A vision for Fermilab Presentation to the National Academy Panel EPP 2010: Elementary Particle Physics In the 21 st Century Pier Oddone, 5/16/05.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Strait Fermilab October 21, 2005 The Neutrino Detector of the Future: A Massive Liquid Argon TPC.
Advertisements

Fermilab E = Mc 2 Opening Windows on the World Young-Kee Kim Fermilab and the University of Chicago June 1, 2010.
U.S. Department of Energy Brookhaven Science Associates BNL’s Role in High Energy Physics Thomas B.W. Kirk Associate Director for High Energy and Nuclear.
Position of the Czech Republic on the European Strategy in Particle Physics Current main activities in particle physics * Plans for the future Recommendations.
European Strategy for Particle Physics 2013 Preparatory group->Strategy group Individual town meetings Town meeting in Krakow: september 2012 Drafting.
Masato Yamanaka (ICRR, University of Tokyo) Collaborators Junji Hisano, Kazunori Nakayama Shohei Sugiyama, Tomohiro Takesako.
International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Edward McKigney Imperial College RAL March 25, 2002 Physics Motivation and Cooling Introduction.
Nailing Electroweak Physics (aka Higgs Hunting) with the Next Linear Collider Bob Wilson High Energy Physics Group CSU Physics Research Evening November.
Hunting for New Particles & Forces. Example: Two particles produced Animations: QPJava-22.html u u d u d u.
Interdisciplinary and Interagency Cooperation in High Energy Physics Barry Barish BPA 5-Nov-02.
View from the NSF: Later Years J. Whitmore (EPP-PNA) M. Pripstein (LHC) M. Goldberg, J. Reidy (EPP) LEPP – CLEO CESR Symposium at Cornell, May 31, 2008.
High Energy Physics Theory: Bigi, Delgado, Kolda –1 postdoc –5 students Experiment: Hildreth, Jessop, Lannon LoSecco, Ruchti, Wayne –3 research professors.
The International Linear Collider Barry Barish iThemba Cape Town 21-Oct-05.
The International Linear Collider Barry Barish IUPAP General Assembly Cape Town 26-Oct-05.
  e Conversion at Fermilab ? Steve Geer BNL-MECO Meeting January 2006.
F Accelerator Physics Center: Status FNAL Steering Group V. Shiltsev.
International collaboration in high energy physics experiments  All large high energy physics experiments today are strongly international.  A necessary.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
Particle Physics at the Energy Frontier Tevatron → LHC & The Very Early Universe Tony LissAir Force Institute of TechnologyApril 10, 2008.
Institute for Anything of the University of Everything Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz New Physics at the LHC C.-E. Wulz (Institute of High Energy Physics) 1 Institute.
Future Accelerators at the energy frontier Peter Hansen february 2010 University of Copenhagen.
The Future of the US program Pier Oddone Symposium for the 30 th anniversary celebration of the US/Japan Agreement on High Energy Physics October 21 st,
Long Range Planning Pier Oddone September 24, 2007.
The Fermilab Research Program Michael Witherell Users’ Meeting June 8, 2005.
Planning for Discoveries in Particle Physics Michael Witherell EPP2010 May 16, 2005.
Physics Priorities S. Dawson July 11, 2007 Fermilab Steering Committee Meeting.
SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 1 SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing Remarks David MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Directory for PPA.
Future Accelerators at the High Energy Frontier
F. Richard, Prague Nov 2002 Towards LHC LC Synergy Report from the LHC/LC (International) Study Group Conv: F. Paige G. Weiglein +Asian.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
