IMP3 1 RITM – code Computation with stiff transport models presented by D.Kalupin 12th Meeting of the ITPA Transport Physics (TP) Topical Group 7-10 May.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Courant and all that Consistency, Convergence Stability Numerical Dispersion Computational grids and numerical anisotropy The goal of this lecture is to.
Advertisements

Steady-state heat conduction on triangulated planar domain May, 2002
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Computing An Adaptive Numerical Method for Multi- Scale Problems Arising in Phase-field Modelling Peter.
Where are we in Integrated modeling? S. Jardin Mature 1½ D evolution code packages exist with reduced modules for most processes –Japan: BPSI: (TASK, TOPICS)
A Discrete Adjoint-Based Approach for Optimization Problems on 3D Unstructured Meshes Dimitri J. Mavriplis Department of Mechanical Engineering University.
Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) 1Daniel Baur / Numerical Methods for Chemical Engineers / BVP and PDE Daniel Baur ETH Zurich, Institut für Chemie-
P. Venkataraman Mechanical Engineering P. Venkataraman Rochester Institute of Technology DETC2013 – 12269: Continuous Solution for Boundary Value Problems.
Point-wise Discretization Errors in Boundary Element Method for Elasticity Problem Bart F. Zalewski Case Western Reserve University Robert L. Mullen Case.
P. Venkataraman Mechanical Engineering P. Venkataraman Rochester Institute of Technology DETC2014 – 35148: Continuous Solution for Boundary Value Problems.
P. Venkataraman Mechanical Engineering P. Venkataraman Rochester Institute of Technology DETC2011 –47658 Determining ODE from Noisy Data 31 th CIE, Washington.
Katsuyo Thornton*, R. Edwin García✝, Larry Aagesen*
Coupled Fluid-Structural Solver CFD incompressible flow solver has been coupled with a FEA code to analyze dynamic fluid-structure coupling phenomena CFD.
Nonlinearity Structural Mechanics Displacement-based Formulations.
Homework 3: Use the Fixed Grid --Volume of Fluid Method with Structured Cartesian CVFEM mesh To track Filling Front h=1 h = 0 2 r = 1 3 Hand in 1. Code.
Ch 5.1: Review of Power Series Finding the general solution of a linear differential equation depends on determining a fundamental set of solutions of.
Parabolic PDEs Generally involve change of quantity in space and time Equivalent to our previous example - heat conduction.
Partial differential equations Function depends on two or more independent variables This is a very simple one - there are many more complicated ones.
Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations
Upscaling and History Matching of Fractured Reservoirs Pål Næverlid Sævik Department of Mathematics University of Bergen Modeling and Inversion of Geophysical.
Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs)
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
First Order Linear Equations Integrating Factors.
Introduction to Monte Carlo Methods D.J.C. Mackay.
Tutorial 5: Numerical methods - buildings Q1. Identify three principal differences between a response function method and a numerical method when both.
Systems of Linear Equations Iterative Methods
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
RFP Workshop Oct 2008 – J Scheffel 1 A generalized weighted residual method for RFP plasma simulation Jan Scheffel Fusion Plasma Physics Alfvén Laboratory,
Challenging problems in kinetic simulation of turbulence and transport in tokamaks Yang Chen Center for Integrated Plasma Studies University of Colorado.
Computational Physics Introduction 3/30/11. Goals  Calculate solutions to physics problems  All physics problems can be formulated mathematically. 
Lecture Objectives: Analyze the unsteady-state heat transfer Conduction Introduce numerical calculation methods Explicit – Implicit methods.
Derivatives In modern structural analysis we calculate response using fairly complex equations. We often need to solve many thousands of simultaneous equations.
 d.s. wu 1 Penalty Methods for Contact Resolution interactive contact resolution that usually works pi david s wu.
ITPA Meeting, PPPL, April, y1999: two core and two SOL transport codes with about 15 users, who worked locally at JET; y2000: Secondees from.
Comparison of Ion Thermal Transport From GLF23 and Weiland Models Under ITER Conditions A. H. Kritz 1 Christopher M. Wolfe 1 F. Halpern 1, G. Bateman 1,
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association Different numerical approaches to 3D transport modelling of fusion devices Alexander Kalentyev.
D. McCune 1 PTRANSP Predictive Upgrades for TRANSP.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Modeling Electromagnetic Fields in Strongly Inhomogeneous Media
On the Use of Finite Difference Matrix-Vector Products in Newton-Krylov Solvers for Implicit Climate Dynamics with Spectral Elements ImpactObjectives 
Partial Derivatives Example: Find If solution: Partial Derivatives Example: Find If solution: gradient grad(u) = gradient.
Differential Equations Linear Equations with Variable Coefficients.
V.M. Sliusar, V.I. Zhdanov Astronomical Observatory, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Observatorna str., 3, Kiev Ukraine
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
INTRO TO OPTIMIZATION MATH-415 Numerical Analysis 1.
DLR Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology 1 Simulation of Missiles with Grid Fins using an Unstructured Navier-Stokes solver coupled to a Semi-Experimental.
Lecture Objectives: - Numerics. Finite Volume Method - Conservation of  for the finite volume w e w e l h n s P E W xx xx xx - Finite volume.
An Introduction to Computational Fluids Dynamics Prapared by: Chudasama Gulambhai H ( ) Azhar Damani ( ) Dave Aman ( )
Unstructured Meshing Tools for Fusion Plasma Simulations
EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics
Mechanisms for losses during Edge Localised modes (ELMs)
Katsuyo Thornton1, R. Edwin García2, Larry Aagesen3
Objective Numerical methods SIMPLE CFD Algorithm Define Relaxation
Numerical investigation of H-mode threshold power by using LH transition models 8th Meeting of the ITPA Confinement Database & Modeling Topical Group.
Scientific Computing Lab
Finite difference code for 3D edge modelling
Announcement MATHCAD for solving system of equation for HW1b
APISAT 2010 Sep. 13~15, 2010, Xi’An, China
Convergence in Computational Science
Objective Unsteady state Numerical methods Discretization
Objective Numerical methods.
Scientific Computing Lab
Lecture Objectives: Analysis of unsteady state heat transfer HW3.
Objective Numerical methods Finite volume.
Linear Algebra Lecture 3.
6.5 Taylor Series Linearization
Mikhail Z. Tokar and Mikhail Koltunov
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas
Presentation transcript:

IMP3 1 RITM – code Computation with stiff transport models presented by D.Kalupin 12th Meeting of the ITPA Transport Physics (TP) Topical Group 7-10 May 2007, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, EURATOM Association, D Jülich, Germany EFDA Integrated Tokamak Modelling (ITM) Task Force

IMP3 2 -There is a number of stiff transport models (GLF23, RITM, Weiland) used in European codes (ASTRA, CRONOS, JETTO and RITM) - New transport code, which is under development by the EFDA ITM Task Force, and will be to a large extend assembled from existing codes, should be capable of working with stiff models - Thus, methods of reliable, stable operation with stiff models is one of current and urgent tasks for the ITM-TF - RITM code has a long time experience of operation with transport coefficients being strongly non-linear functions of of plasma parameter gradients

IMP3 3 Why stiff transport models cause problems? General form of transport equation: After time discretization: With stiff transport models D and are strongly non-linear functions of gradients of plasma parameters, terms and can lead to numerical instabilities

IMP3 4 Methods to avoid these numerical instabilities used in present codes - reduction of the time step usually, the time step is reduced down to s, or even s, which requires large simulation time - smoothing of profiles and/or transport coefficients a plenty of smoothing routines is developed and used in different codes, (caution: such procedure can smooth away important physics) - reformulation of transport equations integral form of transport equations does not contain the radial derivatives of transport coefficients - developments to solvers

IMP3 5 RITM approach to solve transport equations Standard form of transport equation: RITM integral form: New variables: New differential equation for N does not include derivatives of transport coefficients and any assumption about the function behavior in a grid sell, that improves the convergence

IMP3 6 Numerical approach for solving of differential equations in RITM Introducing new variable

IMP3 7 Numerical approach for solving of differential equations in RITM Tokar et.al, Computer Phys. Communications, 175 (2006) Coefficients are determined from continuity of in knots and from boundary conditions This homogeneous equation has Known analytical solutions: This approach requires less iterations to get the steady state solution and allows to obtain solution with enough accuracy for larger time step RITM solver finite volume Time step :

IMP3 8 Smoothing routines … Diverse smoothing routines have been impemented in RITM 2. Smoothing by parabolic curve: 1. Fitting by smooth spline function which consists of three segments: !!! Should be used carefully, as it can smooth away the physics…

IMP3 9 RITM transport model CORE TRANSPORT EDGE TRANSPORT !!! Resulting transport coefficients are strongly non- linear functions of gradients of plasma parameters

IMP3 10 Transport simulations Using RITM approach, numerical instabilities due to very fast change (in space and time) of transport coefficients are completely avoided The time step in simulations can be increased up to 0.1 s and the space resolution can be up to 1000 radial points The total CPU time consumption is several times smaller than with the standard approach RITM run (201 radial points) ~ 30 min JETTO run (101 radial points) ~ 5 hours Predictive calculations of L-H transition in TEXTOR with RITM

IMP3 11 Summary RITM approach to solve transport equations allows for using of stiff transport models and avoid numerical instabilities due to very fast change of transport coefficients This method can be applied for calculations with sufficiently larger time step It is going to be one of the options for the core transport solver in ITM-TF