150GHz 100GHz 220GHz Galactic Latitude (Deg) A Millimeter Wave Galactic Plane Survey with the BICEP Polarimeter Evan Bierman (U.C. San Diego) and C. Darren.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First results from QUIET Osamu Tajima (KEK) The QUIET Collaboration 1.
Advertisements

The Ability of Planck to Measure Unresolved Sources Bruce Partridge Haverford College For the Planck Consortium.
S-PASS, a new view of the polarized sky Gianni Bernardi SKA SA On behalf of the S-PASS team CMB2013, Okinawa, June th 2013.
Foreground cleaning in CMB experiments Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA, Trieste.
Cleaned Three-Year WMAP CMB Map: Magnitude of the Quadrupole and Alignment of Large Scale Modes Chan-Gyung Park, Changbom Park (KIAS), J. Richard Gott.
GHz Measurements of anomalous dust emission Richard Davis, Clive Dickinson, Rod Davies, Anthony Banday Paris.
Cambridge CMB meeting 20 th July 2009 CMB B-modes: Foregrounds Paddy Leahy, Clive Dickinson, Mike Preece, Mike Peel (Manchester)
Photo: Keith Vanderlinde Detection of tensor B-mode polarization : Why would we need any more data?
K. Ganga – CMB Science and Observations 1 Rencontres du Vietnam /08 The QuaD CMB Polarization Experiment K. Ganga APC.
SPECTRA OF GALACTIC COMPONENTS OBSERVED BY WMAP R.D.Davies, R.J.Davis Jodrell Bank Observatory C.Dickinson California Institute of Technology A.J.Banday,
Contamination of the CMB Planck data by galactic polarized emissions L. Fauvet, J.F. Macίas-Pérez.
Component Separation of Polarized Data Application to PLANCK Jonathan Aumont J-F. Macías-Pérez, M. Tristram, D. Santos
Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy Lyle Hoffman, Lafayette College ALFALFA Undergraduate Workshop Union College, 2005 July 06.
Zeldovich-Sakharov program at RATAN-600 “Cosmological Gene” project Ground based support of the Space CMB Missions Y.Parijskij et al Special Astrophysical.
The Cosmic Microwave Background. Maxima DASI WMAP.
Latest results on Anomalous Galactic Microwave Emission from the Cosmosomas Experiment José Alberto Rubiño Martín (IAC-Tenerife) Orsay, October 27 th,
N. Ponthieu Polarization workshop, IAS, Orsay, 09/15/ N. Ponthieu (IAS) The conquest of sky polarization The upper limits era First detections Prospects.
BICEP: B ackground I maging of C osmic E xtragalactic P olarization “The Muscle Behind Curls” Jamie Bock Hien Nguyen Caltech/JPL Andrew Lange Brian Keating.
Foreground limits on the detectability of the B-mode by Bpol Enrique Martínez-González (IFCA) Marco Tucci (IAC) Bpol Meeting, 27-October-2006, Orsay.
CMB large angular scale, full sky polarization anisotropy has been measured moderately well, but not well enough – The value of reionization fraction derived.
University of Chicago 2007 July 30 SOFIA-POL 2007 The Infrared - Millimeter Polarization Spectrum John Vaillancourt California Institute of Technology.
1 CMB Polarimetry with BICEP: Probing Inflationary Gravitational Waves IAS - Polarization 2005 Denis Barkats.
Thoughts on Ground-based lensing measurements Chao-Lin Kuo Stanford/SLAC KIPAC.
SLAC, May 12th, 2004J.L. Puget PLANCK J.L. Puget Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale Orsay.
SCUBA Polarization results: Jane Greaves, Joint Astronomy Centre, Hawaii with special thanks to: Wayne Holland, Tim Jenness, David Berry and.
Dust polarization expectations The PILOT experiment J.-Ph. Bernard CESR Toulouse Dust polarization at long wavelengths J.-Ph. Bernard, Orsay, Bpol meeting.
Separating Cosmological B-Modes with FastICA Stivoli F. Baccigalupi C. Maino D. Stompor R. Orsay – 15/09/2005.
Simulating the Interferometer In order to simulate the performance of an interferometer, 20 by 20 degree sections were extracted from the simulated CMB.
Title Here Probing the Epoch of Reionization with the Tomographic Ionized-carbon Mapping Experiment (TIME) Jamie Bock Caltech / JPL CCAT Workshop, Boulder.
The Implication of BICEP2 : Alternative Interpretations on its results Seokcheon Lee SNU Seminar Apr. 10 th
“First Light” From New Probes of the Dark Ages and Reionization Judd D. Bowman (Caltech) Hubble Fellows Symposium 2008.