Fermilab Neutrino Program Jim Strait Neutrino Discussion at CERN 26 November 2013.
All Hands Meeting FY 2008 Budget Pier Oddone Fermilab December 20, 2007.
Collider Detector at Fermilab Sung-hyun chang High Energy Physics lab. KNU.
P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC The Role of the LHC in US HEP Dan Green US CMS Program Manager January 28, 2003.
Report from Fermilab Presentation to ICFA Symposium Daegu, Korea September 2005 Pier Oddone.
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
John Womersley Welcome Director of Particle Physics, CCLRC International Scoping Study Meeting, RAL April 2006.
Summary Comments and Discussion Pier Oddone 40 th Anniversary Users’ Meeting June 8, 2007.
FSU Experimental HEP Faculty Todd Adams Susan Blessing Harvey Goldman S Sharon Hagopian Vasken Hagopian Kurtis Johnson Harrison Prosper Horst Wahl.
Status of Fermilab Status of Fermilab URA Visiting Committe 5/8/06 Pier Oddone.
PIP-II: Why a new accelerator? Paul Derwent Fermilab Community Advisory Board 23 July 2015.
F Detector and Computing Operations Hugh Montgomery DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 27, 2007.
John Womersley 22 July John Womersley Where have I been? U of Florida Postdoc Florida State Assistant Professor Fermilab Scientist.
Searching for New Matter with the D0 Experiment Todd Adams Department of Physics Florida State University September 19, 2004.
Fermilab and the EPP2010 Fermilab and the EPP2010 Users Meeting 6/1/06 Pier Oddone.
Interactions Kihyeon Cho September 6, People have long asked, What is world made of? and What holds it together?
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
Sep/19/2008 Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation: Accelerator based Particle Physics1 Accelerator Based Particle Physics Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation.
News Y2K June 25, Summary of June 12 Face-to-Face Meeting.
A vision for Fermilab Presentation to P5 Fermilab 9/12/05 Pier Oddone.
John Womersley 1/13 Fermilab’s Future John Womersley Fermilab May 2004.
The Standard Model of the elementary particles and their interactions
Fermilab: Present and Future Young-Kee Kim Data Preservation Workshop May 16, 2011.
Jonathan Nistor Purdue University 1.  A symmetry relating elementary particles together in pairs whose respective spins differ by half a unit  superpartners.
The Fermilab Program Michael Witherell Users’ meeting June 3, 2004.
P5 Report: The Particle Physics Roadmap 1 A. Seiden Fermilab May 14, 2007.
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
Particle Physics Kihyeon Cho *Transparency from Prof. Young-Kee Kim.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Fermilab: Introduction Young-Kee Kim DOE KA12 (Electron Research)Review June 22-23, 2010.
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
Particle Physics Sector Young-Kee Kim / Greg Bock Leadership Team Strategic Planning Winter Workshop January 29, 2013.
Process of the 2nd update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics FCC week, 29 May 2017, Berlin Sijbrand de Jong, President of the CERN Council (slides.
Summary Session 3 Standard Model and Beyond
Particle Physics Theory
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) April 17, 2003, CAT, Indore, India
Stanford Linear Accelerator
Fermilab Proton Beams: Program Perspectives Greg Bock Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson-DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook May 5,
Presentation transcript:

