The Technology Connection. Two Great Areas of Technology Need Preparing students (and teachers!) for the Common Core State Standards The computer adaptive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

9/22/04 Texas Teacher STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness Chart A Tool for Planning and Self-Assessing
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Beginning in DTC Spring Workshop January 22, 2013.
Enhancing Education Through Technology NCLB Title II Part D Cathy HigginsOffice of Educational Technology
NJDOE TALENT DIVISION OVERVIEW prepared for: New Jersey Association of School Administrators April 30,
Smarter Balanced Assessments SBAC Field Test this spring Field Test will determine cut points for proficiency levels, validity of items Will not be used.
Minnesota’s Professional Development Plan to Prepare for the 2014 GED Test Amy Vickers, Minneapolis Adult Education Astrid Liden, Minnesota Department.
PRESENTED BY: LINDSAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT THOMAS L. ROONEY, SUPERINTENDENT LANA BROWN, DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION High School Transition.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 22, 2012 Jose Ortega Rodney Okamoto SMARTER Balanced.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Adult Education Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
STaR Chart Summary for Bryan ISD By Jenna Springfield.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
San Mateo County Results from the 2014 SBAC Field Test Survey Deann Walsh Manager, Learning Analytics & Program Evaluation.
The Office of eLearning eLearningSC PD On-line Professional Development eLearningSC PD On-line Professional Development.
NWOET Annual Advisory Meeting April 9, 2013 at. Blended Learning: Flipped, 1:1, BYO and Ohio’s New Learning Standards Instructional Models and Issues.
STaR Chart Analysis Roberto Martinez EDTC The University of Texas at Brownsville.
Technology Plan Amy Wood, Director of Technology GISD Board Meeting January 18, 2010.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Common Core Standards Norwalk – La Mirada Unified School District April 30, 2012 Principal Meeting.
ELL Instruction & 21 st Century Skills Presenter: Susannah Frank Rocky Mountain PBS.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Contra Costa County Curriculum Council January 31, 2014 Deborah.
Technology Directors/Curriculum Directors Meeting October 2010 Jen Paul – ELL Educational Research Consultant Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability.
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
Currituck County Schools “READY, Set, Go-ing to be a Great year!” Convocation
Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (PGES) Webcast July 24, 2013.
1:1, BYO and Mobile Devices Ohio’s New Learning Standards What works, what does not Instructional Models and Issues Presented by Roger W. Minier, Ph.D.
Gary S. Thomas, Ed.D. Superintendent Education Support Services TECHNOLOGY IN A COMMON CORE AGE 1 Microsoft Encarta Online Copyright © ENIAC Electronic.
Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process October 7, 2013.
Arlington Independent School District More Than A Remarkable Education Technology Overview Summer Leadership August 5, 2010.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Leadership and Education in the 21 st Century DELAINE EASTIN State Superintendent of Public Instruction April 2001.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) for Support Professionals Fall 2013.
Technology Readiness in Michigan MAEDS 2014 Fall Conference MTRAx.
August Coming to North Tech The Employee Evaluation System includes 9 standards broken down into 36 quality indicators that each employee will be.
Sandra Johnson, M.A. & M.S. Susie Ceppi- Bussmann, Ph.D. New Mexico State University.
April 28, 2014 CISD Support: Beth Brophy Mitch Fowler Carrie Johnson Facilitated School Improvement Planning.
Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.
Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS) Update to PAIU CC January 17, 2014 Kristen Lewald, PVAAS.
MCA Benchmarking Orientation Webinar
Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process September 5, 2013.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction School Library Standards for California.
Title IIB Massachusetts Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program (MMSP) Information Session Anne DeMallie, MMSP Coordinator December 8, :30.
1 Educational Technology Electronic Teaching Portfolio Based on the ISTE/NCATE Foundation Standards for all educators. All candidates in teacher preparation.
Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS) Update to PAIU CC December 11, 2013 PVAAS Statewide Team.
Knowledge Interpersonal Skills Technical Skills Teacher will observe each others fluency program set Up for struggling readers and discuss what is being.
Texas STaR Chart Milby High School What is the Texas STar Chart The Teacher STaR Chart is designed to help teachers, campuses, and districts.
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
STaR Chart Survey Results A Look At Three Years of Technology Data for A. P. Solis Middle School by: Karla Lara.
TECHNOLOGY MASTER PLAN Our Children, Our Schools, Our Future Technology Master Plan.
Walnut Valley Unified School District California Assessment and Accountability System Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Walnut Valley Unified School District.
Ohio Department of Education OCTEO Conference March 19,
This PowerPoint can be downloaded at oregoned.org Presented by the Oregon Education Association Center for Great Public Schools.
Student Perception Survey: Survey Coordinator Training Office of Policy and Evaluation April 2016.
SBCUSD and Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Testing Assessment and Accountability, January 2013.
EngageNY.org Technology-Enhanced Learning DATAG March 2013.
AN EXPERIENCE REPORT ASSESSING A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MOOC FOR CS PRINCIPLES SIGCSE 2017 – MEMPHIS, TN JEFF GRAY DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE UNIVERSITY.
Colorado Department of Education Katy Anthes March 2014 Educator Effectiveness & Teacher Librarians.
Data & Technology Updates April, 2016
Assessment Information
Parent and Family Partnership Surveys
Collegewood Elementary School
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
Update on Testing NYSCOSS Conference Steven Katz Assistant Commissioner, Office of State Assessment Heather Klusendorf Program Manager, Computer-Based.
Presentation transcript:

The Technology Connection

Two Great Areas of Technology Need Preparing students (and teachers!) for the Common Core State Standards The computer adaptive assessments themselves

Curricular Components You have seen the Performance Tasks...

Curricular Components You have seen the Performance Tasks...

Curricular Components Students will: Find and evaluate written information from the internet Publish written information to the internet Find and evaluate multi-media information from the internet Publish multimedia information to the internet.

The Computer Adaptive Assessments

Assessment Components There is an option for paper/pencil administration until 2017, but...

Assessment Components “This does not mean the whole district can do paper/pencil. More likely one middle school in the district can do one subject online and the other using paper/pencil.” - Joe Willhoft “We are finding that students using paper/pencil are scoring one standard deviation lower than students using intuitive technology.” - Sue Gendron

Assessment Components The minimum: 20-station computer lab per 600 students for 6 weeks with an option for some students doing paper/pencil (at least until 2017) - Joe Willhoft High-speed internet access for each computer station

Assessment Readiness Options: – Ed Tech K-12 Voucher Program funds – Program Improvement funds – Title I funds – Title III funds

Assessment Readiness March 20 – April 9 – Pilot Districts (LAUSD, Torrance, Long Beach,…) test data collection – Pilot Districts provide feedback and suggestions for improved experience April 9 – April 16 – CDE enhances FAQs for Readiness Tool Survey – CDE hosts and archives a Readiness Tool webinar April 16 – June 14 – CDE begins statewide data collection and review

LACOE Technology Services Assistance: – Facilitation of the planning process – Electronic dissemination of information – Regional face-to-face meetings of district technology leaders – Professional development

LACOE Technology Services Support contact: – Dennis Large – –