Polarization Surveys with the DRAO 26-m Telescope at 1.4 GHz Maik Wolleben, T. Landecker, O. Davison Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory W. Reich,
ASIAA NTU PHYS J.H.P.Wu & AMiBA Team To remove the ground pickup and electronic DC component in the data, we tracked the source- (P1) and tail- (P2) patches.
ATLASGAL ATLASGAL APEX Telescope Large Area Survey of the Galaxy F. Schuller, K. Menten, P. Schilke, et al. Max Planck Institut für Radioastronomie.
CMB & Foreground Polarisation CMB 2003 Workshop, Minneapolis Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA/ISAS.
Update on QUaD Sarah Church QUaD Collaboration Funded: National Science Foundation Astronomy Program and Office of Polar Programs.
QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT. QUIET Project Miami Physics Conference 2009 December 16 Raul Monsalve for the QUIET Collaboration University of Miami QUIET.
Galaxies and galaxy clusters at mm wavelengths: the view from the South Pole Telescope Gil Holder.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
PACS Hitchhiker’s Guide to Herschel Archive Workshop – Pasadena 6 th - 10 th Oct 2014 The SPIRE Photometer and its Observing Modes Bernhard Schulz (NHSC/IPAC)
Joint analysis of Archeops and WMAP observations of the CMB G. Patanchon (University of British Columbia) for the Archeops collaboration.
Galactic Radioemission – a problem for precision cosmology ? Absolute Temperatures at Short CM-Waves with a Lunar Radio Telescope Wolfgang Reich Max-Planck-Institut.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
PHY418 PARTICLE ASTROPHYSICS Radio Emission 1. Radio emission and particle astrophysics 2 Why are the.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
Anomalies of low multipoles of WMAP
LOFAR LOw Frequency Array => most distant, high redshift Universe !? Consortium of international partners… Dutch ASTRON USA Haystack Observatory (MIT)
Chao-Lin Kuo Stanford Physics/SLAC
High Resolution Measurements of CMB Anisotropies with ACBAR U.C. Berkeley: W.L. Holzapfel (co-PI) M.D. Daub M. Lueker Case-Western: J. Ruhl (co-PI) J.
EBEx foregrounds and band optimization Carlo Baccigalupi, Radek Stompor.
Experimental Cosmology Group Oxford Astrophysics Overview CLOVER is a UK-led experiment to detect the B-mode polarisation of the Cosmic Microwave Background.
1 The Planck view of CMB Contamination from Diffuse Foregrounds Carlo Baccigalupi On Behalf of the Planck Collaboration KITP Conference, April 2013.
Adventures in Parameter Estimation Jason Dick University of California, Davis.
Weibin Shi, Xiaohui Sun, Wolfgang Reich Jinlin Han, Patricia Reich, Richard Wielebinski Partner Group of MPIfR at NAOC Primary results for 6cm polarization.
Planck Report on the status of the mission Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA.
Blind Component Separation for Polarized Obseravations of the CMB Jonathan Aumont, Juan-Francisco Macias-Perez Rencontres de Moriond 2006 La.
2-year Total Intensity Observations year Polarization Observations Cosmic Background Imager Tony Readhead Zeldovich celebration.
Planck, COBE, WMAP, and CMB Polarization. The image on the reverse side shows part of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) sky as measured by three different.
The Turbulent Interstellar Medium Far-IR Spectropolarimetry and CMB Foregrounds A CALISTO polarimeter will provide the unique opportunity to study the.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
BICEP2 Results & Its Implication on inflation models and Cosmology Seokcheon Lee 48 th Workshop on Gravitation & NR May. 16 th
CMB physics Zong-Kuan Guo 《现代宇宙学》
Observational Cosmology Lab University of Wisconsin-Madison
Probing Magnetized Turbulence in the Fermi Bubbles
(for the Algorithm Development Group of the US Planck Team)
Observing and Data Reduction
of Montgomery College Planetarium
A Measurement of CMB Polarization with QUaD
Separating E and B types of CMB polarization on an incomplete sky Wen Zhao Based on: WZ and D.Baskaran, Phys.Rev.D (2010) 2019/9/3.
