Datums and Datum Transformations Geomatics Industry Association of America December 4, 2008 Dave Doyle NGS Chief Geodetic Surveyor

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
Advertisements

New Geometric Datum: plans Modernizing the U.S. National Spatial Reference System FGCS San Diego, California Monday 11 July 2011.
Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums State Geodetic Advisor, NGS National Ocean Service, NOAA Sacramento, CA October, 2005 Workshop.
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 23 February 2010 GISC3325.
Alabama Height Modernization Project, NAD 83(2011), and GEOID 12 in Alabama Overview of Height Modernization Project Overview of Height Modernization.
Tidal Datums Text and Figures Source: NOAA/NOS CO-OPS Tidal Datums related publications.
Coastal Zone 2011 Conference “Cool Geodetic Resources For Your Project” A National Ocean Service, NOAA, Presentation 1)TOOLS TO OBTAIN GEODETIC CONTROL.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.
Datums & Coordinate Systems
WELCOME Handouts Available Joel Cusick National Park Service Alaska Regional Office Joel Cusick National Park Service Alaska Regional.
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
Datum Transformation and Coordinate Conversion. Cartesian Coordinate System Y Z X Ellipsoid sized a & f WGS -84 is Earth Centered Earth Fixed; Origin.
Marc Véronneau Canadian Geodetic Survey, Surveyor General Branch
Vertical Datums and Heights
Datums and Coordinates How the Evolution of GPS is Transforming Survey and Mapping GITA/ACSM April 25, 2010 Pam Fromhertz Colorado State Geodetic Advisor,
and IGLD 85 Hydraulic Correctors
Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA
International Great Lakes Datum Overview Presented at a Height Modernization Program meeting January 9, 2014 by David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State.
GIS for Environmental Engineering
Datum Shifts and Geoid Height Models
VDATUM: the Vertical Datum Transformation Tool
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
GEODETIC INFRASTRUCTURE Walter Volkmann Manager of Technical Operations L. D. Bradley Land Surveyors Gainesville, Florida.
Coordinate Systems & Vertical Datum Issues
Mapping Projections of Kentucky Bryan W
National Readjustment of NAD 83 Indiana Society of Professional Land Surveyors Indianapolis, IN January 18, 2008.
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
Geography 370 Locating Positions on the Earth
Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department Geographic Information Systems Spatial Referencing Lecture 4 Week 6 1 st.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
Common Marks. Datasheet Basics The NGS Data Sheet See file dsdata.txt for more information about the datasheet. DATABASE = Sybase,PROGRAM = datasheet,
Towards the unification of the vertical datums over the North American continent D Smith 1, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 1, J L Huang 2, YM Wang 1, M Sideris.
Geocentric Datum of Australia Geocentric Datum of Australia (GDA) Peter Todd Project Manager GDA Implementation ICSM Matt Higgins Technical Manager GDA.
NGS Produces New Coordinates: Is it still NAD83? Past, Present, Future Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor Sacramento, CA.
Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering,
DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND FUTURE OF THE NATIONAL SPATIAL REFERENCE SYSTEM PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS OF OHIO TOLEDO FEBRUARY 11, 2000 David Doyle.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
Feedback on the New Datums Reference Frames 2015 Geospatial Summit April 14, 2015 Amar Nayegandhi Dewberry Consultants LLC.
National Readjustment Dale Pursell Observation and Analysis Division National Geodetic Survey FGCS Workgroup Meeting February 14, 2007.
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
Upcoming Changes to the National Spatial Reference System
Representing the Earth
NATIONAL READJUSTMENT WHAT WHY HOW WHEN NAD83(NSRS)
Shape of the Earth, Geoid, Global Positioning System, Map Coordinate Systems, and Datums Or how you can impress your friend on a hike D. Ravat University.
GPS Derived Heights: A Height Modernization Primer December 1, 2006 Professional Land Surveyors of Colorado 2006 Fall Technical Program Renee Shields National.
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Latest Developments in NGS NGS Products, Tools and Services
Revolution in Earth Measurement Traditional Surveying uses benchmarks as reference points Global Positioning uses fixed GPS receivers as reference points.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
Benefits of the New Reference Frames Dru Smith Joe Evjen 60 minutes April 13, Geospatial Summit1.
Datums Computation Overview Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services January 8, 2009.
GPS collection Survey Grade Receivers Mapping Grade Receivers Recreational Grade Receivers Differential correction Real time CORS beacon WAAS Subscription.
National Readjustment DALE PURSELL ACSM NATIONAL READJUSTMENT WHAT? WHY HOW WHEN POST QUESTIONS.
Legislative Issues for the New Datums of 2022 NGS Geospatial Summit Arlington, VA April, 2015 Dave Doyle NGS, Chief Geodetic Surveyor (Retired)
The Delta Levees Program
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says…
Positioning America for the future A New Geometric Datum for the U.S.
VERTICAL DATUMS APRIL 08, 2008 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 5 March 2009 GISC3325.
Vertical Geodetic Control in Southern Louisiana: Providing the National Spatial Reference System in Dynamic Regions June 20, 2011 Renee Shields Height.
Overview of Datums Commonly Used in Michigan and the National Spatial Reference System Michigan Society of Professional Surveyors 70 th Annual Meeting.
Geodetic Control and Datums Where is it? How Accurately can we map it?
GPS Derived Heights: A Height Modernization Primer May 8 and May 10, 2007 National Geodetic Survey Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey National Oceanic.
The Global Positioning System Rebecca C. Smyth April 17 - May 2, 2001.
Overview of New Datums A webinar for Monthly Height Mod Meeting Dru Smith Chief Geodesist NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey March 12, 2015Webinar for Monthly.
Vertical Control Introductions Purpose for presentation
Datums and Projections Demystifying the Reference Frame
GISC3325-Geodetic Science 20 January 2009
Presentation transcript:

