自発的高速磁気リコネクションモデルとフレアの三次 元構造 鵜飼(愛媛大学) (太陽フレア現象の物理機構?) Question: What is the physical mechanism responsible for large dissipative events observed in space.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress and Plans on Magnetic Reconnection for CMSO For NSF Site-Visit for CMSO May1-2, Experimental progress [M. Yamada] -Findings on two-fluid.
Advertisements

Multiple reconnections and explosive events and in MST and solar flares Gennady Fiksel CMSO workshop, Princeton, NJ, Oct 5-8, 2005.
Particle acceleration in a turbulent electric field produced by 3D reconnection Marco Onofri University of Thessaloniki.
1 MHD Simulations of 3D Reconnection Triggered by Finite Random Resistivity Perturbations T. Yokoyama Univ. Tokyo in collaboration with H. Isobe (Kyoto.
1 A New Model of Solar Flare Trigger Mechanism Kanya Kusano (Hiroshima University) Collaboration with T.Maeshiro (Hiroshima Univ.) T.Yokoyama (Univ. of.
The magnetic nature of solar flares Paper by E.R. Priest & T.G. Forbes Review presented by Hui Song.
CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory.
Two-dimensional Structure and Particle Pinch in a Tokamak H-mode
The CD Kink Instability in Magnetically Dominated Relativistic Jets * The relativistic jets associated with blazar emission from radio through TeV gamma-rays.
William Daughton Plasma Physics Group, X-1 Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented at: Second Workshop on Thin Current Sheets University of Maryland April.
Five Spacecraft Observations of Oppositely Directed Exhaust Jets from a Magnetic Reconnection X-line Extending > 4.3 x 10 6 km in the Solar Wind Gosling.
The Structure of the Parallel Electric Field and Particle Acceleration During Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake M.Swisdak M. Shay M. Hesse C. Cattell University.
Sept. 12, 2006 Relationship Between Particle Acceleration and Magnetic Reconnection.
Two energy release processes for CMEs: MHD catastrophe and magnetic reconnection Yao CHEN Department of Space Science and Applied Physics Shandong University.
太陽フレア・ CME と宇宙天気 Solar Flares/CMEs and Space Weather 浅井歩 (Ayumi Asai) 1 、 下条圭美 1 、 石井貴子 2 、黒河宏企 2 、柴田一成 2 1: 国立天文台野辺山、 2: 京大理.
Dynamics of the Magnetized Wake and the Acceleration of the Slow solar Wind ¹Università di Pisa F. Rappazzo¹, M. Velli², G. Einaudi¹, R. B. Dahlburg³ ²Università.
New England Space Science Meeting 3 Feb 1, 2006 Implications of Reconnection Nathan Schwadron Feb 1, 2006.
Magnetic Reconnection in the Solar Wind Gosling, Phan, et al.
In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive)
Coronal Mass Ejections: Models and Their Observational Basis (P.F. Chen Living Rev. Solar Phys.) 张英智 中国科学院空间科学与应用研究中心空间天气学国家重点实验室.
A Fermi Model for the Production of Energetic Electrons during Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake H. Che M. Swisdak M. A. Shay University of Maryland NRL.
Waves and Currents in Coronal Active Regions Leon Ofman* Catholic University of America NASA Goddard Space Flight Center *Visiting, Tel Aviv University.
Forced kinetic current sheet formation as related to magnetic reconnection in the magnetosphere A. P. Kropotkin and V. I. Domrin Skobeltsyn Institute of.
Observation and Theory of Substorm Onset C. Z. (Frank) Cheng (1,2), T. F. Chang (2), Sorin Zaharia (3), N. N. Gorelenkov (4) (1)Plasma and Space Science.
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
Magnetic accelerations of relativistic jets. Serguei Komissarov University of Leeds UK TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you.
ABSTRACT This work concerns with the analysis and modelling of possible magnetohydrodynamic response of plasma of the solar low atmosphere (upper chromosphere,
Kinetic Effects on the Linear and Nonlinear Stability Properties of Field- Reversed Configurations E. V. Belova PPPL 2003 APS DPP Meeting, October 2003.
The Relation between Soft X-ray Ejections and Hard X-ray Emission on November 24 Flare H. Takasaki, T. Morimoto, A. Asai, J. Kiyohara, and K. Shibata Kwasan.
Space physics EF2245 Tomas Karlsson Space and Plasma Physics School of Electrical Engineering EF2245 Space Physics 2009.
Multiscale issues in modeling magnetic reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland IPAM Meeting on Multiscale Problems in Fusion Plasmas January 10,
Boundaries, shocks, and discontinuities. How discontinuities form Often due to “wave steepening” Example in ordinary fluid: –V s 2 = dP/d  m –P/  