A vision for Fermilab Presentation to the National Academy Panel EPP 2010: Elementary Particle Physics In the 21 st Century Pier Oddone, 5/16/05

2 This will be a personal view…. “If you want to predict the future, help create it” Bumper sticker “Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood” Daniel Burnham, Chicago, circa 1900

3 Driven by physics Where the largest mysteries are: We know next to nothing about the next accessible energy scale: witness the plethora of models We know very little about the world of neutrinos We are ignorant about what dark matter and dark energy are We have strong clues that these are the hunting grounds for major new discoveries We also believe there is a deep connection between all these areas

4 Strategic context: U.S. contribution = secondary = leadingNeutrino Frontier Flavor frontier Energy Frontier Domestic accelerator program with no new investment X

5 Strategic context: U.S. contribution = secondary = leadingNeutrino Frontier Flavor frontier Energy Frontier Domestic accelerator program with new and redirected investment X

6 Enable the most powerful attack on the fundamental science questions of our time Provide world class facilities for HEP as part of the global network Develop science and technology for particle physics and cosmology research Specific Goal: make vital contributions to particle physics in the next decade by: Developing a powerful new tool for discovery at the energy frontier (ILC) Maintaining the foremost neutrino program (NOvA, proton driver(s),+) Overarching Goals: New Initiatives at Fermilab New Initiatives at Fermilab

7 The Energy Frontier (ILC) Goals: Establish all technical components, costs, engineering designs, management structures to enable “early” decision (by 2010). Position US (and Fermilab) to host the ILC. Position US (and Fermilab) to play major roles in detector development and physics analysis. This is the highest priority initiative for the laboratory

8 The Energy Frontier: why ILC? We expect the greatest richness at the energy frontier Few phenomena will manifest themselves in only one machine theories Purely ILCPurely LHC We will build on the foundation of LHC to make major discoveries at ILC

9 ILC/LHC Physics: new particle LHC experiments find a new heavy particle, Z’ Able to show that Z’ mediates a new force of nature This is a great discovery Notice peak is ½ event per bin per fb -1

10 LHC/ILC Physics: new particle ILC measures couplings of Z’ to find out what it means If here, related to origin of neutrino masses If here, related to origin of Higgs If here, Z’ comes from an extra dimension of space These are great discoveries!

11 LHC/ILC physics: CP violation Example Signal M H = 130 GeV LHC experiments discover several kinds of Higgs particles

12 LHC/ILC: CP violation From decays of Higgs, ILC experiments discover a new source of CP violation (e.g. angular correlations to specific decays) Solves the mystery of why matter dominates over antimatter

13 LHC/ILC physics: dark matter CDMS detects WIMPS from the galactic halo LHC discovers a neutralino Dark matter?

14 LHC/ILC Physics: dark matter ILC sparticle measurements determine relic density Show that the neutralino really is dark matter And discover that it is only 2/3 of the total!

15 ILC Research and Development Most critical need: establish world class expertise in SC RF technology in the US: human and physical resources Facilities at Fermilab: buildings exist, need to beef up infrastructure (power,cryo,RF) for cryomodule assembly and testing. Integrate this work into global effort RF module assembly and testing CDR effort Industrialization Not affordable Much longer R&D needed Looks good! Press for early decision Nothing yet LHC discovery: GO This induces other program choices

16 While we develop the ILC…. We must deliver on our “ships of the line”: The Tevatron Program: CDF and D0 LHC and CMS The neutrino program: Minos and MiniBoone and maintain scientific vitality with a diverse program that includes: Particle astrophysics Theory and computing Technology development

17 Tevatron Program Greatest window into new phenomena until LHC is on 1500 collaborators, 600 students + postdocs Critically dependent on Luminosity Doubling time a major consideration

18 Sensitivity to low mass Higgs, or Severely constrain mass Supersymmetry Closing in on the the SM Higgs LEP Excluded Top quark mass (GeV) W boson mass (GeV) L (fb -1 ) Standard Model Run II projections

19 And the non-SM Higgs Explore the majority of allowed parameters for the lightest supersymmetric Higgs

20 Other Windows to New Physics Discovery Potential over most of B s mixing expected region SUSY Chargino Sensitivity to 270 GeV! Observation of B s mixing

21 Tevatron: key is luminosity Luminosity history for each fiscal year Integrated luminosity for different assumptions Integrated Luminosity Per detector by Oct 09 Top Line: all run II upgrades work Bottom line: none work ( pink/white bands show the doubling times for the top line)

22 LHC: delivering on the promise Huge increase in physics reach: 7 times the energy, 100 times the luminosity of the Tevatron US Construction Collaboration has been successful: Fermilab + LBNL + BNL. With increase in energy and luminosity come special challenges (e.g., 300 Megajoules of stored energy in the beam!)

