RequirementMethodStatus The payload must not exceed a weight of 1.45 Kgm.Design, Test The payload must conform to the WFF “no volt requirement”

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Full Mission Simulation Report Temple University Fred Avery, Gene Council, Ny’Jaa Bobo, Salvatore Giorgi, Jay Shukla 4/21/12.

Advertisements

FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM HAWAII. LEO HANO FULL SCALE LOW POWER March 13, 2011 Motor = K780R.

Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.

Critical Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch Program University/Institution Team Members Date.

Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.

RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University/Institution Team Members Date.

Colorado Space Grant Consortium DemoSat-B Colorado State University Matthew Jui, Ian Patterson, Mark Spowart, Todd Wallis June Colorado Space Grant.

Full Mission Simulation Test Report UPR-R(river) P(rock) University of Puerto Rico Río Piedras Campus May 14, 2010.

Team 2 Careful Harry Glenda Alvarenga J.J. Busse Emily Eggers Adam Kemp Gabrielle Massone Dalton Smith Corey Wilson Dynamo Critical Design Review.

Rock it rocke Temple University

Eric Marz Joe Mozloom Swati Maini Linda Mclaughlin Swapnil Mengawade Advisor: Jin Kang, PhD June 22, 2011 Drexel University RockSat1.

FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM HAWAII. LEO HANO FULL SCALE LOW POWER March 13, 2011 Motor = K780R.

Biological Acquisition Unit Team Members: Fred Avery Ny ‘Jaa Bobo Gene Council Salvatore Giorgi Advisors: Dr. Helferty Dr. Pillapakkam.

Stevens Institute of Technology - New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Critical Design Review Mike Giglia, Ethan Hayon Robert Hopkins.

University of Kansas EPS of KUTEsat Pathfinder Leon S. Searl April 5, 2006 AE256 Satellite Electrical Power Systems.

Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.

Critical Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.

Launch Readiness Review SloshSAT University of Northern Colorado Sage Andorka Dan Welsh Maurice Woods III Motoaki Honda Zach Sears 6/11/2010.

Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College October 3, 2011 Conceptual Design Review RockSat- C.

Rock Sat-C Conceptual Design Review The New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Mike Giglia, Ethan.

Launch Readiness Review JASMM Virginia Tech Team Members: Robbie Robertson Zack HarlowJeremiah Shiflet Daniel Martin Matt James Anthony Rinaldi Senior.

UPR-R(river) P(rock) University of Puerto Rico Río Piedras Campus October 16, 2010 CoDR Ver 0.1.

Launch Readiness Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.

Launch Readiness Review River Rock 2010 University of Puerto Rico June 9, 2010.

Critical Design Review Colorado State University - Pueblo April 15, 2005.

University of Wyoming Dorin Blodgett, Kevin Brown, Heather Choi, Ben Lampe Eric Robinson, Michael Stephens, Patrick Weber October 7,

SloshSAT Conceptual Design Review Dr. Robert Walch Sage Andorka Dan Welsh Zach Sears Maurice Woods III Motoaki Honda Ryan Estrick 14 Oct

Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley

Launch Readiness Review MinnSpec University of Minnesota Bryce Schaefer, Chris Woerhle, Art Graf

(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.

Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.

Sam Dodge Mentored by Dr. Tom Sharp Electronics System.

RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:

Hy-V 0.1 Environmental Testing Phillip Jasper Ryan Johnson Mitchell Foral December 2008 Virginia Tech and University of Virginia.

DemoSat IV Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 21, 2006.

MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.

o Portable low-cost aerial drone that can be used for reconnaissance o Relay real-time video and data, like location, heading, battery life o Take high-resolution.

PCB Presentation Group 6 – String Us Up! Matthew Barton Clifford Risley Patrick Nice Seth “Schematic” George.

Colorado Space Grant Consortium Virginia Space Grant Consortium 1 RockOn... A Sounding Rocket Payload Workshop Colorado & Virginia Space Grant Consortium.

Kurran Kelly – Lead Designer Silas Van Natter – Team Lead Josh Van Patten – Team Budget Manager Brandt Pedrow – Team Liaison and Recorder Branden Bakken.

Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.

User notes: –The purpose of the flight readiness review is to determine if your experiment is ready to fly. If it is not ready – it will not fly –You must.

MinnRock Design and Canister Layout Team members Bryce Schaefer (team coordinator)- AEM Cameron Japuntich- AEM Liz Sefkow- ME Mitch Andrus-

RockOn! RockOn! Structure Build RockOn! 2008.

RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report Harding University William Waldron, Joshua Griffith, Drew Cancienne, Edmond Wilson, David Stair 22 April.

UPR-R(river) P(rock) University of Puerto Rico Río Piedras Campus February 17, 2012.

RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson 4/23/2012.

MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.

Launch Readiness Review

Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Section 2: The Payload! User’s Guide Compliance Beta Prototype Testing Section 3: Check-In.

BlackBox Sat Critical Design Review Colorado State University-Pueblo April 2, 2004 Greg Barela Jose Segovia Enrique Cornejo.

Temple University Advisors: Dr. John Helferty & Dr. Chang-Hee Won Charles Wright Jinyan Chen Billy Cheng Brittany Gray 1.

RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University of Minnesota Alex Richman, Jacob Schultz, Justine Topel, Will Thorson 5/27/2012.

Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.

Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June

Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.

FLY-ROD ACCESSORY PACK PRESENTED AS A HONORS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT A Senior Design Project by Rob Streeter and Kurtis Buck.

Full Mission Simulation Test Report RocketSat CU Boulder

RockOn! RockOn! Structure Build RockOn! 2009.

RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:

SOAREX VII Mission Design, construct, test, and fly an ultralight (

Preliminary PCB Design

Critical Design Review Team Name

RockOn... A Sounding Rocket Payload Workshop

CSU DemoSAT-B 2010 DemoSat V: Colorado State University April 9, 2011

Launch Readiness Review

Launch Readiness Review

Image Acquisition and Processing of Remotely Sensed Data

Asteroid Ballistics ECE Faculty Advisor: Richard A. Messner

Launch Readiness Report West Virginia University

Presentation transcript:

RequirementMethodStatus The payload must not exceed a weight of 1.45 Kgm.Design, Test The payload must conform to the WFF “no volt requirement” Design, Test The payload center of gravity (CG) shall be within 1 cubic inch of the geometric centroid of the payload canister. Design, Analysis The allowable static envelope of the payload is a cylinder with a diameter of 9.2” (23.37 cm) and a height of 9.4” (23.87 cm). Design The payload will record data the entire flightDesign, Analysis

Power 2x9V Supply Batteries G-Switch RBF (Wallops) 5V Regulator X / Y Acceleromete r Z Acceleromete r Temperature Sensor AVR Board Flash Memory AVR Microcontroller ADC Data Power interface Digital Still Camera Digital Gyroscope

2.0625” Tall standoffs Digital camera PCB G- switch Batteries 1.5” tall standoffs

Wallops Compliance

PartsCompanyModelPriceSupplier Low range accelerometers x and y-axis Analog DevicesADXL203 $ Digi-Key z-axis Analog DevicesADXL103 $ Digi-Key High range accelerometers x and y-axis Analog DevicesAD22279 $ Digi-Key z-axis Analog DevicesAD22284 $ Digi-Key Gyroscope Analog Devicesadis16100 $ Digi-Key Microcontroller Atmelatmega32-16au $ 8.17 Digi-Key Flash Memory AtmelAT26DF161A $ 2.15 Digi-Key Level shifter MaximMax3392 $ 2.00 Maxim 3.3 Volt Voltage Regulator Linear TechnologyLT1129CST-3.3 $ 4.50 Digi-Key 5 Volt Voltage Regulator Linear TechnologyLT1129CST-5.0 $ 4.50 Digi-Key PCB CPBfabexpresscustom $ PCBFabExpress PNP Transistor General TechnologiesMHC3216S500W-Sn $ 1.50 Digi-Key NPN Tranisitor General TechnologiesGRM188R71H104KA93D $ 1.00 Digi-Key incidentals(resistors, ets., ) Radio Shackvarious $ Radio Shack macrolon plate Big Blue Saw $ Digital Still Camera Canon Canon a570is $ Amazon SD Card PNY1GB $ Circuit City

Type of RestrictionRestrictionStatus Mass allotment:<= 1.44 Kgm Volume allotment:<= The payload’s center of gravity (CG):In 1”X1”X1” envelope of centroid? Wallops No-Volt Requirement Compliance:Yes Structure mounts:Top and bottom bulkheads. No mounts to sides of cans. Sharing:Partially developed

  March  Finalize assembly,  First Full system Run time test & report   April  Second Full system Run time Test & report  Deploy final Flight code   June  LRR