LIGO- G010281-00-R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, 20011 Report to 40 Meter TAC  Caltech 40 Meter Prototype »Objectives and scope »Trade-offs and compromises.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
Advertisements

Marcus Ng Mentor: Alan Weinstein Co-mentor: Robert Ward
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Measurement of the laser beam profile at PSL to Mode Cleaner interface for the 40 Meter Prototype Interferometer A table of contents 1. Introduction 1.1.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory1 Characterization of LIGO Input Optics University of Florida Thomas Delker Guido Mueller Malik Rakhmanov.
LIGO- G05XXXX-00-R 40m meeting, May Experimental update from the 40m team 40m TAC meeting May 13, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech and the 40m collaboration.
LIGO-G M April 5, 2006 Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Richard.
G D Tasks After S3 Commissioning Meeting, Oct 6., 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg.
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, Aug m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee.
LIGO-G R Aspen Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype Seiji Kawamura 2004 Aspen Winter Conference on Gravitational Waves Gravitational.
LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
1 1.ISC scope and activities 2.Initial Virgo status 3.Design requirements 4.Reference solution and design status 5.Plans toward completion 6.Technical.
LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 3/031 40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee LIGO-G R.
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
LIGO-G Advanced LIGO Detector upgrade is planned for »Factor of 10 increase in distance probed (‘reach’) »Factor of 1000 increase in event.
LIGO-G R AJW/40m, LSC meeting, March Caltech 40 meter Prototype Program  Objectives  Accomplishments in the last year »Infrastructure.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 DC Readout Experiment at the Caltech 40m Laboratory Robert Ward Caltech Amaldi 7 July 14.
G Z LIGO R&D1 Input Optics Definition, Function The input optics (IO) conditions light from the pre- stabilized laser (PSL) for injection into.
LIGO- G R Sensing and control, SPIE conference, June Sensing and control of the Advanced LIGO optical configuration SPIE conference at.
G Z AJW for Marcus Benna, Cambridge Wavefront Sensing for Advanced LIGO Model of wavefront sensing in a dual- recycled interferometer Consequences.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
LIGO-G R AJW, 40m Advisory Committee, 8/16/001 40m Prototype Upgrade  Objectives  Recent activities  Building modifications  Optical layout,
LIGO-G R AJW/40m, NSF Review, 1/29/011 Caltech 40 meter Prototype Program  Objectives  Accomplishments in the last year »Infrastructure »IFO.
LSC August G Z Gingin High Optical Power Test Facility (AIGO) 1 High Optical Power Test Facility - Status First lock, auto-alignment and.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
G D Commissioning Progress and Plans Hanford Observatory LSC Meeting, March 21, 2005 Stefan Ballmer.
1 1.Definition 2.Deliverables 3.Status of preliminary design 4.Risks 5.Tasks to be done 6.Decisions to be taken 7.Required simulations 8.Planning ISC workshop:
LIGO- G R Aspen winter conference, January Toward the Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype Aspen winter.
LIGO-G R D. Ugolini, 40m Design Review, 10/18/ Meter Subsystems  PSL »Commissioning »Noise performance  Vacuum »Operating pressure goal.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/021 40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Dennis Ugolini, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee LIGO-G R.
Nov 3, 2008 Detection System for AdV 1/8 Detection (DET) Subsystem for AdV  Main tasks and requirements for the subsystem  DC readout  Design for: the.
Advanced LIGO Simulation, 6/1/06 Elba G E 1 ✦ LIGO I experience ✦ FP cavity : LIGO I vs AdvLIGO ✦ Simulation tools ✦ Time domain model Advanced.
LIGO- G R 40mAdvLIGO R&D program, 10/8/ Meter Lab program for AdvLIGO R&D Alan Weinstein, Caltech AdvLIGO R&D Technical Review, 10/8/02.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
Aligning Advanced Detectors L. Barsotti, M. Evans, P. Fritschel LIGO/MIT Understanding Detector Performance and Ground-Based Detector Designs LIGO-G
LIGO- G Z LSC meeting at Baton Rouge, March Caltech 40m Lab Update LSC Meeting Baton Rouge Mar 21, 2007 Robert Ward, Caltech and the 40m.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
LIGO-G R DC Detection at the 40m Lab DC Detection Experiment at the 40m Lab Robert Ward for the 40m Lab to the AIC group Livingston LSC meeting.
LIGO-G Z 3) Current Status & Plan for Japan RSE -- Stabilization and Installation of PRC & Detuning -- LSC Livingston 2002 Kentaro Somiya.
G I Enhanced LIGO Update Rana Adhikari July ’07 LSC Meeting.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
Testing Advanced LIGO length sensing and control scheme at the Caltech 40m interferometer. at the Caltech 40m interferometer. Yoichi Aso*, Rana Adhikari,
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
Commissioning Progress and Plans
The Advanced LIGO Angular Control System (ASC) (Hanford edition)
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Progress report from 40m team for the Advanced LIGO
40m TAC Update October 2006 The 40m Team 11 April 2019 G I.
Presentation transcript:

