Activity Based Costing Nancy R. Mangold Professor, Department of Accounting California State University, East Bay.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. ACTIVITY BASED COSTING.
Advertisements

Activity-Based Costing: A Tool to Aid Decision Making
ACTG 6310 Chapter 11 – Criticisms of Absorption Cost Systems: Inaccurate Product Costs.
Activity Based Costing: A Tool to Aid Decision Making 3/24/04
Ch 5 – Activity based accounting
5 - 1  2001 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Management Accounting, 3rd ed., Atkinson, Banker, Kaplan, and Young Activity-Based Cost Management Systems.
Cost Allocation Concepts Managerial Accounting Prepared by Diane Tanner University of North Florida Chapter 35.
Activity Based Costing
CHAPTER 5 Activity-Based Costing and Activity-Based Management.
5 - 1 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Activity-Based Costing and Activity-Based Management Chapter.
Chapter 5 Activity-based Cost Systems
ACTIVITY BASED COSTING. Learning Objectives Discuss the importance of unit costs Describe the functional-based costing approach Explain why functional-based.
5 - 1 Activity-Based Costing and Activity-Based Management Chapter 5.
Activity Based Costing: A Tool to Aid Decision Making 11/16/04 Chapter 8.
16-1 Copyright  Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Operating Costs and Cost Allocation, Including Activity-Based Costing Belverd.
© John Wiley & Sons, 2005 Chapter 7: Activity-Based Costing and Management Eldenburg & Wolcott’s Cost Management, 1eSlide # 1 Cost Management Measuring,
Advanced Costing - ABC Activity Based Costing
Do you think that it is costly to convert from a traditional overhead cost allocation basis to activity-based costing such as that used by Cold Stone Creamery?
Activity-Based Costing: A Tool to Aid Decision Making
Chapter Seven Activity-Based Costing: A Tool to Aid Decision Making.
Kinney ● Raiborn Cost Accounting: Foundations and Evolutions, 8e © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated,
5 - 1 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Activity-Based Costing and Activity-Based Management Chapter.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Activity-Based Costing: A Tool to Aid Decision Making
Managerial Accounting by James Jiambalvo
PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright.
Activity-based Cost Management
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 4 Activity-Based Costing Systems.
Prepared by Diane Tanner University of North Florida Chapter 5 1 Allocation of Indirect Costs: Simple Costing & ABC.
1 Copyright  2010 & 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Accounting: What the Numbers Mean 2e (revised) by Marshall, McCartney & Van Rhyn PowerPoint.
Product Costing Process Costing Job Order Allocates costs to products
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 17-1 JOB ORDER COST SYSTEMS AND OVERHEAD ALLOCATIONS Chapter 17.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Financial & Managerial Accounting The Basis for Business Decisions FOURTEENTH EDITION Williams.
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2006McGraw-Hill/Irwin 4 Activity-Based Costing Systems.
Activity-Based Costing: A Tool to Aid Decision Making
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc 2011 ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING: A TOOL TO AID DECISION MAKING Chapter 7.
© 2016 Pearson Education, Inc.
1 Activity-based costing. 2 Introduction In the past, overhead costs were relatively small, and the problems arising from inappropriate overhead allocations.
AFM Activity Based Costing ABC By Isuru Manawadu B.Sc in Accounting Sp. (USJP), ACA.
1 Activity-Based Costing and Activity-Based Management
Management Accounting
Kinney ● Raiborn Cost Accounting: Foundations and Evolutions, 9e © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated,
ActivityBased Costing Systems Dr. Nancy Mangold California State University, East Bay.
1 Module19 Assigning Indirect Costs: Activity-Based Costing (omit pp to 19-13)
5 - 1 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Activity-Based Costing and Activity-Based Management.
Chapter Seven Activity-Based Costing: A Tool to Aid Decision Making.
Activity Based Costing: A Tool to Aid Decision Making
Copyright  2006 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Management Accounting: Information for managing and creating value 4e Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith.
Foundations and Evolutions
Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter Eight ACCT7110-Dr. Bailey-Spring 2008 Activity-Based Costing: A Tool to Aid.
Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Review for ACCT7320-Dr. Bailey-Fall 2010 Activity-Based Costing: A Tool to Aid Decision.
Chapter 5 Activity-Based Cost Management Systems.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Activity-Based Costing and Chapter 5.
Management Accounting BA213 Michael Dimond. Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Costing Methods Process Costing Job Costing Activity-based.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Accounting for Managers, 1Ce, Ch 11 1.
©2005 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 13/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton ©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Job Order Cost Systems and Overhead Allocations Chapter 17.
Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 4 Activity-Based Costing Systems.
Prepared by Diane Tanner University of North Florida ACG Allocating Indirect Costs: Simple Costing & ABC 2-2.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved CHAPTER 13 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,
Activity-Based Costing
Activity-Based Costing and Activity-Based Management
Activity-Based Costing
Preface The use of modern manufacturing practices (such as automation, computer control machines, robotics, JIT) can significantly change the structure.
Cost Accounting and Reporting Systems
Activity-Based Costing and Activity-Based Management
Overview of Activity-Based Cost Systems for Management Control
Activity-Based Costing
Module 19 Activity-Based Costing, Customer Profitability, and Activity-Based Management © Cambridge Business Publishers, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Activity Based Costing Nancy R. Mangold Professor, Department of Accounting California State University, East Bay