Datums and Datum Transformations Geomatics Industry Association of America December 4, 2008 Dave Doyle NGS Chief Geodetic Surveyor

GEODETIC DATUMS HORIZONTAL 2-D (Latitude and Longitude) (e.g. NAD 27, NAD 83 (1986)) VERTICAL/GEOPOTENTIAL 1-D (Orthometric Height) (e.g. NGVD 29, NAVD 88, Local Tidal) GEOMETRIC 3-D (Latitude, Longitude and Ellipsoid Height) Fixed and Stable(?) - Coordinates seldom change (e.g. NAD 83 (1993), NAD 83 (2007)) also 4-D (Latitude, Longitude, Ellipsoid Height, Velocities) Coordinates change with time (e.g. ITRF00, ITRF05)

HORIZONTAL DATUMS 8 Constants 3 – specify the location of the origin of the coordinate system. 3– specify the orientation of the coordinate system. 2 – specify the dimensions of the reference ellipsoid

VERTICAL DATUMS A set of fundamental elevations to which other elevations are referred. Datum Types Tidal – Defined by observation of tidal variations over some period of time (MSL, MLLW, MLW, MHW, MHHW etc.) (NOS Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services) (CO-OPS) Geodetic – Tided to Local Mean Sea Level at one or more points at some epoch (NAVD 88, IGLD85)

HISTORICAL VERTICAL DATUMS OF THE UNITED STATES Second General Adjustment Sea Level Datum of 1929 National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29) First General Adjustment Third General Adjustment Fourth General Adjustment Guam 1963

The National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 is referenced to 26 tide gauges in the US and Canada

The North American Vertical Datum of 1988 is referenced to a single tide gauge in Canada

VERTICAL DATUMS OF THE UNITED STATES Current Reference Systems North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) American Samoa Vertical Datum of 2002 (ASVD 02) Northern Marians Vertical Datum of 2003 (NMVD 03) Guam Vertical Datum of 2004 (GUVD 04) Federal Register Notice: Vol. 58, No. 120, June 24, 1993, pg “Affirmation of Vertical Datum for Surveying and Mapping Activities” Federal Register Notices for American Samoa, Guam and Northern Marians are ready for publication

VERTICAL DATUMS OF THE UNITED STATES Works in Progress Puerto Rico Vertical Datum of 2002 (PRVD 02) Virgin Island Vertical Datum of 2009(?) (VIVD 09?) Hawaiian Islands Vertical Datum (HIVD)

DATUM TRANSFORMATIONS 1. WHAT DATUM ARE THE EXISTING COORDINATES/HEIGHTS ON? 2. WHAT DATUM DO I WANT THE NEW COORDINATES/HEIGHTS ON? 3. HOW LARGE A GEOGRAPHICAL AREA DO I WANT TO CONVERT AT ONE TIME? 4. HOW MANY POINTS ARE COMMON TO BOTH DATUMS? 5. WHAT IS THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE COMMON POINTS? 6. HOW ACCURATE ARE THE EXISTING COORDINATES/HEIGHTS? 0.01 Meter 0.1 Meter 1.0 Meter 7. HOW ACCURATE DO I WANT THE NEW COORDINATES/HEIGHTS?

