Environmental Modeling Validating GIS Models. 1. A Habitat Model Issues: ► Mapping Florida Scrub Jay habitat in the Kennedy Space Center in the Kennedy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Categorical Data Analysis
Advertisements

CHI-SQUARE(X2) DISTRIBUTION
Basic Statistics The Chi Square Test of Independence.
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps
Analysis of frequency counts with Chi square
Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors Uncertainty January 23, 2006.
Lecture 14: Classification Thursday 18 February 2010 Reading: Ch – 7.19 Last lecture: Spectral Mixture Analysis.
AA_Vis_1. Using the software “MultiSpec,” students follow protocols to prepare a “clustered” image of their GLOBE Study Site.
PSY 307 – Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences Chapter 19 – Chi-Square Test for Qualitative Data Chapter 21 – Deciding Which Test to Use.
February 15, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors
Hypothesis Testing Using The One-Sample t-Test
Comparing Population Parameters (Z-test, t-tests and Chi-Square test) Dr. M. H. Rahbar Professor of Biostatistics Department of Epidemiology Director,
The Two Sample t Review significance testing Review t distribution
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
Methods of Validating Maps of Deforestation and Selective Logging Carlos Souza Jr. Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia—Imazon.
Aaker, Kumar, Day Ninth Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides
Hypothesis Testing Charity I. Mulig. Variable A variable is any property or quantity that can take on different values. Variables may take on discrete.
1 Psych 5500/6500 Chi-Square (Part Two) Test for Association Fall, 2008.
Statistical Analysis Mean, Standard deviation, Standard deviation of the sample means, t-test.
Chapter 9: Non-parametric Tests n Parametric vs Non-parametric n Chi-Square –1 way –2 way.
Accuracy Assessment Having produced a map with classification is only 50% of the work, we need to quantify how good the map is. This step is called the.
Other Chi-Square Tests
Discriminant Analysis Discriminant analysis is a technique for analyzing data when the criterion or dependent variable is categorical and the predictor.
Role of Spatial Database in Biodiversity Conservation Planning Sham Davande, GIS Expert Arid Communities Technologies, Bhuj 11 September, 2015.
Environmental Modeling Advanced Weighting of GIS Layers (2)
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA) BCT 2053 CHAPTER 5. CONTENT 5.1 Introduction to ANOVA 5.2 One-Way ANOVA 5.3 Two-Way ANOVA.
EMIS 7300 SYSTEMS ANALYSIS METHODS FALL 2005 Dr. John Lipp Copyright © Dr. John Lipp.
Accuracy of Land Cover Products Why is it important and what does it all mean Note: The figures and tables in this presentation were derived from work.
Environmental Modeling Advanced Weighting of GIS Layers.
Learning Objectives Copyright © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning Statistical Testing of Differences CHAPTER fifteen.
Change Detection The process of identifying differences in the state of an object or phenomenon by observing it at different times. Change detection applications:
HYPOTHESIS TESTING BETWEEN TWO OR MORE CATEGORICAL VARIABLES The Chi-Square Distribution and Test for Independence.
Chuvieco and Huete (2009): Fundamentals of Satellite Remote Sensing, Taylor and Francis Emilio Chuvieco and Alfredo Huete Fundamentals of Satellite Remote.
Remote Sensing Classification Accuracy
Copy Data to Minitab Statistical Tests Open Excel File > Highlight All Data & Column Headings > Copy Launch Minitab: Start > Programs > Minitab > Minitab.
CHAPTERS HYPOTHESIS TESTING, AND DETERMINING AND INTERPRETING BETWEEN TWO VARIABLES.
11.2 Tests Using Contingency Tables When data can be tabulated in table form in terms of frequencies, several types of hypotheses can be tested by using.
State the ‘null hypothesis’ State the ‘alternative hypothesis’ State either one-tailed or two-tailed test State the chosen statistical test with reasons.
Section 12.2: Tests for Homogeneity and Independence in a Two-Way Table.
ContentFurther guidance  Hypothesis testing involves making a conjecture (assumption) about some facet of our world, collecting data from a sample,
1 Chi-square Test Dr. T. T. Kachwala. Using the Chi-Square Test 2 The following are the two Applications: 1. Chi square as a test of Independence 2.Chi.
Bullied as a child? Are you tall or short? 6’ 4” 5’ 10” 4’ 2’ 4”
Chapter 1 continued.  Observation- something noted with one of the five senses.
Statistical Inference for the Mean Objectives: (Chapter 8&9, DeCoursey) -To understand the terms variance and standard error of a sample mean, Null Hypothesis,
Chapter 11: Categorical Data n Chi-square goodness of fit test allows us to examine a single distribution of a categorical variable in a population. n.
Class Seven Turn In: Chapter 18: 32, 34, 36 Chapter 19: 26, 34, 44 Quiz 3 For Class Eight: Chapter 20: 18, 20, 24 Chapter 22: 34, 36 Read Chapters 23 &
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps THEMATIC ACCURACY.
Basic Statistics The Chi Square Test of Independence.
CHI-SQUARE(X2) DISTRIBUTION
Chi-square test.
Test of independence: Contingency Table
Chapter 9: Non-parametric Tests
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
8th grade science Scientific Method.
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Tests.
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps
Association between two categorical variables
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
Chapter 11: Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Chi Square (2) Dr. Richard Jackson
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Tests.
Inference for Two Way Tables
Scientific Method Vocabulary
Inference for Two-way Tables
This is how we do science!!
Graphs and Chi Square.
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Tests.
Correspondence Analysis
Hypothesis Testing - Chi Square
Presentation transcript:

Environmental Modeling Validating GIS Models

1. A Habitat Model Issues: ► Mapping Florida Scrub Jay habitat in the Kennedy Space Center in the Kennedy Space Center Breininger, D.R., M.J. Provancha, and R.B. Smith, Mapping Florida Scrub Jay habitat for purposes of land-use management. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57(11):

1. A Habitat Model Factors Primary habitat: Oak forest on well drained soils Secondary habitat: Oak forest on poorly drained soils, and within 300m from the primary habitat Non-habitat Oak forest on poorly drained soils and 300m away from the primary habitat, or non-oak

2. Data ► Soil, well or poorly drained Data source: Data source: ► Vegetation, oak forest or non-oak Data source: Data source:

3. GIS Analysis ► Overlay: vegetation + soils = 1. oak & well drained soils (primary), 2. oak & poorly drained soils (secondary), 3. Non-oak (non-habitat, well or poorly drained). ► Proximity: 300m buffer around the primary ► Overlay: 1. oak&welldrainedsoil = primary 2. oak&poor & inside_buffer_zone = secondary 3. oak&poor & outside_buffer = non-habitat

4. Model Validation ► Validate the GIS model (veg+soil+300m buffer) Is the model correct in locating the primary, Is the model correct in locating the primary, secondary, and non-habitat? secondary, and non-habitat? ► Collect data in the field independent of the mapped data independent of the mapped data > 30 observations > 30 observations ► Variables: density of the oak trees, density of the oak trees, density of the wildlife. density of the wildlife.

4. Model Validation Habitat ► H1: oak density = normal; K-S test for normality accept or reject the null hypothesis K-S test for normality accept or reject the null hypothesis ► H2: oak in primary habitat = oak in secondary t-test or Mann-Whitney accept or reject the null hypothesis t-test or Mann-Whitney accept or reject the null hypothesis ► H3: oak in secondary = oak in non-habitat t-test or Mann-Whitney accept or reject the null hypothesis t-test or Mann-Whitney accept or reject the null hypothesis

4. Model Validation Wildlife ► H1: wildlife density = normal K-S test for normality accept or reject the null hypothesis K-S test for normality accept or reject the null hypothesis ► H2: wildlife in primary habitat = in secondary t-test or Mann-Whitney accept or reject the null hypothesis t-test or Mann-Whitney accept or reject the null hypothesis ► H3: wildlife in secondary = in non-habitat t-test or Mann-Whitney accept or reject the null hypothesis t-test or Mann-Whitney accept or reject the null hypothesis

4. Model Validation Conclusion Is the GIS model correct in locating primary, secondary, and non habitats ? secondary, and non habitats ?

5. Error Matrix ► A.K.A. a confusion matrix or a contingency table. ► It compares, on a category by category basis, the relationship between known reference data (truth) and the corresponding results of a classification. ► Each matrix is square, with the number of rows and columns equal to the number of categories. ► It is used here to assess whether oaks in the primary habitat have a high density and the secondary habitat has a low density.

Mapped Category True Category Primary Secondary Total Oak >= 50% Oak < 50% Total Accuracy of the oak forest map: 89% 5. Error Matrix

5. More on Error Matrix Reference Classified Data Data Water Forest Urban Grassland Row Total Water Forest Urban Grassland Col Total Overall accuracy = 160/200 = 80% Commission error for forest = 10/75 = 13.3% Omission error for forest = 15/80 = 19.8%