Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2012 AYP Presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.
Advertisements

Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Upper Darby School District Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 2010 Performance.
Adequate Yearly Progress 2012 Comfort ISD. Measures Evaluated Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA.
1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard Status: Approaching (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets (2011)
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results
2011 – 12 AYP & PSSA. AYP = Adequate Yearly Progress Requirement of NCLB (No Child Left Behind) Federal Legislation that will require 100% of students.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2009 AYP Presentation.
Gail Straus, Assistant Director, Special Services Shelton School District State, School District and individual school results for AYP results can be found.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Rufus Cage Elementary Houston Independent School District
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API December 12, 2011.
How Closely Do California’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of California’s general population.
PBMA 2016 Learning Gains.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2000 to 2009
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools,
First-Time, First-Year Minority Enrollees in U. S
How Closely Do Rhode Island’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Rhode Island’s general.
Minority Applicants to U.S. Dental Schools, 1990 to 2017 (1 of 3)
UNTHSC Fall Enrollment by Program: Asian/ Pacific Islander
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general.
How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general population.
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2016
Evergreen Elementary School
How Closely Do New Mexico’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of New Mexico’s general population.
How Closely Do New Mexico’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of New Mexico’s general.
Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report
Texas State Accountability
How Closely Do California’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of California’s general.
How Closely Do Rhode Island’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Rhode Island’s general.
Supplementary Data Tables, Community Health Indicators
A-F Accountability and Special Education
Minority Applicants to U.S. Dental Schools, 1990 to 2016 (1 of 3)
How Closely Do New York’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
First-Time, First-Year Minority Enrollees in U. S
State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY 10-11
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2017
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2000 to 2015
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2018
Minority Applicants to U.S. Dental Schools, 1990 to 2018 (1 of 3)
Enrollees by URM and Non-URM Status in U. S
State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY 10-11
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2000 to 2009
How Closely Do New York’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2018
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2016
How Closely Do District of Columbia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of District of.
Enrollees by URM and Non-URM Status in U. S
How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general population.
How Closely Do District of Columbia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of District of.
How Closely Do Rhode Island’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Rhode Island’s general.
How Closely Do California’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of California’s general population.
How Closely Do Maine’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do District of Columbia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of District of.
How Closely Do New York’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
Presentation transcript:

Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2012 AYP Presentation

AYP Targets Paynter Elementary School Met 13 out of 13 Targets – Made AYP Whitehall Elementary School  Met 17 out of 19 Targets – School Improvement II Harrison Middle School Met 29 out of 29 Targets – Made AYP Baldwin High School  Met 12 out of 15 Targets – Warning Baldwin-Whitehall School District - Warning

Mathematics % % % % % % % Reading % % % % % % % PSSA AYP Performance Targets Over Time

Attendance Attendance Target: 90%

Graduation Graduation Target: 85%

Baldwin High School: Math Performance (Groups must be 40 or larger to be reported for AYP) 2011 Math Goal 67% Met Target2012 Math Goal 78% Met Target All Students68.4Yes69.9Yes –SHCI White (non-Hispanic)71.3Yes75.3Yes-CI Black (non –Hispanic)N/A Latino/HispanicN/A Asian or Pacific IslanderN/A American IndianNo Students Multi-Racial/EthnicN/A IEPN/A English Language LearnerN/A Economically Disadvantaged50.6Yes41.8No

Baldwin High School: Reading Performance (Groups must be 40 or larger to be reported for AYP) 2011 Reading Goal 72% 2012 Reading Goal 81% Met Target All Students76.5Yes75.6No White (non-Hispanic)80.1Yes81.6Yes Black (non –Hispanic)N/A Latino/HispanicN/A Asian or Pacific IslanderN/A American IndianNo Students Multi-Racial/EthnicN/A IEPN/A English Language LearnerN/A Economically Disadvantaged55.7Yes41.0No

Harrison Middle School: Mathematics Performance Groups must be 40 or larger to be reported for AYP 2011 Math Goal 67% Met Target2012 Math Goal 78% Met Target All Students81.8Yes84.6Yes White (non-Hispanic)87.2Yes87.7Yes Black (non –Hispanic)47.8Yes69.8Yes-CI Latino/HispanicN/A Asian or Pacific IslanderN/A 55.3Yes-SH American IndianN/A Multi-Racial/EthnicN/A IEP48.1Yes50.7YES-SHCI English Language LearnerN/A 33.3YES-SH Economically Disadvantaged62.4Yes71.0Yes-SH

Harrison Middle School: Reading Performance Groups must be 40 or larger to be reported for AYP 2011 Reading Goal 72% Met Target2012 Reading Goal 81% Met Target All Students74.7Yes78.7Yes-SH White (non-Hispanic)79.7Yes83.1Yes Black (non –Hispanic)47.8Yes64.2Yes-SH Latino/HispanicN/A Asian or Pacific IslanderN/A 36.2Yes-SH American IndianN/A Multi-Racial/EthnicN/A IEP44.4YES53.4Yes-SH English Language LearnerN/A 11.1Yes-SHCI Economically Disadvantaged54.3Yes64.6Yes-SH

Paynter Elementary: Mathematics Performance Groups must be 40 or larger to be reported for AYP 2011 Math Goal 67% Met Target2012 Math Goal 78% Met Target All Students83.5Yes88.9Yes White (non-Hispanic)86.4Yes91.3Yes Black (non –Hispanic) N/A Latino/Hispanic N/A Asian or Pacific Islander N/A American Indian No Students Multi-Racial/Ethnic N/A IEP N/A English Language Learner N/A Economically Disadvantaged71.9Yes80.5Yes

Paynter Elementary: Reading Performance Groups must be 40 or larger to be reported for AYP 2011 Reading Goal 72% Met Target2012 Reading Goal 81% Met Target All Students72.2Yes78.0YES-CI White (non-Hispanic)75.6Yes82.3Yes Black (non –Hispanic) N/A Latino/Hispanic N/A Asian or Pacific Islander N/A American Indian No Students Multi-Racial/Ethnic N/A IEP N/A English Language Learner N/A Economically Disadvantaged57.0Yes64.7Yes-SH

Whitehall Elementary: Mathematics Performance Groups must be 40 or larger to be reported for AYP 201 Math Goal 67% Met Target2012 Math Goal 78% Met Target All Students91.5Yes85.8Yes White (non-Hispanic)93.5Yes90.0Yes Black (non –Hispanic)N/A Latino/HispanicN/A Asian or Pacific IslanderN/A American IndianNo Students Multi-Racial/EthnicN/A IEP75.9Yes69.5Yes-CI English Language LearnerN/A Economically Disadvantaged84.1Yes73.9Yes-CI

Whitehall Elementary: Reading Performance Groups must be 40 or larger to be reported for AYP 2011 Reading Goal 72% Met Target2012 Reading Goal 81% Met Target All Students79.2Yes74.3Yes-GM White (non-Hispanic)82.0Yes79.1Yes-CI Black (non –Hispanic)N/A Latino/HispanicN/A Asian or Pacific IslanderN/A American IndianNo Students Multi-Racial/EthnicN/A IEP65.5Yes50.0No English Language LearnerN/A Economically Disadvantaged67.4Yes60.5No