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Report to 40 Meter TAC  Caltech 40 Meter Prototype »Objectives and scope »Trade-offs and compromises »Recent progress in infrastructure, procurement, modeling »plans and milestones »Conceptual design review: October 18, 2001, 8:30 AM PDT Alan Weinstein, Caltech

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, People  Live & breathe 40m: Alan Weinstein, Dennis Ugolini, Steve Vass, Ben Abbott  LIGO lab engineers playing major roles: Garilynn Billingsley, Lisa Bogue, Rolf Bork, Lee Cardenas, Dennis Coyne, Jay Heefner, Larry Jones, Rick Karwoski, Peter King, Janeen Romie, Paul Russel, Mike Smith, Larry Wallace  6month visiting grad student Guillaume Michel  Lots of SURF students (this summer – 6).  We’ll need lots of add’l help in coming years!

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, m Laboratory Upgrade - Objectives  Primary objective: full engineering prototype of optics control scheme for a dual recycling suspended mass IFO »Table-top IFOs at Caltech, Florida, Australia, Japan (~ complete!) »These lead to decision on control scheme by LSC/AIC (August 2000 LSC) »Glasgow 10m DR prototype with multiple pendulum suspensions »Then, full LIGO engineering prototype of ISC, CDS at 40m »First look at DR shot noise response (high-f)  Other key elements of AdvLIGO are prototyped elsewhere: »LASTI, MIT: full-scale prototyping of Adv.LIGO SEI, SUS (low-f) »TNI, Caltech : measure thermal noise in Adv.LIGO test masses (mid-f) » AIGO, Gingin : high powered laser, thermal effects, control stability »ETF, Stanford: advanced IFO configs (Sagnac), lasers, etc

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Advanced LIGO technical innovations tested at 40m  a seventh mirror for signal recycling »(length control goes from 4x4 to 5x5 MIMO)  detuned signal cavity (carrier off resonance)  pair of phase-modulated RF sidebands » frequencies made as low and as high as is practically possible »unbalanced: only one sideband in a pair is used » double demodulation to produce error signals  short output mode cleaner » filter out all RF sidebands and higher-order transverse modes  offset-locked arms » controlled amount of arm-filtered carrier light exits asym port of BS  DC readout of the gravitational wave signal Much effort to ensure high fidelity between 40m and Adv.LIGO!

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Differences between AdvLIGO and 40m prototype  Initially, LIGO-I single pendulum suspensions will be used »Full-scale AdvLIGO multiple pendulums will not fit in vacuum chambers »to be tested at LASTI »Scaled-down versions can fit, to test controls hierarchy – in 2004?  Only commercial active seismic isolation »STACIS isolators already in use on all 4 test chambers »providing ~30 dB of isolation in Hz range »No room for anything like full AdvLIGO design – to be tested at LASTI  LIGO-I 10-watt laser, negligible thermal effects »Other facilities will test high-power laser: LASTI, Gingin, … »Thermal compensation also tested elsewhere  Small (5 mm) beam spot at TM’s; stable arm cavities »AdvLIGO will have 6 cm beam spots, using less stable cavities »40m can move to less stable arm cavities if deemed useful  Arm cavity finesse at 40m chosen to be = to AdvLIGO »Storage time is x100 shorter »significant differences in lock acquisition dynamics, in predictable ways  Due to shorter PRC length, control RF sidebands are 36/180 MHz instead of 9/180 MHz; less contrast between PRC and SRC signals

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, m Laboratory Upgrade – More Objectives  Expose shot noise curve, dip at tuned frequency  Multiple pendulum suspensions »this may be necessary, to extrapolate experience gained at 40m on control of optics, to LIGO-II »For testing of mult-suspension controllers, mult-suspension mechanical prototypes, interaction with control system »Not full scale. Insufficient head room in chambers. »Won’t replace full-scale LASTI tests.  thermal noise measurements » Mirror Brownian noise will dominate above 100 Hz.  Facility for testing/staging small LIGO innovations  Hands-on training of new IFO physicists!  Public tours (SURF/REU students, DNC media, princes, etc)

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Optical configuration design  A working draft of the 40m upgrade conceptual design report (T010029, link on 40m web page) is substantially complete, and an update will follow this meeting  Requires careful review, prior to and at the Conceptual Design Review (10/18/01) »Infrastructure upgrade »Optical topology (Dual recycled Michelson with F-P arms) »Mirror dimensions, transmissivities, cavity finesses, etc »Cavity lengths, RF frequencies, resonance conditions »SRC tune specified, transfer function determined »Mirror ROC, beam dimensions everywhere »12m Input Mode Cleaner design, expected performance »DC detection scheme »Twiddle modeling, DC fields, length sensing matrix »ModalModel, alignment sensing matrix, WFS parameters »Expected noise (BENCH) »Thermal effects – estimated to be negligible (Kells, AJW)  Mike Smith preparing a detailed optical design requirements document.