Building Blocks of Costing Systems Direct Costs Indirect Costs Cost Object Cost Assignment n Cost object - anything for which a separate measurement of costs is desired.

Building Blocks of Costing Systems Direct Costs Indirect Costs Cost Object Cost Tracing Cost Assignment n Cost object - anything for which a separate measurement of costs is desired. n Direct costs of a cost object - costs that are related to the particular cost object and can be traced to it in an economically feasible (cost-effective) way.

Building Blocks of Costing Systems l Cost object - anything for which a separate measurement of costs is desired. l Direct costs of a cost object - costs that are related to the particular cost object and can be traced to it in an economically feasible (cost-effective) way. l Indirect costs of a cost object - costs that are related to the particular cost object but cannot be traced to it in an economically feasible way. Indirect costs are allocated to the cost object. Direct Costs Indirect Costs Cost Object Cost Tracing Cost Allocation Cost Assignment

Six-Step Approach to Costing éIdentify Cost Objects éIdentify Direct Costs éIdentify Indirect-Cost Pools éSelect Cost-Allocation Base for Each Indirect Cost Pool éDevelop the Rate Per Unit of the Cost- Allocation Base Used to Allocate Indirect Costs éAssign Costs to the Cost Objects

Traditional Costing Systems l Traditionally, job-order and process costing systems have assigned direct labor and direct materials costs to products l Indirect costs were accumulated as support department expenses. l These expenses were allocated to production departments in a simple proportion. Direct Costs Indirect Costs Cost Object Cost Tracing Cost Allocation Cost Assignment

Traditional Costing Systems l Indirect costs are grouped together into one cost pool - called Manufacturing Overhead l One allocation base is selected to allocate the Manufacturing overhead l Allocation base is usually volume based - labor hours, machine hours. l Per unit cost produced from traditional costing system is often not accurate Direct Costs Indirect Costs Cost Object Cost Tracing Cost Allocation Cost Assignment

The World is Changing... l Technology l Product Life Cycle l Product Complexity l Capital Intensiveness l Quality Requirements

Manufacturing Cost Structure is Changing... l Previously l Labor cost was the largest proportion of total product costs l Now l Overhead costs increase significantly due to the use of advanced manufacturing technology

Cost of Product Complexity is Changing... l Which factory has more scheduling costs? Set- up/change-over costs? Inventory carrying costs? Vendor negotiations? Engineering change orders? Plant A Plant B

The Impact of Plant B l Marketplace segmentation and technology advances have moved companies more toward a Plant B environment l Standard cost accounting systems have stayed as they were - designed to support a Plant A environment

Simple and Complex Factories Simple and Complex Factories l Plant A (a simple factory) has little need for a cost system to calculate the cost of its product. l Plant B (A complex factory) requires many resources to support a highly varied product mix. l Complex factories require a cost accounting system to trace expenses to its various products.

Simple and Complex Factories Simple and Complex Factories l Traditional cost systems will under-estimate the cost of resources required for specialty, low-volume products. l These systems will over-estimate the resource cost of high volume, standard products.

