Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cadre 8 Training, October 9, 2012 DIETS & Drivers.
Advertisements

Implementation Science overview
SISEP Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai
Barbara Sims Dean Fixsen Karen Blase Caryn Ward National SISEP Center National Implementation Research Network FPG Child Development Center University.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
April 10, 2013 SPDG Implementation Science Webinar #3: Organization Drivers.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Welcome Coaching Competency Driver Thanks to State Implementation & Scaling-up of Evidence Based Practices Oregon.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Welcome! October VTPBiS Regional Coordinators Meeting.
Building Effective Coaches to Expand & Sustain PBIS Implementation.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS Coaching Makes a Difference Expanding and Refining the Coaches Role Oregon 1.
Training/Coaching Meeting & Team Training Debriefing George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
Installing Alternative Response in Ohio
Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. Karen A. Blase, Ph.D. National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute Implementing Innovations.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS

9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Allison Metz, Ph.D., Karen Blase, Ph.D., Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Rob Horner, Ph.D., George Sugai, Ph.D. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
No, Not the Drivers Again! (Or, RTI is a Journey Not a Destination)
Barbara Sims, Co-Director National SISEP Center FPG Child Development Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Greensboro.NC March 20, 2013 Implementation.
Building Capacity with Implementation Drivers
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs and Services that Promote the Social-Emotional Development of Young Children Part I Karen Blase, Barbara.
Implementation Science 101 Vestena Robbins, PhD Kentucky Dept for Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities.
Implementation Science Vision 21: Linking Systems of Care June 2015 Lyman Legters.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
Implementation Drivers March 23, 2012
MiBLSi Systems of Support for Training October 9,
Improving Outcomes for All Students: Bringing Evidence-Based Practices to Scale March 25, 2009 MN RtI Center Conference Cammy Lehr, Ph.D. EBP & Implementation.
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
Dean L. Fixsen, Karen A. Blase, Michelle Duda, Sandra Naoom, Melissa Van Dyke, Frances Wallace National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte.
Karen A. Blase Barbara Sims Michelle A. Duda Dean L. Fixsen Jonathan Green Ron Dughman, RRCP Jeanna Mullins, RRCP Presented by Jeanna Mullins, Mid-South.
Barbara Sims Brenda Melcher Dean Fixsen Karen Blase Michelle Duda Washington, D.C. July 2013 Keep Dancing After the Music Stops OSEP Project Directors’
Scaling Up in Illinois Integrated System for Student Achievement (ISSA)
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
Barbara Sims Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Integrated System for Student Achievement SISEP in Illinois.
Dean L. Fixsen, Karen A. Blase, Sandra F. Naoom, Melissa Van Dyke, Frances Wallace National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte Florida Mental.
: The National Center at EDC
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Barbara Sims Debbie Egan Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda Using Implementation Frameworks to Identify Evidence Based Practices 2011 PBIS.
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
Patti Book, Brenda Kephart, Kristi Sandvik.  Profile of Hillsboro School District  Map of the Journey  Current Location  Next Destination  Challenges.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE OVERVIEW. CONTEXT & RATIONALE.
Understanding Implementation and Leadership in School Mental Health.
WELCOME Oregon Scaling-up EBISS Utilizing Implementation Science Frameworks to Ensure Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems (EBISS) January/February.
Michelle A. Duda Barbara Sims Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase October 2, 2012 Making It Happen With Active Implementation Frameworks: Implementation Drivers.
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: EXPLORATION
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
UTILIZING IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE FRAMEWORKS TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE BEHAVIORAL & INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS (EBISS) SPRING 2016 PENDLETON, VALE AND REDMOND.
District Literacy Leaders Network Meeting March 24, :00am-12:00pm Dr. LaWonda Smith Manager, English Language Arts Dr. Argentina Back Manager, Multilingual.
Min.cenmi.org Michigan Implementation Network Providing Support through District Leadership and Implementation Team April 29, 2010 Michigan Implementation.
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
An Introduction to Implementation Tools to Help Build Implementation Capacity SPDG Evaluators May 2012 Michelle A. Duda, Dean L. Fixsen,
Putting the pieces together
State and District Role in
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Installation Stage and Implementation Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability and improvement at the organization and systems level Help guide leaders to use the right leadership strategies for the situation Implementation Drivers Drivers

IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Common features of successful supports to help make full and effective use of a wide variety of innovations

Core Implementation Components © Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Positive Outcomes for Students Competency Drivers Organization Drivers Leadership Effective Educational Practices How: What: Why: Professional Development/ Professional Learning Professional Development/ Professional Learning Capacity to provide direction and vision Staff capacity to support children/families with the selected practices Institutional capacity to support teachers & staff in implementing practices with fidelity

Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Competency Drivers © Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Implementation Drivers

Performance Assessment Purposes “Are we doing what we said we would do?”  Measure fidelity  Motivate implementation  Reinforce staff and build on strengths  Interpretation of Outcome Data  Feedback on functioning of »Recruitment and Selection Practices »Training Programs (pre and in-service) »Supervision and Coaching Systems Implementation Drivers Competency Drivers