23 LHC: delivering on the promise US LHC Accelerator R&D Program = LARP: Fermilab + LBNL + BNL +SLAC Commissioning: bring huge FNAL experience to LHC Technology for upgrades: once again, luminosity will be key FNAL will have presence at CERN but also develop remote “operations” center at FNAL. Important step in the development of future “global” machines like the ILC

24 CMS: Compact Muon Detector Coming together: aimed at completion by end of 2007 Muon detectors Magnet cold mass

25 CMS: Compact Muon Detector US collaboration doubled in the last three years >300 Collaborators 41 Institutions

26 US CMS: and Fermilab’s role Only major US lab associated with CMS: a central support role for the US community This was the case during construction Attention now to huge data and physics discovery challenge: the LHC Physics Center (LPC)

27 Summary for LHC and CMS Fermilab will be a vital partner to CERN in making the LHC and CMS a success Our ambition is to contribute with: Presence at CERN as necessary Remote control/monitoring/data centers at Fermilab for both accelerator and detector(s) Technical support and critical mass: such that being at FNAL will be nearly “as good” as being at CERN for all our University partners!

28 Present Neutrino Program Minos Far detector Minos near detector MINOS program is just starting: - 2 GeV neutrinos Kiloton far detector and 1.0 Kiloton near detector -Most precise measurements in the atmospheric region -  disappearance

29 Present Neutrino Program MiniBooNE - 1 GeV neutrinos (Booster) ton oil cerenkov - Operating since   e appearance - first results this fall: all hell will break loose if positive signal

30 New Initiatives: neutrinos Understanding the Neutrino matrix: What is sin 2 2   What is the Mass Hierarchy What is the CP violation parameter  Fermilab is in the best position to make vital contributions to answer these questions

31 New Initiatives: neutrinos Most powerful beam in the world at 200 KW Upgrades (by 2008) would give 440 KW When we stop the Tevatron, we’ll have 600+ KW, the same as JPARC after Further improvements: aimed at 2 MW proton beam power

32 Neutrino Program: accelerators Develop Proton Driver R&D helps develop base of SC RF technology Extremely flexible operations = much simplified complex Accelerator energy is 2% of ILC Also develop alternatives No Tevatron means we have recycler, accumulator and debuncher to play with We have VERY EARLY creative ideas on how to deliver 1-2 MW at 120 GeV.

33 Neutrino Initiative – Proton Driver ILC LINAC  < 1 ILC LINAC ILC/TESLA

34 Neutrino Initiative: NOvA In addition to Beam power: detector mass and detector sensitivity: NOvA is 30 ktons, totally active NOvA is the only experiment sensitive to matter effects (hence the mass hierarchy). We want to start a long term R&D program towards massive totally active liquid Argon detectors for extensions of NOvA. Improvement is proportional to (Beam power) x (detector mass) x (detector sensitivity)

35 Neutrino Initiative: Physics Reach NOvA sensitivity as other experiments (T2K,HK) or accelerators (PD) are added Mass ordering sensitivity with several evolutionary paths Sensitivity for all values of  Sensitivity for some values of 

36 Neutrino Initiative: Physics Reach CP violation reach for evolutionary path Sensitivity for all values of  Sensitivity for some values of   

37 Neutrino Initiative: Physics Reach A possible evolution of the neutrino world program

38 Neutrino Program (delayed ILC) detectors accelerators Minos run MiniBoone run NOvA R&D and Construction NOvA run Proton Driver Construction (if and only if ILC delayed) Proton Driver R&D NOvA II run NOvA II R&D and construction Proton plan first stage 0.2 MW moving to 0.4 MW Proton plan 2 nd stage (If no proton driver) 1-2 MW at 120 GeV Greater than 2 MW any energy ILC CDR DELAYED ILC?

39 Interlinked Roadmap The immediate decisions are: NOvA, and support of ILC R&D and proton driver R&D Options get looked two years down the line after ILC CDR: decision to go for early ILC decision precludes proton driver LHC input will determine branch points at the end of the decade

40 Interlinked Roadmap Establishes the main trunk and branches for the laboratory. It supports a vital role for the US community in the global program Requires “strong focusing” now, which narrows the program…. But it establishes the strong base on which breadth and “texture” can flourish as we move forward.