Nowcasting Convective Storms for Aviation in NCAR/RAL Convective Weather Group Cai Huaqing National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO, USA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
5 th International Conference of Mesoscale Meteor. And Typhoons, Boulder, CO 31 October 2006 National Scale Probabilistic Storm Forecasting for Aviation.
Advertisements

Report of the Q2 Short Range QPF Discussion Group Jon Ahlquist Curtis Marshall John McGinley - lead Dan Petersen D. J. Seo Jean Vieux.
1 Weather in the NextGen Era- Progress and Challenges Ahead Steve Abelman NWS Office of Science and Technology May 4, 2010 Steve Abelman NWS Office of.
ENHANCEMENTS OF THE NCAR AUTO-NOWCAST SYSTEM BY USING ASAP AND NRL SATELLITE PRODUCTS Huaqing Cai, Rita Roberts, Cindy Mueller and Tom Saxen National Center.
Louisville, KY August 4, 2009 Flash Flood Frank Pereira NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Hydrometeorological Prediction Center.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Radiance Assimilation Activities at SPoRT Will McCarty SPoRT SAC Wednesday June 13,
A short term rainfall prediction algorithm Nazario D. Ramirez and Joan Manuel Castro University of Puerto Rico NOAA Collaborator: Robert J. Kuligowski.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 AIRS Products for the National Weather Service Brad Zavodsky SPoRT Science Advisory.
Inter-comparison of Lightning Trends from Ground-based Networks during Severe Weather: Applications toward GLM Lawrence D. Carey 1*, Chris J. Schultz 1,
FAA Tactical Weather Forecasting In The
DATA USED ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES  Vigorous testing of HN and RDT will be carried out for NYCMA  Improvement to the models will be carried out to suite the.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Transition of Radar Refractivity to Operational Radars OS&T Briefing, 6 April 2004 Interested parties: NCAR, McGill University, NEXRAD Office of Science.
Data Integration: Assessing the Value and Significance of New Observations and Products John Williams, NCAR Haig Iskenderian, MIT LL NASA Applied Sciences.
The Hydro-Estimator and Hydro-Nowcaster: Satellite- Based Flash Flood Forecasting Tools Robert J. Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS Center for SaTellite Applications.
Determining Key Predictors for NCAR’s Convective Auto-Nowcast System Using Climatological Analyses Thomas Saxen, Cindy Mueller, and Nancy Rehak National.
RADAR STORM MOTION ESTIMATION AND BEYOND: A SPECTRAL ALGORITHM AND RADAR OBSERVATION BASED DYNAMIC MODEL Gang Xu* and V. Chandrasekar Colorado State University.
Toward a 4D Cube of the Atmosphere via Data Assimilation Kelvin Droegemeier University of Oklahoma 13 August 2009.
STEPS: An empirical treatment of forecast uncertainty Alan Seed BMRC Weather Forecasting Group.
The NWS/NCAR “Forecaster Over the Loop” Fort Worth Operational Demonstration Human Enhancement of a Thunderstorm Nowcasting System Eric Nelson, Rita Roberts,
A. FY12-13 GIMPAP Project Proposal Title Page version 27 October 2011 Title: Probabilistic Nearcasting of Severe Convection Status: New Duration: 2 years.
NASA Applied Sciences Weather Program Review Boulder, CO – November 18-19, 2008 Oceanic Convection Diagnosis and Nowcasting Cathy Kessinger, Huaqing Cai,
Update on NCAR Auto-Nowcaster Juneau, AK. The Auto-Nowcaster System An expert system which produces short-term (0-1 hr) forecasts of thunderstorm initiation,
NCAR Auto-Nowcaster Convective Weather Group NCAR/RAL.
Oceanic Weather and Volcanic Ash Cathy Kessinger NCAR/RAL Weather in the Cockpit Workshop Boulder, CO 8-10 August 2006 Augustine, 12 Jan 2006 M.L.Coombs,
A Thunderstorm Nowcasting System for the Beijing 2008 Olympics: A U.S./China Collaboration by James Wilson 1 and Mingxuan Chen 2 1. National Center for.
Global Observing System Simulation Experiments (Global OSSEs) How It Works Nature Run 13-month uninterrupted forecast produces alternative atmosphere.
The Benefit of Improved GOES Products in the NWS Forecast Offices Greg Mandt National Weather Service Director of the Office of Climate, Water, and Weather.
1 National Severe Storms Laboratory & University of Oklahoma Nowcasting.
T he Man-In-The-Loop (MITL) Nowcast Demonstration: Forecaster Input into a Thunderstorm Nowcasting System R. Roberts, T. Saxen, C. Mueller, E. Nelson,
3 rd Annual WRF Users Workshop Promote closer ties between research and operations Develop an advanced mesoscale forecast and assimilation system   Design.
Jon Trueblood (Dordt College) Timothy Sliwinski (FSU) Dr. Amy McGovern David John Gagne (OU) Dr. John Williams Dr. Jennifer Abernethy (NCAR) Image Courtesy:
Nowcasting Trends Past and Future By Jim Wilson NCAR 8 Feb 2011 Geneva Switzerland.
