E-VALUE FACULTY MENTORING SYSTEM Joe Gough, MA – DOM Operations Manager Marna Stilley, MA – OCIO Academic IS Analyst Contributors: Ed Jauch, MD – Emergency.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE DOS AND DONTS OF GIVING EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK TO COLLEAGUES January 24, 2012 Department of Medicine.
Advertisements

University-Wide Course Evaluation Committee Peter Biehl, Chair, Department of Anthropology Krissy Costanzo, Committee Staff Support; Academic Affairs March.
A-G Updates and the New Piece of the Puzzle: Common Core Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions University of California |
Introduction to Assessment – Support Services Andrea Brown Director of Program Assessment and Institutional Research Dr. Debra Bryant Accreditation Liaison.
Research Training/Education Core Overall Goal - to enhance the interdisciplinary education pipeline and expand the number of persons working collaboratively.
School of Medicine –Promotions and Tenure Jane F. Reckelhoff, PhD Chair, SOM Appointments, Promotion and Tenure Committee Patrick O. Smith, PhD, ABPP Associate.
Management Information Systems 2007 Understanding a Systems Approach to Sound Fiscal Management.
2025 Planning Contacts Meeting November 8, 2012 K-State 2025.
 Humboldt State University Joyce Lopes, Carol Lorentzen, Volga Koval, Randi Darnall Burke, Kate Stroup, Teal Sexton, Amber Blakeslee, Jacque Honda.
Mentoring in the COM at MUSC. Benefits of Effective Mentoring For Faculty and Institution Mentee: Critical for Career Development, Career Satisfaction,
Dashboards as a Data Management Tool Dr. David C. Oehler Director of Assessment, Information and Analysis Northwest Missouri State University.
Implementing a Mentorship Program Across Departments at The Ohio State University College of Medicine May 27, 2014.
Electronic Mentoring Evaluations  Stuart Gansky, DrPH  Jeanette Brown, MD  Mary Margaret Chren, MD  Mitchell Feldman, MD, MPhil  Mike McCune, PhD.
All-Campus Meeting of Faculty & Staff Monday, August 19, 2013 G. Michael Pratt, Ph.D Associate Provost, Miami University Dean, College of Professional.
Mentoring in the COM at MUSC. Benefits of Effective Mentoring For Faculty and Institution Mentee: Critical for Career Development, Career Satisfaction,
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
School of Medicine Research Roadmap October 24, 2011.
Graduate System for Management of Admissions, Alumni & Records Tracking (Grad SMAART) January 8, 2007 Office of Graduate Studies.
Career Development in Academic Medicine January 13, 2011 David Coleman, M.D.
Project Prioritization Process ASPCC Update December 14, 2005.
Strategic Planning A tool for improvement. Strategic Planning LEAD ► Panelists  Dr. Katie Hope, Department of Nursing  Dr. Sue George, Department of.
Michigan’s School Improvement Process Model Plan Study Gather Data Do Student Achievement.
1 School Improvement Plan - School Improvement Management System - Feb. 27, 2008 Albert Mayo (AdvancED)
Mentoring in the COM at MUSC. Contemporary Definition of Mentoring in Academic Setting A dynamic, collaborative, reciprocal, and sustained relationship.
Mentor Champion Meeting October 16, pm 628HE CSB.
PI Portfolio Project Update Academic Senate Committee on Research June 18, 2012.
Asset Investment Management System (AIMS) & Health Analysis Reporting Tracking (HART) April 18, 2007.
School of Medicine –Promotions and Tenure Jane F. Reckelhoff, PhD Chair, SOM Appointments, Promotion and Tenure Committee.
Council of Research Associate Deans January 20, 2011.
WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6.
Institutional Development Institutional Effectiveness Public Information.
PI Portfolio Project Update Academic Senate Committee on Research June 18, 2012.
The Role of the Department Chair in Faculty Development May 9, 2007 Presented by the JABSOM Faculty Development Program.
Mission-Based Management January 2006 Electronic CV System Users Group.
MENTORING TO BUILD INTERNAL CAPACITY AT THE CC. TODAY’S GOALS Introduction to Portland Community College Current Challenges Why Mentoring? Process for.
PROMOTION AND TENURE: THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD. WHAT ARE THE RANKS? WHAT DO THEY MEAN? ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PROFESSOR –NOT THE “PHILOSOPAUSE”
School of Medicine –Promotions and Tenure Jane F. Reckelhoff, PhD Chair, SOM Appointments, Promotion and Tenure Committee.
© 2007 SRI International CPATH Principal Investigators Meeting: Program Evaluation Update March 26, 2010 By the Center for Education Policy Dr. Raymond.
BEN Scholars Program Wrap Up Presentation by Yolanda S. George, AAAS.
August 30, 2011 Overview & Update: SSA’s Activities for the Occupational Information System Project “You are the “ Sylvia E. Karman, Director Office of.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
Literature Review Individual Faculty Development Plans (IDP) Faculty Development-Division Directors SIG Workshop May 2, 2010 Juan M. Parra, MD, MPH.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program May 26, 2004 eGovernment Working Group U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program.
ASC STRATEGIC PLAN PROCESS LYDIA P. HOWELL MD PRESIDENT, ASC PROFESSOR AND CHAIR, UCD PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE.
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
Post University. INSTITUTION: Post University, Waterbury,CT NAMES of Team members: Dylan Clyne, Maura Bozeman and Randal Streck VISION – Our departmental.
Mentoring in the COM at MUSC. Benefits of Effective Mentoring For Faculty and Institution Mentee: Critical for career development/satisfaction, and professional.
ISIS Project Status Report May 18, 2006 Prepared by MAXIMUS, Inc Education Systems Division for the ABT Committee.
P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.
What to Expect from Your Annual Review Philip F. Binkley, MD, MPH Director, Center for FAME Wilson Professor of Medicine.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
The VCCS Administrative & Professional Faculty Development, Evaluation, and Recognition System Task Force Report March, 2016.
Department of Medicine Faculty Development
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Faculty Mentoring in the Department of Medicine
Department of Medicine Faculty Mentoring Plan
Promotion: Policy and Procedures for COM Faculty in State College
Department of Medicine Faculty Development
MUSC College of Medicine New Faculty Orientation
KCTCS BUSINESS (ACTION) PLAN YEAR ONE Annual Update
My UI Career Process improvement for more meaningful and
FACULTY ACTIVITY REPORTS
Objectives What is the P & T process?
Employee Performance Management System
Integrated Budget & Planning Cycle
Faculty Evaluation Process Spring 2018
WordPress Unit Web Coordinators
Academic Program Review Comprehensive Report
Mentoring clinical faculty in the Dept of Pathology
Presentation transcript:

E-VALUE FACULTY MENTORING SYSTEM Joe Gough, MA – DOM Operations Manager Marna Stilley, MA – OCIO Academic IS Analyst Contributors: Ed Jauch, MD – Emergency Medicine Darwin Bell, PhD – Nephrology Gerry Garza, Jill Griffith, Meghan McQueeney, Ben Rogers – Dept of Medicine

Department of Medicine Fiscal Year 2012 Pilot Abbreviated Rollout: 01/15/ /01/12 Initial Goals Mentor Review Mentee End of Year Feedback Evaluation Mentee receives CDP form via 01/15 Mentee completes & “Submits” to Mentor Before 2/1 Mentor reviews, comments, and “Re-Assigns” Early Feb Mentee updates CDP & “Submits” 5/1 Mentor reviews, comments and “Submits” 5/20

System Goals (N=192 Faculty) Electronic Format Generate Reports Status Goal Metrics Automated s

Content & Format Development National Colleagues UCSF MUSC – Alignment with COM Promotion Criteria & Chairman’s Goals Emphasis on Reporting/Measuring (  effectiveness) User friendliness and accessibility

Content & Format Development Structure: 2 documents 1. Mentee Career Development Plan (CDP) Promotion Metrics - Universal + 3 mission area sections 2. End of Year Bi-directional Evaluation the “Big 4” (vision, format, strengths, weaknesses)

Content & Format Development E-Value Homepage Mentee Career Development Plan End of Year Bi-Directional Evaluations Mentee Form to Evaluate Mentor and Departmental Mentoring Program Mentor Form for Evaluation of Mentee

Content & Format Development E-Value Homepage Mentee Career Development Plan End of Year Bi-Directional Evaluations Mentee Form to Evaluate Mentor and Departmental Mentoring Program Mentor Form for Evaluation of Mentee

Content & Format Development E-Value Homepage Mentee Career Development Plan End of Year Bi-Directional Evaluations Mentee Form to Evaluate Mentor and Departmental Mentoring Program Mentor Form for Evaluation of Mentee

Content & Format Development E-Value Homepage Mentee Career Development Plan End of Year Bi-Directional Evaluations Mentee Form to Evaluate Mentor and Departmental Mentoring Program Mentor Form for Evaluation of Mentee

Management Support 11 DOM Divisions (with 13 Faculty Mentor Champions) Marna Stilley/E-Value HQ COM Mentoring Operations Group (Medicine, Neurosciences, OB-Gyn, RadOnc) E-Value Homepage Toolkit

Challenges Acceptance/value Compliance with timelines Communication How will the data be used?

E-Value Reports Compliance Report Enterprise Report Crosstab Report

E-Value Reports Compliance Report Enterprise Report Crosstab Report

E-Value Reports Compliance Report Enterprise Report Crosstab Report

Next Steps Pilot Data Collection & Feedback – June 1, 2012 Fiscal Year 2013 Rollout: 3 Phases July – Initial Plan December – Mid-Year Goal Attainment June – End of Year Goal Attainment, CQI Continuous Feedback Mentee receives initial CDP form via July Mentee completes and routes for Mentor review Mentor reviews, and “Submits” Mentee updates CDP & routes for Mentor review January Mentor reviews, and “Submits”

Summary – Lessons Learned Communication: Administrative support to faculty Website tools Refinement: Analyze data (strengths/weaknesses) Supplement faculty annual evaluation? Looking ahead How to use the COM data? Train mentors?