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, ETM perp SRM ETM inline ITM inline ITM perp PRM Symm Port Input Asym Port Pickoff Carrier RF Sidebands f 1 RF Sidebands f 2 Control topology for Advanced LIGO

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Control signals from Twiddle Differential Arm (L-)  Gravity Wave Signal  larm1-larm2 »Dark:0,  /2 »Subcarrier – Carrier e2 e1 Dark larm2 larm1 Dark:  /2 Dark:0

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Length sensing signals from Twiddle Twiddle is a Mathematica program to numerically calculate response of RF demodulation of IFO signals in response to motion of mirrors away from locked configuration. Can construct MIMO length sensing and control matrix. AdvLIGO control matrix much more diagonal than LIGO I! Mainly due to the availability of 2 pairs of RF sidebands Use double demodulation at asym port for the Michelson ( l - ) signal

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Modeling: E2E/DRLIGO

Comparing Twiddle and E2E: DC Fields Fields agree between E2E and Twiddle well at DC. Richard George 9 th August 2001 Hanford

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Optics Parameters PSL MMT MC MMT ITM BS ETM ITM ETM RM 38,2502, RF Vacuum flat flat flat 38,250 1, , , flat Optical Lengths (mm) Beam Amplitude Radius (mm) Beam Radius of Curvature (m) 40m upgrade optical layout AJW, 2/2001. MMTs obsolete. SM

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, AdvLIGO and 40m noise curves AdvLIGO (PF, 7/01) 40m

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Milestones Achieved so far  Lab infrastructure substantially complete, incl new conditioned power and new 12” cable trays  Active seismic isolation system installed, commissioned (Vass, Jones, etc)  Vacuum control system complete (D. Ugolini)  Vacuum envelope for 12m MC and output optic chamber installed (Vass, Jones)  All but one optical table in place (Vass, Jones)  Remaining on infrastructure: install seismic stacks for 12m MC and OOC; all in- vacuum cabling; and one more (big) optical table.  DAQ system installed, logs frames continuously (R. Bork)  PSL installed, commissioned; full tuning and characterization in progress (P. King, L. Cardenas, R. Karwoski, P. Russell, D. Ugolini, B. Abbott, SURFs)  Many PEM devices installed, in EPICS and DAQS, and in routine use (vacuum gauges, weather station, dust monitor, STACIS, accelerometer, mics, …) (Ugolini, SURF Tsai).

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, More milestones achieved  Full optical layout complete, all ISC tables laid out and parts lists assembled, scattered light controlled (M. Smith)  Design of digital suspension controllers for MC and COC in progress (B.Abbott)  Computing hardware and software (EPICS, Dataviewer, DMT, etc) largely in place (Bork, Ugolini, etc)  Optical glass in hand, polishing and coating in progress (G. Billingsley)  SOS suspensions (all but TM’s) constructed (not assembled), suspensions for TM’s under design (J. Romie)  Detailed WBS for construction, and for experiment (T. Frey)

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, m Infrastructure – substantially complete  Dismantling of old IFO, distribution of surplus equipment to LIGO and LSC colleagues  Major building rehab: »IFO hall enlarged for optics tables and electronics racks »roof repaired, leaks sealed »new electrical feeds and conditioners, 12" cable trays, etc »new control room and physicist work/lab space »New entrance room/changing area »rehab of cranes, safety equipment, etc  Active seismic isolation system (STACIS) procured, installed, and commissioned on all four test mass chambers

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, STACIS Active seismic isolation  One set of 3 for each of 4 test chambers  6-dof stiff PZT stack  Active bandwidth of Hz,  20-30dB of isolation  passive isolation above 15 Hz.