GOES-R: Bringing Critical New Capability to Automated Aviation Weather Products Paul H. Herzegh National Center for Atmospheric Research With acknowledgements.
NOAA Hazardous Weather Test Bed (SPC, OUN, NSSL) Objectives – Advance the science of weather forecasting and prediction of severe convective weather –
James Pinto Project Scientist II NCAR Research Applications Laboratory NCAR/RAL Perspective on Aviation-based Requirements for RUA.
Convective Storm Forecasting 1-6 Hours Prior to Initiation Dan Lindsey and Louie Grasso NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/RAMMB and CIRA, Fort Collins, CO John Mecikalski,
NOAA-MDL Seminar 7 May 2008 Bob Rabin NOAA/National Severe Storms Lab Norman. OK CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison Challenges in Remote Sensing to.
The LAMP/HRRR MELD FOR AVIATION FORECASTING Bob Glahn, Judy Ghirardelli, Jung-Sun Im, Adam Schnapp, Gordana Rancic, and Chenjie Huang Meteorological Development.
ASAP In-Flight Icing Research at NCAR J. Haggerty, F. McDonough, J. Black, S. Landolt, C. Wolff, and S. Mueller In collaboration with: P. Minnis and W.
Recent and Planned Updates to the NCAR Auto-Nowcast (ANC) System Thomas Saxen, Rita Roberts, Huaqing Cai, Eric Nelson, Dan Breed National Center for Atmospheric.
Improved Statistical Intensity Forecast Models: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Year 2 Project Update Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO John A. Knaff,
Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Weather Research Program (AWRP) Highlights for FPAW November 19, 2015.
1 Aviation Forecasting – Works in Progress NCVF – Ceiling & Visibility CoSPA – Storm Prediction A Joint Effort Among: MIT Lincoln Laboratory NCAR – National.
COMPARISONS OF NOWCASTING TECHNIQUES FOR OCEANIC CONVECTION Huaqing Cai, Cathy Kessinger, Nancy Rehak, Daniel Megenhardt and Matthias Steiner National.
National Convective Weather Forecast (NCWF) Collaborators: C. Mueller, J. Pinto, D. Ahijevych, D. Megenhardt, N. Rehak Stan Trier, NCAR
New developments in the Graphical Turbulence Guidance (GTG) product
Nowcasting Convection Fusing 0-6 hour observation- and model-based probability forecasts WWRP Symposium on Nowcasting and Very Short Range Forecasting.
Local Analysis and Prediction System (LAPS) Technology Transfer NOAA – Earth System Research Laboratory Steve Albers, Brent Shaw, and Ed Szoke LAPS Analyses.
THE CHALLENGES OF NOWCASTING CONVECTION OVER THE OCEAN Huaqing Cai, Cathy Kessinger, Nancy Rehak, Daniel Megenhardt and Matthias Steiner National Center.
High impact weather nowcasting and short-range forecasting using advanced IR soundings Jun Li Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
2004 Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC Stan Benjamin Steve Weygandt NOAA / Forecast Systems Lab NY Courtesy:
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Combining GOES Observations with Other Data to Improve Severe Weather Forecasts.
Briefing to FAA and Airline Industry Representatives 8 April 2010 Global/Oceanic Convection Diagnosis and Nowcasting Cathy Kessinger, Huaqing Cai, Matthias.
Forecaster-Over-The-Loop Demonstration Forecaster CWSU Auto-nowcaster Rita Roberts 28 November 2007 Goals: Science and Operational Debrief NWS Program.
SIGMA: Diagnosis and Nowcasting of In-flight Icing – Improving Aircrew Awareness Through FLYSAFE Christine Le Bot Agathe Drouin Christian Pagé.
RUC Convective Probability Forecasts using Ensembles and Hourly Assimilation Steve Weygandt Stan Benjamin Forecast Systems Laboratory NOAA.
11 Short-Range QPF for Flash Flood Prediction and Small Basin Forecasts Prediction Forecasts David Kitzmiller, Yu Zhang, Wanru Wu, Shaorong Wu, Feng Ding.
NOAA, May 2014 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS NOAA Activities toward Transitioning Mature R&D Missions to an Operational Status.
ASAP Convective Weather Research at NCAR Matthias Steiner and Huaqing Cai Rita Roberts, John Williams, David Ahijevych, Sue Dettling and David Johnson.
2. WRF model configuration and initial conditions  Three sets of initial and lateral boundary conditions for Katrina are used, including the output from.
Investigations of Using TAMDAR Soundings in the NCAR Auto-Nowcaster H. Cai, C. Mueller, E. Nelson, and N. Rehak NCAR/RAL.
60 min Nowcasts 60 min Verification Cold Front Regime
  Robert Gibson1, Douglas Drob2 and David Norris1 1BBN Technologies
NCAR Research on Thunderstorm Analysis & Nowcasting
New developments in the Graphical Turbulence Guidance (GTG) product
Studies of convectively induced turbulence
Aiding Severe Weather Forecasting
Generation of Simulated GIFTS Datasets
Presentation transcript:

Nowcasting Convective Storms for Aviation in NCAR/RAL Convective Weather Group Cai Huaqing National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO, USA

Outline Very-short term storm forecast (0-2 hr) ---- NCAR Auto-Nowcaster Short-term storm forecast (0-8 hr) ---- FAA CoSPA (Consolidated Storm Prediction for Aviation) Very-short term storm forecast over the ocean (Oceanic Convective Diagnosis and Nowcsting

Why We Still Need Nowcasting?

Detection and extrapolation of surface convergence boundaries …. ….that trigger thunderstorm initiation and impact storm evolution. The Auto-nowcaster System is unique in its ability to provide nowcasts of storm initiation by…..

Weather Forecast Office Washington DC Sydney Australia Forecast Office U. S. Army White Sands Missile Range Central U. S. for the FAA Where has the Auto-nowcaster been demonstrated ? Has being transferred to: Bureau Meteorology Beijing China U.S National Weather Service – Dallas Weather Forecast Office AWIPS

Data Sets Radar WSR-88D Satellite Mesonet Profiler Sounding Numerical Model Lightning Analysis Algorithms Predictor Fields Forecaster Input Fuzzy Logic Algorithm - Membership functions - weights - Combined likelihood field Final Prediction Flow Chart for the Auto-Nowcaster System

Predictor Fields Large-Scale Environment B-L characteristics Satellite Cloud Typing Boundary characteristics Cumulus development Storm motion and trends

Example of Auto-Nowcaster Initiation Forecast 1 hour forecastVerification Initiation nowcasts extrapolation nowcasts

CoSPA 0-8 hr blended forecasting system developed by MIT/LL, NOAA GSD and NCAR. It provides VIL and echo top forecasts for Federal Aviation Administration. It uses Hrrr (High resolution rapid refresh) model developed by NOAA GSD. NCAR is responsible for blending the extrapolated forecast provided by MIT/LL and Hrrr forecasts produced by NOAA GSD.

