LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec. 2005 1/25 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Review SLAC 12/15/05 Prototype Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BARTOSZEK ENGINEERING 1 The Design of the Booster Collimators Larry Bartoszek BARTOSZEK ENGINEERING 3/10/03.
Advertisements

Cylinders and Actuators
Coll Eng E Doyle 1/18 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Prototype Engineering Status 6/21/06 Jaw-hub-shaft concept - continued Permanent.
Longitudinal Expansion of RFQ Vane Ends at Section-to-Section Interface.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
MICE RF Cavity Design and Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.
MAGSEAL 101. Rotary face seal that utilizes magnetic attraction force to positively mate the optically flat seal faces. Magnetic attraction force variation.
Status of the LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator Prototype 30 September 2013 LHC Collimation WG Meeting Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US.
Status of the LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator Prototype 14 October 2013 LHC Collimation WG Meeting Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC.
1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
Rolling element bearings A. Lozzi 09
Influence of the Gravity, Vacuum and RF on CLIC Module T0 Behavior R. Raatikainen.
LARP Rotatable Collimator Prototype Assembly completed and all mechanical tests successful: Cooling tubes now twist, under vacuum, as jaws turn, with R~1.
LARP Rotatable Collimator Prototype Assembly completed and all mechanical tests successful: Cooling tubes twist, under vacuum, as jaws turn, with R~1 m.
LARP Rotatable Collimator Prototype Assembly completed and all mechanical tests successful: Cooling tubes twist, under vacuum, as jaws turn, with R~1 m.
SAM PDR1 SAM LGS Mechanical Design A. Montane, A. Tokovinin, H. Ochoa SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
SLAC Phase II Secondary Collimators 6 October 2005 LARP Collaboration Meeting-St. Charles, IL Tom Markiewicz SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator.
LARP Rotatable Collimator Prototype Assembly completed and all mechanical tests successful: Cooling tubes now twist, under vacuum, as jaws turn, with R~1.
Beam LARP Rotatable Collimator Mechanical Engineering Discussion 03 October 2008 Phase II CERN ME Video Mtg. Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC.
MECHANICAL DESIGN OF TCSP COLLIMATORS Secondary Collimators Embedding BPMs L. GENTINI, A. Dallocchio, A. Bertarelli, F. Carra, M. Garlasche.
LHC Phase II Collimator teleconference - 4 March 2008LHC Rotatable Phase II Collimators 1 beam LARP Phase II collimator Progress and Plans 4 March 2008.
LHC Phase II Collimator Compact jaw simulations New FLUKA => ANSYS mapping scheme New 136mm x 950mm jaw –60cm primary collimator –Helical cooling channel.
LARP LHC PHASE II COLL RC1 TESTS - S. Lundgren 06 June 2006 No 1 /17 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Collimator Test Program Plan Forward Revised.
LARP LHC PHASE II COLL RC1 TESTS - S. Lundgren 16 May 2006 No 1 /22 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Collimator Test Program Revised 5/15/06.
The SLAC Phase II Collimator Program 15 June 2005 CERN Team Visit Tom Markiewicz SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
SLAC RC Status Report 30 August 2010 LHC Collimation Working Group Meeting Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
A. Bertarelli – R. Perret CERN TS – MME Group 1 CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research Mechanical Engineering and Thermo-mechanical.
SLAC R&D Mtg November 2007LHC Rotatable Phase II CollimatorsSlide # / 17 beam LARP Rotatable Collimators for LHC Phase II Collimation 12 November.
A. Bertarelli CERN TS – MME Group 1 CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research Actuating system of the LHC Collimators (Phase 1) Main Features.
CERN-SLAC meeting June, The LHC Collimator Project LHC Collimators for Phase 1 CERN-SLAC meeting – June, Palo Alto, Ca Alessandro Bertarelli.
1 LARP Collimator Engineering E. Doyle 2/3/05. 2 Review: SS Thermal Simulation 150mm OD 25mm wall Simply supported Heat: 1hr beam life, FLUKA results,
LHC Collimators Phase 2 - Visit to Plansee 28th August Materials for Phase II collimators.
LARP Coll. Video-conf. May 12, '05Phase II Collimator Engineering - E. Doyle1/20 Adapting the NLC Consumable Collimator to LHC Phase II Secondary Collimation.
Phase II Collimators for LHC Upgrade at SLAC - Material Issues E. Doyle 03 Sept /25 Workshop on Materials for Collimators CERN 2007/09/03 Phase.
A. Bertarelli – A. DallocchioWorkshop on Materials for Collimators and Beam absorbers, 4 th Sept 2007 LHC Collimators (Phase II): What is an ideal material.
LARP Rotatable Collimators 19 June 2006 ILC R&D Status Meeting Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
LARP LHC PHASE II COLL RC1 TESTS - S. Lundgren 30 Jan 2007 No 1 /13 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Collimator Development and Test Program Status.
LARP LHC PHASE II COLL RC1 TESTS - S. Lundgren 10 Dec 2007 No 1 /12 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Collimator Development and Test Program Status.
LARP LHC PHASE II COLL RC1 - S. Lundgren 21 Sep 2009 No 1/17 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-1 Collimator Development Status and Outlook Revised.
Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators Progress Report V. Kashikhin for the FNAL Superconducting Magnet Team (presented.
ROLLING Rolling is a process of reduction of the cross-sectional area or shaping a metal piece through the deformation caused by a pair of metal rolls.
accident deformation – doyle 1/12 Phase II Collimator - Accident Deformation Simulation December 11, 2006.
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator Status Report SLAC ILC R&D Summary Meeting 24 April 2006 T. Markiewicz/SLAC.
LARP Collimation – Engineering & Analysis
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1, ETC - Status 4/10/06
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
Review on collimator movement with stepping motors
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Review SLAC 12/15/05 RC1 Construction and Test Plan LARP LHC PHASE II COLL REVIEW – RC1.
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-1
Review on collimator movement with stepping motors
Recommendations of 12/16/05 review committee & SLAC response
LARP Collimation – Engineering & Analysis
23 April 2012 Tom Markiewicz/SLAC
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1
accident deformation – doyle (rev1) 1/8
Phase II Collimators : design status
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-0 and RC-1
LARP Rotatable Collimators for LHC Phase II Collimation
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-1
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
RC1 Prototype Conceptual Design Review 15 December, 2005
LHC Collimator – RF Contact Concept (180o wrap)
Engineering Update E. Doyle 5/16/06
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-0 and RC-1
accident deformation – doyle 1/8
Presentation transcript:

