Chapter 4: Derivations PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning April 10, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Logic & Critical Reasoning
Advertisements

For Friday No reading Homework: –Chapter 9, exercise 4 (This is VERY short – do it while you’re running your tests) Make sure you keep variables and constants.
Logic Use mathematical deduction to derive new knowledge.
Deduction In addition to being able to represent facts, or real- world statements, as formulas, we want to be able to manipulate facts, e.g., derive new.
Formal Logic Proof Methods Direct Proof / Natural Deduction Conditional Proof (Implication Introduction) Reductio ad Absurdum Resolution Refutation.
Mr Barton’s Maths Notes
CSE (c) S. Tanimoto, 2008 Propositional Logic
1. 2  6 argument forms, 15 points each, plus 10 free points  Symbolic argument forms (no translations)  For each one, you will be asked to construct.
1 2 We demonstrate (show) that an argument is valid deriving by deriving (deducing) its conclusion from its premises using a few fundamental modes of.
Today’s Topics n Review Logical Implication & Truth Table Tests for Validity n Truth Value Analysis n Short Form Validity Tests n Consistency and validity.
Reading: Chapter 4, section 4 Nongraded Homework: Problems at the end of section 4. Graded Homework #4 is due at the beginning of class on Friday. You.
Natural deduction  ` A  ` B  ` A Æ B  ` A  ` A Æ B  ` B  ` B  ` A ) B  ` A  ` A ) B  ` B  ` A ÆIÆI ÆE1ÆE1 ÆE2ÆE2 Assume )I)I.
No new reading for Monday or Wednesday Exam #2 is next Friday, and we’ll review and work on proofs on Monday and Wed.
1st 100 sight words.
1 Understanding and Handling the Personal Power for Children Nurturing Parenting.
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications
The Forward-Backward Method The First Method To Prove If A, Then B.
Chapter 4: Derivations : Logic & Proofs July 7, 2009 Karin Howe.
Journal 16 August 2010 Describe something you did this past summer.
Methods of Proof involving  Symbolic Logic February 19, 2001.
Unit 6 Outdoor fun Task. Learning aims : 1. Describe a thing clearly. 2.Continue to write a story based on the one we have known.
Review I Rosen , 3.1 Know your definitions!
Advanced Topics in Propositional Logic Chapter 17 Language, Proof and Logic.
Finding the Request Form on the Website: You can also go to the main Read to Me page,
Introductory Logic PHI 120 Presentation: “Basic Concepts Review "
Determining Validity and Invalidity in Deductive Arguments PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 6, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
Today’s Topics Review of Sample Test # 2 A Little Meta Logic.
Natural Deduction CS 270 Math Foundations of CS Jeremy Johnson.
Chapter Four Proofs. 1. Argument Forms An argument form is a group of sentence forms such that all of its substitution instances are arguments.
Chapter 3: Semantics PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning March 13, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
Basic Inference Rules Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.
Chapter Five Conditional and Indirect Proofs. 1. Conditional Proofs A conditional proof is a proof in which we assume the truth of one of the premises.
Introductory Logic PHI 120 Presentation: “Solving Proofs" Bring the Rules Handout to lecture.
Argument Diagramming Part I
1 Helping Children Manage Their Behavior Nurturing Parenting Section 7.4 GOAL To increase the ability of parents to help children manage their behavior.
Formal Proofs and Boolean Logic Chapter 6 Language, Proof and Logic.
Proof Tactics, Strategies and Derived Rules CS 270 Math Foundations of CS Jeremy Johnson.
Objectives The student will be able to: 1. divide monomials. 2. simplify negative exponents.
Chapter 5: Indirect Rules : Logic & Proofs July 9, 2009 Karin Howe.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 13 An Introduction to Truth Tables By David Kelsey.
Week 8 Discussion: Ch 8, TA: Karin Howe PHIL 121 Spring 2012.
Today’s Topics Argument forms and rules (review)
More Proofs. REVIEW The Rule of Assumption: A Assumption is the easiest rule to learn. It says at any stage in the derivation, we may write down any.
First Grade Sight Words. the of and a an to.
1 Propositional Proofs 1. Problem 2 Deduction In deduction, the conclusion is true whenever the premises are true.  Premise: p Conclusion: (p ∨ q) 
March 23 rd. Four Additional Rules of Inference  Constructive Dilemma (CD): (p  q) (r  s) p v r q v s.
Critical Reasoning Lecture 16 An Introduction to Truth Tables
{P} ⊦ Q if and only if {P} ╞ Q
Enjoy the most popular song (神曲)
Identifying Counterexamples
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
A v B ~ A B > C ~C B > (C . P) B / ~ B mt 1,2 / B ds 1,2
Truth Trees.
CS 270 Math Foundations of CS
Natural Deduction.
Midterm Discussion.
Computer Security: Art and Science, 2nd Edition
Proof Strategies PHIL 122 Fall 2012 Karin Howe.
Reasoning with the Propositional Calculus
Reasoning with the Propositional Calculus
Proof Tactics, Strategies and Derived Rules
Reasoning with the Propositional Calculus
Reasoning with the Propositional Calculus
High Frequency Words Set #1.
For Wednesday, read Chapter 4, section 3 (pp )
Introductory Logic PHI 120
1st Grade High-Frequency Words
Chapter 5: Indirect Rules
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 4: Derivations PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning April 10, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University

