AST Stakeholder Meeting California Air Resources Board Stakeholder Meeting February 17, 2005 1927 13th Street, Room 202 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why Recover Petrol Vapour in Petrol Filling Stations?
Advertisements

June 16, 2010 California Air Resources Board LaMar Mitchell1 Basic Guide to Gasoline Vapor Recovery at the Gasoline Dispensing Facility Gasoline vapor.
1 EVALUATION OF EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS FROM ONROAD MOTORCYCLES January 15, 2006.
Cryomodule Helium Volumes Tom Peterson, Fermilab AWLC14 13 May 2014.
USEPA Petroleum Refinery Enforcement Emerging Issues February 22, 2011.
Off-Highway Recreational Vehicle Workshop 12/18/2012.
Garry Kaufman Deputy Director Colorado Air Pollution Control Division June 6, 2014.
Slide 1 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 E VAPORATIVE E MISSIONS IN MOBILE6 L ARRY L ANDMAN MOBILE6 Workshop June , 1999.
Subcommittee On Pressure Relief Systems CRE Meeting Spring 2011 Meeting Clark Shepard.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
1 Why Recover Petrol Vapour in Petrol Filling Stations? Petrol contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that evaporate in fuel tanks During unloading.
November 14, 2003 Aboveground Storage Tank Enhanced Vapor Recovery.
Highlights of Colorado’s New Oil and Gas Hydrocarbon Emission Reduction Rules - Adopted February 2014 Presentation to WESTAR May 2014 Will Allison Colorado.
EPA’s Lead Modeling Study at the Santa Monica Airport Kim Hoang, PhD, MPH EPA Region 9.
ARB’s Intent to Establish Evaporative Emission Standards for Pleasure Craft NMMA/ARB Meeting Feb. 7, 2006.
1 CARB Public Consultation Meeting Compressed Natural Gas Specifications August 3, 2005 WSPA/CIPA Presentation Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA)
Initial NVFEL Evaporative Emission Test Results from Marine Fuel Tanks n Test Procedures n Baseline Emissions n Pressure Relief Valves n Limited Flow Orifices.
Pat Bennett Engineering Evaluation Section Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board AST EVR WORKGROUP MEETING July 23, 2002.
Evaporative Emission Control for Gasoline Boat Fuel Systems Mike Samulski U.S. Environmental Protection Agency International Boatbuilders’ Exhibition &
Fuel Tank Inerting Joint Airbus/FAA, A320 Flight Tests
Directed Inspection and Maintenance (DI&M) Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s.
MICHELLE WILSON ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 Stage II Vapor Recovery Update.
Problem Solving Using Common Engineering Concepts Introduction to Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas-Pan American College of Science and Engineering.
MassDEP Stage I Vapor Recovery Program
The Outdoor Power Equipment Institute 341 South Patrick Street Alexandria, VA FAX Outdoor Power Equipment.
Scoping Meeting GHG Accounting Issues Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Natural Gas Gathering & Processing October 25, 2007 Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Mobile Source Control Division November 13, 2002 Planning and Technical Support Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board Proposed.
Lecture Oct 18. Today’s lecture Quiz returned on Monday –See Lis if you didn’t get yours –Quiz average 7.5 STD 2 Review from Monday –Calculate speed of.
12/25/2009 Pleasure Craft Proposal Draft Pleasure Craft Evaporative Emissions Regulation and Standards.
Gasoline Dispenser Hose Permeation Workshop November 13, 2003 Monitoring and Laboratory Division Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection.
Dispersion of Air Pollutants The dispersion of air pollutants is primarily determined by atmospheric conditions. If conditions are superadiabatic a great.
1 Evaluation Of Evaporative Emissions From Pleasure Craft June 27, 2007.
Modeling Jet-A Vaporization in a Wing Fuel Tank
Vandenberg Air Force Base E-85 Fueling Facility California Air Resources Board E-85 Workshop Presented by Stu S. Webster Metcalf & Eddy 02 February 2006.
California Air Resources Board Workshop November 3, th Street, Room 202 1:30 - 3:30 p.m. Aboveground Storage Tank Enhanced Vapor Recovery.
