1 Department of Correctional Services Vote 19 CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE: 2001/2002

CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE: AS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2002

CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE: PER PROGRAMME

CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE: PER STANDARD ITEM

CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE: PER PROVINCE

6 Department of Correctional Services Vote 20 MTEF BASELINE ALLOCATION: 2002/2003 – 2004/2005

7 To contribute to maintaining and protecting a just, peaceful and safe society by enforcing sentences of the courts in the manner prescribed by the Correctional Services Act (Act no 111 of 1998), detaining all prisoners in safe custody whilst ensuring their human dignity and promoting the social responsibility and human development of all prisoners and persons subject to community corrections. AIM OF DCS

8 Vision To be one of the best in the world in delivering correctional services with integrity and commitment Mission To deliver a Correctional Service in partnership with stakeholders by providing: incarceration of prisoners under conditions consistent with human dignity; rehabilitation and reintegration programmes, proper supervision of persons under community corrections procurement and acquisition of adequate resources which enable effective response to challenges through progressive management, trained personnel, sound work ethics, performance management and good governance. Vision and Mission

9 To keep offenders in safe custody. To supervise and control probationers and parolees. To maintain control, discipline and a safe environment in prison. To provide humane conditions for offenders. To provide rehabilitation programmes which help offenders to address their offending behaviour and allow them to live and lead responsible lives. To assist offenders with re-integration into the community. CORE BUSINESS OF DCS

10  Development of a Green Paper on Correctional Services.  Create a culture of Good Governance to combat corruption, crime, malpractice and mal- administration within the Department.  Improvement of the skills capacity of lower level staff and the retention of skilled personnel.  Improvement of prisoner management.  Taking appropriate measures to adequately address the special needs of targeted prisoner categories including but not limited to: the youth; females; the aged; pregnant females and mothers with infants; terminally-ill prisoners; the mentally challenged; and prisoners with disabilities.  Enhancement of rehabilitation programmes.  Enhancement of prisoner peer-educator programmes. KEY DEPARTMENTAL MEDIUM TERM OBJECTIVES

11  Deployment of prisoner generated goods and services including labour for poverty and disaster relief and rural development.  Enhancement of Community Corrections.  Significantly decrease incarcerated population to reduce overcrowding.  Development of significant cost reducing prison facility prototype designs.  Significantly improving the maintenance and repair of facilities.  Significantly increase prison accommodations to reduce overcrowding. KEY DEPARTMENTAL MEDIUM TERM OBJECTIVES

12  Administration, which comprises the Ministry and other senior policy- makers and managers of the Department.  Incarceration secures prisoners and ensures the sound management of Correctional Services facilities.  Rehabilitation provides opportunities for education and training, skills development, personal development, spiritual enlightenment and preparation for release.  Community corrections ensure the direct supervision of probationers and parolees.  Facility Mangement and Capital Works provide for accommodation needs of the department. DEPARTMENTAL PROGRAMMES

/2002 Year 0 R’ /2003 Year 0+1 R’ /2004 Year 0+2 R’000 Revised baseline allocation % Increase on previous year 4.6% 7.8% 9.2% 2004/2005 Year 0+3 R’000 MTEF BASELINE ALLOCATIONS 2002/2003: 2004/2005 Original Baseline allocation

14 MTEF Baseline Total Supplementary Infrastructure Allocations Maintenance and upgrade of existing prisons /2003 Year 0+1 R’ /2004 Year 0+2 R’ /2005 Year 0+3 R’000 National Treasury Allocations: Detail Adjustment to Baseline Inflation and Related Adjustments Construction and Maintenance of a new prison

15 Administration Total Incarceration Rehabilitation Community corrections Facility Management and Capital works /2003 Year 0+1 R’ /2004 Year 0+2 R’ /2005 Year 0+3 R’ /2002 Year 0+1 R’000 Budget Allocations per programme MTEF: 2002/2003 – 2004/ Capital Works/Facility Man Apops

