CAL FIRE/ OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL. Topics: 1. New Pipeline Safety Laws 2. Regulation Workgroup 3. Fee Increase 4. Out-of-Service Pipelines.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Damage Prevention PHMSA Update Annmarie Robertson PHMSA/Office.
Advertisements

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Spill Control Association of America 2014 Annual Meeting and Conference March 20, 2014.
1 PHMSA Pipeline Incident and IM Data: What They Do and Do Not Tell Us Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 20, 2008 New Orleans, LA Carol Parker.
Integrity Management Program Special Permits (IMP-SP) Draft Administrative Plan 12/5/2007.
June 19, 2014 CONTROL OF TRASH ENTERING WATERWAYS IN CALIFORNIA DRAFT WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD POLICY.
MODULE 1 Introduction to OSHA and DOT Training.
Contractor Safety Management
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Congress and Contractor Personal Conflicts of Interest May 21, 2008 Jon Etherton Etherton and Associates, Inc.
What options do states have? What is Georgia planning to do? What are some of the other states doing? What are the possible implications to permit fees?
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
Overview of Key Rule Features
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Safety Update Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Program.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
SCOPING MEETING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REQUIRED BY PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 3161 (b)(3) AND (4) (SENATE BILL 4) (PAVLEY) C ALIFORNIA D EPARTMENT.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Harold Winnie, CATS Manager (Central Region) Leak detection for.
The Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). FOIA Topics of Discussion Public Meetings Closed Meetings Meeting Notices & Agendas Electronic Communication.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
1 Updates to Texas Administrative Code 1TAC 206 Jeff Kline, Statewide Accessibility Coordinator Texas Department of Information Resources February 8, 2012.
Technical Regulations – U.S. Procedures and Practices U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue Digital Video Conference Series August 22, 2006 Mary Saunders Chief,
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Liquid Pipeline Advisory Committee Meeting Arlington,
Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act March 23, 2010.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF PEARLAND PLANNING DAY MARCH 13, 2008.
Presented by: Yolanda Chavez, RN, BSN Policy Rules and Curriculum Development Unit DADS Regulatory Services 1 DADS REGULATORY UPDATE March 2013.
CONSIDERATION OF STREAMLINED PROCESS FOR STIPULATED WASTE TIRE HAULER AND WASTE TIRE FACILTY ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY CASES CIWMB Board Meeting Agenda Item.
Technical Assistance Grants to Communities Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans November 20, 2008 Steve Fischer PHMSA/Office of Pipeline Safety.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Regulatory and Compliance Landscape Western Region Gas Conference.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM Land Division Update Chip Crockett Chief, Industrial Hazardous Waste Branch Air & Waste Management Association Southern Section Pine.
Interdepartmental Placement of Employees Returning to Work Following Approved Leave County of Los Angeles Department of Human Resources July 6, 2011.
Office of Pipeline Safety Integrity Management Inspection Process Louisiana Pipeline Safety Seminar August 2003.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Tom Torlakson State Superintendent of Public Instruction Family Fees For Part Day California State Preschool (CSPP) California Department of Education.
California State Lands Commission Mineral Resources Management Division Long Beach Unit Safety & Environmental Audit Proposal June 23, 2011 Mineral Resources.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
Pipeline Safety – 2015 Year in Review. Large PHMSA Budget Increase Pipeline Safety spending in 2015 was increased $26.9 million. Main areas of expansion.
Office of Pipeline Safety Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity Management July , 2002 Houston, Texas Welcome.
U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Integrity Management Systems November 18, 2015 Chris McLaren - 1 -
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
1 City of Shelby Wastewater Treatment Division Becomes State’s Second Public Agency to Implement a Certified Environmental Management System CERTIFICATION.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Section 24 Pipeline Safety Standards Incorporated Into the Federal.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Regulatory Initiatives.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Special Board Meeting CONSIDERATION OF BOARD ACTION OVER MADERA COUNTY LEA Sacramento, CA October 3, 2005.
ASPEC January 2015 Incidents –0 incidents, 0 near misses Hours 27/12/14-30/01/15 13% Site, 1% Travel, 86% Office ASPEC QSHR January 2015 Minutes.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Oil Spill Response Plans A History Lesson PHMSA Review and Approval.
Topics to be Addressed  Mandatory Employee Contributions to WRS  Employee Contributions to Health Insurance  Police and Fire Exception  Changes to.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PREVENTION & PREPAREDNESS May 11, 2016 REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM.
Pipeline Safety in Michigan Jennifer McKay Policy Director Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council City of Boyne City Commission Meeting April 25, 2016.
CALIFORNIA WATER ISSUES Survey of Wine Institute Advocacy Efforts Wine Institute Board of Directors Meeting – March 8, 2016 Tim Schmelzer, Director of.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Improving California’s Oil Spill Prevention & Response A Summary of Senate Bill 414 Amy Trainer, Executive Director Environmental Action Committee of West.
BSEE BAST Determination Process Joseph Levine National Ocean Industries Association 2016 Annual Meeting April 22, 2016 Washington, D.C “To promote safety,
Water Quality/Stormwater Seminar September House Bill 2031 Requires TCEQ to adopt an expedited permitting process for discharge permits for treated.
Presentation to Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 18 & 19, 2015.
ABC-MAP Act 191 of 2014 September 16, 2016 Pennsylvania’s Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PA PDMP)
Office of the State Fire Marshal Pipeline Safety Division
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AUGUST 24, 2017 REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH.
The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq
The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq
Presented to the Project Certification Committee on November 16, 2011.
Cupa violation Review BAESG Meeting May 20, 2019 Matthew Burge
Presentation transcript:

CAL FIRE/ OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL

Topics: 1. New Pipeline Safety Laws 2. Regulation Workgroup 3. Fee Increase 4. Out-of-Service Pipelines CAL FIRE/ OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL

RECENT INCIDENT THE RECENT PIPELINE INCIDENT AT REFUGIO BEACH IN SANTA BARBARA COUNTY SPILLED OVER 100,000 GALLONS OF CRUDE OIL AND IMPACTED OVER 25 MILES OF COASTLINE AND OCEAN WATER. THE IMPACTS FROM THE SPILL WERE DEVASTATING, BOTH ENVIRONMENTALLY AND ECONOMICALLY.

NEW LEGISLATION SB 295 AND AB 864 WERE RECENTLY SIGNED INTO LAW TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF PIPELINE SAFETY. THE REQUIREMENTS IN THESE NEW LAWS WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE THE WORKLOAD FOR CALFIRE/OSFM PIPELINE SAFETY DIVISION.

SENATE BILL 295 SB 295 REQUIRES THE CAL FIRE/OSFM TO: CONDUCT ANNUAL INSPECTIONS OF PIPELINE OPERATORS AND THEIR PIPELINES BEGINNING JANUARY 1, ADOPT REGULATIONS REGARDING ANNUAL INSPECTIONS BY JANUARY 1, ADOPT REGULATION TO INCREASE THE FEES ASSESSED ON PIPELINE OPERATORS IN ORDER TO PAY FOR THE HIGHER NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS.

ASSEMBLY BILL 864 AB 864 REQUIRES THE CAL FIRE/OSFM TO DEVELOP REGULATIONS BY JULY 1, 2017, WHICH INCLUDE: INCLUDE RESEARCHING THE USE OF BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY ON PIPELINES TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF OIL RELEASED IN AN OIL SPILL. CREATING A DEFINITION OF AUTOMATIC SHUTOFF SYSTEMS. DEVELOPING A PROCESS TO ASSESS THE ADEQUACY OF THE PIPELINE OPERATOR’S RISK ANALYSIS.

ASSEMBLY BILL 864 AB 864 REQUIRES THE CALFIRE/OSFM TO DEVELOP REGULATIONS BY JULY 1, 2017, WHICH INCLUDE: DEVELOPING A PROCESS BY WHICH AN OPERATOR MAY REQUEST CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT OF INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THEIR PLAN OR CONTAINED IN ANY DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RISK ANALYSIS. DETERMINE HOW NEAR TO AN ENVIRONMENTALLY AND ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AREA A PIPELINE MUST BE TO BE SUBJECTED TO REGULATION BASED ON THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE PIPELINE IMPACTING THOSE AREAS.

IMPLEMENTATION THE DEPARTMENT IS WORKING ON THE BCP AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE NEW LAWS. THE DEPARTMENT IS REQUESTING 17 NEW POSITIONS STARTING JULY 2016.

REGULATION DEVELOPMENT THE DEPARTMENT WILL SET UP THE REGULATIONS WORKGROUP. THE FIRST WORKGROUP MEETING WILL BE HELD ON JANUARY 26, 2016 FROM 10 AM TO 1 PM AT: California African American Museum 700 Exposition Park Drive Los Angeles, CA 90037

REGULATION WORKGROUP TO ENSURE COMPLIANT, THE PIPELINE SAFETY DIVISION (PSD) HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO ESTABLISH A WORKGROUP WITH ALL APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF COMPETENCY AND EXPERTISE TO DEVELOP THE NEW REGULATIONS. THE WORKGROUP WILL HAVE EXTENSIVE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RESULTING IN PROPOSED REGULATIONS THAT ARE ESSENTIAL FOR THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW LAWS.

