SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 eCTD An overview of the full day presentation by Dr Olaf Schoepke at the SAAPI conference in July 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Future strategy for e-submission as seen by industry Dr Michael Colmorgen, IFAH-Europe 2nd Veterinary Workshop on E-submission 4 Dec 2009, EMEA, London.
Advertisements

1 Harmonisation of requirements: where we are Erik Waterdrinker, IFAH-Europe 2nd Veterinary Workshop on E-submission 4 Dec 2009, EMEA, London.
ECTD Submissions: Guide to BookMarking and Hypertext Linking (Last Updated: March-09) Prepared By:
Infrastructures For Information Inc. The Collaborative XML Content Company Content Company.
DOCUMENT TYPES. Digital Documents Converting documents to an electronic format will preserve those documents, but how would such a process be organized?
Configuration Management
Electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) Update Jon Clark ICH M2 Deputy Topic Leader January 21, 2003.
1 Module 7: Science. Objectives 2 Welcome to the Cayuse424 Science module. In this module you will learn:  Cayuse424 Basic Template Concepts.  How to.
Reference Management Software Tools Mendeley. Table of Contents: Part A Background/Location Signup/Login Import References Organize (Manage) References.
Ch. 5 Web Page Design – Templates and Style Sheets Mr. Ursone.
The Application for Renewal Accreditation: Electronic Submissions.
eCTD – A TOOL to QUICK /RELIABLE REGULATORY SUBMISSION
Natural Resource Publications Management Publishing Reports in the Natural Resource Technical Report (NRTR), Natural Resource Report (NRR), and Natural.
July 11 th, 2005 Software Engineering with Reusable Components RiSE’s Seminars Sametinger’s book :: Chapters 16, 17 and 18 Fred Durão.
ALEC 604: Writing for Professional Publication Week 13: Submission for Publication.
©2014 Factorytalk Co., Ltd. Proprietary and Confidential eCTD Specification 17 July 2014.
Developing a Basic Web Page with HTML
© 2008 Octagon Research Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 PhUSE 2010 Berlin * Accessing the metadata from the define.xml using XSLT transformations.
Tutorial 3: Adding and Formatting Text. 2 Objectives Session 3.1 Type text into a page Copy text from a document and paste it into a page Check for spelling.
Web Content Management Systems. Lecture Contents Web Content Management Systems Non-technical users manage content Workflow management system Different.
Oracle iLearning/Tutor Integration Jan  Oracle iLearning Overview  Oracle Tutor Overview  Benefits of integration  Manual integration process.
EFPIA EFPIA IT Proposals ppt Slide 1 EFPIA Proposals for IT Support to the European Regulatory Procedures Mr S. Hasler EFPIA PAT Regulation 2000.
1 Networks and the Internet A network is a structure linking computers together for the purpose of sharing resources such as printers and files Users typically.
Luc Audrain Hachette Livre Head of digitalization
VERSION 7 What’s to Come?. Workflow – Lifecycle Definition  Ability to define custom Lifecycles NEW BEING WORKED IN REVIEW WAITING FOR APPROVAL APPROVED.
Justina A. Molzon, MS Pharm, JD
ACRIS Electronic Submission Overview Topics How to Sign Up How to Submit What Happens after Submission Tips & Suggestions.
Fundamentals of XML Management Greg Alexopoulos Systems Engineer Documentum.
IRISS Lifecycle Group Joe Cipollina – Pfizer Ted Hanebach – canreg Shy Kumar – Datafarm Inc. Alastair Nixon – GlaxoSmithKline Kevin Wing - eCTDConsultancy.
DMF Procedures and Communication between API, FP Manufacturers and Regulatory Authorities Jean-Louis ROBERT National Health Laboratory L – 1011 LUXEMBOURG.
Introduction to HTML Tutorial 1 eXtensible Markup Language (XML)
XML A web enabled data description language 4/22/2001 By Mark Lawson & Edward Ryan L’Herault.
Thesis Format and Submission
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Medicines Regulatory Affairs
J. B. Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. © Copyright 2005 J. B. Chemicals Pharma Ltd. Electronic Submissions – eCTD Advantages Dr Milind Joshi.
Best Archival Practice in the Regulation of Medicines: Work on the Guidelines for Agencies for Medicinal Products Ph.D. Arian Rajh Agency for Medicinal.
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part II A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 Technical Issues.
Cascading Style Sheets CSS. Source W3Schools
Firmware - 1 CMS Upgrade Workshop October SLHC CMS Firmware SLHC CMS Firmware Organization, Validation, and Commissioning M. Schulte, University.
CTD Dossier Preparation K. Srikantha Reddy Sr
Writing Your Own Web Page: Using HTML and FrontPage Chapter 10.
Web Design New Brighton High School Exploring the History of the World Wide WebWorld Wide Web.
1 COMMON TECHNICAL DOCUMENT / ORIGIN OF CTD… ICH EWG CTD WAS OFFICIALLY SIGNED OFF IN NOVEMBER 2000, AT 5 TH ICH CONFERENCE; SAN DIEGO,CALIFORNIA.
CHAPTER NINE Accessing Data Using XML. McGraw Hill/Irwin ©2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Introduction The eXtensible.
Accurate  Consistent  Compliant Contact: i4i the structured content company the structured content company.
Text2PTO: Modernizing Patent Application Filing A Proposal for Submitting Text Applications to the USPTO.
Analysis. This involves investigating what is required from the new system and what facilities are available. It would probably include:
Swissmedic Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products Hallerstrasse 7 CH-3000 Bern Workshop 2 - Paragraph 13 TPA 2nd Follow-up Information.
An Overview of eCTD for CMC Specialists Dr Martin Moxham June 2010 iRegulatory Ltd, 1 Viewpoint Office Village, Babbage Road, Stevenage, SG1 2EQ, United.
© Copyright IBM 2007DIA ERS SIAC Presentation, January 2008 The HL7 RPS and SPL Standards - A High Level View Terry Hardin Sr. IT Architect Emerging Software.
Regulated Product Submission Eileen M. Girten, MS i3 Statprobe 1DIA Education SIAC.
DIA ERS SIAC IND CMC eCTD Submissions Part II – IND to NDA
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
CTD Content Management
Software Quality Assurance Software Quality Factor
Nonclinical Information in the Common Technical Document: Opportunities for Content Reuse Peggy Zorn, MPI Research Susan Mattano, Pfizer, Inc.
Software Documentation
Monika Kawohl Statistical Programming Accovion GmbH
Handling ongoing variations concerning same document
EU SUBMISSION BY Haripriya & Revathy.
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II
Agile Translation Best Practices Ann Rockley, CEO The Rockley Group
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Business Cases and Advantages of eCTD v4.0
Fundamentals of Electronic Submissions and eCTD
Business View on eCTD v4.0 Advantages and challenges when considering implementation to overcome constrains of the current eCTD specification.
Monika Kawohl Statistical Programming Accovion GmbH
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part II
Presentation transcript:

