Operational Emergency Response Modeling Systems for Use with

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. L. Buckley and C. H. Hunter Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River National Laboratory Recent Improvements to an Advanced Atmospheric Transport.
Advertisements

Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,
© 1999 Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation CA57 WHAT IS AN ACCIDENT.
Risk Management Information System A Spatial Planning Tool for Chemical Disaster Management SENES Consultants India International Conference on Environmental.
Module 9 Atmospheric Stability Photochemistry Dispersion Modeling.
Reed Maxwell 1,2,3 Ian Ferguson 1,3 Shadi Moqbel 1,3 John Williams 1,2,3 Steven Meyerhoff 1,2,3 Erica Siirila 1,2,3 1 Department of Geology and Geologic.
Weather Support for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)
CHAPTER 3: SIMPLE MODELS
X ONE-BOX MODEL Atmospheric “box”;
Modeling with CAMEO Les Benedict St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
Modeling Human Response to Threats and Disasters John H. Sorensen Oak Ridge National Laboratory May 29-30, 2003.
1. Emissions of chemical into the atmosphere 2. Atmospheric transport, diffusion and deposition 3. Chemical reactions 4. Air quality management 5. The.
fluidyn – PANAIR Fluidyn-PANAIR
8 th Conference on Air Quality Modeling – A&WMA AB3 Comments on Nonstandard Modeling Approaches By Ron Petersen, CPP Inc Blue Spruce Drive Fort Collins.
Natalie Harvey | Helen Dacre Figure 1 Future Work Conduct sensitivity experiments to understand the relative importance.
The Evolving Roles and Responsibilities of Federal Agencies in Providing Transport and Dispersion Support Debbie Payton NOAA’s Ocean Service Office of.
Development and Testing of Comprehensive Transport and Dispersion Model Evaluation Methodologies Steven Hanna (GMU and HSPH) OFCM Hanna 19 June 2003.
LINDSEY NOLAN WILLIAM COLLINS PETA-APPS TEAM MEETING OCTOBER 1, 2009 Stochastic Physics Update: Simulating the Climate Systems Accounting for Key Uncertainties.
Incident Response Mechanism for Chemical Facilities By Stephen Fortier and Greg Shaw George Washington University, Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk.
Environmental Modeling Steven I. Gordon Ohio Supercomputer Center June, 2004.
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
Hiromasa Nakayama*, Klara Jurcakova** and Haruyasu Nagai*
Dispersion Modeling A Brief Introduction A Brief Introduction Image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
UNCLASSIFIED Initial Study of HPAC Modeled Dispersion Driven by MM5 With and Without Urban Canopy Parameterizations Dr. Chris Kiley – NGC Dr. Jason Ching.
Dr. Charles W. Beadling Central Asia Regional Health Security Conference April 2012 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
QUESTION: ARE CURRENT MET OBSERVATIONS ADEQUATE FOR URBAN APPLICATIONS? R. P. Hosker, Jr. NOAA-Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Turbulence & Diffusion.
Urban Meteorology James R. Mahoney, Ph.D. Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmospheres Deputy Administrator, NOAA September 22, 2004 James.
08/20031 Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office Helen Champion, Sarah Watkin Derrick Ryall Responsibilities Tools Etna 2002 Future.
Building Aware Flow and T&D Modeling Sensor Data Fusion NCAR/RAL March
Review of Urban Modeling Program at LLNL CRTI RD Project Review Meeting Canadian Meteorological Centre August 22-23, 2006.
A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas O. COCEAL and S. E. BELCHER University of Reading, UK.
James S. Ellis National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Department of Energy (DOE) OFCM Special Session Atmospheric.
Air quality decision support under uncertainty (case study analysis) Piotr Holnicki Systems Research Institute PAS Warszawa, Newelska 6
1 Welcome North Dakota State University Emergency Management & Planning Donald Borgen ND Division of Emergency Services ND GIS Users Conference.
Session 3, Unit 5 Dispersion Modeling. The Box Model Description and assumption Box model For line source with line strength of Q L Example.
Sandia National Laboratories
An ATD Model that Incorporates Uncertainty R. Ian Sykes Titan Research & Technology Div., Titan Corp. 50 Washington Road Princeton NJ OFCM Panel Session.
PLUME MODELING WALTER CHROBAK HEADQUARTERS PROGRAM MANAGER NATIONAL ATMOSPHERIC RELEASE ADVISORY CENTER (NARAC) OFFICE OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS NATIONAL.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Model Evaluation and Assessment ALBERT EINSTEINALBERT EINSTEIN: Things should be made as simple as possible, but not any simpler. Theodore A. Haigh Confederated.
Working With Simple Models to Predict Contaminant Migration Matt Small U.S. EPA, Region 9, Underground Storage Tanks Program Office.
Session 5, CMAS 2004 INTRODUCTION: Fine scale modeling for Exposure and risk assessments.
Managing Smoke and Emissions. A new system for managing smoke and emissions in Victoria that will provide for coordinated: Investment Service delivery.
First Define the Information Needed, Then Select a Course of Action John S. Irwin, NOAA EPA, OAQPS Air Quality Modeling Group RTP, NC
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Consequence Analysis 2.2.
Example 2 Chlorine is used in a particular chemical process. A source model study indicates that for a particular accident scenario 1.0 kg of chlorine.
CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT. Consequence Assessment Definition: The analysis, evaluation, and interpretation of available information associated with an actual.
Scenario #1 Response Urban Sarin HIGH Trained Response Personnel Source -pooled, surface characteristics/properties MicroMeteorology - wind, heating, turbulence.
PROTECTIVE ACTIONS AND REENTRY. Protective Actions Promptly and effectively implemented or recommended for implementation to minimize the consequences.
Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
James S. Ellis Atmospheric Science Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Department of Energy (DOE) Workshop on Effective Emergency Response.
Adaptation and Installation of the software “TRACE_WIN” and “NOSTRADAMUS” Modeling airborne radiological dispersion and contamination for radiation hazardous.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
First Responder Use Case March, 2008.
1 Emergency and Disaster Response to Chemical Releases Site Control Module 7.
Climate models 101 for air quality Anand Gnanadesikan Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Johns Hopkins University GAIA Conference on Climate Change.
Summary of the Report, “Federal Research and Development Needs and Priorities for Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Modeling” 22 September 2004 Walter.
HYSPLIT/ALOHA Demonstration Glenn Rolph OAR Air Resources Laboratory June 21, 2016.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
DLE.LINC.overview.7/30/02.lp Pg. 1 Ron Baskett National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Department of Energy.
Steven Hanna (GMU and HSPH) OFCM Hanna 19 June 2003
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office
Models of atmospheric chemistry
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Presentation transcript:

