1 The RadOn method and associated error analysis Delanoë J., Protat A., Bouniol D., Testud J. C entre d’étude des E nvironnements T errestre et P lanétaires.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Robin Hogan, Chris Westbrook University of Reading Lin Tian NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Phil Brown Met Office Why it is important that ice particles.
Advertisements

Ewan OConnor, Anthony Illingworth, Robin Hogan and the Cloudnet team Cloudnet.
C=0.3D +/- 25% Realistic range of aspect ratios: - columns, plates, branched, dendrites Auer & Veal (1970) sizes 100 to 1mm - bullet rosette arm widths.
Anthony Illingworth, + Robin Hogan, Ewan OConnor, U of Reading, UK and the CloudNET team (F, D, NL, S, Su). Reading: 19 Feb 08 – Meeting with Met office.
Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
Robin Hogan, Malcolm Brooks, Anthony Illingworth
Blind tests of radar/lidar retrievals: Assessment of errors in terms of radiative flux profiles Malcolm Brooks Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth David.
Robin Hogan Anthony Illingworth Ewan OConnor Nicolas Gaussiat Malcolm Brooks University of Reading Cloudnet products available from Chilbolton.
Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
Clouds processes and climate
Robin Hogan, Chris Westbrook University of Reading Lin Tian NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Phil Brown Met Office The importance of ice particle shape.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Changes to the Instrument Synergy/ Target Categorization product.
Robin Hogan & Anthony Illingworth Department of Meteorology University of Reading UK Parameterizing ice cloud inhomogeneity and the overlap of inhomogeneities.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Anthony Illingworth Department of Meteorology, University of Reading UK PDFs of humidity and cloud water content from Raman lidar.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Damian Wilson Malcolm Brooks Evaluation statistics of cloud fraction and water content.
Robin Hogan Julien Delanoe University of Reading Remote sensing of ice clouds from space.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Cloudnet level 3 products.
Review of model/obs/products. Models Fluxes –ECMWF fluxes will added v soon (Openshaw) UKMO Global model data –In testing –Damian to provide more data.
Allison Parker Remote Sensing of the Oceans and Atmosphere.
Nicolas Gaussiat and Robin Hogan Progress meeting 4 – Toulouse – Oct 2003 Dual wavelength retrieval of LWC and IWC at Chilbolton.
1 START08 Heymsfield/Avallone UTLS PSDs Stratospheric PSDs Population-mean ice crystal densities Crystal shape information (SID-2) Extinction estimates.
Microphysical and radiative properties of ice clouds Evaluation of the representation of clouds in models J. Delanoë and A. Protat IPSL / CETP Assessment.
Equation for the microwave backscatter cross section of aggregate snowflakes using the Self-Similar Rayleigh- Gans Approximation Robin Hogan ECMWF and.
Towards improved QPE with a local area X-band radar in the framework of COPS F. Tridon, J. Van Baelen and Y. Pointin Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique,
Robin Hogan Anthony Illingworth Marion Mittermaier Ice water content from radar reflectivity factor and temperature.
Ice-Cloud effective particle size parameterization based on combined lidar, radar reflectivity, and mean Radar Doppler velocity Data Rational Brief outline.
Remote sensing of Stratocumulus using radar/lidar synergy Ewan O’Connor, Anthony Illingworth & Robin Hogan University of Reading.
IRCTR: International Research Centre for Telecommunications and Radar Evaluation of particle shape and orientation within ice clouds using the S-band Doppler.
Initial 3D isotropic fractal field An initial fractal cloud-like field can be generated by essentially performing an inverse 3D Fourier Transform on the.
The DYMECS project A statistical approach for the evaluation of convective storms in high-resolution models Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol, Robert.
High-Resolution X-band Dual-Polarization Weather Radar: Theory and Applications Sense and Nonsense on precipitation and drop size distribution estimation.
- 1 - A Simple Parameterization For Mid-latitude Cirrus Cloud Ice Particle Size Spectra And Ice Sedimentation Rates David L. Mitchell Desert Research Institute,
Bryan A. Baum 1 Ping Yang 2, Andrew Heymsfield 3 1 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 2 Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 3 National Center.
Delft University of Technology 1 Do eddy dissipation rate retrievals work for precipitation profiling Doppler radar?, CESAR Science Day, June 18th, 2014.