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Review SLAC 12/15/05 Prototype Engineering Studies

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 LHC Phase II collimator concept development LHC & NLC collimators compared FLUKA/ANSYS jaw thermal response simulations –A major % of our effort so far –model evolution Baseline Jaw concept –Material selection –Cooling channel arrangement –Jaw support –Jaw geometry Baseline collimator concept –aperture control –jaw support/actuation –RF parts –cooling water supply Unresolved issues

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Phase I Supporting System Fixed base Adjustable base Pivoting cradle (manual adjustment +/-10º) Jaw actuation system Vacuum Tank SLAC will utilize as much of CERN support and actuation systems as possible – must work in horizontal (shown), vertical (90 o ) and skew (+/- 45 o ) 1.48 m

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Phase I Mechanical design Steppers & roller screws – jaw ends independent Return Springs C/C, copper, SST jaw, 1.2 m long Vacuum tank Bellows not shown (4x) Coolant in/out SLAC concept substitutes - rotate-able jaws for 1.2m long Phase I jaws - Larger vacuum tank to allow max jaw diameter

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 NLC Consumable Collimator 6.0 Note short length of collimation material. L/D =.02

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Phase II Baseline layout beam 136mm diameter x 950 mm long jaws (750 mm effective length due to taper). Vacuum tank, jaw support mechanism and support base derived from CERN Phase I.

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 NLC & original LHC specs – major differences Bottom Line: LHC & NLC collimators are different animals * * This spec infeasible, has been relaxed

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Water cooled 2-d & (3-d rectangular) model 3-d “Hollow cylinder” model - Uniform or limited arc cooling “Solid” model Tubular cooling channels Uniform ID Cooling – simulates helical or axial channels H2O simulation – helical flow shown Progression of ANSYS models – increasingly realistic beam

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Material thermal performance (Hollow Cylinder Model) - O.D = 150 mm, I.D. = 100 mm, L = 1.2 m - NLC-type edge supports

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Cu chosen as best balance between collimation efficiency, thermal distortion & manufacturablity

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Central Aperture Stop -Swelling neutralized -Bending neutralized NLC-type Aperture control - Swelling neutralized - Bending toward beam Shaft support (Phase I) -Swelling toward beam -Bending toward beam Aperture-defining support Choice of Aperture-Defining Scheme - To Minimize Bending and Swelling Deformation toward Beam

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 61C Note transverse gradient causes bending Interesting side trip: 64% less distortion if cooling is limited to a 36 o arc centered on beam path. 89C Note axial gradient  x=221  m Spec: 25  m support  x=79  m Note more swelling than bending 64% less distortion 360 o full I.D. cooling 36 o arc cooling

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Limited cooling arc: free wheeling distributor – orientation controlled by gravity – directs flow to beam-side axial channels. Pro: Far side not cooled, reducing  T and thermal distortion. Con: peak temperature higher; no positive control over flow distributor (could jam); difficult fabrication. 360 o cooling by means of helical (or axial) channels. Pro: Lowers peak temperatures. Con: by cooling back side of jaw, increases net  T through the jaw, and therefore thermal distortion; axial flow wastes cooling capacity on back side of jaw. water beam Helical and axial cooling channels illustrated beam