Operational Emergency Response Modeling Systems for Use with Major Releases of Airborne Hazards Ronald L. Baskett, John S. Nasstrom, Gayle Sugiyama NARAC/IMAAC Program Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Presented at Air Quality In Emergency Response California Air Response Planning Alliance October 15, 2008 Sacramento, CA This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. LLNL-PRES-407706

Tools for Estimating Hazard Areas Guidebooks and guidelines Computer models of atmospheric transport, dispersion and deposition Measurements of air concentration and ground contamination

The Emergency Response Guidebook Table is Based on a Series of Default Model Runs Pre-determined hazard distances and protective action recommendations are based on type of accident and hazardous material Used for transportation accidents with known material and quantity at risk

Dispersion Models are Useful for Estimating Impacts from Major or Complex Airborne Releases Major incidents include: Large industrial fires Major chemical spills Explosions Weapons of Mass Destruction Chemical Biological Radiological

The Choice of Dispersion Model Depends on the Complexity and Type of Incident Gaussian Plume Gaussian Puff Lagrangian Particle

Dispersion Models ― Gaussian Plume Characteristics: Fast-running Analytic & empirical Single meteorology input Steady-state and spatially uniform meteorology Simple source geometry Provide near-source magnitude of hazard area Downwind distance to 10 km Applications: Planning calculations Real-time response Examples: EPA/NOAA ALOHA (toxic industrial chemicals), DOE Hotspot (radiological material) Runs on stand-alone PC

Time- and Space-Varying Meteorological Models are Employed for More Complex Dispersion Modeling Systems Diagnostic Prognostic Local and regional flows from observed meteorological data Adjustment for conservation of mass Empirical adjustments for terrain and thermal-stratification Idealized similarity-theory parameterization Forecast boundary-layer and mesoscale flows (fronts, precipitation, land-sea breeze, mountain effects) Assimilate observations Solve conservation equations for thermodynamic energy, momentum and mass Expertise on local conditions resides with the National Weather Service forecast office

Dispersion Models ― Gaussian Puff Capabilities: Represent plume as superposition of multiple Gaussian spatial distributions for contaminant mass Time- and space-varying dispersion if coupled to appropriate meteorological data Empirical representation of physics such as denser-than-air or urban effects Applications: Real-time response Post-event assessment Runs on a stand-alone PC with real-time meteorological feed

Dispersion Models ― Lagrangian Particle Capabilities: Simulation of fluid particles marked with contaminant mass Fully 3-D Time- and space-varying Inhomogeneous flows driven by regional- or building-scale models Monte Carlo stochastic dispersion Applications: Real-time response Post-event assessment Runs on centralized reach-back system