16 Personnel Total Administrative expenditure Inventories /2003 Year 0+1 R’ /2004 Year 0+2 R’ /2005 Year 0+3 R’ /2002 Year 0+1 R’000 Budget Allocations Standard Item MTEF: 2002/2003 – 2004/2005 Land and buildings Equipment Transfer Payments Professional and Special Services

17 Budget Allocations Per Province 2001/2002 versus 2002/2003

18 Budget Allocations : Key Features MTEF: 2001/2002 versus2002/2003 Personnel expenditure Human Resource Development Overtime Medical Aid(Medcor) Vehicles Information Technology Electronic Monitoring Inmate Tracking /2002 R’ /2003 R’000

19 Budget Allocations : Key Features MTEF: 2001/2002 versus2002/2003 Facilities Management Capital Works Apops Rehabilitation of offenders Medical Treatment (Prisoners) Parole Boards /2002 R’ /2003 R’000

20 D.C.S COST DRIVERS MTEF: 2002/2003 – 2004/2005

21 Voted Year /2002 Year /2003 Year /2004 Year /2005 Existing Accommodation APOPS Prisons Financed prison accommodation Plus: Additional financed Upgrading/ Extensions New DCS Prisons Projected DAPP %Overcrowding 67.17% 81.08% 94.81% 98.26% COST DRIVER: PRISON ACCOMMODATION

22 Voted Year /2002 Year /2003 Year /2004 Year /2005 Prisoners Probationers and Parolees Total Offenders (Financed) DCS APOPS Projected Offender Population Unfunded offender population COST DRIVER: FINANCED OFFENDER POPULATION

23 Year /2003 Year /2004 Year /2005 Provincial Offices Total Personnel Need Head Office Management Areas Year /2002 Financed MTEF Shortfall Plus: Add. Financed COST DRIVER: PERSONNEL ESTABLISHMENT NEED Total Financed

24 OPTIONS PRESENTED TO NATIONAL TREASURY

25 Salary Increase: D.C. S Officials Total projected prison population Needs Based Rehab. Programme Backlog personnel establishment /2003 Year 0+1 R’000 OPTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING 2003/2004 Year 0+2 R’ /2005 Year 0+3 R’000 Agricultural self-sufficiency TOTAL New prison accommodation

26 OPTION :1 Salary increase: DCS officials Negotiations for a special salary increase (on a sliding scale from 3 to 10 %- excluding mangement) for DCS officials with implementation date 1 April Financial Implications : 2002/03- R 309,263 million 2003/04- R 327,548 million 2004/05- R 345,574 million

27 OPTION 2: Funding of total Projected Prison Population The option is aimed to ensure effective achievement of the Departmental core objectives in providing a safe and humane custody in terms of the Constitution and Correctional Services Act. It involves the funding of the projected cost for the total projected daily average prison population. Financial Implications : 2002/03- R 76,630 million 2003/04- R 123,991 million 2004/05- R 184,351 million

28 OPTION: 3 Backlog on personnel establishment and personnel needs for new prisons Funding of the backlog on the personnel establishment, personnel needs for new prisons already opened and to be opened within the MTEF period Financial Implications : 2002/03- R 389 million- Backlog-R million New prisons R million 2003/04- R million 2004/05- R million- Backlog R million New prisons R million

29 OPTION:4 Development and implementation of needs based rehabilitation programmes. Engagement of the community in the rehabilitation programmes and the development and implementation of need based rehabilitation programmes by the year 2003 Financial Implications : 2002/03- R 13,349million 2003/04- R 10,829million 2004/05- R 11,034million

30 OPTION : 5 Building of three additional prisons and upgrading of existing facilities Financial Implications : 2002/03- R 270,045 million 2003/04- R 354,231 million 2004/05- R million

31 OPTION : 6 Increase Agricultural Self-sufficiency This option will enhance self-sufficiency especially regarding the production of animal products. The additional infrastructure created will increase the rehabilitation capacity, whilst the cost-effective production will decrease the incarceration costs. Financial Implications : 2002/03- R million 2003/04- R 9,694 million 2004/05- R 11,194 million Saving for DCS per annum : R 2,788 million