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Helical cooling passages chosen for manufacturablity, beamline vacuum safety Per CERN’s Phase I design – no water-vacuum weld or braze Tube formed as helix, slightly smaller O.D. than jaw I.D. O.D. of helix wrapped with braze metal shim Helix inserted into bore, two ends twisted wrt each other to expand, ensure contact Fixture (not shown) holds twist during heat cycle Variations: 1.Pitch may vary with length to concentrate cooling 2.Two parallel helixes to double flow 3.Spacer between coils adds thermal mass, strength 4.Electroform jaw body onto coil

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Max Cu temp 200 Possible boiling Max water return temp Deflection 325 & 750 (SS & trans) All temperature simulations based on 20C supply. For CERN 27C supply add 7 to all temperature results. CERN max water return temp 42C Exceeds spec, or other possible problem as noted Baseline Jaw Performance

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Estimates for downbeam collimator heat loading and deflection – scaled from worst case baseline (green)

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Jaw diameter – limited by vacuum tank size and required range of motion. Vacuum tank size limited by proximity of opposing beam pipe in all collimator orientations. Jaw Diameter Determined

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 jaw tends to bow toward beam due to heating. Stop prevents reduction of gap Jaw ends spring-loaded to the table ass’y (next slide) … move outward in response to bowing Shallow groove => smooth contact surface safe from beam accidents May use two stops to control tilt Adjustable central gap-defining stop Stop in/out position controls aperture, actuator external, works through bellows.

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Self aligning bearing Leaf springs allow jaw end motion up to 1mm away from beam Adjustable central jaw stops (previous slide) define gap -Flexible bearing supports allow jaw thermal distortion away from beam CERN’s jaw support/positioning mechanism. Vacuum tank, bellows, steppers not shown. Flexible end supports used in conjunction with central gap-defining mechanism

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Rigid round-square transition Spring loaded fingers ground two jaws through range of motion RF contact overview Sheet metal parts flex to follow jaw motion Clearance problems to be resolved Concept satisfies CERN RF requirements - Need sufficient contact pressure Cooling issues not addressed

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 CERN design: Jaw supported on individually moveable shaft at each end, controlled by steppers external to tank. Bellows allows full range of jaw motion Continuous one-piece cooling tube brazed to jaw, exits tank at each end through shaft. Unresolved interferences between RF parts and cooling and support parts Jaw rotation mechanism not devised Substantial forces to rotate jaw Mandrel to support coil not shown Flex Cooling Supply Tube Concept Space required for flexible water connections results in 95 cm maximum jaw length.

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Contiguous with helical tube inside jaw. Formed after assembly-brazing of jaw and installation of bearing on stub-shaft Exits through support shaft per CERN design Material: CuNi10Fe1, 10mm O.D., 8mm I.D. Stub-shaft (bearing not shown) Support shaft relaxed (as shown)# coils4 O.D.111mm (4.4in) full 360 o rotation# coils5 O.D.91mm (3.6in) torque9.1N-m (81in-lb) Detail of Flex Cooling Supply Tube

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 ANSYS simulation: Axial stress for un-grooved and grooved jaw with axially uniform heat input. CaseTmax °CDeflection (um) Jaw edge refaxis ref Straight59.533~100 grooved59.515~74 Grooves reduce bending deflection Note: RF taper requirements may make this concept un-feasible

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Specifications for baseline Phase II collimator * * Relaxed from original spec baseline design deviates

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Unresolved Issues Jaw actuation mechanism How to handle mass of rotary jaws (fail open springs) Availability of CERN actuation mechanism for SLAC use is being discussed Jaw rotary indexing mechanism force to rotate jaws acceptable? concept not developed do we know angular position of jaw at all times? RF parts – taper requirement details not clear central groove in jaws (smooth track for central aperture stop) strain-relieving grooves in jaws what is the acceptable range of taper angles for the jaw ends Heat generation in thin RF parts Need details of CERN support stands, etc Effects due to accident does accident cause unacceptable gross distortion of the jaw? do RF fingers work in contact with damaged surface? How much material melts and where does it go? – depends on jaw orientation is central aperture stop safe from contamination by melted material? Beam tests may be required

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 LHC Phase II Collimation BONUS SLIDES

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Phase I Jaw - Design Principles 1. Jaws in C/C or graphite 2. Cooling Cu-pipes (2 x 3 turns) and plate pressed against the jaw, brazed to the bar. 3. Main GlidCop® support bar Glidcop support bar Cu cooling plate c/c

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Material Properties

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Heat Transfer by Boiling Water

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 Construction possibility – jaw with axial cooling channels

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 NLC Aperture-Defining Geometry One independent variable (stop roller spacing, s) defines aperture. s = stop roller spacing

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 NLC Jaw Indexing Mechanism

LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 beam NLC suspension and aperture-defining mechanism: limitations in LHC environment. 150mm jaw full 30 mm retraction showing interference with opposing beam pipe. Vac envelope with pass-through for beam 2 as possible solution.