Significant Prognostic Impact of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET Scan Performed During and at the End of Treatment with R-CHOP in High- Tumor Mass Follicular.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Intergroup Randomised Trial of Rituximab versus a Watch & Wait Approach in Patients with Advanced Stage, Asymptomatic, Non-bulky Follicular Lymphoma.
Advertisements

Efficacy and Safety of Three Bortezomib-Based Combinations in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from All Randomized Patients.
Casulo C et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 510.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
LaCasce A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 293.
Lesokhin AM et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 291.
Kovacs G et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 23.
Rituximab Maintenance: Stage III/IV Follicular Lymphoma (ECOG/CALGB E1496) Subset: 237 FL pts CVP x 6-8 → PR/CR (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone)
Utility of Post-Therapy Surveillance Scans in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Thompson C et al. Proc ASCO 2013;Abstract 8504.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Frontline Therapy with Brentuximab Vedotin Combined with ABVD or AVD in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma Younes A et al. Proc.
Follicular & Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas. Five-year TTF and Response Duration (RD) According to FLIPI Risk Group R-CHOPCHOPP value TTF Low-risk
ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and the Impact.
Involved Field Radiotherapy versus No Further Treatment in Patients with Clinical Stages IA/IIA Hodgkin Lymphoma and a “Negative” PET Scan After 3 Cycles.
Dose Interruption/Reduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the First 3 Months of Treatment of CML Is Associated with Inferior Early Molecular Responses.
The Use of Trastuzumab in the Elderly in the Adjuvant Setting and After Disease Progression in Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Dall.
R-CHOP vs R-FC Followed by Maintenance with Rituximab vs Interferon-Alfa in Elderly Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Kluin-Nelemans HC et al. Proc ASH.
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
Sequential Dose-Dense R-CHOP Followed by ICE Consolidation (MSKCC Protocol ) without Radiotherapy for Patients with Primary Mediastinal Large B Cell.
Alternating Courses of CHOP and DHAP Plus Rituximab (R) Followed by a High-Dose Cytarabine Regimen and ASCT is Superior to Six Courses of CHOP Plus R Followed.
1 Nowakowski GS et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 689.
Rituximab maintenance for the treatment of indolent NHL Dr Christian Buske.
Bortezomib Induction and Maintenance Treatment Improves Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Extended Follow-Up of the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4.
A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Consolidation with a Single Dose of 90 Y Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin ® ) (Z) vs Maintenance with Rituximab (R)
Dose-Adjusted EPOCH plus Rituximab in Untreated Patients with Poor Prognosis Large B-Cell Lymphoma, with Analysis of Germinal Center and Activated B-Cell.
The Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor PCI is Highly Active as Single-Agent Therapy in Previously-Treated Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Preliminary.
Dyer MJS et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 1743.
Head-to-Head Comparison of Obinutuzumab (GA101) plus Chlorambucil (Clb) versus Rituximab plus Clb in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and.
Rituximab Maintenance versus Wait and Watch After Four Courses of R-DHAP Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Previously Untreated Young.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
Gray Zone Lymphoma (GZL) with Features Intermediate between Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): A Large Retrospective.
1 Flinn I et al. Proc ICML 2013;Abstract 084.
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
Frontline Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) Shows Superior Efficacy in Comparison to Bendamustine.
Continued Overall Survival Benefit After 5 Years’ Follow-Up with Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) versus Melphalan-Prednisone (MP) in Patients with.
Randomized Phase III US/Canadian Intergroup Trial (SWOG S9704) Comparing CHOP ± R for Eight Cycles to CHOP ± R for Six Cycles Followed by Autotransplant.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
R-CHOP with Iodine-131 Tositumomab Consolidation for Advanced Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Southwest Oncology Group Protocol S0433 Friedberg.
Nabhan C et al. Proc ICML 2013;Abstract 102.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
BENEFIT OF CONSOLIDATIVE RADIATION THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA TREATED WITH R-CHOP CHEMOTHERAPY JACK PHAN, ALI MAZLOOM, L. JEFFREY.
Mamounas EP et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-10.
Savage KJ et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 579.
A Phase III Randomized Intergroup Trial (SWOG S0016) of CHOP Chemotherapy plus Rituximab vs CHOP Chemotherapy plus Iodine-131-Tositumomab for the Treatment.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) for Multiple Myeloma (MM) in the Era of New Drugs Phase III study of lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone.
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Kahl BS et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract LBA-6.
Stephen Ansell, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic
Ferrajoli A et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 1395.
Jonathan W. Friedberg M.D., M.M.Sc.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Ansell SM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 798.
Vitolo U et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 777.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 99.
Salles GA et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8004.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
Advani RH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 443.
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.
Presentation transcript:

Significant Prognostic Impact of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET Scan Performed During and at the End of Treatment with R-CHOP in High- Tumor Mass Follicular Lymphoma Patients: A GELA-GOELAMS Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 877.

Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 877. Background Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) usually respond well to initial treatment with immunochemotherapy, which also increases survival benefits. However, a small proportion of patients relapse or develop refractory disease. The identification of this subgroup of patients can lead to early therapeutic interventions, potentially leading to better prognosis. Little is known about the use of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in patients with FL, although it is widely used for the staging and restaging of aggressive lymphomas. Objective: –Evaluate the prognostic value of FDG-PET performed in the middle and at the end of treatment in patients with high tumor mass FL treated with first-line immunochemotherapy.

GELA-GOELAMS Trial Design Eligibility (n = 121) Previously untreated Grades I-IIIA FL High tumor burden per GELF criteria R-CHOP = rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone FDG-PET was performed – Before treatment (initial FDG-PET) – After 4 cycles of R-CHOP (interim FDG-PET) – At the end of treatment (final FDG-PET) FDG-PET scans were first interpreted in each center, then centrally reviewed by 3 investigators blinded to clinical data. Positivity or negativity was rated according to the Deauville visual semi- quantitative criteria. R-CHOP + R (n = 121) R-CHOP q3wk x 6 cycles R q3wk x 2 cycles No R maintenance Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 877.

Centrally Reviewed* FDG-PET Scans (Abstract) Time of FDG-PET scan Positive scans Negative scans Initial FDG-PET (n = 118)99%1% Interim (I)-FDG-PET (n = 111)24%76% Final (F)-FDG-PET (n = 106)22%78% * The Kappa coefficient indicated a good degree of concordance among the 3 PET reviewers. Positivity was defined as fixation at level 4 (FDG uptake superior to that of the liver) or 5 (FDG uptake clearly superior to liver and/or new sites of disease). Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 877.

Survival Rates (Abstract) Response I-PET-negativeI-PET-positivep-value 2-y PFS86%61% Response F-PET-negativeF-PET-positivep-value 2-y PFS87%51%< y OS100%88% PFS = progression-free survival; OS = overall survival Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 877.

Author Conclusions In patients receiving first-line therapy for FL, FDG-PET scans performed either after 4 cycles of R-CHOP or at the end of immunochemotherapy induction are strongly predictive of treatment outcomes. Therapeutic intervention based on PET results during inductive treatment should be evaluated in the future. Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 877.

Investigator Commentary: Significant Prognostic Impact of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET Scans — A GELA-GOELAMS Study The evaluation of PET scans is a recommended criterion at the end of treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Importantly, a negative PET scan is needed for long-term survival and cure. PET scanning has never been a recommendation for low-grade lymphomas because results reveal some as positive PET scans and others as negative scans. Because FLs have a high avidity for PET scanning, they are often positive on initial evaluation. This study demonstrated that negative PET scans are significant, as a longer PFS was observed in these cases. As such, it may be helpful to perform PET scanning at the end of treatment in low-grade lymphomas, especially in patients with bulky masses. Interview with Stephanie A Gregory, MD, January 11, 2012 This is an interesting study demonstrating that PET scans at the end of treatment are good predictors of treatment outcome as indicated by the 2-year PFS rates. A modest OS difference was also seen based on the final PET scans. Although this trial does not give information about what to do with the patients with F-PET-positive scans, these data indicate that about 50% of these patients will relapse and 12% will die. Interview with Brad S Kahl, MD, January 26, 2012