HES-HKS & KaoS meeting 19/June/2012 Toshi Gogami.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Advertisements

Tracking for high multiplicity event (E05-115) & E GEANT4 simulation 14/Dec/2011 School of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami ( 後神 利志 )
HERMES tracking for OLYMPUS. Part #1. Detector survey. A.Kiselev OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting DESY, Hamburg,
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
Goal of MICE:   out /  in of   Assuming a standard (or agreed to) definition of 6-D cooling.  We can also assume that the tracker can give.
GLAST background review dec Simulating rates: the big picture Incoming rate into the 6 m 2 sphere: is it right? Corresponding trigger rate: implies.
Velo to T Alignment - Reminder General Strategy  Perform relative VELO-to-IT/OT alignment using  X,  Y at the center of magnet and  X,  Y (each.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting Toshi Gogami 5/June/2012 Hall-C.
Spectroscopic Investigation of P-shell Λ hypernuclei by the (e,e'K + ) Reaction - Analysis Update of the Jlab Experiment E Chunhua Chen Hampton.
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
HLab meeting 10/14/08 K. Shirotori. Contents SksMinus status –SKS magnet trouble –Magnetic field study.
1 Tracking code development for FFAGs S. Machida ASTeC/RAL 21 October, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting Toshi Gogami 5/July/2012. Contents SPL + ENGE Gogami spectra (Λ,Σ 0, 12 Λ B) Level 1.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting 2Apr2012 T.Gogami SURA residence facility.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04 Why Monte-Carlo ? To understand and separate influences of parameters (ex: fog d, distorsions,m.i.p.
G.Corti, P.Robbe LHCb Software Week - 19 June 2009 FSR in Gauss: Generator’s statistics - What type of object is going in the FSR ? - How are the objects.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
E Analysis update Adjust of the Splitter-HKS Side Yuncheng Han May 09, 2012 Hampton University JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting.
JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting / JSPS Core to Core Seminar TOSCA models for ENGE and other spectrometers 9May2012 – 11May2012 Department of Physics,
Analysis MEMO Magnetic field shield for S-2S TOF detector 9Mar2015 Toshiyuki Gogami.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting Toshi Gogami 24July2013. Contents APPC12 Test CYRIC Analysis.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting Toshi Gogami 26June June2013.
EMMA injection & extraction Takeichiro Yokoi(Oxford University)
Geant4 Simulation of the Beam Line for the HARP Experiment M.Gostkin, A.Jemtchougov, E.Rogalev (JINR, Dubna)
2004 Fall JPS meeting (English version) K.Okada1 Measurement of prompt photon in sqrt(s)=200GeV pp collisions Kensuke Okada (RIKEN-BNL research center)
HES-HKS analysis meeting Toshi Gogami 5Mar2014. Contents  Cross section & Λ binding energy 12 C(e,e’K + ) 12 Λ B 10 B(e,e’K + ) 10 Λ Be 7 Li(e,e’K +
Fast Tracking of Strip and MAPS Detectors Joachim Gläß Computer Engineering, University of Mannheim Target application is trigger  1. do it fast  2.
Meshed with no iron for comparison Used Willy’s conceptual design for iron pieces Not optimized in any way Used thin and thick pieces Compared fields (BMOD.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting Toshi Gogami 27/June/2012.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting Toshi Gogami 11/July/2012.
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting 1Nov2013 Toshi Gogami 2009 年の今頃.
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Status report - Tracking code - T.Gogami 9/30/2010.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting 30July2013 Toshi Gogami. Contents Λ の減少 (H の減少 )
Update on B-analysis Introduction Towards a definition of a limited set of plots for TDR, using all available data. Based on few general.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
PIXEL ladder alignment Hidemitsu ASANO. Photo analysis & survey beam data (with zero magnetic field) ① SVX standalone tracking Global Tracking Strategy.
HES-HKS analysis meeting 30 Aug 2013 Toshiyuki Gogami.
Review on Coulomb’s Law and the electric field definition
Example Problem #2 Maxwell 2D Hall Sensor. T7_3D, pg. 2 7/21/02 Hall Sensor Description: The Hall sensor works similarly to the vr sensor, except that.
COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING Integrierte Optimierung mit ANSA, LS-OPT und META – Infotag Morphing with.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic diagram of the coordinate system; θ is the viewing angle and O.R. represents.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting 1/Mar/2012 Toshi Gogami. Contents TOSCA.
Background simulations: update and simulations of absorbed dose
Status of the dipole magnetic field analysis
analisys: Systematics checks
Discussion today Over the next two class periods we will be designing a ring resonator based 2-channel wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) optical link.
Progress with Spin Tracking in GEANT4
Tracker to Solenoid Alignment
Force acting on a charged particle moving through a magnetic field
ENFORCED MOTION IN TRANSIENT ANALYSIS
From: Magnetic Field Effects on Laser Drilling
Discussion today Over the next two class periods we will be designing a ring resonator based 2-channel wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) optical link.
(CMS GEANT4 simulation)
HPS Collaboration meeting, JLAB, Nov 16, 2016
Setting of various sources A
مفاهیم بهره وري.
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Status of energy deposition studies IR7
Setting of various source Part II
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Presentation transcript:

HES-HKS & KaoS meeting 19/June/2012 Toshi Gogami

Contents ENGE+SPL TOSCA – New map debut !

SPL + ENGE ( TOSCA calculation )

Process Ever 1.ENGE+SPL 3D-CAD  SAT file 2.Create combined model directly New strategy – ENGE + SPL 3D-CAD  SAT file  1.SPL 2.SPL + tilt ….(1) 3.ENGE 4.ENGE + tilt …..(2) 5.Combine (1) and (2) Errors….

The way to SPL+ENGE mag. Field map 1.SPL Fill holes in CAD to avert volume mesh errors. B vs. current density scan instead of B-I curve.  Set the current density which can reproduce the measurements of magnetic flux density. 2.SPL + tilt ….(1) Read precise positions and angles in global coordinates from 3D-CAD file.  Input With no symmetry 3.ENGE Fill holes in CAD to avert volume mesh errors. B vs. current density scan instead of B-I curve.  Set the current density which can reproduce the measurements of magnetic flux density. 4.ENGE + tilt …..(2) Read precise positions and angles in global coordinates from 3D-CAD file.  Input With no symmetry 5.Combine (1) and (2) 1.Set coordinates system to the same as GEANT4 code 2.Solve  Map

SPL SPL holes  Chose [ A/cm 2 ] ( ~1.7 T )

SPL + tilt (with no symmetry)

ENGE

ENGE (current density scan) ( -50.0, -75.0, 0.0 )  Chose [A/cm 2 ] ( ~1.56 T )

SPL + ENGE model

Backgrounds One box background Could not meshed well anyhow…. Two boxes background

Same coordinate system as GEANT4 code Rotated to set them same as GEANT4 code

Incidence of an electron Okayasu Dr thesis Track Particle = electron p = 300 MeV φ = 1.67 rad θ = 87.2 mrad

The effects from the other magnet The effect on magnetic field from the other side of magnet. – 4 Points P1 = (40, 15, 100) P2 = (20, 10, 80 ) P3 = (10, 5, 70 ) P4 = ( 5, 3, 60 ) – 5 sets SPL + ENGE model – SPL (ON) + ENGE (ON).... Set1 – SPL (OFF) + ENGE (ON)....Set2 – SPL (ON) + ENGE(OFF)....Set3 ENGE model....Set4 SPL model....Set5 Want to see  Set1 vs. Set2+Set3 and Set1 vs. Set4+Set5 Comparison 2 Comparison 1

Set4 – Set2 (comparison 1)

Set5 – Set3 (comparison 2)

考察 The effects on the calculation of mag. field Depend on the shape and the configuration of magnets Less than a few % effects for each component Optical nature is intricately changed according to these plots which shows the effects for all components are different. To obtain magnetic fields which have practical nature of optics When one calculate a magnet, put another magnet on the setup. (relatively finer mesh) – Add up those magnetic field together later. (to see this is ok or not, need do check Set1 vs. Set4+Set5) Calculate magnetic field for those magnets at once. (relatively rough mesh)

Summary and To do Summary – ENGE+SPL TOSCA calculation New map is now available (combined version) To obtain magnetic fields which have practical nature of optics – When one calculate a magnet, put another magnet on the setup. (relatively finer mesh) – Calculate magnetic field for those magnets at once. (relatively rough mesh) To do – Output and implement new maps (E01-011) ENGE ONLY SPL ONLY ENGE + SPL – Matrix tuning mtune – Cross sections of Λ,Σ 0 and 12 Λ B g.s. Efficiencies (Trigger, Tracking, DAQ, K + selection, Burned effects, absorption, decay….)

END