Namur Research Institute for Life Science IN VITRO RADIOBIOLOGY AND RELATED TOPICS: description of some fundamental research performed with a low energy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modifiers of cell survival: Linear Energy Transfer Lecture Ahmed Group
Advertisements

Computer modeling of radiation effects Noriyuki B. Ouchi and Kimiaki Saito Radiation Effects Analysis Research Group, Nuclear Science and Engineering Directorate,
Experimental studies of low energy proton irradiation of thin vacuum deposited Aluminum layers T. Renger, M. Sznajder, U.R.M.E. Geppert Chart.
17-May-15FCAL collaboration workshop, Status of sensor R&D in Minsk K. Afanaciev, M. Baturitsky, I. Emeliantchik, A. Ignatenko, A. Litomin, V. Shevtsov.
Characterization of primed state of CVD diamond by light and alpha particles C. Manfredotti Experimental Physics Department University of Torino INFN-
Modifiers of Cell Survival: Oxygen Effect
THE INFLUENCE OF THE P53STATUS FOR BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF THE GLIOBLASTMA CELLS FOLLOWING BORON NEUTRON CAPTURE THERAPY Keiko Seki, Yuko Kinashi, Sentaro.
Radiation Exposure, Dose and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Medicine Background Image:
Space radiation dosimetry and the fluorescent nuclear track detector Nakahiro Yasuda National Institute of Radiological Sciences.
Heavy charged particles for cancer radiation therapy (HST.187) Introduction (Bragg peak, LET, OER, RBE) I.Physical rationale II.Biological rationale III.Clinical.
Interactions of charged particles with the patient I.The depth-dose distribution - How the Bragg Peak comes about - (Thomas Bortfeld) II.The lateral dose.
Bystander Effects.
Theoretical calculations and simulations of interaction of X-rays with high-Z nanomoities for use in cancer radiotherapy Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan,
TRAINING COURSE ON RADIATION DOSIMETRY: Radiobiology Basics – RBE, OER, LET Anthony WAKER University of Ontario Institute of Technology Thu. 22/11/2012,
BIOLOGICAL EFFICIENCY OF A THERAPEUTIC PROTON BEAM: A STUDY OF HUMAN MELANOMA CELL LINE I. Petrović 1, A. Ristić-Fira 1, D. Todorović 1, L. Korićanac 1,
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
The Skandion clinic, plans for the use of particle beams for radiation therapy in Sweden presented by Erik Grusell, medical radiation physicist Dept of.
A Laser Afternoon: Introduction Ken Peach Particle Therapy Cancer Research Institute (Oxford Martin.
The segment of the TOP-IMPLART accelerator up to 150 MeV has been funded by Regione Lazio and is under realization at ENEA- Frascati Center choose as a.
Applications of Geant4 in Proton Radiotherapy at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Jerimy C. Polf Assistant Professor Department of Radiation.
First Year Workshop 2014 Miriam Lafiandra
The Increased Biological Effectiveness of Heavy Charged Particle Radiation: From Cell Culture Experiments to Biophysical Modelling Michael Scholz GSI Darmstadt.
Kinome siRNA survival screen results Acknowledgements Discovery and investigation of novel radiosensitising genes Gaganpreet Tiwana 1, Remko Prevo 1, Balam.
What is the Research Question? Teacher - Cindy Johnson School - Palacios High School Mentor – Dr. John Ford Department of Nuclear Engineering (Radiation.
Training Module 3 – Version 1.1 For Internal Use Only ® Radiation Therapy 
Susanna Guatelli & Barbara Mascialino G.A.P. Cirrone (INFN LNS), G. Cuttone (INFN LNS), S. Donadio (INFN,Genova), S. Guatelli (INFN Genova), M. Maire (LAPP),
Ion Beam Analysis of Gold Flecks in a Foam Lattice F E Gauntlett, A S Clough Physics Department, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Munich-Centre for Advanced Photonics A pixel detector system for laser-accelerated ion detection Sabine Reinhardt Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.
Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids Bologna, 1-5 September 2008 Study of influence of catechins on bystander responses in alpha-
A ENEA Radiation Sources Laboratory, Research Center Frascati, Rome, Italy b Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Technology and Health Department, Viale Regina.
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
N. Gubanova 1, V. Kanygin 2, A. Kichigin 3, S. Taskaev 4 1 Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia 2 Novosibirsk State Medical University,
USE OF GEANT4 CODE FOR VALIDATION OF RADIOBIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OBTAINED AFTER PROTON AND CARBON IRRADIATIONS OF MELANOMA CELLS Ivan Petrović 1, Giuseppe.
EXPERIMENTAL ACTIVITY IN THE ENEA-FRASCATI IRRADIATION FACILITY WITH 3-7 MEV PROTONS M. Vadrucci, A. Ampollini, F. Bonfigli, M. Carpanese, F.Marracino,
TPS & Simulations within PARTNER D. Bertrand, D. Prieels Valencia, SPAIN 19 JUNE 2009.
Basic Biologic Interactions of Radiation IONIZATION.
RADIOBIOLOGY. Principles of Radiobiology based on n Random nature of radiation interactions n how radiation interacts at cellular level n factors that.
Determining Radiation Intensity
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
METAL DETECTORS: PERFORMANCES AND APPLICATIONS Oleksandr Okhrimenko Institute for Nuclear Research NAS of Ukraine, Kiev.
Karolina Kokurewicz Supervisors: Dino Jaroszynski, Giuseppe Schettino
Metal micro-detector TimePix imaging synchrotron radiation beams at the ESRF Bio-Medical Beamline ID17 Andrii Chaus Institute for Nuclear Research National.
Interaction of x-ray photons (and gamma ray photons) with matter.
Conclusions References 1. A. Galimberti et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 477, (2002). 2. F. Capotondi et al., Thin Solid Films 484, (2005).
AD-4 Status Report 2013 Biological Effects of Antiprotons Are Antiprotons a Candidate for Cancer Therapy? Additional ontributions to phase two: University.
Experimental Cave at Trento CPT: status update Francesco Tommasino RDH/IRPT Meeting – Roma, 1 Feb 2016.
WP2 Combined effect of charged particles irradiation and anticancer drugs in cultured human tumor cells (Milano and Roma 3, collaboration with CNAO and.
WP2. Combined effect of charged particles irradiation and anticancer drugs in cultured human tumor cells (Milano and Roma 3, collaboration with CNAO and.
1 NANO AMPLIFIED THERAPY INFN-Milano, INFN-Torino, INFN-Pisa, INFN- Roma3, CNR-Pisa, University of Torino - Biotechnology Department.
RBE: open issues and next challenges Francesco Tommasino Workshop: la radiobiologia in INFN Trento, Maggio 2016.
Methods & Materials (continued)
Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness
Combined effect of charged particles irradiation and anticancer drugs in cultured tumor cells.(RDH_IRPT WP2; INFN_Milano, CNAO and Istituto Tumori) The.
INTERACTION OF PARTICLES WITH MATTER
New and Emerging fields in Bio-medicine
MeV Ion Microbeams and Radiation Biology at the University of Surrey
Very High Energy Electron for Radiotherapy Studies
CELLION Technical Report
Single Ion Bombardment of Living Cells at LIPSION - Status Report -
Modelling the cell cycle
L M Smyth, P A Rogers, J C Crosbie & J F Donoghue
International Workshop on radiosensitization
Development and characterization of the Detectorized Phantom for research in the field of spatial fractionated radiation therapy. D. Ramazanov, V. Pugatch,
AAPM Annual Meeting, Anaheim, California July 13, 2015
Bystander Effects.
RADIOBIOLOGY Agnieszka Żyromska.
Nanoparticles for enhancing the effectiveness of proton therapy
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
Presentation transcript:

Namur Research Institute for Life Science IN VITRO RADIOBIOLOGY AND RELATED TOPICS: description of some fundamental research performed with a low energy particle accelerator. University of Namur, Belgium

Low energy particle accelerator ? 2 MV terminal voltage (4 MeV H +, 6 MeV He 2+, 12 MeV C 5+ ) Multi-ions, DC beam: DC ion sources and 100 V ripple on 2 MV. “Originally” designed for material analysis 2 TiH 2 + (C) + Cs H +, He ++, C 5+ He + H -, C -, He -

Low energy ? We “play” with LET Broad beam: Statistical hit of cells

Broad beam dose delivery Why is this important? Our spot size ~ 1cm PBS ~ 3-9 mm Worse effect with higher LET 4

General overview

Irradiation facility Beam ( + H, 2+ He, 5+ C) Vacuum chamber Pumping system BC 400+ CCD camera for high current beam tuning Irradiation dish XY motorised table Movable PIPS for beam spatial uniformity and stability checking PIPS detector for online dose-rate monitoring 6

Energy/dose rate qualification LET 7 Wéra et al., NIMB 269 (2011) H: 700 keV (30 keV/µm) to 4 MeV (10 keV/µm) 2+ He: 2,7 MeV (140 keV/µm) to 6 MeV (90 keV/µm) 5+ C: 12 MeV (LET mean : 282 keV/µm) (model for distal edge) Dose rate: 0,01 to 100 Gy/min  : 10 4 – 10 6 part/s/cm 2 LET: particle energy loss / cell tickness  : nber of part/cm 2.s

Broad beam vacuum 100,000 cells seeded as a drop on a polymer foil (8 µm) Cells, Bacteria, Rotifer, C-elegant, µ-chips, new dosimeters, … Type A cells seeded Type B cells seeded The U. Of Namur’s broad beam setup The cell dishes Si 3 N 4 Medium

General overview One side cell dish Two sides cell dish

Some outputs (A549 lung cancer cells) X-Rays α: 0,33 ± 0,04 Gy -1 β: 0,018 ± 0,005 Gy -2 + H 10 keV/µm α: 0,824 ± 0,029 Gy -1 + H 25 keV/µm α: 1,26 ± 0,03 Gy He 100 keV/µm α: 2,36 ± 0,08 Gy C 282 keV/µm α: 1,54 ± 0,04 Gy -1 References: Heuskin, Wera, Michiels, Lucas, A549 lung cancer cells 1 Gy/min

Some outputs at low dose (A549) 10 keV/µm protons: hypersensitivity100 keV/µm alpha: bystander effect References: Heuskin, Wera, Michiels, Lucas,  Two different effects !