Presentation transcript:

150GHz 100GHz 220GHz Galactic Latitude (Deg) A Millimeter Wave Galactic Plane Survey with the BICEP Polarimeter Evan Bierman (U.C. San Diego) and C. Darren Dowell (JPL, Caltech) Faculty Advisor: Brian Keating (U.C. San Diego) and NASA Advisor: Ed Wollack (GSFS) BICEP collaboration (Caltech, JPL, UCSD, U.C. Berkeley, U. Wales Cardiff, CEA, IAS) Abstract: BICEP (the John Robinson Telescope at the South Pole) is a 49-pixel microwave polarimeter that has been observing for 2.5 years in the atmospheric band windows at 100/150/220GHz and beam FWHM's of 0.93/0.63/0.42 degrees respectively. Most observations are of the 2% of the sky with the lowest expected astronomical foreground contamination; however, a fraction are of the galactic plane from l = 265 to 340 degrees. From these observations, high signal to noise maps have been produced within several degrees of the galactic plane, both in temperature and polarization. Our present analysis focuses on the trend of decreasing polarization fraction for objects that have brighter unpolarized intensities, the polarized and unpolarized spectrum of the objects in the galaxy between our bands, and the magnetic field structure of the galaxy on large scales. CMB Foregrounds, Pasadena CA, July 2008 Observing Strategy from South Pole A view of the 250mK feedhorn section of the BICEP focal plane looking up to the 4K section and the sky 220GHz Imaging and Polarimetry BICEP 100GHz and 150GHz Galactic Plane Maps Prior to the second year of observation, the focal plane was equipped with two 220GHz feeds to extend the spectral coverage. This greatly enhances BICEP's ability to study polarized dust emission. Contact/ References Contact the authors at: [1] K. W. Yoon, et al. 2006, SPIE, 6275, 62751K [2] Planck reference sky model, v1.1, Members of Working Group 2 and available at [3] R. H. Hildebrand, et al. 1999, ApJ, 516, 834 [4] M.-A. Miville-Deschenes, et al. 2008, arXiv [5] Finkbeiner, D. P., Davis, M., & Schlegel, D. J. 1999, ApJ, 524, 867 [6] NASA/WMAP Science Team 150GHz U Polarization Map Galactic Latitude (Deg) Galactic Longitude (Deg) 150GHz Q Polarization Map Galactic Latitude (Deg) 100GHz Integration Time Galactic Latitude (Deg) Galactic Longitude (Deg) FDS 5 /WMAP 6 are smoothed and filtered with BICEP beams and observing strategy. WMAP agrees in T for both PSI and NSI objects. WMAP Q maps show less polarization for NSI objects than PSI objects as well, although map noise is currently dominating the direct comparison. FDS has a reasonable PSI pixel prediction at 100 GHz but over-predicts emission at 150 GHz. Comparison with WMAP W Band and FDS Model 8 The emission from galactic dust grains rises with increasing frequency. Synchrotron and free-free emission decreases with rising frequency. By directly differencing the 100 GHz and 150 GHz maps (smoothed to the same beam resolution), the pixels with strongly increasing or decreasing spectra stand out. The dotted outline on the map to the right indicates the region from which the points on the scatter plots are drawn. Due to current naïve filtering, 1/f atmospheric noise contaminates the maps between 290 to 315 degrees galactic longitude and is excluded in the current analysis. Microwave Spectrum and Polarization of the Galactic Plane Blue points are from pixels with a large positive spectral index (PSI): increasing intensity with increasing frequency. Red points have a large negative spectral index (NSI): decreasing intensity with increasing frequency. Plots of polarization fraction perpendicular (positive Q) or parallel (negative Q) to the galaxy. There is a slight decrease of polarization fraction with increasing intensity, a trend which has been noted and modeled elsewhere 3,4. NSI emission is less polarized on average than PSI emission. (100GHz – 150GHz) Temperature Map (mK) Galactic Latitude (Deg) Galactic Longitude (Deg) Galactic Latitude (Deg) 150GHz Unpolarized Temperature Map Galactic Latitude (Deg) 100GHz Unpolarized Temperature Map Galactic Latitude (Deg) 100GHz Q Polarization Map Galactic Latitude (Deg) Galactic Longitude (Deg) 100GHz U Polarization Map Galactic Latitude (Deg) 220GHz Unpolarized Temperature Map Galactic Longitude (Deg) BICEP observes at a fixed elevation, scanning in azimuth at 2.8 deg/s. Every hour, the telescope is stepped 0.25 deg, bookended by small scans in elevation to calibrate off the atmosphere. In galactic coordinates, this causes the integration pattern shown on the right. The BICEP temperature and polarization maps are presented in galactic coordinates and CMB temperature units. Polarization is presented as Stokes parameters: Q = P Cos[2 Ψ] and U = P Sin[2 Ψ], where Ψ is the angle measured counterclockwise from the north galactic pole and P is the total polarized intensity. Processing of the time streams to final maps includes bolometer and filter transfer function deconvolution, bad weather and glitch removal, relative calibration off the atmosphere, 15th order polynomial subtraction with the galaxy masked, variance weighting mapping of T/Q/U, and absolute calibration from WMAP temperature anisotropies and/or a partially polarized rotating dielectric sheet. 1 The Planck consortium has begun using these maps, in preliminary form, to compare to the detailed foreground predictions of the Planck Sky Model. Comparisons between maps (with improved analysis) and eventual Planck data in all three of the main HFI science bands should allow powerful cross-checks of the calibrations and methodology of each experiment. 2