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 eCTD An overview of the full day presentation by Dr Olaf Schoepke at the SAAPI conference in July 2008

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 Overview History Why go electronic? Types of electronic submissions What eCTD consists of Preparing eCTD Eye openers and bombshells Conclusion

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 eSubmissions history Began in late 80’s but insufficient IT capabilities 1995 FDA used PDF files with hyperlinks 1997 CTD topic of ICH first eCTD guideline 2003 CTD mandatory in EU and first eCTDs submitted 2006 lifecycle management a challenge

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 The future in EMEA July 2008 – only electronic submissions accepted (either eCTD or non-eCTD) July 2009 – strongly recommend only eCTD format electronic submissions to be accepted. Paper and other electronic formats to be exception.

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 Why go electronic? Quality Better quality Entire life cycle of product covered Easy and rapid call up of information Costs Paper and transportation costs reduced Storage and archive requirements reduced Faster, more efficient review, quicker registration Environmentally responsible

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 Save a tree!! NCE is approx 240,000 pages Paper for this would be 672 kg Equivalent to ONE average tree AN ENTIRE TREE IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A SINGLE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FORM ONE APPLICANT TO ONE HEALTH AUTHORITY

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 Types of electronic submissions NeeS format (Non eCTD electronic submission) Scanned version of paper submission without backbone etc. eCTD Documents in ‘intelligent’ PDF, JPG or GIF format, with folder or tree structures and XML backbone

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 What does eCTD consist of? Folder or tree structure XML backbone file is Table of Contents Additional ‘util’ information (Document type definition – rule book for tags and attributes) Regional information and files

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 Folder Structure Sections with specific information in folder names

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 Preparing documents Templates should be used where possible Documents to be: technically correct have the right granularity conform to external regulations/guidelines consistent with internal standards and styles – naming conventions, etc. ‘intelligent’ PDF files

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 From eCTD Fundamentals Dr O Schoepke

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 Granularity Defines how the completed document is broken down, tagged and stored for reuse Determines smallest piece of information that is reusable Changing granularity during lifecycle is difficult, therefore must be planned at the beginning. FDA Guidance Each document should be provided as a separate file

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 ‘intelligent’ PDF files A file converted to special PDF format enabling links and bookmarks to be applied, and hence is searchable.

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 Cross referencing documents Intradocument links – bookmarks Most intradocument links can be automatically set using templates To set each link manually would take MANY hours Interdocument links Cross reference documents in context of other documents.

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 Cross referencing submissions Inter submission links Cross references of submissions in context of other submissions, e.g. variations.

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 Time frames Once all documents are written, checked and formatted setting bookmarks and links take from 2 to 12 weeks.

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 Eye openers Global application Life cycle history easily accessible Ease of compilation and review once system is up and running Intersubmission checks made possible by both applicant and reviewer Authenticity of documentation easy to verify.

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 Bombshells Extensive software programme needed to support the system Software programme used in EU costs €20,000 per USER (over R200,000 per user) Extensive IT support needed by applicant and regulator

SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 Conclusion Great idea but need intermediate steps to get there CTD format to be adopted immediately NeeS in interim Essential to join electronic bandwagon