Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.

Advertisements

Antideg and Municipal Stormwater Discussion Sept. 23, 2009.

Los Angeles County MS4 Permit Reissuance: New Directions & Strategy Presented by LA Regional Water Quality Control Board Southern California Water Dialogue.

7:00 pmWelcome and introductions 7:05pmHLWD planning overview Plan update process 7:25 pmStakeholder involvement Watershed problems 7:40 pmPublic comment.

Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Tracking Thursday, May 31, 2012 Martin Hurd, Vladislav Royzman, Tetra Tech, Inc. Brian Burch, Megan Thynge,

Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin Alabama Water Resources Conference September 6, 2012 A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of.

CBP Partnership Proposal for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented CBP WQGIT Wastewater Treatment Workgroup Briefing.

California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.

Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.

Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.

Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.

Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.

Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator

GIT 6 Role in Advising Management Board on Alignment Issues Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice-chair.

Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.

Region 1 & 2 IR Workshop October 28,  The Water Quality Framework is a new way of thinking about how EPA’s data and information systems can be.

Forestry BMP Review Process Mark Sievers, Tetra Tech Forestry Workgroup (FWG) Conference Call—February 1, 2012.

Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.

CBP BMP Verification Program Development: Progress to Date and Forthcoming Issues CBP Management Board Briefing May 9, 2012 Meeting.

Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.

Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board April 11, 2013.

1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.

Chesapeake Bay Executive Council Meeting May 12, 2009 Mount Vernon, Virginia Jeff Corbin, Virginia Assistant Secretary of Natural Resources.

Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,

Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.

Updating Background Conditions and BMP Efficiencies Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office

What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,

Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.

Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.

Virginia’s Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Credit Trading Program

Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,

Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.

EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.

Countywide Model SUSMP July 17, Topics SUSMP Timeline Goals Approach to Compliance NPDES Permit Requirements NPDES Permit Requirements Model SUSMP.

Report of the NPDES Subcommittee. Conference Call Meetings July 8 and August 19 Mercury Discharges – Utility Request to Address Permit Requirements for.

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. September 16, 2015 How can we make sure the Chesapeake Bay Restoration really works?

John Kennedy VA DEQ - Ches. Bay Program Mgr Tributary Strategies: Point Source Nutrient Controls Potomac Watershed.

Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.

Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.

Chesapeake Bay TMDL and What It Means for You Katherine Antos, Coordinator Water Quality Team U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Virginia Municipal.

Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.

Point Sources Progress Reporting Management Board Conference Call February 9, 2012.

OVERVIEW: CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTS AND WATER & CLIMATE CHANGE ACTIVITIES Water Resources Technical Committee Oct. 29, 2015 Presented by Tanya.

Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.

STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT POLLUTION PREVENTION INTEGRATION Discussion about Project Implementation Phase FEBRUARY 2002.

Carin Bisland, EPA Principals’ Staff Committee 5/14/12.

HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.

Variance Petition Requirements

Verification Requests Citizen Advisory Committee –Repeated requests for BMP verification Chesapeake Executive Order Strategy –USDA and EPA commitment to.

JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final

Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.

Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.

Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.

New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP

Proposed Bay TMDL Schedule

Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategies, TMDLs, and MS4 Permits

Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans

Methodology to Distribute Target Loads

Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016

What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?

Mercury TMDL Review & Permitting Strategy Update

Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III

Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016

Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL

2018 BMP Verification Assessment

Presentation transcript:

Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board May 9, 2012 Proposal for a Supplemental Wastewater Indicator

Background Maryland suggested alternative wastewater indicator since wastewater data in current Reducing Pollution Indicators are affected by annual weather variations but other loads are not Discussed with the Wastewater Treatment Workgroup, Water Quality Goal Implementation Team, and Management Board between October 2011 and April 2012 Guiding principles: – Maintain current Reducing Pollution Indicator based on wastewater monitoring data – Add supplemental indicator to clearly communicate on-the-ground efforts – Minimize reporting burden to the jurisdictions 2

Proposed Supplemental Indicator On April 9, WQGIT approved the following indicator pending review of the indicator results: “The number and/or percentage of significant wastewater facilities with nutrient treatment technology operational and installed that will attain the wasteload allocation at the permitted flow. Indicator data to also include facilities that achieve permit limits through trading/offset programs.” Indicator would be based on whether permit limits for significant facilities have reached their effective date April 30: WQGIT and WWTWG approved sharing the following options with the Management Board – New York abstained 3

Option 1: 4

Option 2: 5

Features Data based on same reporting period as Reducing Pollution Indicator Will show same years as Reducing Pollution Indicator Executive summary will focus on watershed- wide progress. State-specific progress available online In the future, could consider incorporating numbers or percents based on design flow 6

Decisions Requested 1.Do you approve the adoption of a supplemental indicator that tracks significant wastewater facilities that that are meeting Bay TMDL WLAs? 2.If yes, would you prefer that this indicator report the number of significant facilities or the percent of significant facilities? 7