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, m Infrastructure, continued  New vacuum control system and vacuum equipment »Installed and commissioned  New output optic chamber, seismic stack fabricated »Chamber installed in July, stack to be installed in fall 2001  Vacuum envelope for 12 m input mode cleaner fabricated »Chamber installed in July, stack to be installed in fall 2001  All electronics racks, crates, cable trays, computers, network… procured and installed

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, New vacuum envelope at 40m PSL EnclosurePSL Electronics BS chamberNew optical tables12m MC beamtube New Output Optic Chamber Cable trays

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, m PSL  LIGO-I PSL installed in June by Peter King, Lee Cardenas, Rick Karwoski, Paul Russell  Spent the last month fixing birthing problems, tuning up (Ugolini, Ben Abbott, SURF students)  All optical paths have had one round of mode matching tune-up, comparing BeamScan with model; round 2 coming up.  Frequency stability servo (FSS) and PMC servo (PMCS) have been debugged  Both servos now lock easily, reliably, stably  DAQ birthing problems have been fixed; full DAQ readout of fast channels (and slow EPICS channels) logged to frames routinely  Frequency reference cavity has visibility > 94%; PMC has visibility ~80% and transmission > 50%. More tuning required, and Peter will install less lossy curved mirror sometime soon.  No temp stability on Freq reference cavity; Peter should have heating jacket on order.  Full characterization of PSL in progress, first draft available within a month: »Frequency noise »Intensity noise »Pointing and angle jitter »Long-term stability of frequency, intensity, pos/angle »Beam size and mode matching everywhere on table.

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, PSL Mode Matching (SURF Tim Piatenko)

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Preliminary PSL performance results (SURF A. DeMichele) PMC servo noise PMC and FSS stability

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Optical Layout  All suspended optics have OpLevs and are in sight of cameras  Almost all of 9 output beams come out in this area, routed to ISC tables  12m input mode cleaner  short monolithic output MC  baffling, shutters, scattered light control  Mode matching between each optical system  integrated with building, electrical, CDS layout  Detailed layout of all ISC tables, with detailed parts lists Mike Smith

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Optical Layout Baffles, isolators, Shutters, etc

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Output and Input Optic Chambers

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Input Optic and BS chambers

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Detailed layouts of ISC tables, parts lists

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Optics, suspensions  All glass blanks received (3 MC, 2 RM, BS, ITMs, ETMs, + spares) received from Corning and Heraeus.  3 MC mirrors + spares are at WP for coating (they broke 2 blanks already).  Hope to have 3 MC mirrors polished, coated, and ready for hanging by beginning of  Specs near readiness for polishing and coating core optics; hope to have them ready for hanging by fall  Parts for SOS suspensions (all but the 4 TM’s) are in hand (first set went to Hanford; now have 2 nd set).  Janeen hopes to finish design for TM suspensions by end of summer; constructed by beginning of  Ben Abbott (with Jay Heefner) designing and assembling digital suspension controllers for all 10 suspended optics.

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, Milestones through 2004  4Q 2001: Infrastructure complete »PSL, 12m MC envelope, vacuum controls, DAQS, PEM »Conceptual design review. Begin procurement of CDS, ISC, etc  2Q 2002: »12m input MC optics and suspensions, and suspension controllers. »Begin installation and commissioning of 12m input mode cleaner  4Q 2002: »Core optics (early) and suspensions ready. Suspension controllers. Some ISC. »Glasgow 10m experiment informs 40m program »Control system finalized  2Q 2003: »Core optics (late) and suspensions ready. Suspension controllers. »auxiliary optics, IFO sensing and control systems assembled  3Q 2003: Core subsystems commissioned, begin experiments »Lock acquisition with all 5 length dof's, 2x6 angular dof's »measure transfer functions, noise »Inform CDS of required modifications  3Q 2004: Next round of experiments. » DC readout. Multiple pendulum suspensions? »Final report to LIGO Lab.

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, (Some) outstanding issues and action items  IFO design (optics, sensing, control, etc) needs careful review by experts – before, during, and after October 18, 2001 CDR.  Any significant changes in people’s thinking re: optical configuration, controls, CDS architecture??  Output mode cleaner – will PSL-PMC-like device be adequate? (For 40m, for AdvLIGO). Suspended?  180 MHz – too fast for WFS, LSC PD’s?  Detailed noise model (RSENOISE, Jim Mason)  Triple-check LSC, ASC calculations (Twiddle, ModalModel)  Design servo filters!  Lock acquisition studies with E2E/DRLIGO  Triple-check thermal effects (Melody) – negligible?  DC GW PD – in vacuum?

LIGO- G R AJW,report to 40m TAC, Aug 13, SURF 2001 at the 40m  Richard George, U. Cambridge »E2E DRLIGO vs Twiddle  Andrea DeMichele, Pisa »40m PSL servos characterization  Mihail Amarie, Caltech/Romania »burst waveforms, database events, coincidence analysis  Tim Piatenko, Cornell/Moscow »40m PSL Optics characterization  Victor Tsai, Caltech »40m PEM  Irena Zivkovic, U. Nis, Serbia »t/f characterization of SN burst waveforms