R. Oran csem.engin.umich.edu SHINE 09 May 2005 Campaign Event: Introducing Turbulence Rona Oran Igor V. Sokolov Richard Frazin Ward Manchester Tamas I.
Challenges in Understanding 3D Magnetic Reconnection in Observations and Simulations Session organizers: Peter Wyper (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Oak.
Reconnection process in Sun and Heliosphere A.C. Das Physical Research Laboratory Ahmedabad IHY school for Asia – Pacific Region, Kodaikanal, Dec.10-22,
Evolution of Emerging Flux and Associated Active Phenomena Takehiro Miyagoshi (GUAS, Japan) Takaaki Yokoyama (NRO, Japan)
Reconnection rates in Hall MHD and Collisionless plasmas
Nonlinear interactions between micro-turbulence and macro-scale MHD A. Ishizawa, N. Nakajima, M. Okamoto, J. Ramos* National Institute for Fusion Science.
3D Reconnection Simulations of Descending Coronal Voids Mark Linton in collaboration with Dana Longcope (MSU)
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Spectral Signature of Emergent Magnetic Flux D1 神尾 精 Solar Seminar Balasubramaniam,K.S., 2001, ApJ, 557, 366. Chae, J. et al., 2000, ApJ, 528,
II. MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS (Space Climate School, Lapland, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)
Electron inertial effects & particle acceleration at magnetic X-points Presented by K G McClements 1 Other contributors: A Thyagaraja 1, B Hamilton 2,
S.I.Bezrodnykh, V.I.Vlasov, B.V.Somov
有限振幅拡散擾乱より発展する 磁気リコネクションの 3 次元シミュレーション 横山 央明(東京大学 ) 、磯部 洋明(京都大学) 理論懇シンポジウム 国立天文台 Temporal evolution of a current sheet with initial.
Spectroscopic Detection of Reconnection Evidence with Solar-B II. Signature of Flows in MHD simulation Hiroaki ISOBE P.F. Chen *, D. H. Brooks, D. Shiota,
Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland presented in honor of Professor Eric Priest September 8, 2003.
STUDIES OF NONLINEAR RESISTIVE AND EXTENDED MHD IN ADVANCED TOKAMAKS USING THE NIMROD CODE D. D. Schnack*, T. A. Gianakon**, S. E. Kruger*, and A. Tarditi*
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
MHD wave propagation in the neighbourhood of a two-dimensional null point James McLaughlin Cambridge 9 August 2004.
MHD and Kinetics Workshop February 2008 Magnetic reconnection in solar theory: MHD vs Kinetics Philippa Browning, Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics,
A shock is a discontinuity separating two different regimes in a continuous media. –Shocks form when velocities exceed the signal speed in the medium.
Flare Ribbon Expansion and Energy Release Ayumi ASAI Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University Explosive Phenomena in Magnetized Plasma – New Development.
Space physics EF2245 Tomas Karlsson Space and Plasma Physics School of Electrical Engineering EF2245 Space Physics 2010.
Shock heating by Fast/Slow MHD waves along plasma loops
Katarzyna Otmianowska-Mazur (UJ, Poland)‏ Grzegorz Kowal (UW-Madison/UJ, Poland)‏ Alex Lazarian (UW-Madison, USA)‏ Ethan Vishniac (McMaster, Canada)‏ Effects.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Sun: Magnetic Structure Feb. 16, 2012.
Alex Lazarian Astronomy Department and Center for Magnetic Self- Organization in Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas Collaboration: Ethan Vishniac, Grzegorz.
MHD Simulations of magnetotail reconnection (J. Birn) Observations MHD simulation: overview Propagation of dipolarization signals Generation of pulsations:
1 Fluid Theory: Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). 2 3.
Coronal Mass Ejection: Initiation, Magnetic Helicity, and Flux Ropes. L. Boundary Motion-Driven Evolution Amari, T., Luciani, J. F., Aly, J. J., Mikic,
Self-Similar Reconnection: A new model for astrophysical application beyond the Petschek model Shin-ya Nitta 新田 伸也 The Graduate University for Advanced.
Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares
An overview of turbulent transport in tokamaks
The Bow Shock and Magnetosheath
Series of high-frequency slowly drifting structure mapping the magnetic field reconnection M. Karlicky, A&A, 2004, 417,325.
Contents Introduction Force-Free Approximation Analytical Solutions
MHD Simulation of Plasmoid-Induced-Reconnection in Solar Flares
速報 “Fast Magnetic Reconnection via Jets and Current Microsheets”
Evidence for magnetic reconnection in the high corona
Presentation transcript:

自発的高速磁気リコネクションモデルとフレアの三次 元構造 鵜飼(愛媛大学) (太陽フレア現象の物理機構?) Question: What is the physical mechanism responsible for large dissipative events observed in space plasmas (solar flares, substorms)? 1. First phase: magnetic energy is stored in a large-scale region (current sheet) 2. Second phase: critically stored magnetic energy is explosively released Observations ⇒ magnetic reconnection is essential for flares 「 In space plasmas, the most powerful magnetic energy converter is provided by slow shocks (Petschek, 1964) ⇒ the fast reconnection mechanism involving standing slow shocks is most responsible for flares 」 Question: How can the fast reconnection mechanism be realized as an eventual solution of an initial problem and be sustained steadily in the system?

(two plasma processes be simultaneously explained) 1. Magnetic energy storage 「 magnetic reconnection should not occur effectively until magnetic energy is critically stored; i.e., any effective dissipation mechanism may not exist in the usual current-sheet system in static equilibrium 」 *in usual circumstances in space (collisionless) plasmas, R m >>1; no effective dissipation mechanism ⇒ no effective magnetic reconnection (reconnection electric field is readily short-circuited) 2. Explosive magnetic energy release 「 fast magnetic reconnection is suddenly triggered when magnetic energy is critically stored in the large-scale current-sheet system 」 *storage of magnetic energy is associated with enhancement of currents; hence, enhanced currents ⇒ key to triggering of fast reconnection *the resulting fast reconnection mechanism involving slow shocks should be sustained steadily ⇒ explosive system collapse

< Spontaneous Fast Reconnection Model (SFRM) > (Basic idea; flare scenario) (i) critically enhanced currents in the system (during storage of magnetic energy) ⇒ current-driven anomalous resistivity (as a possible dissipation mechanism) (ii) positive feedback between the (macroscopic) reconnection flow and (microscopic) current-driven anomalous resistivity ⇒ evolution of the fast reconnection mechanism as an eventual solution (iii) the resulting fast reconnection mechanism sustained steadily ⇒ explosive magnetic energy release, drastic collapse of the field system A new-type nonlinear instability due to coupling between micro- and macro- plasma processes: different from the conventional externally driven model (Petschek, Priest and Forbes, Sato….)

> ( Assumption ) *current-driven anomalous resistivity model (experiments, Ono; Yamada ) [η(r,t) is assumed to increase with V d as a function of macroscopic quantities when V d >Vc (η determined by the feedback from macroscopic reconnection flows)] I. 2D simulations: different parameters in various situations 「 fast magnetic reconnection builds up by the positive feedback between the plasma flow and the anomalous resistivity, which simultaneously grow explosively 」 「 resulting fast reconnection mechanism (slow shocks) is sustained steadily and extends outwards with time ⇒ drastic collapse of the overall current sheet system 」 (1). localized diffusion region with locally enhanced anomalous resistivity (2). standing slow shocks extending outwards with time; fast reconnection jet (3). large-scale plasmoid swelling and propagating outwards (Nitta, Ap.J, 2004)

「 Fast reconnection mechanism involving standing slow shocks can be realized as an eventual solution of 2D MHD equations 」 「 Resulting fast reconnection (slow shock) configuration is consistent with the one suggested by theoretical studies based on conservation laws of MHD quantities 」 * new discoveries: never recognized by previous theoretical studies on the fast reconnection mechanism (Petschek, 1964; Vasyliunas, 1975; Priest and Forbes, 1986 ; in particular, different from Petschek Model ) (i) Spontaneous evolution as a nonlinear instability ( 外部条件の影響も考慮可能; emerging flux ) (ii) Large-scale plasmoid at the end of the (supersonic) fast reconnection jet (in a free space) (iii) Large-scale magnetic loop (in a closed system); fast shock at the loop top

II. Spontaneous Fast Reconnection Model in Three Dimensions *no analytical study on the 3D fast reconnection mechanism; only a few 3D simulations 「 basic 3D fast reconnection configuration has little been understood 」 「 Key points to be clarified 」 *Whether or not the fast reconnection mechanism involving standing slow shocks can be realized as an eventual solution in three dimensions? *How the positive feedback between 3D reconnection flow and current-driven anomalous resistivity works as a nonlinear instability? (Ugai and Shimizu, Phys. Plasmas, 1996) 「 when a current-driven anomalous resistivity (diffusion region) appears in a region of sufficiently large extent in the z direction, the 3D fast reconnection mechanism can be realized 」 (Ugai et al, Phys. Plasmas, 2004) 「 so long as η increases with V d with a sufficiently large threshold, the fast reconnection mechanism can explosively evolve by the positive feedback even in 3D situations 」 Question: What is the 3D fast reconnection configuration that can be sustained steadily?