Electronic Distribution An Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling System Turns a Dispersion Model into a Useful Emergency Response Tool Dispersion Model Transport Turbulence and Diffusion Dry deposition Wet deposition Chemical transformation Decay Outputs Air concentration Deposition Meteorology Observations Forecasts Products Wind fields Health Effect plots Deposition Source Model Point, spill, fire, explosions sprayer … Plume rise Electronic Distribution Web & E-mail GIS Layers Incident Information Where, When (What, How Much) Field Measurements Air concentration Deposition - Default source terms Material properties Terrain Land Use Supporting Databases Population GIS maps Health effects criteria

Cycle of new products based on updated sets of measure-ments Modeling Systems Need Fast Methods of Receiving and Incorporating Field Monitoring Data to Update Plume Predictions An initial plot may only show the downwind location only with no estimate of health effects A revised plot may be based on updated event data A few initial field measurements may be used to make an initial estimate of the amount released When little field data are available, models take a lead role Example revised data: Updated source location, detailed weather Source scaled to initial set of measurements NARAC may provide several “sets” of plots during an exercise or event. As more information is gathered, such as a new source estimate or updated meteorology, NARAC will update our products with this new information. As measurements are taken and provided to NARAC, comparisons will be made between measured values and model calculated values. NARAC staff may then release a new set based on changes made to the model calculation to match the measurements. Measurements may received from on site or local teams, regional teams (such as RAP) or Federal teams (such as the FRMAC). Cycle of new products based on updated sets of measure-ments If extensive field data become available, that data can be used to describe effects Health-effects plot may be developed based on a source term estimated from field measurements More extensive sets of field measurements will improve the accuracy of the source term and health effects calculations

Indoor Air Concentrations can be Substantially Less than Outdoors Outdoor Plume Air Concentration Corresponding Indoor Air Concentration 0.336 4.08 16.8 Building leakiness data may be used with Census data on residences for estimating indoor air concentrations

Building Effects and Dense Gas Releases Dramatically Change Dispersion Patterns Neutrally buoyant gas Dense gas release Neutrally buoyant gas Density and buildings increase vertical mixing, lateral spreading near the source, and upwind dispersion, while potentially reducing downwind concentrations

Specialized Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Models Treat High-Resolution Building Flows Capabilities: Spatially and temporally resolved flows around individual buildings and building groups Concentration fluctuations and peak concentrations Applications: Pre-event planning Pre-computed libraries of scenarios Post-event assessment

Model Systems Need to be Thoroughly Tested and Evaluated Analytic solutions test model components versus known, exact results Field and laboratory experiments test models in controlled, real-world conditions Operational applications evaluate the usability, efficiency, consistency and robustness of models for operational conditions

Different Responders use Modeling Products to Assist in Making Different Emergency Response Decisions First responders Determine safe approach to the incident Locate the incident command site Select personal protective equipment Take initial field measurements Control access to incident Specialized response and support teams Guide field measurement and sampling teams Determine evacuation routes Estimate number of casualties or illnesses to expect for hospitals Emergency Managers and Public Affairs Officers Guidance for making shelter or evacuation recommendations Means to communicate decisions to the public (and allay concerns)

Technical Products Need to be Based on Standard Health Effect Criteria Example for chemical releases: Red: life threatening effects (AEGL3, ERPG3 or TEEL3) Orange: serious long-lasting effects (AEGL2, ERPG2 or TEEL2) Yellow: notable discomfort (AEGL1, ERPG1 or TEEL1)   AEGL: EPA Acute Emergency Guideline Level ERPG: American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Emergency Response Planning Guideline TEEL: DOE Subcommittee on Consequence Assessment & Protective Actions (SCAPA) Temporary Emergency Exposure Limits Reports need to include model inputs, assumptions, and uncertainty

Public Releasable “Briefing” Products Need to Show Protective Action Recommendations in a Simple and Straightforward Manner Example Shelter-in-Place Maps based on Dispersion Model Calculations Shelter-in-Place Map Shelter-in-Place

Dispersion Modeling System Actionable Information Summary: For Major Releases, Dispersion Modeling Systems Transform Incident Information into Actionable Information Incident Information Meteorological data Source information (release time, location, height, material …) Measurement data and observations Release mechanism models (spills, fires, explosions …) Meteorological model (steady-state, 3-D wind field, forecast) Transport and dispersion model Dispersion Modeling System Actionable Information Hazard areas Health effect levels based on public exposure guidance Exposed populations (casualty and fatality estimates) Protective action guidance Planning and consequence assessments