WHAT IS THE TRANS- PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP (TPP)? UE POLITICAL ACTION PRESENTS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRESIDENT OBAMAS APPROACH TO ASIA-PACIFIC Trans-Pacific Partnership Betsy Barrientos March 5, 2012.
Advertisements

U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS Trade, Human Rights & Global Influence.
Contemporary issues in International Trade Presenters : Anil Gupta Ankit Khandelwal Konark Gupta Pranshu Chanana Saurav Agrawal.
TPP impact on domestic regulation: consumer rights and public health Angela McDougall, Policy Advisor.
Trade Implications of the Trans-Pacific Partnership for ASEAN and Other Asian Countries Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan.
©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 6 International Business McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Voters’ View of Fast Track Authority for TPP Pact – January 2014 – Hart Research/Chesapeake Beach Consulting National survey among 816 US registered voters.
~ TTIP ~ A CHARTER FOR DEREGULATION AN ATTACK ON JOBS AN END TO DEMOCRACY.
Robert E. Scott Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy Research Economic Policy Institute TRADE, JOBS AND U.S. MANUFACTURING The Effects of U.S. Trade.
 Economics – explains the choices we make and how those choices change as we cope with scarcity  Scarcity – the idea that there is a short supply or.
Warm-up Make a list of 5 products, services, or ideas you believe we import. Make a list of 5 products, services, or ideas that you believe we export Why.
Free Trade, Energy Security, and Transportation. Free Trade Agreements remove tarrifs, import quotas, preferences, boundaries, and fees on most goods.
Exposing the Trans-Pacific Partnership For What it Really Is Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch.
Map of TPP negotiating countries:
Exposing the TPP For What it Really Is Lacey Kohlmoos Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch Liz Moran Western Organization of Resource Councils.
“Why do business in Panama?” A Survey of Certain Legal Aspects David M. Mizrachi This document is not meant to be relied upon in place of seeking independent.
North American Free Trade Agreement MEG AND ALICIA.
American Politics & Foreign Policy Trade & Foreign Economic Policy Hoa Nguyen I
AUSTRALIA’S DOHA ROUND AGENDA. TODAY’S DISCUSSION  briefly, the WTO and Australia  what was decided at Doha  what has happened since Doha  Australia’s.
Free Trade Agreements: Helping U.S. Businesses Export.
Globalization and International Linkages
General orientation of international economic integration
September 28, 2012 Expanding Market Opportunities Through Trade Policy: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative Sushan Demirjian Deputy Assistant U.S.
Principles of Marketing Lecture-41. Summary of Lecture-40.
The Political Economy of International Trade
Japan’s FTAs/EPAs with APEC Economies Nobuhiko Sasaki Deputy Director-General APEC Senior Official METI Japan March 2006.
Vermont Commission on International Trade and State Sovereignty Overview of International Trade And Its Impact on Vermont Vermont Legislative Council October.
Chapter 17: International Trade Section 2
 Economic Systems must make three basic decisions: 1) What and how many goods and services should be produced? 2) How should they be produced? 3) Who.
An Introduction to Fast Track The Oregon Fair Trade Campaign OR-FTC.
(early 1990s to present day). It’s not mainly about trade, but a rather system of (undemocratic) global governance “Each Member shall ensure the conformity.
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any manner.
What is the Trans-Pacific Partnership and why should I care? Photo Credits: Occupy Bellingham, Stop FastTrack/flickr/ccStop FastTrack.
International Trade and Investment Agreements February 11.
Copyright Atomic Dog Publishing, 2002 International Expansion Trade Barriers Trade Facilitators.
Aiia : voice of the digital economy ASR: voice of services in Australia Presented by Kaaren Koomen Director, Australian Services Roundtable Director (Alternate),
Ban on Supporting Domestic Industries Mexican sugar industry employed 300,000 workers and indirectly supported an additional 1.9 million.
The Changing Landscape of Trade Negotiations Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan For presentation at 2015 Seoul Conference.
Overview of State of Play on TPPA Jane Kelsey TPPA Workshop Wellington, 20 December 2011.
TPP Impending Interference with States’ Obligations to the WHO FCTC Dr. Zarihah Zain Malaysian Women’s Action for Tobacco Control & Health.
International Trade - Basics. Why trade? All trade is voluntary People trade because they believe that they will be better off by trading Allows for Specialization.
The Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Threat To America’s Retirees.
What is the Trans-Pacific Partnership and why should I care? Photo Credits: Occupy Bellingham, Stop FastTrack/flickr/ccStop FastTrack.
24 March 2010Exporting 101 Building International Sales Assessing Risk & Opportunity Craig A Harvey Chair, MSDEC.
February 9, 2016 The Pike Law Firm, P.C..  The Trans-Pacific Partnership (“TPP”) is a trade agreement among 12 Pacific Rim countries  The TPP agreement.
Raj Malhotra’s IAS Study Group, Chandigarh Issue Based Current Affairs Week 5 (2016)
Trans-Pacific Partnership. Free trade agreements.
Globalization: International Trade and the Bretton Woods Institutions Part II: The WTO.
Trans-Pacific Partnership February 18, 2016 IR 213 Lecture 8: A Little Trade History Benjamin Graham Guest Lecture: TPPCyrus Mohammadian.
Chapter 23 – Comparative Economic Systems Section 1 – Capitalism.
OUTSOURCING & OFFSHORING
Good or Bad For America?. Whom does it benefit: Consumer or Business What impact is it having? Helpful or harmful? – For Businesses? Workers? Consumers?
THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP: OVERVIEW March 17, 2016Cielito F. Habito.
THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP An overview. History 2005: Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement, a free trade agreement, signed by Brunei,
CHAPTER 17 IS TRADE BENEFICIAL? THE GREAT DEBATE: FREE TRADE VERSUS PROTECTIONISM International Trade.
Unit IX – Global Interdependence
2016 ILS Retreat September 30- October 2, 2016 Boca Raton Resort & Club “Thoughts on the Trans Pacific Partnership, The Election, and the Future of Trade”
Our Debt-Money System: Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP)     Session 5: SUN 10:00 am – 11:50 am.
Trade Update and Outlook: A View from Washington
Globalization, Trade, & Getting Elected
THE POLOTICAL ECONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Chapter 10: Business in a Global Economy
Honors International Marketing Ms. Osteen
Trade Barriers and Free Trade
NS3040 Fall Term 2017 Protectionism 2017
Will membership in TPP really help Japan?
Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP)
Asia Europe Labour Forum Kate Lappin
NS3040 Fall Term 2018 TPP: Arguments Against
NS3040 Fall Term 2018 USMCA Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Strong Dollar Weak Dollar.
Presentation transcript:

WHAT IS THE TRANS- PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP (TPP)? UE POLITICAL ACTION PRESENTS

THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, US, Vietnam

TPP IS AN ATTACK ON DEMOCRACY Each signatory government must conform its domestic policies to the terms of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Thus, the TPP would impose permanent restrictions on domestic federal and state policymaking. “ We are writing the constitution for a single global economy." -Renato Ruggerio, first Director General of WTO

UNDERMINING DEMOCRACY:  TPP ensures corporate controlled tribunals settle disputes between corporations and governments.  TPP will affect many aspects of our lives like medicine, consumer protections, internet freedom, and more.  TPP will drive down conditions for workers.  TPP will contribute to climate change.  And now that fast track has passed there is no changing the TPP- it ’ s just Yes or No.

INVESTOR-STATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: A threat to our sovereignty and control Corporations will be able to sue governments before a corporate controlled Tribunal, demanding our tax dollars compensate for their loss of “expected future profits” from any labor, environmental, health, safety, land use, and zoning laws we have in place. Corporations will be able to bypass domestic courts and take their case to the Tribunal to be decided by three corporate lawyers who rotate between representing the corporations before the Tribunal and being the judges of the Tribunal.

MOST OF THE TPP IS NOT ABOUT TRADE NON-TRADE CHAPTERS  Government Procurement  Investment  Services  Financial Services  Telecommunications  E-commerce  Intellectual Property  Visas/Temporary Movement of Natural Persons  Regulatory Coherence  Sanitary Standards (food standards, animal disease, invasive species)  Technical Barriers (product safety standards, toxics, labeling)  Competition Policy  State Owned Enterprises  Supply Chains  Labor  Environment  Medicines TRADE CHAPTERS  Market Access for Goods  Customs  Trade Facilitation and Capacity Building  Trade Remedies (Anti-dumping/CVD)  Subsidies ADMINISTRATIVE CHAPTERS  Initial Provisions  Exceptions  Dispute Settlement  Final Provisions

TPP’S NON-TRADE POLICIES  Foreign firms can effectively stop any financial regulation including restructuring of debt, bans on toxic derivatives or other dangerous financial practices.  Extends patents on drugs, limits fair use of copyrighted material, bans tinkering with software and digital devices and criminalizes disclosures of trade information.  Places similar limits on our Internet freedom that Congress rejected in 2011 with SOPA.  Greater property rights for foreign investors than domestic firms.  The national security defense exception is not an excuse for lost profit as it has been in other trade agreements.