CoSPA Functional/Data Flow Slide from Depree et al. 2009

Examples of CoSPA Forecasts

Forecasting Convection Over the Ocean Why we care storms over the ocean? Diagnosis of oceanic convection Nowcasting of oceanic convection Uplink weather information into the cockpit

Air France 447 (0145 UTC 1 June 2009) The wide-area view provided by real-time experimental Global Convection/Turbulence uplinks may have improved pilot situational awareness (approx.) Last verbal contact, 0133 UTC (approx.) Last ACARS message, 0214 UTC (approx.) Last verbal contact, 0133 UTC (approx.) Last ACARS message, 0214 UTC Longwave IR (0145 UTC) Cloud Top Height (0145 UTC) Convection Diagnosis Oceanic (CDO) 0145 UTC + + Motivation : Air France 447

“Wx Ahead” Uplink Message valid 0130 UTC 1 June 2009 /EXP CLOUD TOP FI AF447/AN NXXXAF 01 Jun '/' Cloud tops 30,000 to 40,000 ft//////CCC///// 'C' Cloud tops above 40,000 ft///////////CC///// *4.0N,30.0W///////// *////////C////////// //*//CC///CCC///////// ///*CCCC/C/CC////////// ////*CCCCCCC//C///////// ///CC*CCCCC///CC//////// ///CCC*CCCCC///////////// //CCCCC*CCCC////////////// //CCCCCCC*CCC////////////// /CCCCCCCCC*CCC///// / //CCCCCCCCCC*CC///// // /// //CCCCCCCCCCC*C///////// ////// /////CCCCCCCCCC*C// // // ////// //////CCCCCCCC//*/ // / ////// CC//////CCCCCCC//* ///////// CCC////////////// * ///////// /C//////////// *1.3N,31.4W //// /////// */ *// / /*/// // /*/// / /*// * // * /// * // // * //// * ///// * ////// * ///// /// * /// Pos Rpt / // * / 0133 // X 1.4S,32.8W // Valid for // / z // Pilot feedback at url: deleted] Graphical view (EFB concept)Text-based view for ACARS printer 30-39Kft >40Kft /=30-39Kft C=>40Kft

Oceanic Diagnosis and Nowcasting System Convective Diagnosis Oceanic (CDO) identifies convective cells CDO Interest CDO Binary Product Convective Nowcasting Oceanic (CNO-Titan) makes 1-hr and 2-hr nowcasts of storm location using an object tracker (Titan) CNO- Titan Nowcast CNO-Gridded produces gridded nowcasts that will more closely resemble storm structures CNO- Gridded Nowcast CNO-RF Random Forest Nowcast CNO-RF utilizes environmental and model-based inputs to better predict storm initiation and decay [Cai et al. (2009)] CTopCClassGCD With Growth/Decay Without Growth/Decay

CNO Based on TITAN (Dixon and Wiener, 1993) TITAN for Radar Data An Example of 1 Hr CNO-TITAN *1 hr nowcast of CDO valid at 1315 UTC on August 19, 2007 using TITAN technique is shown on the right; red lines on the right represent CDO = 2.5 verification. *Advantages of TITAN: computationally efficient; capability of addressing growth/decay. *Disadvantages of TITAN: polygons can only roughly represent storm shapes; tends to over-forecasting

