Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Conceptual Design Bryan C Fuqua – SAIC 281.335.2282 Diana DeMott – SAIC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA) Tariq Ashraf Systems Engineering Feb 24, 2005.
Advertisements

Instruments and Approaches in Risk Analysis Session 3 Dr. Bijan Khazai Risk Analysis Fundamentals of Risk Analysis 1.
Mission Success Starts with Safety The Similarities and Differences of Reliability Engineering and Probabilistic Risk Assessment RAMS VII Workshop November.
Introduction to Risk Management 26 September 2014 Peter Fowler CPPD.
RISK INFORMED APPROACHES FOR PLANT LIFE MANAGEMENT: REGULATORY AND INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVES Björn Wahlström.
Project Management Gaafar 2007 / 1 This Presentation is uses information from PMBOK Guide 2000 Project Management Risk Management* Dr. Lotfi Gaafar.
Introduction to Research Methodology
System Safety Concepts Dave Balderston Office of System Safety March 26, 2003.
Service Design – Section 4.5 Service Continuity Management.
Risk Management Planning for Problems. Characteristics of Risk Risk has two principle characteristics Uncertainty – It may or may not happen Loss – If.
Risk Assessment & Risk Management at GSFC
1 The Cost of Organizational Structures and Interfaces prepared for Ground System Architectures Workshop by Darryl W. Webb Business and Operations Analysis.
Reliability Risk Assessment
“ Hard work and concern for the society is the key to success ” - O P Jindal On-site and Off-site Emergency Plans Based on Integral Risk Management – Key.
6/23/2015 Risk-Informed Process and Tools for Permitting Hydrogen Fueling Stations Jeffrey LaChance 1, Andrei Tchouvelev 2, and Jim Ohi 3 1 Sandia National.
The Australian/New Zealand Standard on Risk Management
Overview of Advanced Design White Paper Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23, 1998 OFES Headquarters, Germantown.
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RISK MANAGEMENT 2.
MIT ICAT MIT ICAT. MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Motivation Adverse Weather Significantly Impacts Flight Operations  Safety % All US Accidents  Efficiency.
Tony Gould Quality Risk Management. 2 | PQ Workshop, Abu Dhabi | October 2010 Introduction Risk management is not new – we do it informally all the time.
Hazards Analysis & Risks Assessment By Sebastien A. Daleyden Vincent M. Goussen.
Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.
Quality Risk Management ICH Q9 Annex I: Methods & Tools
TIWANA WALTON MENTOR: SHARON MONICA JONES High Level Aviation Safety Risk Assessment.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
Hazard Management for Safety Critical Systems Philip Benjamin Supervised by: Dr. David Hemer Computer Science Department University Of Adelaide.
Isograph Reliability Software RiskVu V3. Isograph Reliability Software ESSM – The first risk monitor ? Essential Systems Status Monitor Installed at Heysham.
Risk Assessment and Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Mario. H. Fontana PhD.,PE Research Professor Arthur E. Ruggles PhD Professor The University of.
Project Risk and Cost Management. IS the future certain? The future is uncertain, but it is certain that there are two questions will be asked about our.
Overview of Credit Risk Management practices in banksMarketing Report 1 st Half 2009 Overview of Credit Risk Management practices – The banking perspective.
Federal Agency Update - A Public Real Estate Symposium Las Vegas, Nevada January 26, 2010 Procedures Guide for Right of Way Cost Estimation and Cost Management.
WHAT IS SYSTEM SAFETY? The field of safety analysis in which systems are evaluated using a number of different techniques to improve safety. There are.
Opting for “Long Term Operations” Technical, economic and regulatory considerations MARC Conference June 8, 2010 Sean Bushart, EPRI Sr. Program Manager.
Managing Risks in Projects. Risk Concepts The Likelihood that some Problematical Event will Occur The Likelihood that some Problematical Event will Occur.
A GENERIC PROCESS FOR REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING Chapter 2 1 These slides are prepared by Enas Naffar to be used in Software requirements course - Philadelphia.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
FAULT TREE ANALYSIS (FTA). QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS Some of the commonly used quantitative risk assessment methods are; 1.Fault tree analysis (FTA)
Slide 1V&V 10/2002 Software Quality Assurance Dr. Linda H. Rosenberg Assistant Director For Information Sciences Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA
Chapter 17 Risk Management. RISK MANAGEMENT RISK MANAGEMENT FOCUSES ON THE FUTURE RISK MANAGEMENT FOCUSES ON THE FUTURE RISK AND INFORMATION ARE INVERSELY.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Ch 10 - Risk Management Learning Objectives You should be able to: List and describe risk management processes, inputs, outputs, and tools List and describe.
Strategy: Analysis and Practice Slide 1/1 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005 Chapter 14. Risk, uncertainty and strategy.
BSBPMG504A Manage Project Costs 7.1 Estimate Costs Adapted from PMBOK 4 th Edition InitiationPlanning ExecutionClose Monitor Control The process of developing.
Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA)
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt Risk-based regression testing in a telecommunication system node Master’s thesis presentation
1 V&V Needs for NextGen of 2025 and Beyond A JPDO Perspective Maureen Keegan JPDO Integration Manager October 13, 2010.
Toulouse, September 2003 Page 1 JOURNEE ALTARICA Airbus ESACS  ISAAC.
AURA New Initiatives Office. GSMT SWG Meeting L. Stepp, July 30, 2002 NSF Science Working Group Support Available from AURA NIO Available Personnel Current.
Pavan Rajagopal, GeoControl Systems James B. Dabney, UHCL Gary Barber, GeoControl Systems 1Spacecraft FSW Workshop 2015.
Engineering | Architecture | Design-Build | Surveying | Planning | GeoSpatial Solutions November 16, 2015 THE AWWA J100 - WHAT IT IS, WHY IT IS BEING UPDATED,
Chapter 8 Risk Management Plans 8 Risk Management Plans C H A P T E R.
SAFETY AND HEALTH IN PROCESS INDUSTRIES(MKKK1653) 2015/2016 ASSIGNMENT Failure mode, effect and critical analysis (FMECA) By Yahya Gambo (MKK152006) SUBMITTED.
ON “SOFTWARE ENGINEERING” SUBJECT TOPIC “RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT” MASTER OF COMPUTER APPLICATION (5th Semester) Presented by: ANOOP GANGWAR SRMSCET,
Project Cost Management
[Team Name] (e.g. ESH) Team Lead.
PRA: Validation versus Participation in Risk Analysis PRA as a Risk Informed Decision Making Tool Richard T. Banke– SAIC
Security SIG in MTS 05th November 2013 DEG/MTS RISK-BASED SECURITY TESTING Fraunhofer FOKUS.
Safety and Risk.
Quality Risk Management
Training Course on Integrated Management System for Regulatory Body
Sandia National Laboratories
Quantitative Risk Assessment
Risk Analysis Fundamentals of Engineering Design by Barry Hyman
Knowing When to Stop: An Examination of Methods to Minimize the False Negative Risk of Automated Abort Triggers RAM XI Training Summit October 2018 Patrick.
Hazards Analysis & Risks Assessment
A New Concept for Laboratory Quality Management Systems
Project Risk Management Jiwei Ma
Review and comparison of the modeling approaches and risk analysis methods for complex ship system. Author: Sunil Basnet.
HRA: Aerospace Challenges
Presentation transcript:

Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Conceptual Design Bryan C Fuqua – SAIC Diana DeMott – SAIC Paul Wilson – SAIC

What is PRA? Determining risk generally amounts to answering the following three questions: –What kinds of events or scenarios can occur (i.e., what can go wrong)? –What are the likelihoods and associated uncertainties of the events or scenarios? –What consequences could result from these events or scenarios (e.g., Loss of Crew and Loss of Mission)? Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) is a comprehensive, structured, and logical analysis method aimed at identifying and assessing risks in complex technological systems for the purpose of cost-effectively improving their safety and performance. (PRA Procedures Guide for NASA Managers and Practitioners) They are often characterized by (but not limited to) event tree models, fault tree models, and physics based simulation models 2

Why Use PRA for Planning or Early in Concept Phase? PRA can be applied in the conceptual design phase and not just the operational phase PRA can be utilized as a key input to the Risk Informed Decision Making process Identifies potential risks early to: –Determine what (equipment, process, mission, etc.) drives the risk –Mitigate or eliminate risks earlier in design to lower costs –Allows trade studies to compare design alternatives based on risk 3

Use of PRA in Trade Studies Provide additional information for Risk Informed Decisions made by management Compare concept/design alternatives based on risks Determine magnitude of reduced risk due to proposed changes in: –Design –Process –Equipment / components 4

Using PRA Methodology Develop high level PRA models of Design Reference Missions (DRMs) or early design prototypes – Models may include Event Trees, Fault Trees, or other probabilistic- based applications Models should be based on conceptual designs and generic key system and equipment level information Using what is known today, we can quantify the model(s) to predict magnitudes of risk, or compare risks, for different designs Following this methodology will provide program/project management with a better understanding of the risks 5

Key PRA Parameters to Develop Establish the scope of the model Understand and incorporate success criteria Use a high level approach to provide magnitude of (not specific) risk Master Equipment List (MEL) Find data (e.g., historical data, surrogate data, etc.) Use placeholder data for known future considerations 6

PRA Results (Risk Drivers) Identify and characterize the key risks and challenges associated with potential high risk programs in aerospace or other industries Loss of life Loss of equipment or facility Large financial loss 7

Conclusion PRA methodology is a tool that has the potential to improve both conceptual planning and early design efforts to help identify and ultimately mitigate risks in a more efficient and cost effective manner. 8