Remote Sensing of Forest Genetic Diversity and Assessment of Below Ground Microbial Communities in Populus tremuloides Forests Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin Karen Mock – Utah State University Rick Lindroth – University of Wisconsin
2 Trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) Populus tremuloides –Widespread –Genetically diverse –Chemically diverse –Clonal –Dominant canopy species –Economically important
3 Secondary metabolites affect decomposition Affect soil organisms Alter N availability through protein complexes Interact with other nutrients
4 Populus tremuloides Genotype “Dan1” Populus tremuloides Genotype “Wau1” After ~1 year decomposition:
5 Genotype Phenotype Nutrient Cycles Litter Chemistry Environment
6 Genotype Phenotype Nutrient Cycles Litter Chemistry Environment
7
8 Genotype AGenotype B Litterfall Genotype B Nutrient cycling Genotype A Nutrient cycling
10
Objectives 1. Estimate the genetic diversity of aspen stands across multiple ecoregions using remotely sensed data. 2. Build predictive models of genetically- mediated leaf chemistry using remotely sensed hyperspectral data. 3. Measure belowground microbial biodiversity and functional diversity that results from genetically determined variation in plant chemistry. 11
Hyperspectral data
13 Midwest remote sensing July 2009
AVIRIS Pre-processing: Steps Uncorrected image 1) Cloud, shadow, water mask 2) Cross-track correction 3) Remove redundant bands 4) Atmospheric correction 5) Terrain normalization Aditya Singh
AVIRIS Pre-processing: Mask development B22 550nm B43 750nm B nm B nm NDVI [B43 – B22]/[B43 + B22] NDII [B43 – B97]/[B43 + B97] Lee filter Water = NDVI < 0 Cloud shadow = NDII > 0.6 Clouds = fB164 > 500 Combined Water + Cloud + Cloud shadow mask 1.Mask generation: Water + Cloud + Cloud shadow Aditya Singh
AVIRIS Pre-processing: Mask development Uncorrect ed B nm NDIIMask Aditya Singh
AVIRIS Pre-processing: Cross-track illumination correction Get DN values DN i 2.Bilinear cross-track illumination correction: For each band… Get pixel locations (x, y) Mask for Water/Cloud/Shadow = DN im, x m, y m Regress DN to coordinates: Dn im → β0 + β1*x m + β2*y m + β3*x m *y m Estimate trend for entire scene: IL i ← β0 + β1*x + β2*y + β3*x*y Note: x, y, locations for full scene De-trend full scene using IL i ; add mean of masked scene DN corr = DN i – IL i + mean(DN im ) Aditya Singh
AVIRIS Pre-processing: Cross-track illumination correction Uncorrected Corrected Aditya Singh
3.Remove overlapping bands 4.Atmospheric correction ACORN5b (Atmospheric CORrection Now) Mode 1.5 Advanced atmospheric correction for hyperspectral data with spectral fitting for water vapor and vegetation liquid water 365nm 655nm 1253nm 1866nm 1263nm 1872nm 2496nm 667nm AVIRIS Pre-processing: Removing redundant bands, Atmos. Corr.
5.Terrain normalization: C-Factor (Teillet et al. 1982) AVIRIS Pre-processing: C-factor terrain normalization Where: θ p slope, θ z solar zenith angle, φ a solar azimuth, φ o aspect Note: IL (cosine-i) image is included with AVIRIS data product. Where: ρ H : Reflectance from horizontal surface; ρ H uncorrected reflectance b k and m k determined by regressing each band with the IL image Aditya Singh
AVIRIS Pre-processing: C-factor terrain normalization Cross-track, atmospheric and terrain corrected Uncorrected Aditya Singh
22
23
Leaf and Soil analyses Leaf Carbon, nitrogen Condensed tannins, lignin Soil Nutrient: C, N, NH 4 +, NO 3 - Microbial: extracellular enzymes, t-RFLP 24
Microbial analyses Extracellular enzymes Rate limiting step in decomposition Functional description T-RFLP Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Widely applicable, molecular-based 25
Project Status Upper midwest sites collected July/ August 2009 Data and sample processing underway Good range of N, CT SSR markers confirmed t-RFLP primer sets developed 26
Project Status Western sites (UT an CO) planned for July
Mock et al Molecular Ecology
30 Acknowledgments NASA Peter Wolter Aditya Singh Timothy Whitby Peter Johnston Anthony Hatcher Mason Roberts Jacqui Bryant
31 Not all secondary metabolites are effective defense chemicals From Hemming and Lindroth 1995