Basic Introduction Rules Conjunction (&I) Disjunction (  I) p q__________ p & q &I p________ q  p  IL p________ p  q  IR

Basic Elimination Rules Conjunction (&E) Conditional (  E) Biconditional (  E) p & q_____ p &EL p  q p________ q  E p  q q____________ p  EL p & q_____ q &ER p  q p____________ q  ER

Fill in the Blank Proofs 1.(A & D)  H Pr. 2.C & D Pr. 3.A & B Pr. /  H 4.A____ 5._____&E, 2 6.A & D &I, 4,5 7._____  E, 1,6 1.  A  (B  C) Pr. 2.(C  D)   A Pr. 3.B & D Pr. /  C 4.B _____ 5.D _____ 6.C  D _______ 7._______  E, 2, 6 8.______ _______ 9.C  E, 8, 4

Strategies HAMMER!! –Use the Elimination Rules to break apart the premises into small bloody pieces Backwards Strategy –Start by placing your goal at the bottom and then try to specify a line or lines from which you can get your goal in a single step. Then do the same for the lines you specified and repeat until you work your way up to the premises.

Practice Using Basic Elimination and Introduction Rules in the Proof Lab Practice Using Conjunction Introduction &I), p. 49 Practice Using Disjunction Introduction (  I), p. 50 Practice Using Conditional Elimination (  E), p. 54 [skip Problem 3 for now] Practice Using Conjunction Elimination (&E), p. 55 Practice Using Biconditional Elimination (  E), p. 101, Problem 1

Rules Requiring Assumptions ConditionalBiconditionalDisjunction II II EE p  q  I p  q  I p  q r p..qp..q A p A r q A r p A q q A p

Fill in the Blank Proofs 1.A  B Pr. 2.A  C Pr. /  A  (B & C) 3.A A (  I) 4.B ______ 5._____  E, 2,3 6.B & C _______ 7.A  (B & C) _______ 1.A  (B  C) Pr. /  (A  B)  (A  C) 2. A  B A (  I) 3. ________ A (  I) 4. _______  E, 1, 3 5. B________ 6. C ________ 7.A  C  I, 5 8.(A  B)  (A  C) ______