Performance Assessment Challenges Drivers are ‘in service’ to a defined “it” No definition of “it” No definition of ‘fidelity’ to the “it” What’s the way forward? Performance Assessment processes are weak Content Context No Competency indicators What’s the way forward? Blaming the teacher What’s the way forward? Implementation Drivers Competency Drivers

Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Competency Drivers © Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Implementation Drivers

Selection Purposes Select for the “tough to teach traits” Screen for pre-requisites Set expectations for new hires – use of data, coaching Allow for mutual selection Improve likelihood of retention after “investment” Improve likelihood that training, coaching, and supervision will result in implementation Implementation Drivers Competency Drivers

Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Competency Drivers © Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Implementation Drivers

Training Purposes Continue “Buy-in” process Knowledge acquisition Skill Development Form a ‘community’ Get started…get better Implementation Drivers Competency Drivers

Training and Coaching Implementation Drivers OUTCOMES % of Participants who Demonstrate Knowledge, Demonstrate New Skills in a Training Setting, and Use new Skills in the Classroom TRAINING COMPONENTS Knowledge Skill Demonstration Use in the Classroom Theory and Discussion 10%5%0%..+Demonstration in Training 30%20%0% …+ Practice & Feedback in Training 60% 5% …+ Coaching in Classroom 95% —Joyce and Showers, 2002

Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Competency Drivers © Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Implementation Drivers

Coaching Purposes Ensures fidelity Ensures implementation Develops application judgment in their setting Provides feedback to selection and training processes Grounded in “Best Practices” Must include direct observation and feedback Implementation Drivers Competency Drivers

Organization Drivers Change Organizations and Systems Create and sustain hospitable organizational and system environments for effective services Develop functional data systems that can be used to inform decision-making Implementation Drivers Organization Drivers

Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Competency Drivers Organization Drivers Implementation Drivers © Fixsen & Blase, 2008

© Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Robert Horner, George Sugai, 2008 All organizations [and systems] are designed, intentionally or unwittingly, to achieve precisely the results they get.“ — R. Spencer Darling Business Expert Organizational Change

System Change EXISTING SYSTEM EFFECTIVE INNOVATIONS ARE CHANGED TO FIT THE SYSTEM EXISTING SYSTEM IS CHANGED TO SUPPORT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INNOVATION EFFECTIVE INNOVATION

System Change Creating Capacity for Competent Change New innovations do not fare well in current organizational structures and systems Develop new position descriptions and job functions in State Departments of Education and in Regional and District systems. “Systems trump programs.” —Patrick McCarthy, Annie E. Casey Foundation

Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Competency Drivers Organization Drivers Implementation Drivers © Fixsen & Blase, 2008

Decision Support Data Systems Purposes Monitor and improve student outcomes through data-based decisions Provide information to assess effectiveness of intervention and prevention practices Analyze the relationship of fidelity to outcomes Guide further program development  Detect discrete issues as well as systemic issues Engage in continuous quality improvement  Of the Intervention and the Drivers Celebrate success Be accountable to parents, Board of Education taxpayers, and other funders Implementation Drivers Organization Drivers

Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Competency Drivers Organization Drivers Implementation Drivers © Fixsen & Blase, 2008

Facilitative Administration Purposes Creates an internally hospitable environment for the new way of work – at the level of the “agency” (e.g. school, District) Facilitates the installation, implementation, and improvement of the Drivers for each innovation Takes the lead on Systems Interventions Looks for ways to make the direct work of practitioners (e.g. teachers, school staff) and administrators more effective and less “burdensome”!! Implementation Drivers Organization Drivers

Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Competency Drivers Organization Drivers Implementation Drivers © Fixsen & Blase, 2008

Systems Intervention Purposes Identify and “lift up” systemic barriers and facilitators to the next level to improve support for the new way of work Create an externally “hospitable” environment for the new way of work Embed facilitators and strengths Contribute to cumulative learning in multi-site projects Implementation Drivers Organization Drivers

Big Ideas that Help Linked Teaming Structures  Linking Communication Protocols (e.g. agenda links, meetings dedicated to feedback) Terms of Reference Practice to Policy Feedback surveys and action plans Organizational Drivers Organization Drivers

Drivers Integration with Other Frameworks Implementation Drivers Teams Locus of Responsibility Monitor Integration Cycles Within a Driver Among Drivers Feed Forward Feedback Stages Exploration Installation Initial Implementation Full Implementation

Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Adaptive Technical Integrated & Compensatory Competency Drivers Organization Drivers Leadership Improved educational outcomes Interventions meet Implementation Consistent Use of Educational Innovations © Fixsen & Blase, 2008

Integrated and Compensatory Implementation Drivers Integrated Consistency in philosophy, goals, knowledge and skills across these processes (S/T/C/SE/DSDS/FA/SI) Compensatory  At the practitioner level  At the program level Competency Drivers Organization Drivers Leadership Drivers Integrated & Compensatory