Low dose effects Low dose hypersensitivity Enhanced cell killing per unit dose up to 0,5 Gy of radiation Involves mainly G 2 cells 2 Survival of asynchronous T98G human glioma cells irradiated with 240 kVp X-rays 1. 1 Joiner M. et al Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2 Marples B. et al Radiat Res 12 G 2 /M checkpoint

Low dose effects p,  Irradiated cell Bystander cell Non irradiated cells that suffer from the effects of radiation or Nature of bystander signal is unclear Probably involves reactive oxygen species in bystander cells May be transmitted through culture medium or by gap junctions 13

14 37 % 47% 61% 82% 90% Knowing the cell size, it is possible to determine the proportion of non hit cells: Low dose effects 100 keV/µm alpha particles Proportion of non hit cells Mean particle number per cell Bystander effect

Deal with ions unexpected effects Dose distribution: can be wide in a cell population when LET is high Low dose: hypersensitivity and bystander effect: could occur upstream of tumor (detrimental) BUT can be of advantage for some types of cancer (brain tumor) Mutational RBE in surviving cells  secondary cancers ? Kiefer, Radiat Res, 2001 p+ hadrons

Nanoparticles sensitizers  Would allow to scale down the dose in tumor and thus reduce detrimental effects on upstream tissues

Radiosensitization effect of GNPs  GNPs used for study the radiosensitization effect GNPs functionalized by PEG and amine groups: 2  Commercial GNPs (ACD,Inc) : 5 nm and 10 nm  Cell line: A 431 (epidermal carcinoma carry large numbers of EGF binding sites, used as a positive control for EGFR expression)  Cancer cell line chosen for study the radiosensitization effect  GNPs are lyophilized (COMs) before used for experiment in vitro

Protocol I.Incubation cells (A431 – A549) with NPs 1.Cells are first seeded on the mylar film for ~2 h to ensure the adherence of A-431 cells 2. NPs are suspended in cell medium for a final con. of 0.05 mg/ml, this mixture is added to fill the irradiation chamber Cells are incubated with NPs for 24 hours No toxic con. (MTS test) II.Cells Irradiation by proton beams Irradiation dose (Gy): 0,0.5,1…. Dose rate: 1 Gy/min LET :25 KeV/µm or 10 KeV/µm III.Clonogenic assay After 8 days, colonies are stained with crystal violet and then counted Average cell loading 0.5 – 1 pg Au / cell – NP (10 nm) /cell

Survival fractions Proton irradiation, LET= 25 KeV/µm & 10 keV/µm

What are the mechanisms ? Particle Auger electron X-ray Fluorescence photon Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) 2 nd electrons

GEANT4 single cell irradiation Proton, 25 keV/µm Yellow: interactions X-Ray emission 2 nd é emission Elastic collisions

25 keV/um Dose Geant4 p25 Mean sd Geant4 p25 + GNP 10 nm Mean sd pg/cell  GNP 10 nm (white random spots) Total surface area = 3.89 µm² (vs 322 um² for the cell) 3Gy: 240 protons, and only 2.85 protons hit GNP GEANT4 single cell irradiation 1 % proton in GNP for a 50 % increase of cell death ?

What are the mechanisms ? Particle Auger electron X-ray Fluorescence photon 3 Gy: 3-6 protons hit GNP Marginal dose increase by 2 nd é There is an effect (size, material, LET) Main route is ROS amplification Marginal increase of 2 nd electrons by direct proton impact ? ROS due to NP + delta e ? Work in progress

In vitro radiobiological research Dose response (SF, Radiosensitivity, …) of any type of cells (canc./healthy/undifferentiated, …) Targeted & non-targeted effects Low dose, low dose rate (radioprotection) High dose, high dose rate (hypofractionation) Cell response: gene expression, cell dialog, inflammatory response, cell/macrophages differentiation, …) Association of radiation with drugs or sensitizers RBE, OER, …. As said yesterday, there is a strong evidence showing that radiobiology is of prime importance for clinical radiotherapy. and Low energy accelerators are very valuable tools to study radiobiology (in vitro) Low energy accelerators may help

Conclusions Low energy particle accelerator is a convenient tool Bottom up approach that supports clinical science. Helps to understand and evaluate new clinical procotols Our radiobiology platform is available for experiments.

Thank you for your attention