US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® OVERVIEW OF THE CIVIL WORKS PROCESS Planning Principles & Procedures – FY 11.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US Army Corps of Engineers Budgeting Process
Advertisements

F1B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Risk Management Module F1: Authorities and Policies.
FDR1 - 1 Flood Risk management History/Mission/Policies.
US Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division Northwestern Division 1 System Flood Control Review: Regional Agency Review Briefing Lonnie Mettler Northwestern.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® COL Richard P. Pannell District Commander, Galveston District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers United States Army.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Vertical Team Roles & Responsibilities Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Suburban Flooding: Finding regional solutions to a growing problem Imad Samara Project Manager and Silver.
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Philadelphia District How to start the Corps’ Project Delivery Engine Local Sponsor Identifies A Problem and Requests Corps.
Engineer Circular Requests to Alter USACE Projects
Water Resources In the United States: Perspectives and Challenges by Dr. Jerome Delli Priscoli Institute for Water Resources US Army Corps of Engineers.
Module 23 STEPS 15 & 16 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) and Other Decision Documents Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
A HISTORY OF WATER RESOURCES POLICIES AND GUIDANCE Overview Briefing for Planning Associates Class of 2011 by John C. Furry 3 March 2011.
CHARLESTONMOBILE WILMINGTON SAVANNAH JACKSONVILLE US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® NC Water Resources Congress Christine Brayman Deputy For.
Dam Safety Program Management and Organization
Federal Funding Process LYNDA HOFFMAN, WATERWAYS DIVISION MANAGER.
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
Study conducted for the Coalition of Alabama Waterway Associations by Troy University Center for International Business and Economic Development.
Module 22 STEPS 11, 12, 13 & 14 Washington Level and Administration Review Processes Module 22 STEPS 11, 12, 13 & 14 Washington Level and Administration.
NED COSTS And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning.
1. 2 Water Supply Sources Surface water Groundwater Reuse Water Supply Facilities Storage Wells Desalinization Plants Intakes& Pumps Treatment Transmission.
Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
NRCS Watershed Rehabilitation
Module 24 STEPS 17, 18, & 19 Project Implementation Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Coastal Texas Protection and Restoration Project
Regional Flood Plain Management Council April 15, 2015 H-GAC December 2nd.
An update from the National Committee on Levee Safety Presented to the TWCA by Karin M. Jacoby, PE, Esq. June 17, of 14An Involved Public and Reliable.
1 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Indian River Lagoon North Restoration Feasibility Study Public Meeting September.
Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Theodore A. Brown, P.E., SES Chief Planning and Policy Division
Module 11 STEPS 4 & 5 Conduct Reconnaissance Study & Report Certification Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
WRRDA and WRDA: How are they different, and does it make any difference? Inland Rivers, Ports and Terminals, Inc. Tuesday, April 29, 2014 James A. Kearns.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers Watershed Authorities, Policies and Procedures Michael Greer Regional Technical.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® The Nature Conservancy’s Climate, Risk & Resilience 2013 Learning Exchange Col. Richard Hansen U.S. Army Corps.
1 Slide1 THINGS WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT LEVEES: CURRENT INITIATIVES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS Presentation to Association of State Flood Plain Managers.
Inland Waterways: The National Perspective Amy Larson Executive Director National Waterways Conference, Inc PNWA Annual Meeting.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® PLANNING GUIDANCE Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
“Getting the Funding Right” Kim Koleos Juris Doctor, University of Florida.
1 New Orleans District Morganza to the Gulf 23 May 2008 Carl Anderson, Senior Project Manager, USACE.
OREGON IDAHO WYOMING COLORADO NEVADA NEW MEXICO TEXAS UTAH ARIZONA CALIFORNIA US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® And Taking Care Of People! Arroyo.
World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure (PIANC) and the International Environmental Commission Technical Seminar October 28, 2009 Westin.
Multipurpose Planning Module M1: Multi-purpose Plan Formulation – Policies and Constraints BU ILDING STRONG SM.
Harbors Module NH1: Authorities and Policies. NH1 - 2 BU ILDING STRONG SM Student Learning Objectives Student will be able to:  Describe the Federal.
Welcome To: PCC4: Economic Analysis In Planning U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Planners Core Curriculum.
HYDROPOWER. Objective: The student will be become familiar with the Corps policy for hydropower development. The student will be have a basic understanding.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
BUILDING STRONG SM Partnering and Coordination to Accomplish the Navigation Mission.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Southwestern Division Pacesetters – Army Strong – Engineer Ready! The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and its Southwestern Division.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11 AUTHORIZATION AND APPROPRIATION OR “It Takes Two to Tango"
US Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District FY04tpr\skbcongressional Civil Works Program Missions Missions Process Process Select Authorities Select Authorities.
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® USACE-IOOS Missions, Priorities, Recommendations Linda Lillycrop IOOC Member USACE Liaison, U.S. IOOS US Army.
BUILDING STRONG SM Northwestern Division Presented by Lori Rux Chief, Program Support Division June 11, 2009 BPA Direct Funding for Corps Hydropower Projects.
Winter Leader Conference February 4, 2009 “ Building Strong “1 Budgets and Appropriations: Restoring our Infrastructure Budgets and Appropriations: Restoring.
CANADIAN COLUMBIA RIVER FORUM U.S. Flood Control and Operational Perspective Jim Barton, Chief of Corps of Engineers Columbia Basin Water Management Division.
Request to Alter USACE Projects
Preliminaries Federal/Corps Planning Process PA Program Plan Formulation Supplement - FY 08.
1 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting April 13, 2005 Project Manager.
BUILDING STRONG ® Levee Safety Program  Levee Safety Program Implementation Guidance provided by HQUSACE in 2007 (Post Hurricane Katrina) ► Designate.
1 Hydraulic and Hydrologic Considerations in Planning.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® BUILDING STRONG SM The Louisville Engineer District CORPS 101 Brandon R. Brummett, P.E., PMP Outreach Coordinator.
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Step 6: Selection Of The Recommended Plan Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Beneficial Use of Dredge Materials: Introduction to Dredging and Policy J. Bailey Smith US Army Corps of Engineers April 4, 2011.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Miles City, Montana Section 205 Gwyn M. Jarrett - Project Manager Omaha District April 27, 2016.
BUILDING STRONG SM Revitalizing and Expanding Partnerships Charles E. Shadie, P.E. Senior Hydraulic Engineer Mississippi Valley Division U.S. Army Corps.
Savannah River Projects
Mahoning County Informational Meeting USACE Programs, Authorities, and Ohio Silver Jackets Program Presented by: Ashley Stephens 16 August 2016.
PRINCIPLES & GUIDELINES
Continuing Authorities Program
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® OVERVIEW OF THE CIVIL WORKS PROCESS Planning Principles & Procedures – FY 11