SO 2 Emission Factors Kristin Burford 23/April/01 ME 449A: Sustainable Air Quality Source: Environmental News ServiceEnvironmental News Service.
Proposed Regulations for Portable Fuel Containers Refueling Spillage Control Project January 26, 1999 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Energy Savings from Electric Water Heaters in Commercial Applications Danielle Gidding.
Air Resources Board Research Division Economic Valuation of Air Quality Benefits Bart Croes, Chief Research Division.
Cargo Tank Program Emissions and Regulation Development Public Workshop March 2, 2005 ARB, MLD 1st Floor Conference Room th Street Sacramento, CA.
Area Source Emissions Inventory Improvement Update Michael Ege, Emissions Inventory Specialist Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
MLD - Proposed TP Proposed Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP DYNAMIC PRESSURE PERFORMANCE Public Workshop, June 20, 2001 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES.
Vapor Recovery Requirements for E85 Dispensing Facilities Meeting to Discuss Vapor Recovery Requirements for Facilities that Dispense E85 February 2, 2006.
1 WRAP Oil & Gas Phase II Work Plan: 2002 and 2018 Area Source Inventory Improvements and Area Source Controls Evaluation WRAP Stationary Sources Forum.
Union Pacific Railroad Comments February 23, 2005.
13/3/2010 Spark-Ignition Marine Engine Draft Proposal.
Introduction Catalysts GAO Conclusion The Cost of Filling Up: Did the FTC Approve Too Many Petroleum Industry Mergers? Rayola Dougher Manager, Energy Market.
Producer Partner Reported Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American.
Air Pollution Control Devices: Mobile Sources. Automotive Emissions M_____ sources contribute approximately 60% of total air pollution (78% of CO, 47%
A presentation for by ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Consulting and Management International Petroleum Environmental Conference 22.
Power Plant Engineering
Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control Project Monitoring and Laboratory Division June 28, 1999 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.
ARB Phase III Reformulated Gasoline Auto Industry Comments Ann M. Schlenker DaimlerChrysler Representing the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers September.
Enhanced Vapor Recovery Workshop November 9, 1999 Enhanced Vapor Recovery Workshop November 9, 1999 FNew and/or Revised Test Procedures Volumetric Phase.
1 Setting Evaporative Emission Standards for Off Highway Recreational Vehicles (OHRV) March 23, 2006.
IBEX 2007 Session 310 The Evolution of Automotive Fuel Tanks Presented by: Roy Giacomazzi Senior Development Engineer.
Engineering Evaluation Unit Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board (916) ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANK (AST) VAPOR RECOVERY.
MULTI-COMPONENT FUEL VAPORIZATION IN A SIMULATED AIRCRAFT FUEL TANK C. E. Polymeropoulos Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University.
Refueling Spillage Control For Small Off-Road Engines Air Resources Board August 6, 1998 Dean Bloudoff.
Pat Bennett Engineering Evaluation Section Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board AST EVR WORKGROUP MEETING April 17, 2002.
SO 2 Emissions Kristin Burford 23/April/01 ME 449A: Sustainable Air Quality.
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Meeting on Issues Relating to the California Phase 3 Reformulated Gasoline Regulations California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
Garry Kaufman Air Pollution Control Division.  Background on Oil and Gas Air Regulation in Colorado  Basis for Additional Air Quality Requirements for.
1 Pat Bennett Engineering Evaluation Section Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board Aboveground Storage Tank Enhanced Vapor.
FLASH EMISSIONS JIM COOPER, CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION.
EVALUATION OF EVAPORATIVE AND EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM OFF-HIGHWAY RECREATIONAL VEHICLES (OHRV) September 06, 2006.
Calculation of evaporative emissions with COPERT Giorgos Mellios
Evaporative Emissions due to EVAP System Malfunctions
Presentation transcript:

AST Stakeholder Meeting California Air Resources Board Stakeholder Meeting February 17, th Street, Room :00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

AST Stakeholder Meeting Agenda Welcome and Introductions Overview of AP-42 emission estimation approach Discuss the comments received by stakeholders Results from small scale studies Future Plans Contact Information

AST Stakeholder Meeting Welcome and Introductions

AST Stakeholder Meeting Overview of AP-42 Emission Estimation Approach

AP-42 Emission Estimation Approach Purpose: –Use AP-42 approach to calculate statewide emission estimate for Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs)

AP-42 Emission Estimation Approach Statewide Emission Estimate For ASTs: –Sum of emissions calculated for 16 regions in CA. –Emissions from each region are calculated based on the tank size and configuration. Emissions = Tank Population x Emission Factor

AP-42 Emission Estimation Approach Tank Population: –Number of tanks in a region by size, type, and vapor recovery configuration. –Determined from a statewide survey of fuel haulers.

AP-42 Emission Estimation Approach Survey Status: –Contacted 187 companies –62 companies responded –Extrapolated results determined the presence of approximately 9,300 tanks statewide –Survey portion is completed

AP-42 Emission Estimation Approach Emission Factor: –It is an estimated amount of hydrocarbon emissions emitted into the atmosphere in a given period of time. –Calculated on a monthly basis.

AP-42 Emission Estimation Approach AP-42 Methodology: –Developed by American Petroleum Institute (API) –Is approved by the U.S. EPA –Widely used by industry –Calculates Total losses/emissions from ASTs Emissions = Standing Storage or Breathing Loss + Working Loss –Applies only to tanks vented through small orifices or pressure relief valves.

AP-42 Emission Estimation Approach Standing Storage or Breathing Loss (Ls) –It is a loss due to evaporation. Heating of the tank by the sun causes the fuel to volatilize and vent to the atmosphere. L S = nV V W V K E K S –Please review pages of the AP-42 document

AP-42 Emission Estimation Approach Working Loss (Lw) : –This loss occurs when mass of vapors are emitted to the atmosphere during the: Transfer of gasoline from cargo tank to AST (Deliveries) Transfer of gasoline from AST to vehicle (Dispenses) Lw = Lw (Deliveries) + Lw (Dispenses) –Please review pages 6 and 7 of the AP-42 document.

AP-42 Emission Estimation Approach Sacramento Case Study –Used AP-42 methodology to calculate emission factors for gallon tank with various configurations. –Intend to apply this calculation methodology to different tank sizes and configurations for all 16 regions in California. –Methodology uses reasonable assumptions.

AP-42 Emission Estimation Approach Assumptions Used: –Tank is half full on average. –Fuel surface temperature range is derived from the ambient temperature range. –Phase I or Phase II vapor recovery controls Tanks with controls have a P/V valve at 2” WC Tanks without controls have no P/V valve –Working loss emissions assumes 2 deliveries per year and 95% control for both Phase I and Phase II vapor recovery systems.

AP-42 Emission Estimation Approach

Comments Received Approach seems reasonable. Deliveries for some styles of tanks may be greater than two per year. Assumption of no P/V valves for tanks with no Phase I or Phase II controls needs to be investigated. Additional comments?

Small Scale Studies (AP-42 Bias) How well does AP-42 predict actual emissions from open tanks? –Web search found two AST studies that measured emissions from open tanks without pressure relief valves. –ARB performed some initial observations on small one gallon tanks with various vent openings.

Small Scale Studies (Published Literature) AP-42 Versus Volumetric Loss (Summer Monthly Loss for a 1200 L Tank, No Pressure Relief Valve)

Small Scale Study (ARB Initial Observations) AP-42 Versus Gravimetric Measurement (16 Degree F Temperature Increase)

Small Scale Study Conclusions: –AP-42 method significantly under estimates emissions on open systems without pressure relief valves. –Need to refine method to measure emissions from open systems.

Future Plans AP-42 Correlation Study on 50 gallon AST Control Technology Demonstration Using Two Identical 50 gallon ASTs –One AST will serve as a control. –Second AST will be retrofitted with control technology. –Emission reductions will be incrementally measured with a carbon canister.

Need Volunteers We need volunteers to give us access to their full size AST, so further correlation studies can be done.

Contact Information General AST Information Joe Guerrero (916) Stephanie Connelly (916) Tank Population Ranjit Bhullar (916) LaMar Mitchell (916) Emission Inventory Jim Watson (916) Pamela Gupta (916)

Contact Information Need More Information? ARB Vapor Recovery Website: – ARB Aboveground Storage Tank Website: –