EarthCARE and snow Robin Hogan University of Reading.
Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff & Dave Donovan Comparing ice-cloud microphysical properties using Cloudnet & ARM data.
Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloudy Boundary Layers with the Adiabatic Assumption Paquita Zuidema*, Janet Intrieri, Sergey Matrosov, Matthew.
Anthony Illingworth, Robin Hogan, Ewan O’Connor, U of Reading, UK Dominique Bouniol, CETP, France CloudNET: retrieving turbulence parameters from cloud.
Measurements of raindrop-size distributions from dual-polarization spectral observations Dmitri Moisseev and V. Chandrasekar Colorado State University.
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
Anthony Illingworth, Robin Hogan, Ewan O’Connor, U of Reading, UK Nicolas Gaussiat Damian Wilson, Malcolm Brooks Met Office, UK Dominique Bouniol, Alain.
Data assimilation, short-term forecast, and forecasting error
Looking for deterministic behavior from chaos GyuWon LEE ASP/RAL NCAR.
Dual-Polarization and Dual-Wavelength Radar Measurements Vivek National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado I.Polarization and dual- wavelength.
Topic 7: remote sensing of cloud particles and properties; validation etc.
Robin Hogan Ewan O’Connor The Instrument Synergy/ Target Categorization product.
KNMI 35 GHz Cloud Radar & Cloud Classification* Henk Klein Baltink * Robin Hogan (Univ. of Reading, UK)
A comparison of airborne in-situ cloud microphysical measurements with ground C and X band radar observations in African squall lines E. Drigeard 1, E.
BBHRP Assessment Part 2: Cirrus Radiative Flux Study Using Radar/Lidar/AERI Derived Cloud Properties David Tobin, Lori Borg, David Turner, Robert Holz,
Cloud and precipitation best estimate… …and things I don’t know that I want to know Robin Hogan University of Reading.
Retrieval of Cloud Phase and Ice Crystal Habit From Satellite Data Sally McFarlane, Roger Marchand*, and Thomas Ackerman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
A comparison of cloud microphysics in deep tropical convection forming over the continent and over the ocean Emmanuel Fontaine 1, Elise Drigeard 1, Wolfram.
Drakkar Calibration The Drakkar microwave radiometer Calibrating Drakkar The Calibrated Data Future Work Delft, October 2004 Anne Armstrong (CETP/LMD)
AQUARadar Identification of temporally stable Z-R relationships using measurements of micro-rain radars M. Clemens (1), G. Peters (1), J. Seltmann (2),
UCLA Vector Radiative Transfer Models for Application to Satellite Data Assimilation K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano and Q. Yue Department of Atmospheric.
Testing a new ice parameterization scheme based on CloudNET & ARM observations. CloudNet Final meeting: October 2005 Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff Co-authors:
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Southern Ocean Clouds Characterization.
Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin SIRTA Cloud and Radiation Observatory M. Haeffelin, A. Armstrong, L. Barthès, O. Bock, C. Boitel, D.
Robin Hogan Anthony Illingworth Marion Mittermaier Ice water content from radar reflectivity factor and temperature.
UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.
Developing Winter Precipitation Algorithm over Land from Satellite Microwave and C3VP Field Campaign Observations Fifth Workshop of the International Precipitation.
Toward Continuous Cloud Microphysics and Cloud Radiative Forcing Using Continuous ARM Data: TWP Darwin Analysis Goal: Characterize the physical properties.
QUEST-Meeting, 14. Dez. 2007, Offenbach Das neue COSMO-EU Mikrophysikschema: Validierung von Eisgehalten Axel Seifert Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach.
Table 1. Structural Form Parameter Estimates of inflation rate
The DYMECS project A statistical approach for the evaluation of convective storms in high-resolution models Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol, Robert.
A LATENT HEAT RETRIEVAL IN A RAPIDLY INTENSIFYING HURRICANE
RadOn : Retrieval of microphysical and radiative properties of ice clouds from Doppler cloud radar observations J. Delanoë and A. Protat IPSL / CETP.
ARM Validation Data for Climate Models
Radar-lidar synergy for the retrieval of water cloud parameters
Cloud liquid water and ice content by multi-wavelength radar
Presentation transcript:

1 The RadOn method and associated error analysis Delanoë J., Protat A., Bouniol D., Testud J. C entre d’étude des E nvironnements T errestre et P lanétaires CloudNET meeting : Paris Julien Delanoë 4/5 th April 2005