DATUM TRANSFORMATION IDEAL METHOD SATISFIES ALL USERS’ REQUIREMENTS CAPABLE OF TRANSFORMING LARGE DATASETS NEAR-REAL TIME APPLICATIONS SIMPLE - METHOD SHOULD NOT REQUIRE AN EXPERT OR DECISIONS TO BE MADE ACCURATE

NGS DATUM TRANSFORMATION MODELS VERTCON (NGVD 29 only) NADCON (NAD 27, OLD HAWAIIAN, PUERTO RICO, 3 ALASKA ISLANDS) (HPGN/HARN) Federal Register Notice: Vol. 55, No. 155, August 10, 1990, pg “Notice to Adopt Standard Method for Mathematical Horizontal Datum Transformation” Federal Register Notice: Vol. 72, No. 132, July 11, 2007, pg “Notice to Adopt a Standard Model fro Mathematical Vertical Datum Transformations”

3065 Projects included:  67,693 total stations  Typical shifts 1-3 cm in both horizontal/ellipsoid height  No national transformation model (e.g. NADCON) NAD 83 National Readjustment

HISTORICAL HORIZONTAL DATUMS OF THE UNITED STATES New England Datum North American Datum of 1927 Bessel Ellipsoid U.S. Standard Datum North American Datum Puerto Rico Datum Old Hawaiian Datum UnAlaska Datum SE Alaska Datum Point Barrow Datum St. Paul Island Datum St. Lawrence Island Datum Barter Island Datum Flaxman Island Datum Valdez Datum American Samoa Datum 1962 Guam Datum 1963 Golofnin Bay Datum Kripniyuk Datum Port Clarence Datum Pribilof Islands Datum St. Michael Datum Yakutat Datum Yukon Datum St. George Island Datum

HORIZONTAL DATUM OF THE UNITED STATES Current Reference System North American Datum of 1983 NAD 83 (1986) – 2D & passive NAD 83 (199x) – 3D & passive NAD 83 (CORS96) – 4D & active NAD 83 (2007) – 3D & passive Federal Register Notice: Vol. 54, No. 113, June 14, 1989, pg “Affirmation of Datum for Surveying and Mapping Activities”

ARE NAD 83 & WGS 84 THE SAME? Federal Register Notice: Vol. 60, No. 157, August 15, 1995, pg “Use of NAD 83/WGS 84 Datum Tag on Mapping Products” IT DEPENDS If requirements are greater than 3m then Yes If requirements are less than 3m then No

DATUM = WGS 84(G730) Datum redefined with respect to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame of 1992 (ITRF92) +/- 20 cm in each component (Proceedings of the ION GPS-94 pgs ) DATUM = WGS 84(G873) Datum redefined with respect to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame of 1994 (ITRF94) +/- 10 cm in each component (Proceedings of the ION GPS-97 pgs ) DATUM = WGS 84 RELEASED - SEPTEMBER 1987 BASED ON OBSERVATIONS AT MORE THAN 1900 DOPPLER STATIONS DATUM = WGS 84(G1150) Datum redefined with respect to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame of 2000 (ITRF00) +/- 2 cm in each component (Proceedings of the ION GPS-02) HOW MANY WGS 84s HAVE THERE BEEN???? WORLD GEODETIC SYSTEM 1984

ARE NAD 83 & WGS 84 THE SAME? NAD 83 to ITRF00 dX = m dY = m dZ = m S = 0.62 x rX = mas rY = mas rZ = mas

MY SOFTWARE SAYS I’M WORKING IN WGS-84 Project tied to WGS-84 control points obtained from the Defense Department -- Good Luck! You’re really working in the same reference frame as your control points -- NAD 83? Unless you are doing autonomous positioning (point positioning +/ meters) you’re probably NOT in WGS-84