BUILDING STRONG ® References  Project Partnership Kit  ER , Planning Guidance Notebook

BUILDING STRONG ® Objective  To provide an overview of the Corps’ missions  To be able to identify the major phases of the Corps’ Civil Works project development process.

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE Civil Works Missions  USACE was created in 1775 to support the Revolutionary War.  Civil Works mission began in 1824 with navigation on the Mississippi & Ohio Rivers  Missions are defined by Legislative Br. (Congress) and Executive Br. (President) Missions Include:  Navigation  Flood Risk Management  Ecosystem Restoration  Hurricane & Storm Damage Reduction  Hydropower  Recreation  Water Supply

Navigation Inland and Intracoastal Waterways 12,000 miles; 9’ – 14’ 240 Lock Chambers 630 million tons annually; ~50% coal & petroleum Harbors 300 major seaports; 2 billion short tons annually; 95% of import/export Over 700 small harbors; 600 million tons annually

1936 Flood Control Act ~ 400 major dams & reservoirs 8,500 miles of levees Every $1 invested ($119B) has prevented $6 in damages ($706B) Flood Risk Management

BUILDING STRONG ® Focus: aquatic, riparian and wetland resources WRDA 2000 authorized 10 regional / watershed restoration programs; Most significant is Florida’s $7.8 billion $100M invested in small (CAP) projects (e.g., §1135) Ecosystem Restoration Objective: Use USACE engineering expertise to restore significant ecosystem resources to less degraded, natural condition.

 Focus: Protect public shores and infrastructure; Recreation use is incidental  400 miles of coastal structures  Many small projects (§14) Hurricane & Storm Damage Reduction U.S. has 84,240 miles of ocean and Great Lakes shoreline; majority of population lives near coast.

BUILDING STRONG ® 24% of U.S’s hydropower (3% of total U.S. electric energy) Over $1 billion a year in revenue from power sales Regional power marketing by Energy Department Hydropower 75 plants (350 units) with 20,720 megawatts capacity (1 MW = 746 HP)

BUILDING STRONG ® Recreation USACE is the largest provider of outdoor recreation in U.S. 456 lakes in 43 states 4,300 facilities 93,000 campsites 3,500 boat ramps 5,100 trail miles 12M acres 400 million visits a year by ~ 25 million people Supports 500,000 jobs & $15B spending

BUILDING STRONG ® Water Supply  USACE includes storage in multipurpose reservoirs Municipal & Industrial  117 projects; 9.5M A-F  Serve 10M persons in 115 cities in 36 states Agricultural  Western States only; managed by BuRec  50 projects; 56M A-F (joint use)

BUILDING STRONG ® How a USACE CW Project Is Born  Problem Perception  Request For Federal Action  Study Problem & Report Preparation  Report Review and Approval  Project Authorization  Project Implementation

BUILDING STRONG ® CW Studies & Projects - “It Takes Two to Tango”  Authorization: Permission and guidance on the conduct of an activity or program. USACE needs separate authorization for a study and project construction.  Appropriation: Approval to obligate and expend funds for an authorized activity or program. USACE CW projects are funded via annual “Energy & Water Development Appropriations Act”.