CNO Based on Modified TITAN---- Gridded Forecast An Example of 1 Hr CNO-Gridded Forecast TITAN Motion Vectors at t 0 Gridded 0 hr TITAN Motion Vectors Temporal & Spatial Smoothing min Motion Vectors min Forecasts by Advecting Original Satellite Data at t 0 Gridded 1 hr TITAN Motion Vectors Gridded 2 hr TITAN Motion Vectors Merged with GFS Winds Closest in Time Temporal & Spatial Smoothing Temporal & Spatial Smoothing min Motion Vectors min Motion Vectors min Forecasts by Advecting 60 min Nowcasts min Forecasts by Advecting 120 min Nowcasts Merged with GFS Winds Closest in Time 1-3 Hr CNO-Gridded Forecast Flow Chart *Advantages of CNO-Gridded: realistic looking storms; low bias. *Disadvantages of CNO-Gridded: could be computationally expensive; no explicit growth/decay capability

CNO Based on Random Forest Statistical Analysis and Data Fusion The random forest technique produces an ensemble of decision trees from labeled training instances –during training, RF generates estimates of predictor importance –RF trees “vote” on classification of new data points, comprising a nonlinear empirical model that provides both deterministic predictions and probabilistic information Vote: 1 => 40 votes for “0”, 60 votes for “1”; consensus category “1” Data pt. Tree 1 Vote: 0 Data pt. Tree 2 Vote: 0 Data pt. Tree 3 Vote: 1 Data pt. Tree 4 Vote: 0 Data pt. Tree 100 … *Slide courtesy of John Williams and Dave Ahijevych

An Example of CNO- RF Forecast Compared with CNO- TITAN ( 1 hr) *1 hr forecasts valid at 1315 UTC on August 19, 2007 for both techniques; Red lines represent CDO = 2.5 verification *Advantages of random forest technique: more realistic looking storms; taking into account of storm environment to address storm growth/decay. *As a relatively new, novel technique for nowcasting, its potential needs to be fully explored CNO Hurricane Dean A B C D A B C D CNO-RF CNO-TITAN

Statistical Evaluation of the Three Nowcasting Techniques CSIBIAS 5 days of data from Aug 19-23, 2007 over the Gulf of Mexico domain are used to calculate the statistics with a grid size of ~ 5 km and CDO threshold of 2.5 All three techniques show skill over persistence RF and gridded forecast perform best at 1 hr lead time TITAN is the best at 2-3 hr lead time Gridded forecast is the best for 4-6 hr lead time

Examples of 1 hr Gridded Forecast over the Gulf of Mexico Domain * White lines are CDO=2.5 verification, satellite data available every 30 min A B C D Issue time: 1215 UTC 2009/09/05 Valid time: 1315 UTC 2009/09/05 1 HR

Examples of 3 hr Gridded Forecast over the Gulf of Mexico Domain *White lines are CDO=2.5 verification, satellite data available every 30 min A B C DIssue time: 1215 UTC 2009/09/05 Valid time: 1515 UTC 2009/09/05 3 HR

Examples of 6 hr Gridded Forecast over the Gulf of Mexico Domain *White lines are CDO=2.5 verification, satellite data available every 30 min A B C DIssue time: 1215 UTC 2009/09/05 Valid time: 1815 UTC 2009/09/05 6 HR

Summary Statistics of CNO-Gridded Forecasts 30 days of data from Sep 1-30, 2009 over the Gulf of Mexico domain are used to calculate the statistics with a grid size of ~ 5 km and CDO threshold of 2.5 The results showed here could serve as benchmark performance of extrapolation-based nowcasting techniques for oceanic convection Similar verification for model forecasts need to be done so that a comparison of convective forecasting skills between model and extrapolation can be obtained The black squares are statistics from Aug 19-22, 2007 What are the GFS model scores for oceanic convection???

Summary Multiple short-term convective forecasting products, both over land and over ocean, are being researched, developed and tested at NCAR/RAL for various agencies such as FAA, NOAA and NASA. Potential collaborations in the nowcasting areas would be beneficial to all participants.