REGULATION WORKGROUP CAL FIRE/OSFM STAFF CHAIRPERSON – SUPERVISING PIPELINE SAFETY ENGINEER (1) ASSOCIATE GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAM ANALYST (1) PIPELINE SAFETY ENGINEER (1) RESEARCH PROGRAM SPECIALIST I – GIS (1)

REGULATION WORKGROUP STAKEHOLDERS PIPELINE OPERATOR REPRESENTATIVE – INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT (1) PIPELINE OPERATOR REPRESENTATIVE – DOT COMPLIANT (1) PIPELINE OPERATOR REPRESENTATIVE – CONSTRUCTION (1) PIPELINE OPERATOR REPRESENTATIVE – CATHODIC PROTECTION (1) PIPELINE OPERATOR REPRESENTATIVE – LEAK DETECTION (1) PIPELINE CONTRACTOR (1) PIPELINE OPERATOR REPRESENTATIVE – SMALL OPERATOR (1) PIPELINE OPERATOR REPRESENTATIVE – LARGE OPERATOR (1) ASSOCIATION REPRESENTATIVE (2) ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE (2) OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES (2) NOTE- COMPOSITION OF WORKDROUP SUBJECT TO CHANGE DEPENDING ON AVAILABITITY OF REPRESENTATIVES.

REGULATION WORKGROUP KICK OFF MEETING ON JANUARY 26, 2016 WORKGROUP WILL MEET AT LEAST ONCE A MONTH FOR THE NEXT SIX MONTHS MEETINGS WILL BE IN SACRAMENTO AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DEPENDING ON THE LOGISTICS OF THE WORKGROUP.

REGULATION WORKGROUP THE WORKGROUP’S CHAIR WILL ESTABLISH MEETING DATES, LOCATIONS, AND AGENDAS. ALL MEMBERS WILL PARTICIPATE IN SCHEDULED MEETINGS AND CONFERENCE CALLS WHEN POSSIBLE. MEETING MINUTES WILL BE COMPLETED BY OSFM STAFF AND POSTED ON THE OSFM WEBSITE.

REGULATION WORKGROUP CONT’ MEMBERS WILL PROVIDE TIMELY REVIEW AND COMMENT ON DRAFT DOCUMENTS. MEETINGS WILL BE HELD MONTHLY OR AS FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY. SUB-WORKGROUPS MAY BE ESTABLISHED TO ADDRESS SPECIFIC TECHNICAL ISSUES; SUB WORKGROUP MEETINGS WILL BE HELD ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS.

GOALS OF WORKGROUP DEVELOP REGULATIONS (CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 19). REVIEW AND EVALUATE EXISTING INSPECTIONS AND LEAK TRENDS TO DETERMINE THE BEST APPROACH FOR THE NEW “ANNUAL INSPECTION” REGULATIONS. DEVELOP THE PROPOSED REGULATION THAT WILL REDUCE PIPELINE ACCIDENTS ON INTRASTATE HAZARDOUS LIQUID PIPELINES.

GOALS OF WORKGROUP CONT CREATE A DEFINITION OF AUTOMATIC SHUTOFF SYSTEMS. RESEARCH AND IDENTIFY THE BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGIES FOR LEAK DETECTION AND AUTOMATIC SHUT OFF SYSTEMS. DETERMINE HOW NEAR TO AN ENVIRONMENTALLY AND ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AREA A PIPELINE MUST BE TO BE SUBJECT TO REGULATION BASED ON THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE PIPELINE IMPACTING THOSE AREAS.

GOALS OF WORKGROUP CONT DEVELOP A PROCESS TO ASSESS THE ADEQUACY OF THE PIPELINE OPERATOR’S RISK ANALYSIS. DEVELOP A PROCESS BY WHICH AN OPERATOR MAY REQUEST CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT OF INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THEIR PLAN OR CONTAINED IN ANY DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RISK ANALYSIS. PROPOSE REGULATION FOR FEE INCREASE THAT IS NECESSARY TO COVER THE COSTS OF OPERATIONS.

SALARY ADJUSTMENT CALFIRE/OSFM PIPELINE SAFETY DIVISION WAS OPERATING AT 70% VACANCY RATE FOR THE PIPELINE SAFETY ENGINEER (PSE) POSITION DUE TO THE RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION ISSUE. THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCE (CALHR) ADJUSTED THE SALARIES TO A COMPETITIVE LEVEL FOR PIPELINE SAFETY ENGINEERS AND SUPERVISING PIPELINE SAFETY ENGINEERS.

