19th January 2012 Don Wells (Hess) API RP 17N Subsea Production System Reliability and Technical Risk Management & Integrity Management 19th January 2012 Don Wells (Hess)

Agenda Introduction Scope Membership General Progress Detail Progress Integration 17 Committee/ISO

Introduction Incorporate Integrity Management into current API 17N …Subsea Reliability and Technical Risk Management Recognize and incorporate integration with other Industry initiatives Incorporate updates based on feedback from using existing 17N document Respond to recent industry experiences

Scope Review of Summer Meeting topics Continue previously presented scope Additional scope – API 17A requirements Design and Operations of Subsea Production Systems Greenfield Brownfield Future requirements

Membership Room for additional membership Organized into subcommittees Design and Decommission Manufacture, Assembly, SIT, Installation, Commissioning Operations Technology Qualification Regulations Room for additional membership Opportunity to Make a Difference

General Progress 2010 – 2011 2012 - Planned Storming and forming - Complete Gap Analysis – Mostly Complete Interfacing with Runar Østebø – Statoil & convener of ISO/TC67 WG4 2012 - Planned Define Tone (prescriptive / recommend) Work the Gaps Work the Interfaces Industry Peer Assist Workshop SURF IM Forum

Detail Progress Define Scope - Completed Define Charter – Completed Divide and Conquer Design and Decommission New Key Process (KP) for Through Life to be Developed Does API want Risk Based or Safety Case Approach? (Hybrid?) Do we want/need to meet with BSEE to discuss? don’t have all the answers yet. We are working it and this is a representation of where we are. Storm and Form approach has been taken

Detail Progress Divide and Conquer Manufacture, Assembly, SIT, Installation, Commissioning Matrix Developed Where & How to test being worked Does Verification and Validation need new KP? (Rewrite KP06?) MOC being worked don’t have all the answers yet. We are working it and this is a representation of where we are. Storm and Form approach has been taken

Detail Progress Divide and Conquer – cont. Operations Reviewed and Raised issues with existing 12 KPs Proposed 3 additional KPs Field Modifications Inspection and Monitoring Remedial Intervention Added 3 Processes to “Project Phase Guide to Processes”

Detail Progress Divide and Conquer – cont. Technology Qualification New Risks Identified Obsolescence – Misuse of TRLs New Technologies New materials Keep integrated as a section in API 17N If not, make it a Technical Reference Make Generic vs. Prescriptive Robust, Goal Based with examples Utilize DNV RP A-203 as much as possible Evaluate the use in early conceptual phase Survey Industry to ID Qualifying Technologies main challenges

Detail Progress Divide and Conquer – cont. Regulations Managing Committees 1-4 Interfaces Will lead Prescriptive vs. Recommend discussions On hold until more definition / decisions from other committees

Path Forward Path Forward Write Review Ballot Continue Subcommittee work Outline of Process to use as QA tool Common Matrix to combine / review completed work Work the idea of using SURF IM Forum to discuss with industry and gather additional input Write Review Ballot

Interface / Integration API 17A, API Q1 ISO 14224 - Collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for equipment 20815 - Production assurance and reliability management 15663 - Life Cycle Costing TR 12489 - Reliability modeling and calculation of safety systems Review committee draft document Feedback 17N specific comments DNV RP A203/API RP 17Q?