Formal Adjudications Chapter 8. In General Lawyers and legal assistants play an important role in the adjudication aspect of administrative procedure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 4: Enforcing the Law 4 How Can Disputes Be Resolved Privately?
Advertisements

The Process of Litigation. What is the first stage in a civil lawsuit ?  Service of Process (the summons)
Gerri Spinella Ed.D. Elizabeth McDonald Ed.D.. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Key Concepts Chapter 1-Teachers and the Legal System Part I Legal Aspects.
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
DUE PROCESS DEVELOPMENTS IN TERMINATION AND GRIEVANCES.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 3 Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 3 Litigation and.
Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Alternative, Judicial, and E-Dispute Resolution
Gerri Spinella Ed.D. Elizabeth McDonald Ed.D.
Litigation and Alternatives for Settling Civil Disputes CHAPTER FIVE.
16.1 Civil Cases.
Experts & Expert Reports  Experts and the FRE  FRCP, Rule 26 and experts  How are experts used in patent litigation?  What belongs in a Rule 26 report?
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
Pretrial Matters: Pleadings & Motions © Professor Mathis-Rutledge.
Chapter 2.2: Civil & Criminal Trials
Chapter 13: Criminal Justice Process ~ Proceedings Before Trial Objective: The student should be able to identify the required procedures before a trial.
Alaska Mock Trial Glossary of Terms. Laws Rules created by society to govern the behavior of people in society. Among other things, the laws are one formal.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 29 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE III FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 26, 2002.
CJ227 Criminal Procedure Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 4 (Chapter 9 – Pretrial Motions, Hearings and Pleas) (Chapter.
Evidence and Argument Evidence – The asserted facts that the arbitrator will consider in making a decision – Information – What is presented at the hearing.
The U.S. Legal System and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Motion for Summary Judgment The Keys to Success. How does this work?  Summary judgments are governed by Rule 166(a) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
1 Chapter 7 Litigation, the legal process and alternative dispute resolution Copyright © Nelson Australia Pty Ltd 2003.
Introduction to Adjudications Every new tribunal, erected for the decision of facts, without the intervention of jury,... is a step towards establishing...
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The FERC Regulatory Process Dennis H. Melvin, Esq. Director – Legal Division (OAL) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Chapter 4 Alternative, Judicial, and E- Dispute Resolution.
4-1 Chapter 4— Litigation REED SHEDD PAGNATTARO MOREHEAD F I F T E E N T H E D I T I O N McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
Chapter What would likely happen to Anthony if he turns to the courts for help in ending the discrimination? 2. Does Anthony have a duty to anyone,
Unit 3 Seminar! K. Austin Zimmer Any question from Unit 2! Please make sure you have completed your Unit 1 & 2 Papers!
Chapter 4.  Litigation: The process of bringing, maintaining, and defending a lawsuit  Pretrial litigation process can be divided into:  Pleadings.
Criminal and Civil Cases
The American Court System Chapter 3. Why Study Law And Court System? Manager Needs Understanding Managers Involved In Court Cases As Party As Witness.
Chapter 5 The Court System
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Chapter 4 Resolving Disputes: Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Options McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
The Adversary System.  To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible  Controlled by.
Mon. Nov. 26. Work Product “Privilege” A witness, X, who is friendly to the D was interviewed by P’s attorney and a statement was drawn up Is there any.
Chapter 4 Resolving Disputes: Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Options Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction.
Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications Every new tribunal, erected for the decision of facts, without the intervention of jury,... is a step towards establishing...
Evidence in Court Holy Trinity Law Audrius Stonkus.
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases. Types of Civil Lawsuits In civil cases the plaintiff – the party bringing the lawsuit – claims to have suffered a loss and usually.
9.2 – Deciding whether or not to take civil action.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
Kaplan University - Adjunct Professor Brian Tippens, J.D. - June 04, Chapter 9 Accountability through Reviewability.
VCE Legal Studies: Evaluating the role of the court as a law-maker
Chapter 3 Trials and Resolving Disputes. Chapter Issues Basic Trial ProceduresBasic Trial Procedures Procedures and Processes of Litigating a DisputeProcedures.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION DISCOVERY OVERVIEW.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 JUDICIAL, ALTERNATIVE AND ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION ARBITRATION AND ADR.
The Adversary System Part I Chapter 7. Learning Intention Explain the processes and procedures for the resolution of criminal cases and civil disputes.
1 Ruling on Objections Presented by Peter K. Halbach, Chief Hearing Officer North Dakota Department of Transportation.
BUSINESS LAW CIVIL PROCEDURE Session 3 Lakeshore Technical College Richard Opie, JD, MA copyright 2014.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 22 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 16, 2002.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
Teachers and the Law, 8 th Edition © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Teachers and the Law, 8e by David Schimmel, Leslie R. Stellman,
Comparing the Inquisitorial and Adversarial Systems.
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
The Paralegal Professional Chapter Eight Criminal Procedure and Administrative Law.
Many slides Copyright © 2008 by Delmar Learning
Introduction to Environmental Law
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 Civil Cases
Also known as the ‘accusatorial’ system.
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Law Procedures Chapter 13 p. 384
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Chapter 3 Alternative, Judicial, and Online Dispute Resolution
Chapter 4 Resolving Disputes: Litigation and Alternative Dispute
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Presentation transcript:

Formal Adjudications Chapter 8

In General Lawyers and legal assistants play an important role in the adjudication aspect of administrative procedure. APA provides that all proceedings that result in an order are adjudications. Order is defined to include all actions, including licensing, tha tare not rulemaking.

