Janos MONIGL director of TRANSMAN Ltd 1968 TU Dresden – M.Sc.traffic engineer 1974 TU Budapest – M.Sc.engineer economist 1976 Hungarian Academy of Science – PhD 2001 habilitation; private professor TU Budapest Expertise: Transport analysis and policy making Transport system planning Transport demand and network modelling Impact modelling, evaluation Fare system planning; e-ticketing Transport institutions, regulations 15 April, 2010 Budapest

Governance issues and measures toward sustainability A. MTA organisation structure and responsibilities; governance Structure and involved bodies in the MTA Responsibilities regarding PT and road traffic issues B. Deployment of measures to promote attractiveness of PT Better use of infrastructure for improving the quality Improving conditions of “intermodality-components” Restricting road traffic conditions (e.g. parking regime, access fee..) Enhancing passenger rights - “Passenger charter”? Advanced planning methods – Regional Mobility Plans C. Sources and proportions of PT financing “Ordinary” revenues - Potentials for additional sources

Governance issues – PT associations

Measures influencing mobility

Factors of „good” intermodality

e-Card: Data generator

Placing of Different Fare Products in the Uniform Product Frames

BP Integrated Transport Centre?

Inclusion of the whole Central Region in the investigation area - Changes in demography, structure and volumes of land use - All-transport mode (BKV, MÁV, Volán, car) traffic modelling - More detailed factors for modal shift and route choice - Infrastructure developments, organisatorical and also fiscal measures to drive users to clean transport modes to enhance viability - Integration of different modes in the development packages - Comprehensive, wide range all-transport mode impact calculations - Prioritisation of projects by efficiency analysis (CBA, MCA) - It is a necessity to have a well-founded and sensitive planning tools G eneral planning principles, conditions at the BTSDP

Planning goals and objectives

11 Integrated all-transport mode planning framework Development target groups ► ▼ Development tools and measures (Examples)► ▼ Development impacts (indicators) ▼ Improve travel conditions by mode and area Minimize environmental intrusion and damages Enhance accessibility and development chances Ensure maximal economic and social efficiency Keep transport financeable  Construct transp.infrastr.  Reconstruct transp..infrastr. Re-design feeder lines  Re-design road network Unifying fare system Introducing e-ticketing Applying city access fee Implementation of passenger information system  Investment costs Operation costs  Modal share! Transport time costs Transport user costs  Accident costs Air pollution Noise  Accesibilities! Location potentials  Efficiency (CBA,MCA) From policy goals until measure impact indicators in one model chain!

Procedure of transport system development planning and modelling

13 Local travel patterns of groups From the BKV household survey 2004

14 Integrated travel demand and modal shift forecasting; impact calculation

15 Future Example: Metro line M5 ? Circular rail ? H5U07M5U07 – HA07MJ07

16 Air pollution of road transport (NOx kg/day)

17 Main impact mechanisms of area access fee (Example)

18 Daily traffic load difference map (A.FEE 2020 – BAU 2020)

19 Daily traffic on Danube bridges