TPP’S NON-TRADE POLICIES Continued….  U.S. must import food that does not meet U.S. standards, putting our health at risk and undermining U.S. producers.  “Buy American”, “Buy Local” procurement preferences forbidden, first federally then state and municipalities.  “Transparency” chapter would allow pharmaceutical firms to challenge drug-price decisions by Medicare, Medicaid, VA formularies.  State laws are subject to direct challenge in corporate tribunals by foreign investors.

TPP CONTRIBUTES TO CLIMATE CHANGE  Will increase carbon emissions that are heating up our planet and provoking mass extinction of life;  Would increase fracking and natural gas export;  Weak language on conservation and gives fossil fuel corporations the right to challenge climate protections similar to the challenge of the Keystone pipeline decision by TransCanada;  Multilateral Environmental Agreements Rollback-unlike past trade agreements, the TPP does not obligate nations to follow all seven core MEAs;

WHAT ABOUT LABOR STANDARDS? The most recent US Department of Labor report shows that Malaysia uses forced labor in its electronics and garment industry, and child labor to produce palm oil. Mass graves were recently discovered with 139 bodies of men, women and children showing signs of torture.

ENSURES A RAW DEAL FOR WORKERS UNDER NAFTA: Over 5 million U.S. manufacturing jobs gone; 45,000 U.S. manufacturing facilities gone; Millions of service sector jobs off-shored; Real median wages at 1972 levels; Tax bases shrink: schools, infrastructure cut; Floods of unsafe imported food, products; Environmental, health, zoning laws attacked in foreign trade tribunals & dumped; Displacement, migration, hunger in developing country trade partners;

BYE - BYE, BUY LOCAL TPP will hurt our ability to have government services procure products locally and will allow for products to be labeled as “Made in America” with only 45% of the components or ingredients actually made in the US.

TPP PUTS WORKERS IN A RACE TO THE BOTTOM Mexico $4.80/day ($124/month) Vietnam $155/month Malaysia $187/month Chile $354/month Peru $222/month Japan $6.30/hr Canada $7.69/hr New Zealand $9.46 Australia $12.10/hr

“FAST-TRACK” ONLY NEEDED FOR BAD AGREEMENTS Of 500+ trade agreements since 1974, Fast Track was only used for 16 of them. Fast Track was used to force NAFTA, WTO, CAFTA, Korea, Colombia “free trade” agreements into place. Candidate Obama said he would “replace Fast Track … I will ensure that Congress plays a strong and informed role in our international economic policy and in any future agreements we pursue and in our efforts to amend existing agreements.” But in June 2015 Congress granted his request for this extreme trade authority!

THE 99% MUST FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE TPP

Battles Won Against Corporate Power-Grabs via “Trade” Agreements STOPPED: Fast Track in 1998 DERAILED: WTO Expansion: Seattle ‘99 –today! DERAILED: FTAA (Free Trade Area of the Americas) DERAILED: MAI (Multilateral Agreement on Investment) DERAILED: AFTA, Malaysia, SACU, Thailand, FTAs WE CAN WIN!

GLOBAL RESISTANCE HAS BEGUN…

WE NEED TO ACT NOW A YES or NO vote on TPP is expected in 2016 Many predict the vote will take place in February or during the “Lame Duck” session of Congress post election.

THE FOLLOWING DEMOCRATS IN UE BASE AREAS VOTED FOR FAST TRACK  Brad Ashford (NE-2) Omaha area  Ami Bera (CA-07) Sacramento County  Donald Beyer (VA-8) Northern Virginia  Gerry Connolly (VA-11) Northern Virginia  Jim Costa (CA-16) Fresno & Madera Counties  Susan Davis (CA-53) San Diego County  Sam Farr (CA-20) Monterey & San Benito Counties  Jim Himes (CT-4) Fairfield County  Ron Kind (WI-3) - Southwest Wisconsin  Mike Quigley (IL-5) Chicago  Scott Peters (CA-52) San Diego County Visit Public Citizen’s website to follow Congressional news on the TPP. To find out about actions against the TPP near you check out Flush the TPP! (flushthetpp.org)