EARLY NAD 83 NETWORK PROBLEMS NOT “GPSABLE” POOR STATION ACCESSIBILITY IRREGULARLY SPACED POSITIONAL ACCURACY

HIGH ACCURACY REFERENCE NETWORKS (HARN) “GPSABLE” Clear Horizons for Satellite Signal Acquisition EASY ACCESSIBILITY Few Special Vehicle or Property Entrance Requirements REGULARLY SPACED Always within Km HIGH ACCURACY A-Order (5 mm + 1:10,000,000) (3 5.5 hr sessions) B-Order (8mm + 1:1,000,000) (2 5.5 hr sessions)

FEDERAL & COOPERATIVE BSE NETWORKS (FBN/CBN) MORE STATE PARTNERSHIPS REMOVE DISTORTIONS IN EARLY HARNS (3-10 CM) ENSURE CONNETIONS TO CORS IMPROVE ELLIPSOID HEIGHT ACCURACY (Not more than 2 cm)

HPGN – HARN FBN - CBN

National Geodetic Survey, Retrieval Date = DECEMBER 1, 2008 HV7843 *********************************************************************** HV7843 DESIGNATION - OBSERVATORY HV7843 PID - HV7843 HV7843 STATE/COUNTY- VA/CAROLINE HV7843 USGS QUAD - HV7843 HV7843 *CURRENT SURVEY CONTROL HV7843 ___________________________________________________________________ HV7843* NAD 83(1993) (N) (W) ADJUSTED HV7843* NAVD (meters) (feet) ADJUSTED HV7843 ___________________________________________________________________ HV7843 LAPLACE CORR (seconds) DEFLEC99 HV7843 GEOID HEIGHT (meters) GEOID03 HV7843 DYNAMIC HT (meters) (feet) COMP HV7843 MODELED GRAV- 980,023.3 (mgal) NAVD 88 HV7843 HV7843 HORZ ORDER - FIRST HV7843 VERT ORDER - FIRST CLASS I HV7843 HV7843.The horizontal coordinates were established by classical geodetic methods HV7843.and adjusted by the National Geodetic Survey in November HV7843 HV7843.The orthometric height was determined by differential leveling HV7843.and adjusted in June HV7843 HV7843.The Laplace correction was computed from DEFLEC99 derived deflections. HV7843 HV7843.The geoid height was determined by GEOID03.

HV7843 SUPERSEDED SURVEY CONTROL HV7843 HV7843 NAD 83(1993) (N) (W) AD( ) 1 HV7843 NAD 83(1986) (N) (W) AD( ) 1 HV7843 NAD (N) (W) AD( ) 1 HV7843 NAVD 88 (09/21/92) (m) (f) LEVELING 3 HV7843 NGVD 29 (02/12/90) (m) (f) ADJUSTED 1 1

DATUM TRANSFORMATIONS MOLODENSKY For continental regions accuracy can be +/- 8 to 10 meters Does not model network distortions very well. Assumes heights in both systems are ellipsoidal (NAD 27 did not have ellipsoidal heights).

DATUM TRANSFORMATIONS MOLODENSKY Converts latitude, longitude and ellipsoidal height to X,Y,Z Earth-Centered Coordinates. Applies a 3-dimensional change in the origin (dX, dY,dZ) Applies a change in the size and shape of the reference ellipsoid Converts new X,Y,Z Earth-Centered Coordinates back to latitude, longitude and ellipsoidal height

MOLODENSKY TRANSFORMATION

NADCON d  = dλ = d  = dλ =  = λ = d  = dλ = d  = dλ = d  = dλ = d  = dλ = d  = dλ = d  = dλ = d  = dλ = d  = dλ = d  = dλ =

COORDINATE COMPARISON NAD 27 to NAD 83(1993) MOLODENSKY ADJUSTED vs. TRANSFORMED Station: OBSERVATORY (HV7843) LATITUDE LONGITUDE PUBLISHED MOLODENSKY.20828”.00844” m m THIS CORRESPONDS TO A POSITIONAL DIFFERENCE OF m (21.08 ft)

COORDINATE COMPARISON NAD 27 to NAD 83(1993) NADCON ADJUSTED vs. TRANSFORMED Station: OBSERVATORY (HV7843) LATITUDE LONGITUDE PUBLISHED NADCON.00052”.00244” m m THIS CORRESPONDS TO A POSITIONAL DIFFERENCE OF m (0.20 ft)

GOOD COORDINATION BEGINS WITH GOOD COORDINATES GEOGRAPHY WITHOUT GEODESY IS A FELONY