Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COSMO-SREPS COSMO Priority Project C. Marsigli, A. Montani and T. Paccagnella ARPA-SIM, Bologna, Italy.
Advertisements

COSMO Workpackage No First Results on Verification of LMK Test Runs Basing on SYNOP Data Lenz, Claus-Jürgen; Damrath, Ulrich
A NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF LOCAL ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES A.V.Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre On the Value of.
For the Lesson: Eta Characteristics, Biases, and Usage December 1998 ETA-32 MODEL CHARACTERISTICS.
Real Time High-Resolution McGill University J. Gyakum 1, R. McTaggart- Cowan 1, P. Sisson 2 1 McGill University 2 National Weather Service.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
Geophysical Modelling: Climate Modelling How advection, diffusion, choice of grids, timesteps etc are defined in state of the art models.
The Puget Sound Regional Environmental Prediction System: An Update.
1 NGGPS Dynamic Core Requirements Workshop NCEP Future Global Model Requirements and Discussion Mark Iredell, Global Modeling and EMC August 4, 2014.
Numerical weather prediction: current state and perspectives M.A.Tolstykh Institute of Numerical Mathematics RAS, and Hydrometcentre of Russia.
Coupled GCM The Challenges of linking the atmosphere and ocean circulation.
Henry Fuelberg Nick Heath Sean Freeman FSU WRF-Chem During SEAC 4 RS.
The Hurricane Weather Research & Forecasting (HWRF) Prediction System Next generation non-hydrostatic weather research and hurricane prediction system.
Forecasting and Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) NOWcasting Description of atmospheric models Specific Models Types of variables and how to determine.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
Numerical Weather Prediction at DWD COSMO-EU Grid spacing: 7 km Layers: 40 Forecast range: 78 h at 00 and 12 UTC 48 h at 06 and 18 UTC 1 grid element:
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Parametrization of Subgrid-Scale Orographic Drag in the.
Atmospheric Modeling in an Arctic System Model John J. Cassano Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Atmospheric.
Introducing the Lokal-Modell LME at the German Weather Service Jan-Peter Schulz Deutscher Wetterdienst 27 th EWGLAM and 12 th SRNWP Meeting 2005.
NWP Activities at INM Bartolomé Orfila Estrada Area de Modelización - INM 28th EWGLAM & 13th SRNWP Meetings Zürich, October 2005.
Comparison of Different Approaches NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR is Sponsored by NSF and this work is partially.
COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept Dependance of bias on initial time of forecasts 1 WG1 Overview
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Status of the Support Activities WG 6: Reference Version and Implementation WG Coordinator: Ulrich Schättler.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Some Aspects of Parameterisation in Small Scaled Models Thomas Roschke German Weather Service Department of Aviation Meteorology.
Data assimilation, short-term forecast, and forecasting error
Interoperability at INM Experience with the SREPS system J. A. García-Moya NWP – Spanish Met Service INM SRNWP Interoperability Workshop ECMWF –
Status of the COSMO-Model Package Ulrich Schättler.
Improved road weather forecasting by using high resolution satellite data Claus Petersen and Bent H. Sass Danish Meteorological Institute.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Edward Mansell National Severe Storms Laboratory Donald MacGorman and Conrad Ziegler National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK Funding sources in the.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 SRNWP Lead Centre Report on Data Assimilation 2005 for EWGLAM/SRNWP Annual Meeting October 2005, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
1 Rachel Capon 04/2004 © Crown copyright Met Office Unified Model NIMROD Nowcasting Rachel Capon Met Office JCMM.
Status of the COSMO-Software and Documentation WG 6: Reference Version and Implementation WG Coordinator: Ulrich Schättler.
Application of an adaptive radiative transfer parameterisation in a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model DWD Extramural research Annika Schomburg.
DRAFT – Page 1 – January 14, 2016 Development of a Convective Scale Ensemble Kalman Filter at Environment Canada Luc Fillion 1, Kao-Shen Chung 1, Monique.
Bogdan Rosa 1, Marcin Kurowski 1 and Michał Ziemiański 1 1. Institute of Meteorology and Water Management (IMGW), Warsaw Podleśna, 61
MOLOCH : ‘MOdello LOCale’ on ‘H’ coordinates. Model description ISTITUTO DI SCIENZE DELL'ATMOSFERA E DEL CLIMA, ISAC-CNR Piero Malguzzi:
APR CRM simulations of the development of convection – some sensitivities Jon Petch Richard Forbes Met Office Andy Brown ECMWF October 29 th 2003.
Simulations of MAP IOPs with Lokal Modell: impact of nudging on forecast precipitation Francesco Boccanera, Andrea Montani ARPA – Servizio Idro-Meteorologico.
Remote sensing and modeling of cloud contents and precipitation efficiency Chung-Hsiung Sui Institute of Hydrological Sciences National Central University.
A physical initialization algorithm for non-hydrostatic NWP models using radar derived rain rates Günther Haase Meteorological Institute, University of.
Kain-Fritsch convection scheme: an update Marco Arpagaus MeteoSwiss.
Brian Freitag 1 Udaysankar Nair 1 Yuling Wu – University of Alabama in Huntsville.
ARPS( Advanced Regional Prediction System ) Version Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms (CAPS), Oklahoma University tridimensional compressible.
Status of the NWP-System & based on COSMO managed by ARPA-SIM COSMO I77 kmBCs from IFSNudgingCINECA COSMO I22.8 kmBCs from COSMO I7 Interpolated from COSMO.
COSMO model simulations for COPS IOP 8b, 15 July 2007 Jörg Trentmann, Björn Brötz, Heini Wernli Institute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg-University.
Mesoscale Assimilation of Rain-Affected Observations Clark Amerault National Research Council Postdoctoral Associate - Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey,
Summary of WG3 activities Physical Aspects Federico Grazzini, ARPA Emilia-Romagna Servizio Idro Meteo Clima (SIMC)
Characteristics of precipitating convection in the UM at Δx≈200m-2km
Introducing the Lokal-Modell LME at the German Weather Service
Numerical Weather Forecast Model (governing equations)
Sensitivity to the Representation of Microphysical Processes in Numerical Simulations during Tropical Storm Formation Penny, A. B., P. A. Harr, and J.
Development of nonhydrostatic models at the JMA
Status of the COSMO-Software and Documentation
WRF model runs of 2 and 3 August
Tadashi Fujita (NPD JMA)
Grid Point Models Surface Data.
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2013
How do models work? METR 2021: Spring 2009 Lab 10.
Multiscale aspects of cloud-resolving simulations over complex terrain
Daniel Leuenberger1, Christian Keil2 and George Craig2
COSMO-Model New Versions and Plans
NWP Strategy of DWD after 2006 GF XY DWD Feb-19.
Poster Session: Numerical Weather Prediction at MeteoSwiss
The Impact of Moist Singular Vectors and Horizontal Resolution on Short-Range Limited-Area Ensemble Forecasts for Extreme Weather Events A. Walser1) M.
Presentation transcript:

Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi KMD Consortium for Small-Scale Modeling (COSMO) Strengths and Weaknesses Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi

Overview KMD Runs a 7km COSMO over Eastern Africa Links Trends at global NWP centers Trends in regional NWP General Model information and configuration Show this for those interested Strengths Weaknesses

Trends at global NWP centers In 2012 the resolution of global NWP models will be around 16 km (ECMWF), 20km (DWD, JMA), 25 km (KMA, UKMO) and 30 km (CMC). In 2020 the resolution of most global NWP models will be around 10km and the number of layers will be around 100 or more Global NWP centers will use sophisticated, ensemble-based data assimilation systems to derive the initial state of the atmosphere.

Trends in regional NWP Regional high resolution data assimilation at grid spacing <10km with short data cut-off times using local data not available to global centres. Convection permitting/resolving models at grid spacing of 2 to 4km without the parameterization of deep convection (e.g. COSMO-DE at DWD). Data assimilation for convection permitting/resolving models using radar data (e.g. latent heat nudging in COSMO-DE) Short range regional ensemble prediction systems (SREPS) at grid spacing < 10 km, e.g COSMO-SREPS.

General KMD COSMO COSMO MODEL RUN SUMMARY Single Domain ~7km 434x251 grid points 60 vertical levels Model top 50 hPa Forecast length 72 hours but can do 120 hours Output frequency is 1 hours Lateral boundaries updated every 3h (GME)

Model Physics -two stream radiation scheme (Ritter and Geleyn, 1992) including long- and shortwave fluxes in the atmosphere and at the surface; full cloud - radiation feedback; diagnostic derivation of partial cloud cover (rel. hum. and convection) Grid-scale precipitation scheme including parameterized cloud microphysics (Doms and Schättler, 1997) Two different mass flux convection schemes (Tiedtke, 1989 or Bechtold, 2001) differentiating between deep, shallow and mid-level convection Subgrid-scale orography (SSO) scheme (Lott and Miller, 1997) Level-2 scheme of vertical diffusion in the atmosphere, similarity theory (Louis, 1979) at the surface Seven-layer soil model including snow and interception storage

COSMO Dynamics Dynamics : Non-Hydrostatic, fully compressible, advection form. Reference state: hydrostatic, stationary (v=0) Prognostic variables: ‘Cartesian’ wind components u, v, w (spherical base vectors) pressure perturbation p’, Temperature T’ humidity var. q Coordinate systems: rotated geographical coordinates generalized terrain-following height coordinate user-defined vertical stretching       

KMD COSMO Strengths High resolution model run relative to global model Allows higher horizontal resolution (<7km grid spacing), esp. in mountainous terrain. Non-hydrostatic model Theoretically improves forecasts of convection. Convection resolving (<3 km) possible which is necessary to simulate deep convection explicitly But resolution ~7km requires convective parameterization scheme.(Kain-Fritsch CPS) Alternate solution to GME Allows to assess uncertainty based on differences Sophisticated cloud microphysics scheme including the advection of hydrometeors (rain, snow, graupel) Much better scalability on massively parallel computer systems.

Strengths Uses GME for both COSMO is of finer resolution than the GME Lateral boundary conditions and boundary conditions COSMO is of finer resolution than the GME And has different physics Thus provides alternate solution Areas of difference provide information about uncertainty May improve convective forecasts and thus QPF Represents the atmosp in 3 Dimension

KMD COSMO Weaknesses Local Area Model Availability Relies on 6-hour LBC’s from Global model Uses Global model to initiate forecast Availability Run twice daily off GFS 0000/1200 UTC cycle Forecasts to 72 hours in length takes considerable time to become available Still mesoscale not in the realm of storm scale (=<3km) Deep convection still a challenge Topography issues (surface representation)

General Links http://www.meteo.go.ke/nwp/cosmo/index.html http://www.meteo.go.ke/rsmc/products/cosmo