GO Program: Past, Present & Future Koji Mukai Suzaku Guest Observer Facility.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATHENA: The Advanced Telescope for High Energy Astrophysics
Advertisements

X-ray Astronomy with High Spectral Resolution: Astro-E2 / ISAS Y. Tanaka.
THE NSF BUDGET Overview of Agency Funding Processes Presented by Beth Blue National Science Foundation Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management.
CUC Oct 2013 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 15 Peer Review  June 2013, Hilton Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 15  13 topical panels,
December 21-22, 2005Subaru Users Meeting, Mitaka Status of Remote Observation / Service Observation Junichi Noumaru Subaru Telescope National Astronomical.
1 HST Cycle 12 TAC Results Bob Williams TIPS – 17 April 2003.
TAC Subaru UM 2008 K. Shimasaku (chair) - TAC Members - Statistics - Review Process - 08B Schedule - Notice.
CXC Response to June 04 Report 1.Bakeout Status: Paul Plucinsky 2.CIAO upgrade information: Jonathan McDowell 3.DS9 and visualization scripts: Jonathan.
19 Oct 2005Chandra Users' Committee Cycle 7 Peer Review: June 2005  747 proposals, 12 panels, 101 reviewers  Hilton, Logan Airport.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11 Peer Review Proposal Numbers:  668 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
Chandra Users' Committee, 27 April 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12  CfP Release: Dec  GTO Deadline: 11 March 2010  GO Deadline: 18 March.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2006 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 8  725 submitted proposals  *6.4 oversubscribed.
Users' Committee, 25 Oct 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12 Peer Review  June 2010, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 12 
Chandra Users’ Committee, 9-10 Apr 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
Mission Operations and Data Flow Overview Koji Mukai Astro-E2 Guest Observer Facility.
Director's Office Chandra Users’ Committee, Sept 2007 Chandra Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed (based on time)  48 LP, 10.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 6-7 Apr 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11  CfP Release: Dec  POG, final A Eff : 15 Jan 2009  GTO: 43 proposals.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
CXC Chandra Users' Committee Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle proposals *6.4 oversubscribed (based on time) GTO for review: due 3 rd April.
Mopra Time Allocation Mopra publications performance Mopra time allocation statistics Mopra Large Projects Proposal applications for 2012 APRS Jessica.
December, 2009 David Hart.  Allocation Stats  Processing  Interfaces.
December, 2009 Kent Milfeld, TG Allocations Coordinator.
1 Fermi Users Group FSSC News and Operations Support Chris Shrader, Fermi Science support Center NASA/GSFC Fermi Users Group Meeting Goddard Space Flight.
Technology Programme Autumn 2005 Autumn 2005 Competition The Application and Assessment Process Peter Miles TUVNEL Ltd.
User Programs Committee on Visitors, Appeals Process, Unified Access & Feedback.
Special Evening Session: The Business of NASA Research August 22, 2006 Evening Session.
Harvey Tananbaum Director Chandra X-ray Center Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 13th HEAD Meeting April 8, 2013 Building International Space.
WLE Operations Team Planning Meeting 2 nd February 2015, Water’s Edge.
CUC Oct 2012 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 14 Peer Review   June 2012, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 14  13 topical.
GLAST Science Support CenterNovember, 2005 GSSC User Committee Meeting Tools for Mission and Observation Planning Robin Corbet, GSSC
Why Collaboration?  Better science through collaboration If you want to do a big survey, you need to benefit (or persuade) many scientists. (Democratic.
XMM 1Norbert Schartel Report From The Project Scientist Presentation for the XMM-Newton Users Group Meeting VI 19 th / 20 th May 2005 Norbert Schartel.
Toward the Senior Review Rob Petre. Senior Review proposal details Due March 12, 2008 Competing against: XMM, INTEGRAL, RXTE, Swift, Galex, WMAP, Spitzer.
GO Program: Cycle 1 process, results, and Cycle 2 schedule Koji Mukai Astro-E2 Guest Observer Facility.
GLAST Science Support Center June 21, 2007 Getting Involved with GLAST GLAST Guest Investigator Program David Band, GSSC CRESST/GSFC/UMBC.
Fermi Users Group Meeting Goddard Space Flight Center, February 6, 2009C. Shrader, NASA/GSFC 1 Fermi Users Group FSSC News Chris Shrader, Fermi Science.
GLAST Science Support Center November 17, 2006 GUC Face-to-Face Meeting GLAST GI Program (with revised schedule) David Band, GSSC.
Fermi Science Support Center September 26, 2008 FUG Face-to-Face Meeting Fermi GI Program Update David Band, FSSC CRESST/GSFC/UMBC.
NASA Herschel Science Center - page 1 PACS NHSC Cycle 1 Open Time Proposal Planning Workshop 3-4 June 2010 ESA AO and NASA Funding Call Phil Appleton and.
1 SUZAKU HUG 12-13April, 2006 Suzaku archive Lorella Angelini/HEASARC.
Competitive Sensitive 1 ROSES06/NSPIRES TUTORIAL James Green and Brenda Hanrahan Science Proposal Support Office March 15, 2006.
December, 2009 Kent Milfeld, TG Allocations Coordinator.
Gantt Chart of Progress FY
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
TAC Subaru UM /01/16 K. Shimasaku (chair)
Performance based contract I-MHERE Project
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CONGRESSIONAL ACTIONS
ESO Phase 1 & 2 Procedures Gaitee Hussain
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Proposal Cycle: Updates and Plans
Science Policies and Timeline
80-Hour SHARP Certification Course Schedule
Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Gantt Chart of Progress FY
Proposed Strategic Planning Process for FY 2013/14 thru FY 2015/16
GOMACTech-04 Technical Program Committee Timeline
MONTH CYCLE BEGINS CYCLE ENDS DUE TO FINANCE JUL /2/2015
ESA’s INTEGRAL Mission
Discussion of OBD2 by “Correspondence Group” Japan’s proposal
Electricity Cost and Use – FY 2016 and FY 2017
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Presentation transcript:

GO Program: Past, Present & Future Koji Mukai Suzaku Guest Observer Facility

May 3, 2007Suzaku Users' Group Meeting2 GO Program Overview 100% open to competition (except calibration observations and real-time TOOs); no more guaranteed time Stage 1 (science) proposals: parallel submission and review in the US, Japan and ESA International merging meeting to resolve target conflicts; some proposals are “merged” with US and Japanese PIs Priority A and B targets are guaranteed to be observed; C targets as schedule filler Stage 2 (budget) proposals for US-based investigators Additionally, TOO requests can be submitted for unexpected phenomena

May 3, 2007Suzaku Users' Group Meeting3 Cycle 1 (2006 Apr-2007 Mar) All accepted A targets observed, except for –Untriggered TOO observations (potential total of ~400 ksec) 1 US BHC binary TOO and, 1 (of 2) SGR TOO 2 TeV blazar TOOs, Cen X-3, and 1 Japanese BHC TOOs were untriggered –Several observations of Cyg Loop accepted contingent on XIS bakeout All accepted B targets observed, except –Second observation of 1 ESA target (of 2 accepted) –Supplementary observation of Mrk 766 (safehold) Of the C targets (5.3 Msec), about 3 Msec were observed –Higher than expected due to untriggered TOOs and other factors

May 3, 2007Suzaku Users' Group Meeting4 Cycle 1 (Continued) Stage 2 (budget) review was completed in July, 2006 –28 A proposals funded at $34 K/proposal (Hurley IPN proposal at $17K) –23 B proposals at $26 K, 19 Cs at $17 K –10 Foreign PI proposals at $9K GO grants were distributed starting in Sep, 2006 through NSSC –After observation is done, if GSFC has funds (not always the case near, e.g., FY boundaries), PR is initiated –NSSC then does further paperworks before grants are sent All Cycle 1 GO grants totaling $1.6M have been processed by GSFC

May 3, 2007Suzaku Users' Group Meeting5 Cycle 2 (Apr 2007-Mar 2008) ROSES-2006 release: Jan 23, 2006 International AO-2 release: Sep 1, 2006 Proposal deadline: Dec 1, 2006 US Proposal review: Feb 8/9, 2007 International merging meeting: Mar 2, 2007 Target list release: Mar 6, 2007 Stage 2 (budget proposal) deadline: May 7, 2007 Stage 2 review: by early Jul, 2007?

May 3, 2007Suzaku Users' Group Meeting6 Cycle 2 Proposal Process Stage 1 submisson to AKBAR/RPS (all electronic); no NSPIRES submission Reviewer access also through AKBAR/RPS (electronic distribution) NRESS provided on-site computer and logistic support for the review Stage 2 proposals through NSPIRES ($1.7M available) Stage 2 review by Stage 1 Panel Chairs

May 3, 2007Suzaku Users' Group Meeting7 Cycle 2 Statistics 156 proposals submitted to US; 24.1 Ms total time, or 22.1 Ms of non-overlapping, XIS2- adjusted time, requested (factor of >4 oversubscriptioin) –132 proposals to ISAS, 17.9/16.1 Ms, ~3 o.s. US Share: 37.5% (US) % (JUS), or 6.2 Ms Ms after x1.4 oversubscription 50% priority A, 40% B, and 50% C TOO and Time Critical observations must be As –Strong competition for BHC TOOs 47 (A or B) + 26 (C only) proposals accepted

May 3, 2007Suzaku Users' Group Meeting8 International Merging Three of the 4 panel chairs (Brown, Bautz, and Rotshchild) and US Project Scientist (White) represented the US for Cycle 2 Both in Cycles 1 and 2, there were few target overlaps, undersubscribing the 12.5% JUS time. The JUS time was effectively absorbed back into US and Japanese time (c.f. oversubscription factor) Merging committee treated the pre-set rules as guidelines and modified them to fit the situation

May 3, 2007Suzaku Users' Group Meeting9 Proposed and Accepted Targets US proposals by category –1 Comet, 13 Stars, 41 Accreting Binaries, 11 SNR (inc. neutron stars), 6 Galactic diffuse –6 Galaxies, 50 AGN, 25 Groups and Clusters, 1 extragalactic diffuse and 2 GRB Bright AGN and bright X-ray binaries did particularly well –Technical feasibility (particularly of HXD science) played a major role

May 3, 2007Suzaku Users' Group Meeting10 (Lack of) Large Projects In the US review, we allocate available times to the 4 panels and hold a considerable amount of B time in reserve Panels who accept large (>250 ksec) proposals have priority over the reserve time This did not lead to large projects being accepted - longest in Cycle 2 is 210 ksec

May 3, 2007Suzaku Users' Group Meeting11 Cycle 3 Plan Observations during Apr 2008-Mar 2009 ROSES-2007 released: Feb 16, 2007 Proposal Deadline: Nov 30, 2007 Review, merging, and Stage 2 schedule TBD US Share: 37.5% US % JUS (provisional) Current budget implies $1.35M for Cycle 3 GOs (will drop further to $1M in Cycle 4) Potential for special treatment of large projects