BUILDING STRONG ® Sources Of Study Authority SPECIFIC STUDY AUTHORITIES  House Transportation & Infrastructure Cmte. Resolution  Senate Environment & Public Works Cmte. Resolution  Water Resources Development Act  Other Legislation DELEGATED STANDING AUTHORITIES  Section 216, 1970 River & Harbor & Flood Control Act CONTINUING AUTHORITIES (Small Projects)

BUILDING STRONG ® Phases Of Civil Works Project Development Specifically Authorized Projects  Reconnaissance Planning  Feasibility Planning  Preconstruction, Engineering & Design (PED)  Construction  Operation & Maintenance

BUILDING STRONG ® Reconnaissance - Planning Phase REQUIREMENTS {§905(b) WRDA 1986}  Required before initiation of feasibility study  Identify potential solutions in sufficient detail to determine whether planning should proceed  Conduct preliminary analysis of Federal interest, costs, benefits & environmental impacts  Estimate cost of feasibility phase  100 percent Federal funding  Normally 12; not to exceed 18 months duration MSC must certify before initiating feasibility

BUILDING STRONG ® Feasibility - Planning Phase  Produces the feasibility report which is the vehicle for recommending project authorization.  Target time is 3 years. REQUIREMENTS {§905(a) WRDA 1986}  Describe benefits & detriments of alternatives considered and scope of recommended plan  Describe Federal & non-Federal participation  Present views of public, State & Federal agencies  50% non-Federal cost {§105 WRDA 1986}; may be in- kind services

Preconstruction, Engineering & Design (PED) Phase PURPOSE: Complete detailed studies and designs needed to award 1 st construction contract. PRODUCTS INCLUDE:  Design Documentation Reports (DDR)  Plans & Specifications (P&S)  Reevaluation Reports (GRR, LRR, PAC)  Real Estate Design Memorandums Part of Project Cost; 25% non-Federal Financing

BUILDING STRONG ® Construction Phase PREREQUISITES: Project authorization and appropriation of Federal construction funds. Award of 1 st construction contract requires Federal and non- Federal appropriations, real estate, and execution of Project Partnership Agreement USACE continues design, prepares plans and specifications for subsequent contracts. Contractors build the project USACE administers contracts, inspects work, oversees safety requirements. Sponsor participates; accepts completed work.

BUILDING STRONG ® (OMRR&R) Operation & Maintenance Phase  Non-Federal Sponsor responsibility except for navigation projects, dams < WRDA ‘86.  USACE conducts periodic inspections and notifies Sponsor of deficiencies.  Scope is defined in OMRR&R Manual: ► Operation - actions required to function ► Maintenance - routine & preventative work. ► Repair - of minor damage, wear & tear. ► Rehabilitation - to assure structural integrity. ► Replacement - of obsolete, worn-out features.

BUILDING STRONG ® Major Legal & Policy Compliance Requirements  Flood Control & WRDA ► 1936 FCA - Benefits exceed costs ► 1970 FCA - Significant Effects ► 1986 WRDA - Cost sharing  Laws, Statutes & Executive Orders ► National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) ► Clean Water Act (CWA) ► Endangered Species Act (ESA) ► EO Flood Plain Management  WRC’s Principles and Guidelines (P&G)  USACE, Army & OMB Regulations & Policies

BUILDING STRONG ® P&G: The Federal Objective  “The Federal objective of water and related land resources planning is to contribute to National Economic Development (NED) consistent with protecting the Nation’s environment pursuant to national environmental statutes, applicable executive orders, and other Federal requirements.”

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE Objective for Ecosystem Restoration  NED does not measure the contributions of ecosystem restoration projects.  The Corps objective in ecosystem restoration planning is to contribute to National Ecosystem Restoration (NER).  ER

BUILDING STRONG ® Summary The Major Phases of Civil Works Project Development are: Reconnaissance Planning Feasibility Planning Preconstruction Engineering & Design (PED) Construction Operation & Maintenance (OMRR&R)

BUILDING STRONG ® P&G: Six Step Planning Process 5 6 Select Recommended Plan Compare Alternative Plans Evaluate Effects of Alternative Plans Formulate Alternative Plans Inventory & Forecast Resource Conditions Specify Problems & Opportunities