FEE INCREASE SB 295 REQUIRES THE CAL FIRE/OSFM TO RAISE THE FEE IN ORDER TO OFFSET THE ADDITIONAL COST OF CONDUCTING ANNUAL INSPECTIONS AND TO IMPLEMENT THE REQUIREMENT OF SB 295 AND AB 864. THE OSFM IS PROPOSING TO INCREASE THE “CHARGE PER MILE OF PIPELINE OPERATED”. THIS PROPOSAL WOULD PROVIDE THE APPROPRIATE FEES TO OPERATING THE PROGRAM AND COVER THE COST FOR ADDITIONAL WORKLOADS AND STAFFING. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT STATE LAW PROHIBITS THE OSFM FROM CHARGING MORE THAN THE AMOUNT THAT REQUIRED TO OPERATING THE PROGRAM.

FEE INCREASE CONT’ THIS PROPOSAL WILL: ALLOW CAL FIRE/OSFM TO COMPLY WITH THE REGULATORY DEVELOPMENT AND PIPELINE REVIEWS AND INSPECTIONS AS REQUIRED BY AB 864 AND SB 295. REDUCE LIFE AND PROPERTY LOST. REDUCE THE RISK OF FUTURE OIL SPILLS FROM PIPELINES.

FEE INCREASE CONT’ PROVIDE ADEQUATE ENFORCEMENT AND INSPECTION FUNCTIONS OF THE PROGRAM. ENHANCE PUBLIC SAFETY. PROTECT CALIFORNIA’S VITAL NATURAL RESOURCES.

FEE INCREASE CONT’ REDUCE POTENTIAL LITIGATIONS AND FINES FOR THE OPERATOR OF PIPELINES. SAVE MONEY FOR OPERATOR OF PIPELINES IN THE LONG RUN.

WORK GROUP If you are interested in joining the work please contact: DANIEL HASTERT (562) Please have your request in by Friday January 15, 2016

Pipeline Reclassification Notice concerning “Out-of-Service” Pipelines A letter was sent to 19 affected operators in December 2015 advising of changes to our determination of “out of service” pipelines as it relates to jurisdiction, inspection requirements, and assessment of pipeline mileage fees. PHMSA only defines pipelines as either “Active” or “Abandoned”; therefore, in order to comply with federal regulations and interpretations, we have designated “out-of-service” pipelines as “Active” (jurisdictional to the OSFM).

Pipeline Reclassification Notice Definitions ACTIVE pipeline means a pipeline or pipeline segment which is in service whether or not the pipeline is fully operational and includes pipelines which may have been utilized to transport hazardous liquids but are currently static, idle or designated as “out-of- service”. “Active” pipelines must comply with all applicable State and federal laws and regulations pertaining to pipeline safety. ABANDONED pipeline means a pipeline or pipeline segment that is permanently removed from service, which has been safely disconnected from an operating system, purged of combustibles and sealed. Once the process has been verified and accepted in writing by the OSFM, this category of pipeline becomes a non-jurisdictional pipeline. An abandoned pipeline cannot be returned to hazardous liquid service. Before a pipeline can be reclassified as “abandoned”, the operator must submit to the State Fire Marshal, and the State Fire Marshal must approve, a written plan describing the process to be used. Approval of the reclassification plan by the OSFM does not affect or negate any permit or approval requirement of any other agency. OSFM fees are not applicable for “abandoned” pipelines. In addition, “abandoned” pipelines will not need to be reported to the OSFM on the annual Operator Questionnaire: however, the OSFM will maintain the data on these pipelines that had previously been collected during the time the pipelines had been classified as “active”.

Pipeline Reclassification Notice Expectations We provided the operator a list of all pipelines that are currently reported to us as having “out-of-service” segments. The operator is to review this list for accuracy and correctness and advise of any needed corrections prior to April 1, These lines must now be incorporated into the operators integrity management program and be assessed and evaluated for risk to high consequence areas (HCA). A particular focus would be verification and documentation that these pipelines were effectively purged of hazardous liquid, isolated, and pose no threat to affected HCAs. We will be requesting new GIS mapping submissions from all operators with these “out-of-service” segments included. We no longer require written approval to reclassify a line from “active” to “out-of-service” since these lines will remain jurisdictional. Only change would be commodity (i.e.. Nitrogen).

QUESTIONS ???