Fill in the Blank Proofs 1.A  B Pr. 2.C  D Pr. 3.E  (A  C) Pr. 4.E Pr. /  B  D 5.________  E, 3,4 6.A A (  E) 7._____  E, 1,6 8.B  D _______ 9.C A (  E) 10.D _______ 11._________  I, B  D  E, 5, 8, 11 1.(B & C)  D Pr. 2.C Pr. /  B  D 3.B A (  I ) 4.B & C________ 5. _______  E, 1,4 6.D ________ 7.B & C  E, 1,6 8.______ &E, 7 9.B  D  I, 5, 8

More Strategies Arrow In Strategy –When your goal is a conditional, try assuming its antecedent in the hope of deriving its consequent. Alternatively, if you have the consequent of the desired conditional, you can simply derive the conditional directly. Version 2 of  I rule: q____ p  q  I

Strategies, con't Or Elimination Strategy –Use when you have a disjunction available whose disjuncts might imply your goal. Assume each disjunct separately and try to derive your goal from each. If you succeed, derive your goal from the disjunction and the goal derived from each disjunct by Or Elimination. Poof Variant on Or Elimination Strategy –Use when your goal is a disjunction and when you have a disjunction available whose disjuncts might imply your goal. Assume each disjunct of the original disjunction separately and use it to try to derive one side of the disjunction which is your goal. Poof in the other side of the disjunction. If you succeed in arriving at your goal disjunction for both cases, derive the disjunction which is your goal from the original disjunction and the goal derived from each disjunct by Or Elimination.

Another strategic note… positive subformulae 1.If  is an atomic formula, its only positive subformula is itself; i.e.,  2.If  is any negated formula , its only positive subformula is itself; i.e.,  3.If  is a conjunction (  &  ), its positive subformulae are itself, and all positive subformula of each conjunct 4.If  is a disjunction (    ), its positive subformulae are itself, and all positive subformula of each disjunct 5.If  is a conditional (    ), its positive subformulae are itself, and all positive subformula of its consequent 6.If  is a biconditional (    ), its positive subformulae are itself, and all positive subformula of the formulae on either side of the biconditional

Practice Using Rules Requiring Assumptions in the Proof Lab Practice Using Conditional Introduction (  I), p. 51 Practice Using Biconditional Introduction (  I), p. 101, Problems 2-4 Practice Using Disjunction Elimination (  E), p. 56

Putting It All Together … Practice Using Introduction Rules, p. 52 Practice Using Elimination Rules, p. 57 Practice Using the Binary Rules, p. 58 Any more questions?? If not, then how about some more practice?

"Aha!" said Pooh (Rum-tum-tiddle-um-tum.) "If I know anything about anything, that hole means Rabbit," he said, "and Rabbit means Company," he said, "and Company means Food…" There is a rabbit HOLE here. A rabbit hole means that there is a RABBIT nearby. If there is a rabbit nearby, then there is COMPANY around. If there is company around, then there is FOOD available. Thus, there is food available. H, R, R  C, C  F  F

"My friend, you'll help in this thing–for my sake–that's why you're here–I mightn't be able alone. If you flinch, I'll kill you. Do you understand that? And if I have to kill you, I'll kill her–and then I reckon nobody'll ever know much about this little business." If you FLINCH, I'll kill YOU. And if I have to kill you, I'll kill HER. Therefore, I'll kill both of you, if you flinch. F  Y, Y  H  F  (Y & H)

The cake will either make me LARGER or SMALLER. If it makes me larger, I can reach the KEY; and if it makes me smaller, I can CREEP under the door. If I reach the key, I'll get into the GARDEN; and if I creep under the door, I'll get into the garden. So [either way] I'll get into the garden. L  S, (L  K) & (S  C), (K  G) & (C  G)  G Soon her eye fell on a little glass box that was lying under the table: she opened it, and found in it a very small cake, on which the words "EAT ME" were beautifully marked in currants. "Well, I'll eat it." said Alice, "and if it makes me larger, I can reach the key; and if it makes me smaller, I can creep under the door; so either way I'll get into the garden, and I don't care which happens!"