The Symptoms of Obsolete Cost System l Products difficult to produce are very profitable, even though they are not premium priced l Profit margin can not be easily explained l Some products that are not sold by competitors have high reported margins l The results of bids are difficult to explain

The Symptoms of Obsolete Cost System l The competition’s high-volume products are priced at apparently unrealistically low levels l Vendor bids for parts are considerably lower than expected l Customer ignore price increases, even when there is no corresponding increase in cost

The Design Flaws of Traditional Cost Accounting System l Only direct labor hours are used to allocate overhead from cost pools to the products –Direct labor costs are less than 10% of the total production cost, whereas overhead is more than 30% of total cost –Direct labor hours are not a good predictor of the indirect costs

The Design Flaws of Traditional Cost Accounting System l Only volume-related allocation bases (labor hours, machine hours and material dollars) are used to allocate overhead from cost pools to products –correct for volume -related activities –not for non-volume-related costs :setup, scheduling, inspection. –low -volume products may be undercosted –high-volume products are overcosted

The Design Flaws of Traditional Cost Accounting System l Cost pools are too large and contain machines that have very different overhead cost structures –Overhead costs charged to conventional machines too high –Overhead costs charged to automated machines too low

The Design Flaws of Traditional Cost Accounting System l The cost of marketing and delivering the product varies dramatically by distribution channel and yet the cost accounting system ignores marketing costs –marketing and distribution costs are treated as a period cost and written off

Traditional Cost Accounting Weaknesses l Overhead Allocated on Arbitrary Basis –Direct labor over-emphasized –True cost drivers not identified –Product profitability distorted

Traditional Cost Accounting Weaknesses l Cost accounting system supports financial accounting –Directed towards inventory valuation –Emphasis on time period, not product –Management information is secondary concern

Traditional Cost Accounting Weaknesses l Limited to production costs –Non-production expenses not linked to product –No life cycle data available –Cost of quality not reported

Activity Based Costing System l Identify activities performed in order to produce products or perform services l Determine how much the organization is spending on its resources l Trace the expenses of support resources to the activities using resource drivers l Identify the activity cost drivers l Trace activity cost to products based on individual products’ consumption of each activity l Evaluate activity effectiveness & efficiency

Steps For Activity Based Costing éIdentify Activities éIdentify Resources needed éIdentify Resource Drivers éTrace the Resources to Activities using resource drivers éIdentify Activity Cost Drivers éDevelop per unit activity cost rate éAssign activity costs to products based on the actual activities performed for the products

Benefits of ABC l More accurate product cost l Better cost control –continuous improvement of activities to reduce overhead costs l Improved decisions –more accurate product costing lead to better decisions on pricing, product mix, product design, marketing and distribution.

Survey of Activity-Based Costing Survey of Activity-Based Costing U.S. Companies l 36% of the business interviewed use ABC l Of the companies using ABC –25% use ABC to replace their existing cost accounting systems –the others use it for analyses outside their accounting system

Survey of Activity-Based Costing United Kingdom Companies 32% of the companies adopted ABC Canadian Companies 14% have implemented ABC 15% are considering changing to ABC

What Attracted U.S. and Canadian Firms to ABC l More accurate cost information for product pricing (61%) l More accurate profit analysis –By Product (61%) –By Customer (22%) –By Process (20%) –By Department (24%) l Improved performance measures (43%) l Improved insight into cost causation (37%)

Potential Areas for ABC Managing product (project, job, process) costs and product line profitability –ABC for manufacturing costs and manufacturing overhead (30% -50% of manufacturing costs)

Potential Areas for ABC Managing Corporate Overhead –ABC for Selling,, General and Administrative Expenses (25% - 30% of total revenue)

Potential Areas for ABC Managing Customers –ABC for Customer Profitability Analysis

Potential Areas for ABC Managing Marketing and Distribution Channels –ABC for Marketing and Distribution Channel Analysis

Activity-Based Management Use ABC information to have ABM l Operational ABM l Strategic ABM-Product Mix and Pricing l Strategic ABM for Customers l Strategic ABM for Suppliers l Strategic ABM for Product Development l ABC for Service Industries