9-1-1 Network Survivability and Disaster Recovery Feb 17, 2005 Roger Hixson NENA Technical Issues Director FCC Telecommunications Service Priority Summit.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Colombo, Sri Lanka, 7-10 April 2009 Preferential Telecommunications Service Access Networks Lakshmi Raman, Senior Staff Engineer Intellectual Ventures.
Advertisements

Florida Public Service Commission Internal Affairs Hurricane Season Preparation Paul Davis, Director Energy Control Center June 5, 2006.
Homeland Security at the FCC July 10, FCCs Homeland Security Focus Interagency Partnerships Industry Partnerships Infrastructure Protection Communications.
T-Mobile | stick together
Best Practices Tutorial
The current System Landline caller The emergency call process starts with a caller dialing (highly simplified) © 2011 Colorado Resource.
ISO 9001:2000 Certified Your partner in critical communication SolaCom Public Safety Solutions December, 2007.
What’s Going on Behind Wireless Public Safety Solutions WELCOME!
9-1-1 and VoIP Where are you calling from? InfraGard Conference April 2, 2008 InfraGard Conference April 2, 2008.
Keith Godwin Alachua County E911 Coordinator 1. Construction Maintenance UPS failures Power interruptions and outages CPE Service providers equipment.
Don Dittmar – Waukesha County WLIA Fall Regional 2012.
Brian Rosen Chair, Long Term Definition WG.  i1 = document older strategies for VoIP into  i2 = standard way to support VoIP on current E9-1-1.
Earl Comstock President and CEO COMPTEL. The World Has Changed FCC adopts Cable Modem Order and Supreme Court upholds FCC in Brand X FCC adopts Wireline.
Communications Disaster Preparedness: Bureau Overview and Priority Services Tim Peterson Chief of Staff Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau Federal.
Hurricane Katrina Catastrophic Communications System Failure Washington Parish, Louisiana Given the right set of circumstances, total and complete communication.
Richard Barnes & Brian Rosen IEEE Spectrum April 2014 IS 376 November 13, 2014.
Government Emergency Telecommunications Service (GETS) OVERCOMING WIRELINE CONGESTION IN EMERGENCIES.
Ministry of State Policy for Disasters and Accidents Emergency Number.
NENA’s 11 th Annual Technical Development Conference A proposal to support E911 calls on Voice over IP Networks Martin Dawson – Nortel Networks.
E9-1-1 Presentation for. Glenn A. Roach, ENP VP – Services.
North American Emergency Services Brian Rosen Emergicom.
TEL382 Greene Chapter /27/09 2 Outline What is a Disaster? Disaster Strikes Without Warning Understanding Roles and Responsibilities Preparing For.
Interim Text to Information & Training for TelecommunicatorsInformation & Training for Telecommunicators Version 2 August 26, 2013.
Mid-America Regulatory Conference June 9, 2003 Kenneth Moran FCC-OET Director Defense and Security TSP WPS GETS.
Review of Power Blackout on Telecom P. J
North American Emergency Services Brian Rosen Emergicom.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:3 Inform, Educate, and Empower People about Health Issues.
ENP Study Group Disaster Planning Session #6 BROUGHT TO YOU BY: THE FLORIDA NENA EDUCATION COMMITTEE.
FCC Broadband Panel Emergency Services / NG Pete Eggimann Director of Services Metropolitan Emergency Services Board Minneapolis / St. Paul.
Lunchtime Briefing Series
CERT & Residential Care Facilities (RCFS). Learning Objectives Energize your CERT Teams Discover local resources and locate where RCFS are in your area.
INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM (ICS)
SBC and TSP Don Boland Director SBC National Security Emergency Preparedness FCC Presentation February 17, 2005.
ATIS Emergency Communications (EC) Standards Development DOCUMENT #:GSC13-PLEN-35 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:ATIS AGENDA ITEM:Plenary; 6.2 CONTACT(S):Michael.
The National Communications System Bernard Farrell Manager, NCC
State Of California E911 Next Generation Update 2009 Andy Nielsen State of California E9-1-1 Office
Internet Telephony (VoIP) Henning Schulzrinne Dept. of Computer Science Columbia University Fall 2003.
 Working Group 2: Optimal Approach to NG9-1-1 Architecture Implementation by PSAPs Status Report September 29, 2015.
Developing Plans and Procedures
Professional Project Management Service “Bringing It All Together”  The Project Manager is responsible for the overall planning and installation of Qwest.
911 NETWORK SURVIVABILITY….and FCC Telecommunications Service Priority Summit 2/17/05.
Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Annual Report—2007 Presentation to the Commission January 17, 2008.
FoxComm Initiative Presentation Calumet County Board of Supervisors June 19, 2007 Karen Carlson, ENP FoxComm Management Information Coordinator (920)
1 Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Report: Presentation to the Commission January 15, 2009.
Tufts Wireless Laboratory School Of Engineering Tufts University Paper Review “An Energy Efficient Multipath Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks”,
Emergency Communication Plan and Equipment Requirements for Your Organization DRAFT 22 October 2007 Clip art images are a place holder for a photo of your.
NDSU Personal Safety and Security Assist. Project Introduction Leverages: –People and Partnerships –Philosophies –Centralized and Integrated Systems.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style Intrado © 2005 V9-1-1 Building a Foundation Matt Wilson 1/1/2006.
NENA-IETF I3 Proposal No carrier presumed No carrier presumed Fixed, nomadic and true mobile clients supported Fixed, nomadic and true mobile clients supported.
October 10-13, 2006 San Diego Convention Center, San Diego California VoIP Myth Busters Jim Shepard Executive Vice President HBF.
1 Presented by Jim Nixon, Breakout Session Moderator December 15, 2005 Report from Breakout Session #2 Individuals/Organizations to Government.
E911
ESW 7 – NENA Standards Roger Hixson - NENA We are mid-way through documentation development for NG9-1-1, with a number of documents published and more.
APCO, International Meeting the Challenges Public Safety Communications is clearly a full partner in the effort to resolve every emergency…we are truly,
3.04 HIPAA Compliant Employee Sanctions: A Fair and Objective Approach Frank Ruelas, MBA Director, Corporate Compliance Gila River Health Care Corporation.
1 Lt Col Joanne Sechrest Mgr, Priority Telecommunications Branch DHS/IAIP, National Communications System DHS/IAIP, National Communications
Presented by Environmental, Health and Safety Services Zack Adams, PE, CSP, CIH.
Business Continuity Disaster Planning
The member organizations of the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council are grateful to the Department of Homeland Security’s Science and Technology.
Introduction to the Emergency Operations Center City of Santa Cruz 2011 EOC Training and Exercise.
National Emergency Communications Plan Update National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Winter Committee Meeting February 16, 2015 Ron Hewitt.
October 4-7, 2004 Los Angeles, CA E9-1-1 In a VoIP World Timothy Lorello SVP, Chief Marketing Officer TeleCommunication Systems (TCS) (410)
Understanding the System of Systems
ATIS Emergency Services Interconnection Forum (ESIF)
A Survey of Routing Techniques for Mobile Communication Networks
ATIS Emergency Communications (EC) Standards Development
Oman Experience on Telecommunications Emergency Plan
Virtual LAN VLAN Trunking Protocol and Inter-VLAN Routing
E9-1-1 CALL FLOW ELEMENTS - WIRELINE
“Citizen-to-Government” Emergency Communications
Presentation transcript:

9-1-1 Network Survivability and Disaster Recovery Feb 17, 2005 Roger Hixson NENA Technical Issues Director FCC Telecommunications Service Priority Summit

FCC Telecommunications Service Priority Summit CATEGORY 3- Public Health, Safety, and CATEGORY 3- Public Health, Safety, and Maintenance of Law and Order Maintenance of Law and Order Minimum number of services necessary for giving Minimum number of services necessary for giving civil alert, maintaining law and order and the health civil alert, maintaining law and order and the health and safety of the U.S. population and safety of the U.S. population

FCC Telecommunications Service Priority Summit Applicable Circuits for TSP Originating Switch Selective Routing Switch PSAP CAD Cell MPC ALI DB Servers SR DB Server DB System EOC Radio Systems NCIC, etc Admin Lines ( InterTandem ) ILEC CLEC MSC

FCC Telecommunications Service Priority Summit Applicable for TSP treatment Message Circuits (EM)—CO to SR Message Circuits (EM)—CO to SR Emergency Service Circuits (ES)—SR to PSAP Emergency Service Circuits (ES)—SR to PSAP ALI Data Links – PSAP and ALI ALI Data Links – PSAP and ALI PSAP to CAD links PSAP to CAD links Intertandem (if applicable) Intertandem (if applicable)

FCC Telecommunications Service Priority Summit Applicable for TSP treatment Administrative Lines Administrative Lines Radio Circuits Radio Circuits Wireless and Wireline interfaces Wireless and Wireline interfaces Ex: Cell to MSC, MSC to MPC, MPC to ALI Ex: Cell to MSC, MSC to MPC, MPC to ALI EOC Facilities EOC Facilities Special Circuits & Other Critical Links Special Circuits & Other Critical Links

FCC Telecommunications Service Priority Summit Reasons for lack of implementation TSP Costs TSP Costs No cost for sponsorship – if procedures simple enough No cost for sponsorship – if procedures simple enough Service Provider Tariff Costs – need for cost consistency Service Provider Tariff Costs – need for cost consistency Decision on all or `representative’ circuits Decision on all or `representative’ circuits Belief that TSP is not necessary Belief that TSP is not necessary E9-1-1 and general service providers will `take care E9-1-1 and general service providers will `take care of critical public safety circuits’ of critical public safety circuits’ But – if large scale outages, higher TSP level circuits will prevail But – if large scale outages, higher TSP level circuits will prevail Consistent education of all parties needed Consistent education of all parties needed Belief that Public Safety can just order it done in cases of major catastrophes – but will be too late at that point Belief that Public Safety can just order it done in cases of major catastrophes – but will be too late at that point Lack of implementation coordination – need national project plan Lack of implementation coordination – need national project plan

FCC Telecommunications Service Priority Summit Key factors for implementation TSP Costs TSP Costs No cost for sponsorship – if procedures simple enough No cost for sponsorship – if procedures simple enough Service Provider Tariff Costs – need for cost consistency Service Provider Tariff Costs – need for cost consistency Decision on all or `representative’ circuits Decision on all or `representative’ circuits Belief that TSP is not necessary Belief that TSP is not necessary E9-1-1 and general service providers will `take care E9-1-1 and general service providers will `take care of critical public safety circuits’ of critical public safety circuits’ But – if large scale outages, higher TSP level circuits will prevail But – if large scale outages, higher TSP level circuits will prevail Consistent education of all parties needed Consistent education of all parties needed Belief that Public Safety can just order it done in cases of major catastrophes – but will be too late at that point Belief that Public Safety can just order it done in cases of major catastrophes – but will be too late at that point Lack of implementation coordination – need national project plan Lack of implementation coordination – need national project plan

FCC Telecommunications Service Priority Summit Roger Hixson Technical Issues Director National Emegency Number Association (NENA)