2 Outline Rad ar On ly Algorithm Error analysis Retrieval

3 Radar Only Algorithm RadOn Principle of the radar retrieval method

4 Principle of the Radar Algorithm (1) Z Doppler Velocity V d =V t +w  Density law and Area diameter relationships D m (V t ) N 0 * =f(D m,Z) IWC, , r e  V t retrieval

5 First step : Retrieval of V T from V D V d =w+V t Hypothesis (*) : for a long enough time span 2 methods: V t -Z : Statistical relationship between V d and Z Assuming (*), we obtain V t from Z (V t =aZ b ) New approach Running Window: Every 30s we compute the mean V d over ±10 minutes (like Matrosov) for each radar gate.

6 Running Window (20min) Advantages: Better resolution than Matrosov method More variability of V t than V t -Z But instability of RadOn when V t <5cm.s -1 V t from V t -Z relationship 04/14/03 Palaiseau Retrieval of terminal fall velocity with different methods

7 Principle of the Radar Algorithm (2) Z Doppler Velocity V d =V t +w  Density and Area diameter relationships D m (V t ) N 0 * =f(D m,Z) IWC, , r e  V t retrieval

8 Principle of the radar retrieval method (2) Second step : estimate of the particle density  (D) and area A(D) from V T -Z relationship V t -Z relationship obtained from radar is compared to microphysical V t -Z relationships with different density and area laws. Microphysical V t -Z relationships :  (D)=a  D b  and v(D)=f(m(D),A(D),a d,b d ) (Mitchell 1996) Where m(D)=(  /6) a  D 3+b , A=  D  and a d, b d are the continuous drag coefficients (Khvorostianov and Curry 2002). From coefficients of V t -Z radar relationship we estimate the best density diameter and area diameter relationships.

9 Example : 04/14/2003 Palaiseau black: V t -Z obtained by the radar red: The best density and Area relationships

10 Principle of the Radar Algorithm (3) Z Doppler Velocity V d =V t +w  Density and Area diameter relationships D m (V t ) N 0 * =f(D m,Z) IWC, , r e  V t retrieval Step unchanged (see Delft presentation)

11 Principle of the Radar Algorithm (4) Z Doppler Velocity V d =V t +w  Density law and Area diameter relationships D m (V t ) N 0 * =f(D m,Z) IWC, , r e  V t retrieval Step unchanged (see Delft presentation) Direct relationship:

12 Principle of the Radar Algorithm (5) Z Doppler Velocity V d =V t +w  Density and Area diameter relationships D m (V t ) N 0 * =f(D m,Z) IWC, , r e  V t retrieval

13 Clouds parameters Using D m N 0 * and Gamma shape => Clouds parameters

14 Evaluation of RadOn using the microphysical database

15 Evaluation of RadOn using the microphysical database Dataset: CLARE 98, CARL 99, EUCREX, ARM SGP, FASTEX, CEPEX, CRYSTALFACE We impose a density law and area diameter relationships for a radar at 35 and 95GHz: A(D)=  D  with several couples of coefficients  (D)=aD b with several couples of coefficients We compute V t, Z, IWC,  and re from the in- situ measurements, assuming A(D) and  (D) RadOn Algorithm IWC, , r e from RadOnIWC, , r e micro  Entries of the algorithm :Vt and Z e from in situ data

16 bias bias + std bias - std 4 « Density diameter relationships »: b=-1.4, -1.1, -0.8, « Area diameter relationships»

17 bias bias + std bias - std

18 bias bias + std bias - std

19 RadOn Retrieval: 14th April 2003: Palaiseau Deep ice cloud 15th April 2003: Palaiseau Cirrus case

20 Retrieval 14 th April 2003 IWC rere N0*N0*   (D)=0.022D -0.6 A(D)=  /4D 2

21 Retrieval 15 th April 2003 IWC rere N0*N0*   (D)=0.0005D -1.3 A(D)=  D 1.4

22 Future work Refine the error analysis Run Radon on all the CloudNET sites, for all frequencies Statistical study of density, IWC, , r e …. Comparison with Radar/Lidar and other Radar algorithm

23 IWC retrieval from different method 1.RadOn with running window 2.RadOn with Vt-Z 3.IWC-Z-T R.J Hogan 4.IWC-Z Protat et al.

24 With running windowV t -Z IWC-Z-T RJHIWC-Z Protat et al

25