*3D simulation model: direct extension of the precise 2D simulation to the z direction [Evolution of the 3D fast reconnection mechanism] * temporal behaviors of E and the anomalous resistivity η measured at the origin r=0 (for different plasma β) 「 explosive buildup by the positive feedback 」 「 establishment of fast reconnection mechanism 」 「 more powerful for the smaller β 」 「 E 0 does not mean that the fast reconnection is suddenly terminated 」 (3D diffusion region; unstable against tearing instability; bifurcated into a pair of 3D diffusion regions; moving away from each other) β=0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0   

t=50.6 [Resulting 3D fast reconnection configurations] *magnetic field in the (x,y) plane and isosurface of large plasma pressure (3D plasmoid) before and after the tearing -- *plasma flow vectors *isosurface of the resulting anomalous resistivity; resistive tearing in the diffusion region; 3D diffusion region where the anomalous resistivity is locally enhanced moves in the x direction t=50.6 O O

[ Slow shock profiles ] *profiles of quantities in the y direction at different x on the x axis 「 standing switch-off shock structure– in good agreement with the one of the well-known 2D fast reconnection mechanism 」 *fast reconnection jet u x for different plasma β along the x axis 「 reconnection jet u x : accelerated exactly to the Alfven velocity ( consistent with the 2D fast reconnection theory) 」 β=0.15, 0.3, 0.5, 1, 2

「 fast reconnection mechanism involving slow shocks is sustained steadily to be confined in a finite extent in the z direction 」 「 the fast reconnection mechanism is extending outwards with time so that the overall magnetic field system explosively collapses 」 *isosurface of high current density viewed from different angles ; 3D slow shock structure t=50.6

*isosurface of large current density: slow shock and diffusion region 「 3D slow shock extends in the positive x direction 」 (the isosurface does not exactly indicate the slow shock) *3D structure of the standing slow shock (z-extent)? t=38.5 t=44

*magnetic field in the xy plane and the isosurface of plasma pressure P of large value (identified with a large-scale plasmoid; its cross section) [growth of the plasmoid in accordance with the proceeding of the spontaneous fast reconnection process]

*isosurface of plasma density; cross section [strong plasma rarefaction in the fast reconnection region and distinct plasma compression in the plasmoid]

O *temporal behaviors of virtual (magnetized) particles placed at y=1.5 [the ambient magnetized plasma is sucked into the fast reconnection region and is strongly accelerated by standing slow shocks, leading to drastic collapse of overall magnetic field system in accordance with the proceeding of the spontaneous fast reconnection] O t=22 t=44

t=33 t=38.5 t=44 t= 49.5 *temporal behaviors of plasma flow vectors; growth of the fast reconnection jet with time

(in a long current sheet system with free boundaries: Ugai et al, 2005) *Basic idea: 「 magnetic energy storage →critically enhanced currents → dissipation mechanism (anomalous resistivity)→fast magnetic reconnection →flares 」 (Assumption : current-driven anomalous resistivity model with a (large) threshold, consistent with laboratory experiments: Ono, Yamada,..) 1. 「 Only when a current-driven anomalous resistivity is caused in a sufficiently large extent in the z direction, the fast reconnection mechanism involving standing slow shocks can be realized as an eventual solution and sustained in three dimensions 」 2. 「 Central 3D diffusion region is unstable against resistive tearing and is bifurcated into a pair of diffusion regions; 3D slow shocks extend outwards, and, attached to the fast reconnection jet, a large-scale 3D plasmoid swells and propagates 」 3. 「 Resulting fast reconnection mechanism remains to be confined in a finite extent in the z direction; its basic configuration is, both qualitatively and quantitatively, in good agreement with the well-known 2D one 」

*closed system: symmetry boundary conditions on (y,z) plane, across which plasma cannot flow (Masuda et al, 1994) NP t=36 t=42t=48 t=36

Temporal dynamics of 3 D slow and fast shocks *Green: Slow shock; Blue: Fast Shock

*temporal behavior of the slow and fast shocks *Green: Slow shock Blue: Fast Shock

* Slow and fast shocks viewed from different angles *Green: Slow shock Blue: Fast Shock