24 # Same as HDTV test Viewing distance (4.3.1): 3H (H is picture height) # Same as HDTV test Number of Viewer for single display (4.3.2): 1 or 2 # If monitor size is small, 1 viewer use single display 5

NTT Confidential Discuss point 3/8: Display Specification and Set-up Display (4.3.3): Professional/consumer LCD 3D monitor for TV/PC 3D displaying system (4.3.3): ・ Active shutter 3D system with glasses ・ Passive polarized 3D system with glasses Allowable minimum monitor size (4.3.3): 1 viewer: 23 inches 2 viewers: TBD Display resolution (4.3.3): Full-HD (1920 by 1080) 6

NTT Confidential Discuss point 4/8: SRC Resolution (5.1): 1080p Frame rate (5.1): 24, 25, 30 fps # 24 fps is used in 3D blu-ray # 25 and 30 fps is widely used in 2D video application How to get source sequences (5): TBD # Possible to reuse 3D sequences of other 3D project? Video format (6.2): Proposal for AVI format: Uncompressed AVI files in I420 Reason: Although UYVY was used in HD test plan, I420 is widely used in market and color blurring does not occur in progressive format. 7

NTT Confidential Discuss point 5/8: HRC Coding Schemes (7.2.1): ・ MPEG-2 (Main level) ・ H.264 (AVC high and main profiles) ・ H.264 (MVC Stereo high profile) # MPEG-2 and AVC are applied to each view independently Video bit-rate (7.2.2): MPEG-2/ACV: Mbps for each view MVC: Mbps Video encoding mode (7.2.3): CBR, VBR 8

NTT Confidential Discuss point 6/8: ILG and proponent Possible to set up ILG?: TBD # Potential ILG (declared in Rennes): AGH, Acreo, IRCCyN, NTIA # If impossible, only proponents run test Who propose model and conduct tests?: NTT, … # Potential proponents (declared in Rennes): Yonsei, SwissQual, Opticom, DT, Orange FT, NTIA, IRCCyN 9

NTT Confidential Discuss point 7/8: Number of test Number of datasets (4.1): Minimum of 3 # One for each frame rate (24, 25, 30 fps) => 3 tests # 3 frame rates ✕ 3 codecs ✕ (FS + SbS) => 18 tests How many tests for each proponent and ILG?: NTT: 1 or 2 tests XXX: * test YYY: * test ZZZ: * test … 10

NTT Confidential Discuss point 8/8: Schedule Approve test plan: June 2013? # Next VQEG meeting Declare intent to participate: July 2013 Submit model: Feb. 2014? # VQEG meeting after next Select SRC: Mar Generate PVS: Aug Run subjective test: Dec Statistical analysis: Jun Approve final report: Mar