Notice Adjudications are the administrative equivalent of court trials. Adversarial parties may present evidence, may examine and cross-examine witnesses, and may make arguments to a presiding agency official. Parties must be “timely informed” of the time, place and nature of the hearing.

The Test The test for determining whether a party has been given adequate notice of the nature of the case or issues to be considered is whether the information provided permitted the party to adequately prepare his or her case.

Hearing The agency may try new issues as long as it is reasonable to do so. If a new issue is so unrelated to the issues described in the notice that a party could not have been prepared to address the, a continuance must be granted. **Surprise by an agency violates due process.

Technical Defects Notices will not be invalidated because of technical defects. (misspelled name) **An incorrect hearing date is not technical and would violate due process.

Parties and Participation Named parties must participate Parties in interest (parties that could be effected by the outcome) may seek intervention: if a person is not a named party in an administrative proceeding or lawsuit but is a party in interest, he or she may become part of the proceeding.

Parties of Interest/Standing Standing: a person must be sufficiently affected by the matter at hand, and there must be a case or controversy that can be resolved by legal action. **Those who suffer economic injury or loss pursuant to an agency action, even if that action is directed against another, qualify to intervene. **Consumer advocacy groups occasionally intervene on behalf of all consumers.

Right to Participate cont. The right to participate has been extended beyond obvious parties. Competitors and other parties who may suffer some form of economic harm are allowed to participate. Existence of some other legitimate interest General public concern exists

Other Methods of Participation Witness: someone who is interested in the case, but not so far as to intervene Person/Group can file an Amicus Curiae brief: Permit a person or group to express a perspective or opinion without becoming a party.

Discovery Pretrial process whereby the parties exchange information about the case. Prevents, trial by surprise Encourages settlement, as the parties learn the facts of the case and each others’ legal theories early in the game. Parties can make a realistic evaluation of their cases, and, therefore be in better positions to engage in settlement negotiations **Parties may seek protective orders whenever discovery is unduly burdensome or encroaches on a privilege, such as attorney-client or work product doctrines.

6 Primary Tools of Discovery 1. Interrogatories 2. Depositions 3. Requests for production of documents 4. Requests for admissions 5. Bills of particulars 6. Subpoenas

Prehearing Conference The prehearing conference is the equivalent of a judicial pretrial conference. The parties may discuss and identify the issues, discuss stipulations, review exhibits and other evidence, provide a list of witnesses expected to be called, and consider settlement. Presiding official will review the format and procedure of the hearing with the attorneys. Presiding official decides when the prehearing conference will take place.

Prehearing Settlement and Alternative Dispute Resolution APA requires agencies to entertain settlement offers prior to the commencement of adjudicatory hearings if “time, the nature of proceedings, and the public interest permit.” APA also encourages agencies to use alternative dispute resolution (ADR) to dispose of cases. ADR is generally regarded as less expensive and less time-consuming than formal adjudication or litigation. Mediation, arbitration, and conciliations are commonly used forms of ADR.

The Hearing The APA only mandates trial-type procedures whenever another statute specifically requires them. Congressional mandates for a hearing is not likely to be construes as requiring a trial-type hearing. Congress must clearly state that the right to a trial type hearing is granted. If a full trial-type hearing is not required, an agency may use any other form of hearing within the limits of due process.

Evidence Admissibility In state and federal courts, hearsay is not admissible. Hearsay: A statement made outside of court that is offered by a declarant to prove the truth about a matter asserted. **A presiding officer of an administrative hearing may admit hearsay or other evidence that would be excluded from a judicial trial unless the agency has a rule of evidence that requires otherwise. Administrative law judges usually admit nearly all evidence offered, often with the qualification of “what it’s worth.” They tend to look at its weight, reliability and value.

Prejudicial Error Rule and Legal Residuum Rule An error is prejudicial if it had an impact on the outcome of the case. Harmless errors are not reversible. Legal doctrine stating that although agency decisions may be based in large part on evidence that would be in admissible in court, an agency’s decision may not be based entirely on such evidence; a minimal “residuum” of competent evidence must support he agency’s determination.

Privileged and Illegal Evidence Well-established privileges may be invoked in administrative proceedings. Husband-wife Parent-Child Physician-Patient Attorney-Client **The person who can invoke the privilege is the person who the privilege is intended to protect.

Official Notice Parties may request that the court takes judicial notice of the facts. Judicial Notice: method of avoiding the need to prove the well known or obvious. Official Notice: A presiding officer’s declaration that a fact is true without any proof of that fact being offered. **Because officers of agencies are considered experts in their fields, official notice may be taken of any fact that is obvious not only to the average person but also to experts in the field being dealt with.

Burdens Burden of Production: Concerns who in a proceeding has the duty to produce evidence or raise an issue Burden of Persuasion: Concerns who in a proceeding has the duty of persuading the trier of fact that is position is correct. In most cases, the person who carries the burden of production also carries the burden of persuasion. In administrative law, the moving party has the burden of proof.

Standards Most Demanding Standard Beyond a Reasonable Doubt A doubt that causes a reasonable and prudent person to question the truth of an allegation is reasonable. Used in criminal cases, rarely in administrative cases. More Demanding StandardClear and Convincing Evidence Less demanding than the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard, but more than the preponderance standard. Used in administrative cases only when an agency’s action encroaches on a legally protected right. Least Demanding StandardPreponderance of the Evidence More likely true than not; any probability greater than 50%. Standard used in most administrative cases.

Quiz Review